“大替代理论”(the Great Replacement Theory)近年来在西方社会盛行,它发出了白人在西方社会主导地位正在被“阴谋替代”的警告。信奉者从“白人在西方国家人口中占比降低”和“经典西方文化受到移民文化冲击”两个维度对该理论进行...“大替代理论”(the Great Replacement Theory)近年来在西方社会盛行,它发出了白人在西方社会主导地位正在被“阴谋替代”的警告。信奉者从“白人在西方国家人口中占比降低”和“经典西方文化受到移民文化冲击”两个维度对该理论进行阐释和利用,表达对移民和外来文化的不满,甚至应用于种族主义暴行中。对于该理论的研究有助于了解和分析种族主义矛盾愈演愈烈的西方社会现状。它的盛行建立在白人心理、媒体、政客、社会组织等四个层面的社会基础之上,并具有政治极化、社会分裂和信奉者极端化三个方面的影响和发展趋势。该理论的盛行将进一步加剧西方社会的分裂与动荡。展开更多
The article deals with the question of whether far-right parties are able to influence the political and party system in the contemporary state. Far-right parties have acquired special political features that are grou...The article deals with the question of whether far-right parties are able to influence the political and party system in the contemporary state. Far-right parties have acquired special political features that are grounded on a broad variety of far-right ideological norms and political instruments. Far-right parties challenge the state government and policy offering the key (anti-immigration politics) to solve a variety of complicated issues. The main idea of the article is that far-right parties are flexible enough in their political rhetoric and instruments to gain electoral support. Based on different concepts and theories we should underline that far-right parties have a prominent electoral future but their place in the political arena greatly depends on existing conflicts of social and cultural nature in the nation-state.展开更多
In the wake of internet spoiling global audiences with memes and political satire,humor established itself as an intrinsic part of contemporary political rhetoric.A universal notion of humor and free speech,however,ye...In the wake of internet spoiling global audiences with memes and political satire,humor established itself as an intrinsic part of contemporary political rhetoric.A universal notion of humor and free speech,however,yet remain an abstract concept as the national context and the meta-narrative allow partisan interpretation,thus drawing the line between laughter and unlaughter.Nonetheless,the clichéd view of the satirist as a rebel,“speaking truth to power”is struggling to fit the image of the right-wing populists,using humor as a tool to aid marketing political ideas both nationally and globally.In respect to political speech,while humor is an eligible means for singling out political allies globally,it is the national state that is the agora on which standards and limits of free speech,ergo what is humor,are negotiated.This article tackles how humor in Bulgarian election campaign in 2021-2022 is used to serve the populist right-wing agenda in pursuit of political advantages over opponents and how the usage of global context fits in the local framework.In a field of political distrust and competing polar ideologies,the problem resides in how the national nuances of defining humor affect political meanings,identity,and the local discourse on culture wars.The article also takes a transnational comparative approach to political humor in the context of its partisan exploit for populist political purposes in European democracies.展开更多
文摘“大替代理论”(the Great Replacement Theory)近年来在西方社会盛行,它发出了白人在西方社会主导地位正在被“阴谋替代”的警告。信奉者从“白人在西方国家人口中占比降低”和“经典西方文化受到移民文化冲击”两个维度对该理论进行阐释和利用,表达对移民和外来文化的不满,甚至应用于种族主义暴行中。对于该理论的研究有助于了解和分析种族主义矛盾愈演愈烈的西方社会现状。它的盛行建立在白人心理、媒体、政客、社会组织等四个层面的社会基础之上,并具有政治极化、社会分裂和信奉者极端化三个方面的影响和发展趋势。该理论的盛行将进一步加剧西方社会的分裂与动荡。
文摘The article deals with the question of whether far-right parties are able to influence the political and party system in the contemporary state. Far-right parties have acquired special political features that are grounded on a broad variety of far-right ideological norms and political instruments. Far-right parties challenge the state government and policy offering the key (anti-immigration politics) to solve a variety of complicated issues. The main idea of the article is that far-right parties are flexible enough in their political rhetoric and instruments to gain electoral support. Based on different concepts and theories we should underline that far-right parties have a prominent electoral future but their place in the political arena greatly depends on existing conflicts of social and cultural nature in the nation-state.
文摘In the wake of internet spoiling global audiences with memes and political satire,humor established itself as an intrinsic part of contemporary political rhetoric.A universal notion of humor and free speech,however,yet remain an abstract concept as the national context and the meta-narrative allow partisan interpretation,thus drawing the line between laughter and unlaughter.Nonetheless,the clichéd view of the satirist as a rebel,“speaking truth to power”is struggling to fit the image of the right-wing populists,using humor as a tool to aid marketing political ideas both nationally and globally.In respect to political speech,while humor is an eligible means for singling out political allies globally,it is the national state that is the agora on which standards and limits of free speech,ergo what is humor,are negotiated.This article tackles how humor in Bulgarian election campaign in 2021-2022 is used to serve the populist right-wing agenda in pursuit of political advantages over opponents and how the usage of global context fits in the local framework.In a field of political distrust and competing polar ideologies,the problem resides in how the national nuances of defining humor affect political meanings,identity,and the local discourse on culture wars.The article also takes a transnational comparative approach to political humor in the context of its partisan exploit for populist political purposes in European democracies.