Antenatal Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography:A Literature Review

Fetal heart rate(FHR)monitoring is one of the central parts of obstetric care.Ultrasound-based technologies such as cardiotocography(CTG)remain the most common method for FHR monitoring.The CTG’s limitations,including subjective interpretation,high interobserver variability,and the need for skilled professionals,led to the development of computerized CTG(cCTG).While cCTG demonstrated advantages,its superiority over visual interpretation remains inconclusive.This has prompted the exploration of alternatives like noninvasive fetal electrocardiography(NIFECG).This review explores the landscape of antenatal FHR monitoring and the need for remote FHR monitoring in a patient-centered care model.Additionally,FHR monitoring needs to evolve from the traditional approach to incorporate artificial intelligence and machine learning.The review underscores the importance of aligning fetal monitoring with modern healthcare,leveraging artificial intelligence algorithms for accurate assessments,and enhancing patient engagement.The physiology of FHR variability(FHRV)is explained emphasizing its significance in assessing fetal well-being.Other measures of FHRV and their relevance are described.It delves into the promising realm of NIFECG,detailing its history and recent technological advancements.The potential advantages of NIFECG are objective FHR assessment,beat-to-beat variability,patient comfort,remote prolonged use,and less signal loss with increased maternal body mass index.Despite its promise,challenges such as signal loss must be addressed.The clinical application of NIFECG,its correlation with cCTG measures,and ongoing technological advancements are discussed.In conclusion,this review explores the evolution of antenatal FHR monitoring,emphasizing the potential of NIFECG in providing reliable,home-based monitoring solutions.Future research directions are outlined,urging longitudinal studies and evidence generation to establish NIFECG’s role in enhancing fetal well-being assessments during pregnancy.

Imperative for improvements and international convergence of intrapartum fetal monitoring: A bird's eye view

Intrapartum fetal monitoring has been criticized for the lack of evidence of improvement in fetal outcome despite causing increased operative intervention. Paradoxically, cardiotocography （CTG） has been a major driver for litigation for neonatal neurological injury. This analytical review tries to explore why extensive clinical studies and trials over 50 years have failed to demonstrate or bring about signifcant improvement in intrapartum fetal monitoring. There seems a need for significant reform. International congruence on most aspects of CTG interpretation [defnitions of fetal heart rate （FHR） parameters, CTG recording speed, 3-tier systems, etc .] is highly desirable to facilitate future meaningful clinical studies, evaluation and progress in this field. The FHR changes are non-specific and poor surrogate for fetal well-being. As a compromise for maintaining low false-negative results for fetal acidemia, a high false-positive value may have to be accepted. The need for redefning the place of adjuvant tests of fetal well-being like fetal blood sampling or fetal electrocardiography （ECG） is discussed. The FHR decelerations are often deterministic （center-stage） in CTG interpretation and 3-tier categorization. It is discussed if their scientifc and physiological classifcation （avoiding framing and confirmation biases） may be best based on time relationship to uterine contractions alone. This may provide a more sound foundation which could improve the reliability and further evolution of 3-tier systems. Results of several trials of fetal ECG （STAN） have been inconclusive and a need for a fresh approach or strategy is considered. It is hoped that the long anticipated Computer-aided analysis of CTG will be more objective and reliable （overcome human factors） and will offer valuable support or may eventually replace visual CTG interpretation. In any case, the recording and archiving all CTGs digitally and testing cord blood gases routinely in every delivery would be highly desirable for future research. This would facilitate well designed retrospective studies which can be very informative especially when prospective randomised controlled trials are often diffcult and resource-intensive.