AIM:To investigate the clinical response of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)symptoms to exclusion diets based on food intolerance tests.METHODS:A double blind,randomized,controlled pilot trial was performed in 38...AIM:To investigate the clinical response of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)symptoms to exclusion diets based on food intolerance tests.METHODS:A double blind,randomized,controlled pilot trial was performed in 38 GERD patients partially or completely non-responders to proton pump inhibitors(PPI)treatment.Fasting blood samples from each patients were obtained;leukocytotoxic test was performed by incubating the blood with a panel of 60food items to be tested.The reaction of leukocytes(rounding,vacuolization,lack of movement,flattening,fragmentation or disintegration of cell wall)was then evaluated by optical microscopy and rated as follows:level 0=negative,level 1=slightly positive,level 2=moderately positive,and level 3=highly positive.A"true"diet excluding food items inducing moderatesevere reactions,and a"control"diet including them was developed for each patient.Then,twenty patients received the"true"diet and 18 the"control"diet;after one month(T1)symptoms severity was scored by the GERD impact scale(GIS).Hence,patients in the"control"group were switched to the"true"diet,and symptom severity was re-assessed after three months(T2).RESULTS:At baseline(T0)the mean GIS global score was 6.68(range:5-12)with no difference between"true"and control group(6.6±1.19 vs 6.7±1.7).All patients reacted moderately/severely to at least 1 food(range:5-19),with a significantly greater number of food substances inducing reaction in controls compared with the"true"diet group(11.6 vs 7.0,P<0.001).Food items more frequently involved were milk,lettuce,brewer’s yeast,pork,coffee,rice,sole asparagus,and tuna,followed by eggs,tomato,grain,shrimps,and chemical yeast.At T1 both groups displayed a reduction of GIS score("true"group 3.3±1.7,-50%,P=0.001;control group 4.9±2.8,-26.9%,P=0.02),although the GIS score was significantly lower in"true"vs"control"group(P=0.04).At T2,after the diet switch,the"control"group showed a further reduction in GIS score(2.7±1.9,-44.9%,P=0.01),while the"true"group did not(2.6±1.8,-21.3%,P=0.19),so that the GIS scores didn’t differ between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Our results suggest that food intolerance may play a role in GERD symptoms development,and leucocytotoxic test-based exclusion diets may be a possible therapeutic approach when PPI are not effective or indicated.展开更多
AIM: To assess values of 24-h esophageal pH-monitoring parameters with dual-channel probe (distal and proximal channel) in children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: 264 children suspected ...AIM: To assess values of 24-h esophageal pH-monitoring parameters with dual-channel probe (distal and proximal channel) in children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: 264 children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were enrolled in a study (mean age χ = 20.78 ± 17.23 mo). The outcomes of this study, immunoallerrgological tests and positive result of oral food challenge test with a potentially noxious nutrient, enabled to qualify children into particular study groups. RESULTS: 32 (12.1%) infants (group 1) had physiological GER diagnosed. Pathological acid GER was confirmed in 138 (52.3%) children. Primary GER was diagnosed in 76 (28.8%) children (group 2) and GER secondary to allergy to cow milk protein and/or other food (CMA/FA) in 62 (23.5%) children (group 3). 32 (12.1%) of them had CMA/FA (group 4-reference group), and in remaining 62 (23.5%) children neither GER nor CMA/FA was confirmed (group 5). Mean values of pH monitoring parameters measured in distal and proximal channel were analyzed in individual groups. This analysis showed statistically significant differentiation of mean values in the case of: number of episodes of acid GER, episodes of acid GER lasting > 5 min, duration of the longest episode of acid GER in both channels, acid GER index total and supine in proximal channel. Statistically significant differences of mean values among examined groups, especially between group 2 and 3 in the case of total acid GER index (only distal channel) were confirmed. CONCLUSION: 24-h esophageal pH monitoring confirmed pathological acid GER in 52.3% of children with typical and atypical symptoms of GERD. The similar pH-monitoring values obtained in group 2 and 3 confirm the necessity of implementation of differential diagnosis for primary vs secondary cause of GER.展开更多
AIM:To study,whether the association of Schatzki rings with other esophageal disorders support one of the theories about its etiology.METHODS:From 1987 until 2007,all patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic Schatzki...AIM:To study,whether the association of Schatzki rings with other esophageal disorders support one of the theories about its etiology.METHODS:From 1987 until 2007,all patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic Schatzki rings (SRs) were prospectively registered and followed.All of them underwent structured interviews with regards to clinical symptoms,as well as endoscopic and/or radiographic examinations.Endoscopic and radiographic studies determined the presence of an SR and additional morphological abnormalities.RESULTS:One hundred and sixty-seven patients (125 male,42 female) with a mean age of 57.1±14.6 years were studied.All patients complained of intermittent dysphagia for solid food and 113 (79.6%) patients had a history of food impaction.Patients experienced symptoms for a mean of 4.7±5.2 years before diagnosis.Only in 23.4% of the 64 patients who had endoscopic and/or radiological examinations before their first presentation to our clinic,was the SR previously diagnosed.At presentation,the mean ring diameter was 13.9±4.97 mm.One hundred and sixty-two (97%) patients showed a sliding hiatal hernia.Erosive reflux esophagitis was found in 47 (28.1%) patients.Twenty-six (15.6%) of 167 patients showed single or multiple esophageal webs;five (3.0%) patients exhibited eosinophilic esophagitis;and four (2.4%) had esophageal diverticula.Four (7%) of 57 patients undergoing esophageal manometry had nonspecific esophageal motility disorders.CONCLUSION:Schatzki rings are frequently associated with additional esophageal disorders,which support the assumption of a multifactorial etiology.Despite typical symptoms,SRs might be overlooked.展开更多
Dysphagia is a common symptom that is important to recognise and appropriately manage, given that causes include life threatening oesophageal neoplasia, oropharyngeal dysfunction, the risk of aspiration, as well as ch...Dysphagia is a common symptom that is important to recognise and appropriately manage, given that causes include life threatening oesophageal neoplasia, oropharyngeal dysfunction, the risk of aspiration, as well as chronic disabling gastroesophageal reflux(GORD). The predominant causes of dysphagia varies between cohorts depending on the interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors, and is changing with time. Currently in white Caucasian societies adopting a western lifestyle, obesity is common and thus associated gastroesophageal reflux disease is increasingly diagnosed. Similarly, food allergies are increasing in the west, and eosinophilic oesophagitis is increasingly found as a cause. Other regions where cigarette smoking is still prevalent, or where access to medical care and antisecretory agents such as proton pump inhibitors are less available, benign oesophageal peptic strictures, Barrett's oesophagus, adeno-as well as squamous cell carcinoma are endemic. The evaluation should consider the severity of symptoms, as well as the pretest probability of a given condition. In young white Caucasian males who are atopic or describe heartburn, eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease will predominate and a proton pump inhibitor could be commenced prior to further investigation. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy remains a valid first line investigation for patients with suspected oesophageal dysphagia. Barium swallow is particularly useful for oropharyngeal dysphagia, and oesophageal manometry mandatory to diagnose motility disorders.展开更多
文摘AIM:To investigate the clinical response of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)symptoms to exclusion diets based on food intolerance tests.METHODS:A double blind,randomized,controlled pilot trial was performed in 38 GERD patients partially or completely non-responders to proton pump inhibitors(PPI)treatment.Fasting blood samples from each patients were obtained;leukocytotoxic test was performed by incubating the blood with a panel of 60food items to be tested.The reaction of leukocytes(rounding,vacuolization,lack of movement,flattening,fragmentation or disintegration of cell wall)was then evaluated by optical microscopy and rated as follows:level 0=negative,level 1=slightly positive,level 2=moderately positive,and level 3=highly positive.A"true"diet excluding food items inducing moderatesevere reactions,and a"control"diet including them was developed for each patient.Then,twenty patients received the"true"diet and 18 the"control"diet;after one month(T1)symptoms severity was scored by the GERD impact scale(GIS).Hence,patients in the"control"group were switched to the"true"diet,and symptom severity was re-assessed after three months(T2).RESULTS:At baseline(T0)the mean GIS global score was 6.68(range:5-12)with no difference between"true"and control group(6.6±1.19 vs 6.7±1.7).All patients reacted moderately/severely to at least 1 food(range:5-19),with a significantly greater number of food substances inducing reaction in controls compared with the"true"diet group(11.6 vs 7.0,P<0.001).Food items more frequently involved were milk,lettuce,brewer’s yeast,pork,coffee,rice,sole asparagus,and tuna,followed by eggs,tomato,grain,shrimps,and chemical yeast.At T1 both groups displayed a reduction of GIS score("true"group 3.3±1.7,-50%,P=0.001;control group 4.9±2.8,-26.9%,P=0.02),although the GIS score was significantly lower in"true"vs"control"group(P=0.04).At T2,after the diet switch,the"control"group showed a further reduction in GIS score(2.7±1.9,-44.9%,P=0.01),while the"true"group did not(2.6±1.8,-21.3%,P=0.19),so that the GIS scores didn’t differ between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Our results suggest that food intolerance may play a role in GERD symptoms development,and leucocytotoxic test-based exclusion diets may be a possible therapeutic approach when PPI are not effective or indicated.
基金Supported by Grant of State Committee for Scientific Research (KBN) No 4P05E 04719
文摘AIM: To assess values of 24-h esophageal pH-monitoring parameters with dual-channel probe (distal and proximal channel) in children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: 264 children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were enrolled in a study (mean age χ = 20.78 ± 17.23 mo). The outcomes of this study, immunoallerrgological tests and positive result of oral food challenge test with a potentially noxious nutrient, enabled to qualify children into particular study groups. RESULTS: 32 (12.1%) infants (group 1) had physiological GER diagnosed. Pathological acid GER was confirmed in 138 (52.3%) children. Primary GER was diagnosed in 76 (28.8%) children (group 2) and GER secondary to allergy to cow milk protein and/or other food (CMA/FA) in 62 (23.5%) children (group 3). 32 (12.1%) of them had CMA/FA (group 4-reference group), and in remaining 62 (23.5%) children neither GER nor CMA/FA was confirmed (group 5). Mean values of pH monitoring parameters measured in distal and proximal channel were analyzed in individual groups. This analysis showed statistically significant differentiation of mean values in the case of: number of episodes of acid GER, episodes of acid GER lasting > 5 min, duration of the longest episode of acid GER in both channels, acid GER index total and supine in proximal channel. Statistically significant differences of mean values among examined groups, especially between group 2 and 3 in the case of total acid GER index (only distal channel) were confirmed. CONCLUSION: 24-h esophageal pH monitoring confirmed pathological acid GER in 52.3% of children with typical and atypical symptoms of GERD. The similar pH-monitoring values obtained in group 2 and 3 confirm the necessity of implementation of differential diagnosis for primary vs secondary cause of GER.
文摘AIM:To study,whether the association of Schatzki rings with other esophageal disorders support one of the theories about its etiology.METHODS:From 1987 until 2007,all patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic Schatzki rings (SRs) were prospectively registered and followed.All of them underwent structured interviews with regards to clinical symptoms,as well as endoscopic and/or radiographic examinations.Endoscopic and radiographic studies determined the presence of an SR and additional morphological abnormalities.RESULTS:One hundred and sixty-seven patients (125 male,42 female) with a mean age of 57.1±14.6 years were studied.All patients complained of intermittent dysphagia for solid food and 113 (79.6%) patients had a history of food impaction.Patients experienced symptoms for a mean of 4.7±5.2 years before diagnosis.Only in 23.4% of the 64 patients who had endoscopic and/or radiological examinations before their first presentation to our clinic,was the SR previously diagnosed.At presentation,the mean ring diameter was 13.9±4.97 mm.One hundred and sixty-two (97%) patients showed a sliding hiatal hernia.Erosive reflux esophagitis was found in 47 (28.1%) patients.Twenty-six (15.6%) of 167 patients showed single or multiple esophageal webs;five (3.0%) patients exhibited eosinophilic esophagitis;and four (2.4%) had esophageal diverticula.Four (7%) of 57 patients undergoing esophageal manometry had nonspecific esophageal motility disorders.CONCLUSION:Schatzki rings are frequently associated with additional esophageal disorders,which support the assumption of a multifactorial etiology.Despite typical symptoms,SRs might be overlooked.
文摘Dysphagia is a common symptom that is important to recognise and appropriately manage, given that causes include life threatening oesophageal neoplasia, oropharyngeal dysfunction, the risk of aspiration, as well as chronic disabling gastroesophageal reflux(GORD). The predominant causes of dysphagia varies between cohorts depending on the interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors, and is changing with time. Currently in white Caucasian societies adopting a western lifestyle, obesity is common and thus associated gastroesophageal reflux disease is increasingly diagnosed. Similarly, food allergies are increasing in the west, and eosinophilic oesophagitis is increasingly found as a cause. Other regions where cigarette smoking is still prevalent, or where access to medical care and antisecretory agents such as proton pump inhibitors are less available, benign oesophageal peptic strictures, Barrett's oesophagus, adeno-as well as squamous cell carcinoma are endemic. The evaluation should consider the severity of symptoms, as well as the pretest probability of a given condition. In young white Caucasian males who are atopic or describe heartburn, eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease will predominate and a proton pump inhibitor could be commenced prior to further investigation. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy remains a valid first line investigation for patients with suspected oesophageal dysphagia. Barium swallow is particularly useful for oropharyngeal dysphagia, and oesophageal manometry mandatory to diagnose motility disorders.