期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Review on the NO removal from flue gas by oxidation methods 被引量:10
1
作者 Meng Si Boxiong Shen +6 位作者 George Adwek Lifu Xiong Lijun Liu Peng Yuan Hongpei Gao Cai Liang Qihai Guo 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2021年第3期49-71,共23页
Due to the increasingly strict emission standards of NOx on various industries,many traditional flue gas treatment methods have been gradually improved.Except for selective catalytic reduction(SCR)and selective non-ca... Due to the increasingly strict emission standards of NOx on various industries,many traditional flue gas treatment methods have been gradually improved.Except for selective catalytic reduction(SCR)and selective non-catalytic reduction(SNCR)methods to remove NOx from flue gas,theoxidation method is paying more attention to NOx removal now because of the potential to simultaneously remove multiple pollutants from flue gas.This paper summarizes the efficiency,reaction conditions,effect factors,and reaction mechanism of NO oxidation from the aspects of liquid-phase oxidation,gas-phase oxidation,plasma technology,and catalytic oxidation.The effects of free radicals and active components of catalysts on NO oxidation and the combination of various oxidation methods are discussed in detail.The advantages and disadvantages of different oxidation methods are summarized,and the suggestions for future research on NO oxidation are put forward at the end.The review on the NO removal by oxidation methods can provide new ideas for future studies on the NO removal from flue gas. 展开更多
关键词 flue gas treatment NO oxidation Liquid-phase oxidation gas-phase oxidation Catalytic oxidation
原文传递
Phytotoxicity and groundwater impacts of leaching from thermal treatment residues in roadways
2
作者 Khamphe Phoungthong Li-Ming Shao +1 位作者 Pin-Jing He Hua Zhang 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2018年第1期58-67,共10页
The use of coal fly ash(CFA), municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash(MSWIBA) and flue gas desulfurization residue(FGDR) in road construction has become very common owing to its economical advantages. Howev... The use of coal fly ash(CFA), municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash(MSWIBA) and flue gas desulfurization residue(FGDR) in road construction has become very common owing to its economical advantages. However, these residues may contain toxic constituents that pose an environmental risk if they leach out and flow through the soil, surface water and groundwater.Therefore, it is necessary to assess the ecotoxicity and groundwater impact of these residues before decisions can be made regarding their utilization for road construction. In this study,the physico-chemical characteristics, leaching and phytotoxicity of these residues were investigated. Specifically, multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the contributions of the leaching constituents of the CFA, MSWIBA and FGDR leachates to the germination index of wheat seeds. B, Ba, Cr, Cu, Fe and Pb were found to be more toxic to the wheat seeds than the other heavy metals. Furthermore, the leached concentrations of the constituents from the CFA, MSWIBA and FGDR were below the regulatory threshold limits of the Chinese identification standard for hazardous wastes. Analyses conducted using a numerical groundwater model(Wisc LEACH) indicated that the predicted field concentrations of metals from the CFA, MSWIBA and FGDR increased with time up to about 30 years at the point of compliance, then decreased with time and distance. Overall, this study demonstrated that the risks resulting from MSWIBA, CFA and FGDR leaching could be assessed before its utilization for road construction, providing crucial information for the adoption of these alternative materials. 展开更多
关键词 Thermal treatment residues Bottom ash flue gas desulfurization residue Heavy metals Phytotoxicity Groundwater impact
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部