Central nervous injury risk factors after endovascular repair of a thoracic aortic aneurysm with type B aortic dissection

Aortic dissection is the deadliest disease of the cardiovascular system.Type B aortic dissection accounts for 30%-60%of aortic dissections and is mainly treated by endovascular repair of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair(TEVAR).However,patients are prone to various complications after surgery,with central nervous system injury being the most common,which seriously affects their prognosis and increases the risk of disability and death.Therefore,exploring the risk factors of central nervous system injury after TEVAR can provide a basis for its prevention and control.AIM To investigate the risk factors for central nervous system injury after the repair of a thoracic endovascular aneurysm with type B aortic dissection.METHODS We enrolled 306 patients with type B aortic dissection who underwent TEVAR at our hospital between December 2019 and October 2022.The patients were categorized into injury(n=159)and non-injury(n=147)groups based on central nervous system injury following surgery.The risk factors for central nervous system injury after TEVAR for type B aortic dissection were screened by comparing the two groups.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.RESULTS The Association between age,history of hypertension,blood pH value,surgery,mechanical ventilation,intensive care unit stay,postoperative recovery times on the first day after surgery,and arterial partial pressure of oxygen on the first day after surgery differed substantially(P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age,surgery time,history of hypertension,duration of mechanical ventilation,and intensive care unit stay were independent risk factors for central nervous system injury after TEVAR of type B aortic dissection(P<0.05).CONCLUSION For high-risk patients with central nervous system injury after TEVAR of type B aortic dissection,early intervention measures should be implemented to lower the risk of neurological discomfort following surgery in high-risk patients with central nervous system injury after TEVAR for type B aortic dissection.

Application of multi-planar reconstruction technique in endovascular repair of aortic dissection

BACKGROUND Endovascular repair of aortic dissection is an effective method commonly used in the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection.Stent placement during the operation was one-time and could not be repeatedly adjusted during the operation.Therefore,it is of great significance for cardiovascular physicians to fully understand the branch status,position,angle,and other information regarding aortic arch dissection before surgery.AIM To provide more references for clinical cardiovascular physicians to develop treatment plans.METHODS Data from 153 patients who underwent endovascular repair of aortic dissection at our hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected.All patients underwent multi-slice spiral computed tomography angiography.Based on distinct post-image processing techniques,the patients were categorized into three groups:Multiplanar reconstruction(MPR)(n=55),volume reconstruction(VR)(n=46),and maximum intensity projection(MIP)(n=52).The detection rate of aortic rupture,accuracy of the DeBakey classification,rotation,and tilt angles of the C-arm during the procedure,dispersion after stent release,and the incidence of late complications were recorded and compared.RESULTS The detection rates of interlayer rupture in the MPR and VR groups were significantly higher than that in the MIP group(P<0.05).The detection rates of De-Bakey subtypesⅠ,Ⅱ,andⅢin the MPR group were higher than those in the MIP group,and the detection rate of typeⅢin the MPR group was significantly higher than that in the VR group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the detection rates of typesⅠandⅡcompared to the VR group(P>0.05).The scatter rate of markers and the incidence of complications in the MPR group were significantly lower than those in the VR and MIP groups(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The application of MPR in the endovascular repair of aortic dissection has improved the detection rate of dissection rupture,the accuracy of anatomical classification,and safety.

Custom Made Fenestrated Stent Graft Collapse after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Case Report

We present a case of stent graft collapse after performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair with a custom-made fenestrated stent graft. The patient was a 70-year-old woman with an asymptomatic aneurysm of the distal aortic arch, and thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed. The patient showed a blood pressure difference between the left arm and the right arm on postoperative day (POD) 17 prompting the performance of a chest computed tomography scan which revealed stent graft collapse. She then underwent staged debranching of thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Stent graft collapse is a rare but well-described complication of thoracic endovascular repair. Therefore, patients who undergo such a procedure should be carefully monitored for signs and symptoms, which suggest the possibility of stent collapse.

Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissection associated with right-sided aortic arch：report of four cases

Aortic dissection involving a right-sided aortic arch（RAA）is extremely rare with an incidence in adults of 0.04%to 0.1%^（[1]）.Thoracic aortic dissection associated with RAA is even a more uncommon and life-threatening condition.For complicated aortic dissection,conventional open surgical repair is considered a standard therapy^（[2]）.However,

Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Aortic Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with a Hostile Neck Anatomy

Objective This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular aortic repair(EVAR)for the treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm(AAA)with a hostile neck anatomy(HNA).Methods From January 1,2015 to December 31,2019,a total of 259 patients diagnosed with an AAA who underwent EVAR were recruited into this study.Based on the morphological characteristics of the proximal neck anatomy,the patients were divided into the HNA group and the friendly neck anatomy(FNA)group.The patients were followed up for up to 4 years.Results The average follow-up time was 1056.1±535.5 days.Type I endoleak occurred in 4 patients in the HNA group,and 2 patients in the FNA group.Neither death nor intraoperative switch to open repair occurred in either group.The time of the operation was significantly longer in the HNA group(FNA vs.HNA,99.2±51.1 min vs.117.5±63.8 min,P=0.011).There were no significant differences in short-term clinical success rate(P=0.228)or midterm clinical success rate(P=0.889)between the two groups.The overall mortality rate was 10.4%,and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that the two groups had similar cumulative survival rates at the end of the follow-up period(P=0.889).Conclusion EVAR was feasible and safe in patients with an AAA with a proximal HNA.The early and midterm results were promising;however,further studies are needed to verify the long-term effectiveness of EVAR.

Morphological features and endovascular repair for type B multichanneled aortic dissection: A case report

BACKGROUND Among the various types of aortic dissection,multichanneled aortic dissection(MCAD)differs from classic double-channeled aortic dissection and involves the formation of an additional false lumen in the aortic wall or the flaps.It is considered a relatively rare condition with high perioperative mortality and morbidity.However,the morphological characteristic and the optimal therapeutic strategy for MCAD has not been fully determined.CASE SUMMARY A 64-year-old man presented to our hospital with severe epigastric abdominal pain radiating to the back that was associated with nausea without emesis.A computed tomography angiogram was performed that revealed a type B aortic dissection with multiple channels extending from the level of the left subclavian artery to the bilateral femoral arteries.We used a medical three-dimensional modeling(3D)modeling system to identify the location and extension of multiple lumens from different angles.It also precisely located the two primary entries leading to the false lumens,which helped us to exclude the two false lumens with one stent-graft.CONCLUSION By applying medical 3D modeling system,we discover the fragility of aortic wall and the collapse of true lumen caused by the multiple false lumens are the two morphological features of MCAD.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection in 84 patients

Objective The optimal treatment for chronic type B dissection remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to report early and mid-term results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of chronic type B aortic dissection. Methods From June 2001 to September 2007, 84 patients with chronic type B aortic

Relationship between acute kidney injury before thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair and in-hospital outcomes in patients with type B acute aortic dissection

Objective Acute kidney injury （AKI） frequently occurs after catheter-based interventional procedures and increases mortality. However, the implications of AKI before thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair （TEVAR） of type B acute aortic dissection （AAD） remain unclear. This study evaluated the incidence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of AKI before TEVAR in patients with type B AAD. Methods Between 2009 and 2013, 76 patients were retrospectively evaluated who received TEVAR for type B AAD within 36 h from symptom onset. The patients were classified into no-AKI vs. AKI groups, and the severity of AKI was further staged according to kidney disease： im- proving global outcomes criteria before TEVAR. Results The incidence of preoperative AKI was 36.8%. In-hospital complications was significantly higher in patients with preoperative AKI compared with no-AKI （50.0% vs. 4.2%, respectively; P 〈 0.001）, including acute renal failure （21.4% vs. O, respectively; P 〈 0.001）, and they increased with severity of AKI （P 〈 0.001）. The maximum levels of body tem- perature and white blood cell count were significantly related to maximum serum creatinine level before TEVAR. Multivariate analysis showed that systolic blood pressure on admission （OR： 1.023; 95% CI： 1.003-1.044; P ： 0.0238） and bilateral renal artery involvement （OR： 19.076; 95% CI： 1.914 190.164; P = 0.0120） were strong predictors of preoperative AKI. Conclusions Preoperative AKI frequently occurred in patients with type B AAD, and correlated with higher in-hospital complications and enhanced inflammatory reaction. Systolic blood pressure on admission and bilateral renal artery involvement were major risk factors for AKI before TEVAR.

Transarterial Embolization versus Translumber Embolization for Type Ⅱ Endoleak after Endovascular Abdomi nal Aortic Aneurysm Repair:A Meta-Analysis

Objective Type II endoleak is the most common subtype of endoleak as a complication after endovascular aneurysm repair(EVAR).The efficacy of transarterial(TA)embolization and translumber(TL)embolization in the management of type II endoleak remains equipoise.The aim of this study is to compare the technical and clinical success between TA embolization andTL embolization for type II endoleak after EVAR.Methods The protocol was registered(CRD 42018114453)and the electronic databases(Pubmed,Embase,Web of Science,and Cochrane)were systematically searched till March 2019.The search terms included EVAR,type II endoleak,and embolization.The articles were read and extracted by two authors independently to include randomized control trails and retrospective studies that compared TA embolization and TL embolization in patients who developed type II endoleak after EVAR.The technical and clinical success rates were metaanalyzed with random effect model.Results A total of 6 articles with 268 patients and 290 type II endoleaks were included.The pooled odds ratio(OR)of technical success rate for TA vs.TL was 0.56(95%C7,0.10-3.18;P=0.51)and the pooled OR of clinical success rate for TA vs.TL was 0.31(95%CI,0.07-1.29;P=0.11).As a limitation,6 articles were all retrospective studies which may lead to bias.Conclusion Both TA.andTL could be eflective procedure of embolizations to resolve the type II endoleak.The metaanalysis result indicated that TA embolization was not inferior toTL embolization in technical success and clinical success.

Total endovascular repair of an intraoperative stent-graft deployed in the false lumen of Stanford type A aortic dissection: A case report

BACKGROUND A 46-year-old male underwent ascending aortic replacement,total arch replacement,and descending aortic stent implantation for Stanford type A aortic dissection in 2016.However,an intraoperative stent-graft was deployed in the false lumen inadvertently.This caused severe iatrogenic thoracic and abdominal aortic dissection,and the dissection involved many visceral arteries.CASE SUMMARY The patient had pain in the chest and back for 1 mo.A computed tomography scan showed that the patient had secondary thoracic and abdominal aortic dissection.The ascending aortic replacement,total arch replacement,and descending aortic stent implantation for Stanford type A aortic dissection were performed 2 years prior.An intraoperative stent-graft was deployed in the false lumen.Endovascular aneurysm repair was performed to address this intractable situation.An occluder was used to occlude the proximal end of the true lumen,and a covered stent was used to direct blood flow back to the true lumen.A three-dimensional printing technique was used in this operation to guide prefenestration.The computed tomography scan at the 1stmo after surgery showed that the thoracic and abdominal aortic dissection was repaired,with all visceral arteries remaining patent.The patient did not develop renal failure or neurological complications after surgery.CONCLUSION The total endovascular repair for false lumen stent-graft implantation was feasible and minimally invasive.Our procedures provided a new solution for stent-graft deployed in the false lumen,and other departments may be inspired by this case when they need to rescue a disastrous stent implantation.

Early and mid-term outcome of endovascular repair in retrograde type A aortic dissection with an entry tear located in descending aorta

Objective Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is typically presented as antegrade dissection from a primary intimal tear in the proximal ascending aorta extending to the arch and the downstream distal aorta.However,it may also develop in a retrograde fashion with an intimal tear located in descending aorta causing retrograde extension of aortic dissection into ascending aorta,namely,retrograde type A aortic dissection(RTAAD).Though open surgery remains the golden standard to treat type A dissection,as to RTAAD,the distal location of its primary entry tear in descending aorta warrants more extensive aortic repair with higher surgical risks of mortality or morbidity through a median sternotomy.Conversely,confining the surgical extent to the proximal aorta leaves the risks of complications related to the residual tear in the distal aorta untreated.More recently,thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR)is attempted for the treatment of RTAAD with favorable shortterm and long-term prognosis.To the best of our knowledge,this was the largest serial study to apply TEVAR in the treatment of RTAAD.

Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: a study by computational fluid dynamics

Aortic dissection is a dangerous pathological condition where blood intrudes into the layers of the arterial walls, creating an artificial channel (false lumen). In the absence of thrombosis or surgical intervention, blood will enter the false lumen through the proximal tear, and join the true lumen again through a distal tear. Rupture of the weakened outer wall will result in extremely high mortality rates. Type B thoracic aortic dissection (TAD), occurring along the descending aorta, can be repaired surgically by the deployment of an endovascular stent graft, concealing the proximal entry tear. Blood might still flow into the false lumen (FL) through the distal tear. The domain of such flow should be minimized, as complete thrombosis of the FL is generally believed to be more beneficial for the patient. The dependence on the area ratios of the lumens and size of these tears is studied by computational fluid dynamics.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Cardiopulmonary Arrest Due to Aortic Dissection

Background and Aim: Reports on recovery from Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) leading to cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) are few. In retrograde TAAD (r-TAAD) cases, some authors reported the efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). However, only a few reports chose TEVAR for the treatment of r-TAAD resulting in cardiac arrest before hospital arrival. We report a case of r-TAAD presenting with cardiac arrest before hospital arrival not indicated for surgery but TEVAR as treatment. Case: A 65-year-old woman with a history of Marfan syndrome presented to the emergency department after a CPA. Sequential return of spontaneous circulation was achieved 27 min after CPA. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed retrograde r-TAAD with an entry tear to the false lumen in the thoracic descending aorta. Therefore, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed with r-TAAD. Afterward, the clinical course was stabilized. This patient suggests that TEVAR is an effective option for the treatment of patients with hemodynamically unstable r-TAAD, even after CPA. Conclusion: TEVAR can lead to a successful recovery from cardiac arrest due to r-TAAD.

Risk factors of distal segment aortic enlargement after complicated type B aortic dissection

Objectives:Distal segment aortic enlargement(DSAE)is a common complication that influences the long-term prognosis of type B aortic dissection(TBAD)after thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR).In this study,a multivariate analysis was performed to find potential factors predictive of DSAE.Methods:A single-center retrospective study was performed from 1999 to 2016.Included in the study were complicated TBAD patients who underwent TEVAR with uncovered residual tears.Based on the diameter of the distal segment of the uncovered aorta,we assigned patients to an enlargement group and a non-enlargement group.Data extracted from the medical records included demographic and clinical characteristics and followup computed tomography angiography data.The primary endpoints were the all-cause mortality and the presumably aortic-related events that required reintervention during the follow-up period.Results:For the 333 patients,all-cause mortality was 38(11.41%),and 76(22.82%)patients underwent reintervention.A total of 70(21.02%)patients experienced DSAE,among them were 2 patients who died of aortic rupture and 58 patients who accepted reintervention.Multivariate analysis reviewed independent risk factors of postoperative DSAE,including current smoking,the residual length of the patent false lumen,the postoperative number of dissection tears in the thoracic aorta and type III aortic arch;as well as protective factors,including the application of a restrictive bare stent(RBS),the length of covered stent in the descending thoracic aorta,and the distance from the residual first tear to the left subclavian artery(LSA).Conclusion:DSAE after TEVAR for patients with a complicated TBAD can be influenced by their current smoking habit,the residual length of patent false lumen,the postoperative number of dissection tears in the thoracic aorta and the aortic arch type.Meanwhile,RBS usage,the length of the covered stent in the descending thoracic aorta and the distance from the residual first tear to the LSA could have positive effect on the prognosis.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with left subclavian artery reconstruction for blunt traumatic aortic injury in elderly patients

Introduction:Blunt thoracic aortic injury(BTAI)is rare in elderly patients.As the population ages and life expectancy increases,the frequency of this injury will increase,while the treatment and outcomes remain unclear.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the collected data of patients>60 years old with BTAI to investigate the mechanism of trauma;time interval from injury to diagnosis;type and timing of surgical intervention;aortic arch pattern;choice of left subclavian artery reconstruction;endograft to treat BTAI;length of the endovascular procedure;endoleaks;complications including stroke,paraplegia,and renal failure;length of hospital stay(LOS)and intensive care unit stay(L.ICUS);and 30-day mortality.Results:Five elderly trauma patients were found to have BTAI.Four(80%)were males,the cohort mean age was68 years,the major mechanism of trauma was fall injury,and the associated injury was thoracic trauma.All patients were transferred to our hospital,and emergency computed tomography angiography showed BTAI in each patient.The average time interval from injury to diagnosis was 2.7 days.Two patients suddenly showed signs of instability in their vital signs and underwent immediate endovascular repair,while 3 patients underwent delayed endovascular repair.The injury site was located in the aortic isthmus just distal to the origin of the left subclavian artery;the aortic arch pattern was II(80.0%)in 4 cases and III in 1 case(20.0%).The choice of left subclavian artery reconstruction included chimney,double chimney,prefenestration,and chimney combined with in situ fenestration.Endografts to treat BTAI included the Ankura(Lifetech Scientific,Shenzhen,China)and the C-TAG(W.L.Gore&Associates,Flagstaff,AZ USA).The length of the endovascular procedure was 75.4 min;there were no endoleaks and no complications including stroke,paraplegia,or renal failure.The average LOS was25 days,and the average L.ICUS of 2 patients was 15 days,with no 30-day mortality.Conclusion:Elderly patients with fall injury should promptly exclude BTAI.Thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR)with a left subclavian artery reconstruction technique provided good results without procedure-related or neurological complications.Because of the low incidence of this type of injury,we are unable to provide any evidence to guide the treatment option for this life-threatening condition.

Endovascular stent-grafts for acute and chronic type B aortic dissection: comparison of clinical outcomes

Objective To evaluate the early and mid-term results of endovascular repair for acute and chronic type B aortic dissection, and to compare the clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Methods From May 2002 to December 2006, 50 patients with type B aortic dissection were treated by endovascular stent-graft. There were 23 patients in the acute aortic dissection (AAD) group and 27 patients in the chronic aortic dissection (CAD) group. All patients were followed up from 1 to 54 months (average, 17±16 months).The immediate and follow-up clinical outcomes were documented and compared between the 2 groups. Results Placement of endovascular stent-grafts across the primary entry tears was technically successful in all 50 patients. Compared to the CAD group, the AAD group had a higher percentage of pleural effusion (17.4% vs. 0%, P=0.04) and visceral /leg ischemia (26.1% vs 3.7%, P=0.04). Procedure related complications, including endoleak and post-implantation syndrome, occurred more frequently in the AAD group than in the CAD group (21.7% vs 3.7% and 30.4% vs 11.1%, respectively; P=0.08 and P=0.04). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no difference in the survival rate at 4 years between the 2 groups (86.4% vs 92.3%, P=0.42 by log-rank test). However, the event-free survival rate was higher in patients with chronic dissection than in patients with acute aortic dissection(96.2% vs 73.9%; P=0.02 by log-rank test). Conclu- sions Endovascular repair with stent-graft was safe and effective for the treatment of both acute and chronic type B aortic dissection. However, both immediate and long term major complications occurred more frequently in patients with acute dissection than in those with chronic dissection.

Endovascular graft exclusion for descending thoracic aortic dissections

Objective: To assess the operation indications, preoperative evaluation, technique essential and clinical prospective of Endovascular Graft Exclusion for thoracic aortic dissection. Methods: Since September 1998, Endovascular Graft Exclusion for thoracic aortic dissection has been performed on 10 patients. Graft was constructed from self-expanding Z-stents covered with a woven Dacron polyester fabric graft. Ged dimensions were determined ftom spiral computed tomographic scans. All operations were performed under DSA guidance. Results: There was one early death resulting from endoleaks. Proedures in the other 9 patients succeeded. No complications such as myocardial infarction, lung failure, kidney failureand paralysis that commonly occurred ther conventional operations were obsered. Immediate thrombosis in false lumen was achieved in 6 patients, and late thrombosis occurred in 3 patients. Mean follow-up duration was 3 months, the aneurysmal diameter was decreased obviously. Conclusion: These early results support the hypothesis that Endovascular Graft Exclusion may be a safe and durable treatment for selected patients with theracic aortic dissection. Endoleak may allow continued aneurysmal expansion and rupture. Further follow-up is necessary to evaluate the true long-term effectiveness of this procedure.

Comparison of Severe Complications after Acute Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection under Different Surgical Timing

Objective: To investigate the relationship between early intervention timing and complications of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection. Methods: The clinical data of 146 patients with acute stanford type B aortic dissection treated with transseptal stent for aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) from January 2012 to October 2017 in Xiaogan Central Hospital were analyzed. The time was divided into 3 groups, including the onset to TEVAR time &le;48 h group (41 cases in group A), the onset to TEVAR time 48 h - 7 d group (56 cases in group B), the onset to TEVAR time 7 d - 14 d group (49 cases in group C)). The clinical baseline data, the incidence of different complications during perioperative period, and the mortality rate at 30 days were compared between the three groups. Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender and comorbidities between the three groups (all P > 0.05). Group A had a clearer indication of immediate intervention compared with group B and group C (P P P > 0.05). Conclusion: Early intervention of acute TBAD may increase the risk of serious complications after surgery, and the incidence of serious complications will gradually decrease over time;the reduction of severe complications after early grouping is not accompanied by Early mortality and reoperation rates were significantly reduced, and TEVAR treatment in some patients with dissection did not prevent dissection progression and rupture.

Review of Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (TEVAR), Spinal Cord Ischemia (SCI), Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Drainage and Blood Pressure (BP) Augmentation

The object of this review is to examine the role of TEVAR in causing SCI. The anatomy and physiology of blood flow to the spinal cord is examined. The role of auto regulation of blood flow within the spinal cord is also examined. This review examines the reported results from the scientific literature of the effect of thoracic aortic aneurysm repair on spinal cord blood flow. In the light of the-se findings several conclusions can reasonably be reached. These conclusions are that the development of SCI can reasonably be predicted based on complexity and extent of the TEVAR procedure performed and BP augmentation and CSF drainage can significantly reduce the impact of SCI.

Antegrade in situ laser fenestration of aortic stent graft during endovascular aortic repair:A case report

BACKGROUND The endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms(JAAA)usually requires combination treatment with various stent graft modifications to preserve side branch patency.As a feasible technique,according to the situation,antegrade in situ laser fenestration still needs to be improved.CASE SUMMARY This report describes a case that was successfully treated with endovascular repair facilitated by antegrade in situ laser fenestration while maintaining renal arterial flow.Laser fenestration was performed using a steerable sheath positioned in the stent graft lumen in front of the renal artery ostium.With the bare stent region unreleased,renal artery perfusion could be maintained and accurate positioning could be achieved by angiography in real time.CONCLUSION This study suggests the feasibility and short-term safety of this novel antegrade in situ laser fenestration technique for select JAAA patients.