Outpatient Experience of Human Caring Scale （OEHC-Scale）： Improvement by Delphi Method

Based on the outpatient interview and literature review, the initial framework of the outpatient experience of human caring scale was formed with 9 dimensions of outpatient process. The research aim was to improve the scale by Delphi method. Sixteen experts in medical management, human caring or medical education were invited to evaluate the importance of the dimensions and items of the scale and provided some expertise via filling out the DeLphi consultation questionnaires twice in the consulting round. In the first round, the recovery rate showing the experts＇ positivity was 80%; the coefficient of reliability （Cr） ascertaining the authority of the evaluation was 0.92; the mean and full mark ratios responding the concentration of the evaluation were 2.88-4.94 and 6.25%-93.75% respectively; the coefficients of variation （CV） and the Kendall＇s W determining the concordance of the evaluation were 5.06%-52.15% and 0.21-0.24 respectively. In the second round, the recovery rate was 93.75%; the Cr was 0.93; the mean was 3.93-4.93; the full mark ratios were 26.67%-93.33%; the Kendall＇s W was 0.14- 0.31, the CV was 5.25%-23.61%. Via the two-round Delphi study, the scale that included 10 dimensions and 61 items has been improved. Ten dimensions are pre-hospital medical service, guidance, registration, waiting, diagnosis ＆ treatment, paying, inspection ＆ assay, medicine receiving, therapy/injection/transfusion and global evaluation. It was concluded that Chinese scholars have paid high attention to human caring and outpatient experience. The experts have given high agreements about the dimensions which were established with Chinese outpatient process. The dimensions are different from the similar researches about outpatient experience study. In the future, it is necessary to survey the outpatients to test the construct validity, internal consistency reliability and others of the scale to improve the scale.

高职教师绩效考核体系设计——基于AHP和Delphi Method的综合运用

高职教师绩效考核的核心是教师工作业绩细化指标的设计,它的设计与教学改革相关性最大,基于AHP和Delphi Method的综合运用,从一级指标的权重看,教师科研工作业绩明显大于教学工作业绩;从二级指标看,教学研究与改革的重要性正逐步被认识;教学工作虽是衡量工作业绩的第一要素,但其内容已经丰富化,不再局限于课堂教学;教学政策的评定也更加多样化。

Re-discussing the content of the prescription rights of midwives under certain circumstances using the Delphi method

Objective： This study sought to investigate the content of the prescription rights and the prescription types of midwives under certain circumstances in China. Methods： The Delphi method was used to consult 18 nursing experts and 14 medical experts, A total of 30 experts finished the consulting. The reliability of the expert opinions was analyzed to determine the specific situations in which midwives may write prescriptions, the content of the prescription rights and the prescription types. Results： In six specific circumstances （uterine contraction fatigue, uterine contractions that are too strong, postpartum hemorrhage, premature rupture of the membranes, normal delivery and neonatal asphyxia）, midwives have the right to prescribe and administer medication, including 20 drugs and 13 auxiliary examinations. Of these drugs and examinations, 51.5% of the drugs and adjuvant examination prescriptions tend to be independent prescriptions, 30.3% tend to be protocol prescriptions, and 18.2% are similar to both types. Conclusions： The midwives should be granted some prescription rights to enhance their autonomy and the professionalism of midwifery.

Study on traditional Chinese medicine syndrome of esophageal cancer based on Delphi method

Esophageal cancer is one of the common malignant tumors in humans.Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)has unique advantages in the treatment of esophageal cancer.However,the TCM syndrome classification of esophageal cancer is not standardized.This Delphi survey aimed to explore the TCM syndrome classification and symptom characteristics of esophageal cancer.Methods:Based on literature research,an expert consultation questionnaire was developed for the study of the TCM syndrome rules of esophageal cancer.Two rounds of questionnaire surveys were conducted among 62 experts across the country.Statistical description and statistical analysis of the mean,coefficient of variation,grade sum,and unimportant percentage of the retrieved data.TCM syndrome rules and diagnostic indicators for esophageal cancer after screening and sorting out the questionnaire items,convening experts to demonstrate.Results:62 valid questionnaires were collected,and the expert positive coefficient was 100%.The Kendall's coefficient of concordance W of the first and second rounds are 0.232 and 0.2334 respectively.In addition,the Kendall's coefficient of concordance W of the second round has been improved compared with the first round,suggesting that experts have a better degree of coordination on the importance of indicators.The common TCM syndromes of esophageal cancer are obtained:"liver-stomach disharmony,phlegm and qi obstruction syndrome","liver and spleen disorders,phlegm accumulating with stagnation syndrome","deficiency of liver and kidney yin,stubborn blood syndrome","deficiency of spleen and kidney yang,stubborn blood syndrome".Conclusion:The TCM syndrome indicators of esophageal cancer has been established.It provides a basis for the standardized research of TCM syndrome diagnosis of esophageal cancer,which is of positive significance for improving the level of clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Establishing nursing adverse events’reporting content of hospital:using the Delphi method

Objective:To develop nursing adverse events’reporting content of hospital.Methods:The study included two phases.The first phase was to develop the category and definition of nursing adverse events that need to be reported through an expert meeting.The second phase was to develop every nursing adverse event’s reporting content by using the Delphi method.In total,8 experts attended the meeting and 15 experts conducted two rounds of consultation letter.Results:Nursing adverse events that need to be reported of hospital include pressure sore,fall/falling from bed,unplanned extubation,medication error,and accident.Reporting content of these events in detail had also been obtained,which was helpful for cause analysis systematically.Conclusions:The reporting content of the nursing adverse event of hospital is established,and it is a basis for further study of the development of nursing adverse event reporting and feedback system.

Content Validity of a Self-Management Behavior Assessment Tool for Adult Post-Renal Transplant Recipients Using a Modified Delphi Method

Background: Self-management is important for post-renal transplant recipients to resolve renal dysfunction, heart failure, and post-transplant psychosocial issues, and to maintain transplant kidney function, etc. However, because recipients may be unable to adequately self-manage, healthcare providers need to provide self-management support for recipients to improve their skills and confidence in managing their disease. However, it is difficult to comprehensively assess the self-management behaviors in a busy outpatient support setting. Furthermore, since there are no uniform standards for assessment, it is based on the experience and abilities of medical personnel. Therefore, self-management behavior of post-renal transplant recipients is not sufficiently evaluated. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate content validity of a tool that can assess self-management behaviors of adult post-renal transplant recipients, consisting of consensus components from experts familiar with the follow-up of adult post-renal transplant recipients. Methods: A three-round modified Delphi method was used to assess the self-management behaviors of adult post-renal transplant recipients by a panel of experts consisting of certified transplant recipient coordinators, physicians, outpatient nurses, and researchers familiar with the follow-up of post-renal transplant recipients. Regarding management behaviors of adult post-renal transplant recipients, the experts rated the appropriateness and validity of each item using a Likert scale. Consensus ratings from the experts were made by calculating the median, interquartile range, and interquartile range percentage. In the third round, an item-level content validity index was calculated to assess content validity. Conclusions: The 41-item self-management behavior scale for kidney transplant recipients assessed self-management behaviors in five domains: medication, exercise, fluids and diet, disease and symptom prevention and management, and psychosocial adjustment. The content validity of this tool was confirmed, and it can be used to more easily assess the recipients’ self-management behaviors in the post-renal transplant follow-up. This tool can potentially contribute to the maintenance of transplant kidney function and high QOL in recipients.

Construction of nursing standard of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine for patients with COVID‑19 (mild and common) in Beijing based on Delphi method

Objective:The objective of this study is to establish a nursing standard of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine for patients with COVID‑19(mild and common)in Beijing,to provide reference for clinical nursing of patients with COVID‑19(mild and common).Methods:Through online communication meeting with nurses who are in the frontline of anti‑epidemic,clinical investigation,literature research,and expert demonstration meeting are carried out to prepare the draft of the standard,and the Delphi method is applied to determine the standard of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine care for patients with COVID‑19(mild and common)in Beijing.Results:The nursing standard of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine for patients with COVID‑19(mild and common)was established,which included 5 first‑level indicators,14 second-level indicators and 60 third‑level indicators.After two rounds of Delphi method,the positive coefficients of experts were 96%and 83%,the authoritative coefficients of experts were 0.89 and 0.91,and the Kendall’s coefficient of concordance(W)of experts were 0.12,0.09,0.10,0.13(P<0.05)and 0.44,0.43,0.37,0.39(P<0.05).Conclusion:The standard of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine nursing for patients with COVID‑19(mild and common)in Beijing constructed by the Delphi method is scientific and practical,which provides a reference for clinical application of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine nursing to fight against COVID‑19 infection.

Construction of the First Certification Evaluation Index System for Diabetes Specialist Nurses by Delphi Method

Objective: To establish an evaluation index system for the first-time certification of diabetes specialist nurses in line with the clinical nursing practice in China, and to provide a reference basis for government administrations and hospitals to formulate unified standards. Methods: After the research team has determined the theme, it will consult the development of A) specialist nursing through the library, Internet and electronic literature database;B) the history of the development of specialist nurses in diabetes and other fields;C) the selection criteria of specialist nurses;D) the training of specialist nurses system, assessment method;E) Specialist nurse certification body, evaluation standards and certification standards and other related documents, literature, books and report materials. The author established the preliminary index system through literature review, specialist interview and group discussion and used Delphi method to organize three rounds of 30 experts’ consultations. Results: A first certification evaluation index system including 8 fundamental indicators, 5 first-level indicators, 19 second-level indicators and 99 third-level indicators was constructed for diabetes nurses. Conclusion: The results of three rounds of expert consultation and demonstration are reliable, and the constructed index system is suitable for comprehensive evaluation of diabetes specialist nurses, which provides a basis for the effective management of nursing resources.

基于Delphi法构建手术室围术期低体温预防管理评价指标体系

目的 构建手术室围术期低体温预防管理评价指标体系。方法 2022年2月,以结构-过程-结果三维质量评价模式为理论框架,参考相关文献拟定手术室围术期低体温预防管理评价指标体系,采用德尔菲法对来自手术室护理管理、院内感染、麻醉领域的23名专家进行2轮专家函询,采用优序图法确定指标权重系数。结果 2轮专家函询的积极系数分别为100.0%和95.7%,专家权威系数分别为0.946和0.934,各项指标变异系数(CV)均<0.25,Kendall’s W值分别为0.419和0.359(均P<0.001),最终构建了包含3项一级指标、9项二级指标、53项三级指标的手术室围术期低体温预防管理评价指标体系。结论基于Delphi法构建手术室围术期低体温预防管理评价指标体系有较好的科学性和可靠性,可为手术室护理管理者提供参考,有利于临床开展科学、规范、统一的质量评价。

基于Delphi法构建全科住院医师规范化培训教学查房细化评分量表

目的探索构建标准化全科住院医师规范化培训教学查房细化评分量表。方法采用焦点小组法组织从事全科医学工作10年以上的专家进行讨论,初步构建《全科住院医师规范化培训教学查房细化评分表》。然后,由10名全科教学查房指导专家,根据指标的重要性、可行性及专家的积极性、协调性等进行两轮Delphi问卷咨询。最后,运用层次分析法计算各级指标的权重,确定评价指标体系。结果共进行2轮焦点小组讨论,5名成员对各级指标进行讨论修改分类,初步建立教学查房评估指标体系。10名咨询专家共进行2轮问卷咨询,问卷回收率均为100%。第一轮、第二轮专家咨询的权威系数分别为0.93,0.97,协调系数Kendall’s W分别为0.522,0.421,P<0.001。根据两轮专家咨询结果构建7项一级指标、20项二级指标、119项三级指标,其中一级指标的权重分别为0.0327、0.0464、0.1599、0.2815、0.1599、0.1599、0.1599,所有指标判断矩阵的一致性比率CR均小于0.1。结论本研究构建的全科教学查房细化评分体系合理、完整、可操作性好,多维度反映查房教师及住院医师表现,可作为全科教学查房评价的参考依据。

基于Delphi-AHP法的高职专业课教师课程思政能力评价指标体系建构

专业课教师的课程思政能力是高职院校全面推进课程思政工作的关键。针对高职专业课教师课程思政能力结构尚不明晰,评价体系粗放等问题,采用Delphi-AHP法构建高职专业课教师课程思政能力评价指标体系。通过文献三级编码、专家咨询和研究小组讨论,拟定高职专业课教师课程思政能力评价指标体系草案,然后经过两轮德尔菲(Delphi)专家咨询,确定了包含5个一级指标、17个二级指标和58个三级指标的评价指标体系,再采用层次分析法(AHP),构建各级指标判断矩阵,计算各指标权重并检验判断矩阵的一致性,确定各指标的合理权重。研究结果在理论上为探究高职专业课教师课程思政能力内涵拓展了新的认知视角,在实践上为高职院校教师课程思政能力测评提供了可操作的依据和方向。

基于Delphi+BSC导向的基层医疗机构医疗质量控制指标体系构建研究

目的:构建一套与基层医疗机构发展导向相适应、科学合理且能有效应用的医疗质量控制指标体系。方法:通过文献研究及政策文件分析筛选初始指标,借鉴平衡计分卡理论并运用德尔菲法构建质控指标体系及指标权重。结果:通过两轮专家咨询构建了基层医疗机构质量控制指标体系并得出了指标权重,包括4个一级指标、39个二级指标,专家积极系数、权威程度和意见协调程度均较好。结论:该指标体系对基层医疗机构医疗质量控制管理具有较高的科学性和可行性。如果辅以智慧医疗信息化平台的支撑,将能开展常态化推广运用,形成同质化质控管理模式。

基于Delphi-AHP的轻武器训练安全风险因素分析

轻武器是军队数量最多、使用频率最高,也是训练中出现安全事故较多的一类装备。为解决轻武器训练安全风险因素缺乏量化分析的问题,采用“Delphi构建指标-AHP确定权重-事故分析对比验证”的方法,首次构建了轻武器训练安全评价指标体系,系统分析风险因素。结果表明:基于Delphi-AHP确定的指标权重与事故分析结果较为一致,研究方法科学合理;轻武器训练风险性高、影响因素多,需重点考虑人员和管理因素,关注受训者技能水平、受训者安全意识、组织指挥、风险评估及隐患排查等因素,组训时需考虑不同种类轻武器风险因素差异。

基于Delphi法的社区人群轻度认知障碍疾病认知问卷编制研究

背景人口老龄化背景下,维护脑健康已成为健康中国建设的必然要求,开展社区人群认知障碍疾病认知研究具有重要意义,然而目前尚缺乏针对社区人群轻度认知障碍(MCI)疾病认知水平的调查工具。目的编制社区人群MCI疾病认知调查问卷,并检验其信效度,为促进认知障碍疾病管理提供依据。方法在文献研究、专题小组讨论基础上提出问卷设计的理论框架并初步编制问卷条目,于2021年4—5月采用Delphi法邀请13名相关领域专家进行2轮函询以对问卷条目进行评价,通过预调查对条目描述进行修订,于2021年10—12月通过问卷调查对条目进行难度指数分析、辨别度分析、相关性分析及信效度评价,进一步完善问卷。结果(1)专家函询:两轮函询专家积极程度分别为100.0%、84.6%,专家权威系数分别为0.858、0.845,两轮函询专家对各条目“重要性”评分均值分别为3.77~4.92、3.91~4.91,两轮评分变异系数分别为0.056~0.246、0.061~0.213,两轮函询肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.197、0.252(均P<0.001),两轮咨询分别收到29条、12条专家修改意见及建议。(2)问卷调查:共发放809份问卷,回收有效问卷797份,有效回收率98.52%。各条目难度指数为10%~90%,各条目辨别度指数大多高于20%,各条目得分及各维度得分均与问卷总得分呈正相关(P<0.05)。问卷Cronbach’sα系数为0.712,折半信度系数为0.764。模型检验结果KMO值=0.800(>0.6),Bartlett球形检验χ^(2)=3049.278(P<0.05),提示适合进行因子分析。探索性因子分析结果提示,因子累积方差贡献率为54.930%。最终问卷包括“对MCI基本知识的认识与理解”“个人就诊经历”“MCI诊疗期望”“就医决定与行为”4个维度,共20个条目。结论本研究基于Delphi法编制的社区人群MCI疾病认知调查问卷信效度较好,可作为调查社区人群MCI疾病认识水平的工具。

基于Delphi法的口服抗凝药物治疗患者知信行问卷研究

目的编制一套用于评价口服抗凝药物治疗患者知识、信念、行为的调查问卷。方法以知信行理论为指导,采用文献分析和访谈法设计口服抗凝药物治疗患者知信行初始问卷;采用Delphi法就初始问卷进行专家函询,并围绕专家建议修改问卷,形成最终问卷。结果向18名专家进行两轮函询,每轮函询均发放和回收18份问卷,专家积极系数为100%,专家权威系数为0.94。两轮函询中问卷所有维度、因子、条目的重要性均分均≥4分,变异系数均≤0.25,问卷整体及知识、信念、行为3个维度的肯德尔和谐系数为0.09~0.34(P均<0.05)。第一轮专家函询后修改4个条目,删除2个条目,新增5个条目;第二轮专家函询后修改10个条目。最终形成的问卷包含知识、信念、行为3个维度,17个问卷因子,40个条目。结论所编制的口服抗凝药物治疗患者知信行问卷的可靠性和科学性均较高,专家意见较一致,可用于评估口服抗凝药物治疗患者的知识、信念、行为现状。

基于Delphi法构建垂体腺瘤个案管理护理方案

目的:基于德尔菲法构建以个案管理模式为中心的垂体腺瘤病人照护方案,提供临床实践依据。方法:通过查阅国内外文献、临床调研,结合个案管理临床干预模式初步构建垂体腺瘤个案管理照护方案,对我国6个地区22名护理管理和个案管理等相关领域专家进行两轮德尔菲专家函询,确定各级指标。结果:最终形成的垂体腺瘤个案管理方案包括4个一级指标、13个二级指标、62个三级指标;两轮德尔菲专家函询积极系数分别为96.5%和100.0%,专家权威系数分别为0.909和0.916,一级指标的肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.186和0.136,均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:基于Delphi法构建的垂体腺瘤个案管理临床护理方案符合垂体腺瘤多学科团队诊疗需求,内容全面、可靠,具有较高的科学性、实用性,可为垂体腺瘤等临床疾病的单病种管理提供参考依据。

基于Delphi法的《中医妇科临床诊疗指南·妊娠恶阻》评价与修订

目的:修订妊娠恶阻中医临床诊疗指南。方法:检索2010年1月至2015年2月发表的关于中医药治疗妊娠恶阻的文献,结合文献研究,运用Delphi法进行3轮专家问卷调查,收集专家意见,统计专家积极系数和专家共识度,采用SPSS 19.0对专家熟悉程度、专家意见集中程度和专家意见协调程度进行计算,最后根据统计结果和专家咨询结果确定纳入条目。结果:共检出文献141篇,符合要求的高质量目标文献44篇。通过3轮问卷调查和专家论证会,对妊娠恶阻的术语和定义、诊断、辨证、治疗、预防和调护达成专家共识,最终形成妊娠恶阻中医诊疗指南修订征求意见稿。结论:本次妊娠恶阻修订稿较2012版相比修改了症状、辅助检查、治疗原则、针灸疗法部分,增加了预防与调摄,并对原指南的治法方药及中成药添加了文献依据及证据级别。

基于Delphi法构建尘肺病患者健康教育评估工具

目的通过德尔菲(Delphi)法构建尘肺病患者健康教育的评估工具,用于评估健康教育的有效性。方法基于相关专家共识和临床研究,通过问卷星制定尘肺病患者健康教育评估问卷初稿,遴选行业相关专家14名,于2023年4-5月期间,通过微信等方式邀请专家对问卷条目重要性进行判断,并最终确定尘肺病患者健康教育评估问卷。结果2轮函询问卷有效回收率均为100%。第1轮专家函询中,熟悉程度(Cs)为0.880,判断依据(Ca)为0.930,权威系数(Cr)为0.905;第2轮专家函询中,Cs为0.900,Ca为0.960,Cr为0.930。第2轮函询中各级条目的Kendall′s W值均高于第1轮,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。最终筛选出包含10个一级项目和60个二级条目的尘肺病患者健康教育评估问卷。结论采用Delphi法构建的尘肺病患者健康教育评估问卷较为可靠,可用于评估尘肺病患者健康教育的有效性。

基于AHP-Delphi法的黄河山西段水土流失治理生态效益评价研究

针对黄河山西段水土流失问题,对山西采取的水土流失治理措施进行梳理。基于AHP法与Delphi法构建起包含三个评价层次、十二个指标层的水土流失治理生态效益综合评价体系,详细分析各指标含义及计算方法,并对该体系的一致性进行检验,计算各指标的权重,对无量纲化处理过后的各指标进行分值量化,结合评价等级标准,最终得出结论:治理后总体评分为81.61分,评价等级为Ⅳ级。说明山西多年来对省内水土流失问题的整治取得了良好效益,有效缓解了水土流失问题。

Using the modified Delphi method to research the influencing factors of longterm health-related quality of life in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms after endovascular treatment

Background:The purpose of this study was to use the modified Delphi method to identify the influencing factors of health-related quality of life(HRQoL)in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms(UIAs)after endovascular treatment.Methods:A modified Delphi method to obtain expert consensus on the content of potential influencing factors of HRQoL in patients with UIAs treated by endovascular intervention was employed.The research team consists of three neuroradiologists and one epidemiologist from Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University.They randomly selected 21 well-known experts in cerebrovascular disease diagnosis and treatment as participating experts.The importance of the indicator is based on the 5-Likert scale.The standard deviation(SD),coefficient of variation(CV),mean(x),and minimum and maximum scores of each indicator were calculated.The consistency was described by Kendall coefficient of concordance with a p value<0.05 indicating that the expert consistency was high.Result:Twenty-one and 18 questionnaires were responded in 2 rounds,with effective response rates of 85.7%and 100.0%,respectively.The average authoritative coefficient(Cr)of all 21 experts was 0.88,familiarity with the indicators(Cs)was 0.82,and the judgment basis of the indicators(Ca)was 0.94.Eventually,the x values of arterial puncture hematoma,hyperlipidemia,gender,marital status,and hospitalization for other diseases were lower than 3.5;CV for marital status and gender was higher than 0.35.The Kendall coefficient of concordance in the first round was 0.19(p<0.001),and the second round was 0.15(p<0.001).Conclusion:In this study,the factors affecting the recovery of HRQoL after endovascular treatment in patients with UIAs were analyzed by the modified Delphi method,which provided a valuable evidence for the clinical management and daily life guidance for UIAs patients.