BACKGROUND Budd-Chiari syndrome is defined as hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction.For Asian Budd-Chiari syndrome patients,the major treatment modality is recanalization(percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with ...BACKGROUND Budd-Chiari syndrome is defined as hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction.For Asian Budd-Chiari syndrome patients,the major treatment modality is recanalization(percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stent implantation).The cumulative 1-,5-,and 10-year primary patency rates and survival rates are reported to be excellent or satisfactory,but the long-term outcome of patients with restenosis(the most common complication after recanalization)is unknown.AIM To explore the treatment strategy for restenosis in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome after interventional therapy and to evaluate the long-term follow-up results.METHODS The clinical data and follow-up results of 60 patients with restenosis after interventional therapy from November 1983 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.RESULTS Sixty patients with restenosis were retrospectively divided into a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty(PTA)group(40 patients)and a PTA+stent group(20 patients)according to the primary recanalization method.For the patients with restenosis in the PTA group,13 refused treatment,and 27 received further treatment;among these patients,five had a second restenosis,two had a third restenosis,and one had a fourth restenosis.For the patients with restenosis in the PTA+stent group,nine refused treatment,ten received PTA alone,and the other received PTA+stent implantation.Among the patients who received further treatment,five had a second restenosis,three had a third restenosis,and one had a fourth restenosis.The 1-,5-,10-,20-,and 25-year cumulative survival rates of the 38 patients who received further treatment after restenosis were 100%,78.3%,78.3%,70.5%,and 70.5%,respectively;however,for the 22 patients who refused treatment,the survival rates were 72.7%,45.9%,30.6%,10.2%,and unavailable,respectively(P<0.001).CONCLUSION Long-term follow-up after interventional therapy is very important.Active treatment for patients with restenosis can improve prognosis,and minimally invasive treatment strategies for restenosis allows to obtain satisfactory results.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Budd-Chiari syndrome is defined as hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction.For Asian Budd-Chiari syndrome patients,the major treatment modality is recanalization(percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stent implantation).The cumulative 1-,5-,and 10-year primary patency rates and survival rates are reported to be excellent or satisfactory,but the long-term outcome of patients with restenosis(the most common complication after recanalization)is unknown.AIM To explore the treatment strategy for restenosis in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome after interventional therapy and to evaluate the long-term follow-up results.METHODS The clinical data and follow-up results of 60 patients with restenosis after interventional therapy from November 1983 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.RESULTS Sixty patients with restenosis were retrospectively divided into a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty(PTA)group(40 patients)and a PTA+stent group(20 patients)according to the primary recanalization method.For the patients with restenosis in the PTA group,13 refused treatment,and 27 received further treatment;among these patients,five had a second restenosis,two had a third restenosis,and one had a fourth restenosis.For the patients with restenosis in the PTA+stent group,nine refused treatment,ten received PTA alone,and the other received PTA+stent implantation.Among the patients who received further treatment,five had a second restenosis,three had a third restenosis,and one had a fourth restenosis.The 1-,5-,10-,20-,and 25-year cumulative survival rates of the 38 patients who received further treatment after restenosis were 100%,78.3%,78.3%,70.5%,and 70.5%,respectively;however,for the 22 patients who refused treatment,the survival rates were 72.7%,45.9%,30.6%,10.2%,and unavailable,respectively(P<0.001).CONCLUSION Long-term follow-up after interventional therapy is very important.Active treatment for patients with restenosis can improve prognosis,and minimally invasive treatment strategies for restenosis allows to obtain satisfactory results.
