Endoscopic treatment of extreme esophageal stenosis complicated with esophagotracheal fistula: A case report

BACKGROUND At present,there is no unified and effective treatment for extreme corrosive esophageal stenosis(CES)with esophagotracheal fistula(ETF).This case had extreme and severe esophageal stenosis(ES)and ETF after ingesting an enzyme-based chemical detergent,resulting in a serious pulmonary infection and severe malnutrition.Upper gastrointestinal imaging showed that he had an ETF,and endoscopy showed that he had extreme and severe esophageal stricture.This case was complex and difficult to treat.According to the domestic and foreign lite-rature,there is no universal treatment that is low-risk.CASE SUMMARY A patient came to our hospital with extreme ES,an ETF,and severe malnutrition complicated with pulmonary tuberculosis 1 mo after the consumption of an enzy-me-based detergent.The ES was serious,and the endoscope was unable to pass through the esophagus.We treated him by endoscopic incision method(EIM),esophageal stent placement(ESP),and endoscopic balloon dilation(EBD)by using the bronchoscope and gastroscope.This treatment not only closed the ETF,but also expanded the esophagus,with minimal trauma,greatly reducing the pain of the patient.According to the literature,there are no similar reported cases.CONCLUSION We report,for the first time,a patient with extreme CES complicated with ETF,where the endoscope could not be passed through his esophagus but he could be examined by bronchoscopy and treated by EIM,ESP,and EBD.

Efficacy of mucosa-submucosa clip closure method after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND We recently developed a new endoscopic closure technique using only conventional endo-clips for colorectal lesions.Little is known about the feasibility of the endoscopic mucosa-submucosa clip closure method for gastric lesions.AIM To elucidate the efficacy of the endoscopic mucosa-submucosa clip closure method after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD).METHODS Twenty-two patients who underwent gastric ESD and mucosa-submucosa clip closure were included in this study.In this method,endo-clips are placed at the edges of a mucosal defect.Additional endo-clips are then applied in the same way to facilitate reduction of the defect size.Additional endo-clips are applied to both sides of the mucosal defect.Complete closure can be achieved.We have also developed a“location score”and“closure difficulty index”for assessment purposes.RESULTS Complete closure was achieved in 68.2%of the patients(15/22).The location score in the failure group was significantly larger than that in the complete closure group(P=0.023).The closure difficulty index in the failure group was significantly higher than that in the complete closure group(P=0.007).When the cutoff value of the closure difficulty index was set at 99,the high closure difficulty index predicted failure with a sensitivity of 57.1%,specificity of 100%,and accuracy of 86.3%.CONCLUSION The endoscopic mucosa-submucosa clip closure method was unreliable after gastric ESD,especially in cases with a high closure difficulty index.

Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND Transanal minimally invasive surgery(TAMIS)is a good choice for resection of rectal neoplasms.Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)is also widely used in the treatment of benign rectal tumors such as rectal polyps and rectal adenomas.However,no studies have compared the outcome of TAMIS and EMR.AIM To compare the short-term outcomes after TAMIS and EMR for rectal carcinoid and benign tumors(including rectal polyps and adenomas).METHODS From January 2014 to January 2019,44 patients who received TAMIS and 53 patients who received EMR at The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai were selected.Primary outcomes(surgical-related)were operating time,blood loss,length of postoperative hospital stay,rate of resection margin involvement and lesion fragmentation rate.The secondary outcomes were complications such as hemorrhage,urinary retention,postoperative infection and reoperation.RESULTS No significant differences were observed in terms of blood loss(12.48±8.00 mL for TAMIS vs 11.45±7.82 mL for EMR,P=0.527)and length of postoperative hospital stay(3.50±1.87 d for TAMIS vs 2.72±1.98 d for EMR,P=0.065)between the two groups.Operating time was significantly shorter for EMR compared with TAMIS(21.19±9.49 min vs 49.95±15.28 min,P=0.001).The lesion fragmentation rate in the EMR group was 22.6%(12/53)and was significantly higher than that(0%,0/44)in the TAMIS group(P=0.001).TAMIS was associated with a higher urinary retention rate(13.6%,6/44 vs 1.9%,1/53 P=0.026)and lower hemorrhage rate(0%,0/44 vs 18.9%,10/53 P=0.002).A significantly higher reoperation rate was observed in the EMR group(9.4%,5/53 vs 0%,0/44 P=0.036).