Two types of gypsum raw materials, selenite and alabaster, were used to prepare dental stone (a-hemihydrate). Gypsum lumps (0.8~2.5 cm) were hydrothermally treated at 135, 160 and 180癈 for 6, 2 and 1 h respectively. ...Two types of gypsum raw materials, selenite and alabaster, were used to prepare dental stone (a-hemihydrate). Gypsum lumps (0.8~2.5 cm) were hydrothermally treated at 135, 160 and 180癈 for 6, 2 and 1 h respectively. The physicochemical properties and composition characteristics of the a-hemihydrates prepared from selenite and alabaster raw gypsum were determined. The results indicated that both the selenite and alabaster raw gypsum show the same chemical and mineralogical composition of calcium sulphate dihydrate. They differs only in their microstructure, selenite raw gypsum exhibits perfect regular crystals while alabaster gypsum, on the other hand, exhibits irregular, large size and interlocked crystals. Selenite is more accessible to dehydration than alabaster raw gypsum. The a-hemihydrate samples prepared from alabaster raw gypsum showed a very short setting time and a lower compressive strength values in relation to that prepared from selenite gypsum. The compressive strength values of the all prepared samples were higher than that specified by A.D.A specification for dental use. To optimize the setting time of both products further studies are needed.展开更多
目的:研究Cerec Inlab MC XL系统3种石膏材料构建的全冠数字化模型的精度。方法:制备一标准右上第一磨牙全冠预备体模型,并复制超硬石膏、Esthetic-base、CAM-base石膏扫描代型各8个。每组代型采用InEos扫描仪Rotational旋转扫描方式分...目的:研究Cerec Inlab MC XL系统3种石膏材料构建的全冠数字化模型的精度。方法:制备一标准右上第一磨牙全冠预备体模型,并复制超硬石膏、Esthetic-base、CAM-base石膏扫描代型各8个。每组代型采用InEos扫描仪Rotational旋转扫描方式分别获取数字化模型8个(超硬石膏组采取喷粉后扫描),Inlab 3D(version 3.65)软件测量每个数字化模型相应位点的距离参数并与实物比较。本实验采用SPSS 19.0统计软件对数据进行分析。结果:超硬石膏组的成像质量略优于Esthetic-base组和CAM-base组。Esthetic-base组、CAM-base组与实物组在颊舌(P=0.199)、近远区域(P=0.087)的测量值比较差异无统计学意义,但超硬石膏组与实物组比较有统计学差异(P=0.00,P=0.003)。此外,超硬石膏组在近远区域的偏差值较颊舌区域大,差异有统计学意义(F=7.310,P=0.000)。超硬石膏组、Esthetic-base组、CAM-base组的总体偏移值分别为(0.049±0.036)、(0.016±0.050)、(0.017±0.052)mm。结论:在本实验条件下Esthetic-base、CAM-base石膏构建的数字化模型精度较高,而超硬石膏喷粉构建的数字化模型精度较差,不推荐使用。展开更多
文摘Two types of gypsum raw materials, selenite and alabaster, were used to prepare dental stone (a-hemihydrate). Gypsum lumps (0.8~2.5 cm) were hydrothermally treated at 135, 160 and 180癈 for 6, 2 and 1 h respectively. The physicochemical properties and composition characteristics of the a-hemihydrates prepared from selenite and alabaster raw gypsum were determined. The results indicated that both the selenite and alabaster raw gypsum show the same chemical and mineralogical composition of calcium sulphate dihydrate. They differs only in their microstructure, selenite raw gypsum exhibits perfect regular crystals while alabaster gypsum, on the other hand, exhibits irregular, large size and interlocked crystals. Selenite is more accessible to dehydration than alabaster raw gypsum. The a-hemihydrate samples prepared from alabaster raw gypsum showed a very short setting time and a lower compressive strength values in relation to that prepared from selenite gypsum. The compressive strength values of the all prepared samples were higher than that specified by A.D.A specification for dental use. To optimize the setting time of both products further studies are needed.