The Acta Oceanologica Sinica, publishes the most recent scientific achievements in the field of ocean sciences, recently adopted ScholarOne Manuscripts to manage its submissions and peer review process. The comprehens...The Acta Oceanologica Sinica, publishes the most recent scientific achievements in the field of ocean sciences, recently adopted ScholarOne Manuscripts to manage its submissions and peer review process. The comprehensive online platform will help further promote academic exchange by streamlining the editorial and publication process： authors enjoy ease of submission and ability to track manuscript review status while editors can manage review tasks in a dynamic, frilly-integrated interface that enables the most informed decision- making.展开更多
The Acta Oceanologica Sinica, publishes the most recent scientific achievements in the field of ocean sciences, recently adopted ScholarOne Manuscripts to manage its submissions and peer review process. The comprehens...The Acta Oceanologica Sinica, publishes the most recent scientific achievements in the field of ocean sciences, recently adopted ScholarOne Manuscripts to manage its submissions and peer review process. The comprehensive online platform will help further promote academic exchange by streamlining the editorial and publication process： authors enjoy ease of submission and ability to track manuscript review status while edi- tors can manage review tasks in a dynamic, fully-integrated interface that enables the most informed decision- making.展开更多
Previous mobile usability studies are only pertinent in the context of ergonomics,physical user interface,and mobility aspects.In addition,much of the previous mobile usability conception was built on desktop co...Previous mobile usability studies are only pertinent in the context of ergonomics,physical user interface,and mobility aspects.In addition,much of the previous mobile usability conception was built on desktop computing measurements,such as desktop and web application checklists,or scarcely addressed the mobile user interface.Moreover,the studies focus mainly on interface features for desktop applications and do not reflect comprehensive mobile interface features such as navigation drawers and spinners.Therefore,conducting usability evaluation using conventional usability measurement would result in irrelevant results.In addition,the resulting works are tailored for usability testing,which requires highly skilled evaluators and usability specialists(e.g.,usability testers and user experience designers),who are rarely integrated into a development team.The lack of expertise could lead to unreliable usability evaluations.This paper presents a review from industrial experts on a comprehensive and feasible usability evaluation framework developed in our previous work.The framework is dedicated to smartphone apps,which integrate evaluator skills and design concerns.However,there is no evidence of its usefulness in practice.Therefore,the usefulness of the framework measurement for evaluating apps’usability in the eyes of non-usability specialists is empirically assessed in this paper through an expert review.The expert review involved eleven industrial developers and was complemented by a semi-structured interview.The method is replicated in comparison with a framework from another study.The findings show that the formulated framework significantly outperformed the framework(p=0.0286)from other studies with large effect sizes(r=1.81)in terms of usefulness.展开更多
Officially launched in August 2014,the journal Confucian Academy(Chinese Thought and Culture Review)[ISSN 2095–8536,CN 52–5035/C]is a leading Chinese–English bilingual scholarly journal dedicated to traditional Chi...Officially launched in August 2014,the journal Confucian Academy(Chinese Thought and Culture Review)[ISSN 2095–8536,CN 52–5035/C]is a leading Chinese–English bilingual scholarly journal dedicated to traditional Chinese thought and culture in prompting conversations among world civilizations.展开更多
We are grateful for the work of the following colleagues, who acted as reviewers for submitted manuscripts during 2018. Names with an asterisk indicates colleagues who reviewed more than one manuscript.
基金supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(611750 68,61472168,61163004)Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province(2013FA130)Talent Promotion Project of Ministry of Science and Technology(2014HE001)
文摘The Acta Oceanologica Sinica, publishes the most recent scientific achievements in the field of ocean sciences, recently adopted ScholarOne Manuscripts to manage its submissions and peer review process. The comprehensive online platform will help further promote academic exchange by streamlining the editorial and publication process： authors enjoy ease of submission and ability to track manuscript review status while editors can manage review tasks in a dynamic, frilly-integrated interface that enables the most informed decision- making.
文摘The Acta Oceanologica Sinica, publishes the most recent scientific achievements in the field of ocean sciences, recently adopted ScholarOne Manuscripts to manage its submissions and peer review process. The comprehensive online platform will help further promote academic exchange by streamlining the editorial and publication process： authors enjoy ease of submission and ability to track manuscript review status while edi- tors can manage review tasks in a dynamic, fully-integrated interface that enables the most informed decision- making.
基金partially funded by the Research University Grant Scheme(RUGS),Universiti Putra Malaysia(UPM).
文摘Previous mobile usability studies are only pertinent in the context of ergonomics,physical user interface,and mobility aspects.In addition,much of the previous mobile usability conception was built on desktop computing measurements,such as desktop and web application checklists,or scarcely addressed the mobile user interface.Moreover,the studies focus mainly on interface features for desktop applications and do not reflect comprehensive mobile interface features such as navigation drawers and spinners.Therefore,conducting usability evaluation using conventional usability measurement would result in irrelevant results.In addition,the resulting works are tailored for usability testing,which requires highly skilled evaluators and usability specialists(e.g.,usability testers and user experience designers),who are rarely integrated into a development team.The lack of expertise could lead to unreliable usability evaluations.This paper presents a review from industrial experts on a comprehensive and feasible usability evaluation framework developed in our previous work.The framework is dedicated to smartphone apps,which integrate evaluator skills and design concerns.However,there is no evidence of its usefulness in practice.Therefore,the usefulness of the framework measurement for evaluating apps’usability in the eyes of non-usability specialists is empirically assessed in this paper through an expert review.The expert review involved eleven industrial developers and was complemented by a semi-structured interview.The method is replicated in comparison with a framework from another study.The findings show that the formulated framework significantly outperformed the framework(p=0.0286)from other studies with large effect sizes(r=1.81)in terms of usefulness.
文摘Officially launched in August 2014,the journal Confucian Academy(Chinese Thought and Culture Review)[ISSN 2095–8536,CN 52–5035/C]is a leading Chinese–English bilingual scholarly journal dedicated to traditional Chinese thought and culture in prompting conversations among world civilizations.
文摘We are grateful for the work of the following colleagues, who acted as reviewers for submitted manuscripts during 2018. Names with an asterisk indicates colleagues who reviewed more than one manuscript.
