Objective:To study the clinical effect of modified circumcision in the treatment of phimosis and excessive foreskin.Methods:110 patients with overly long foreskin or phimosis were divided into experimental group and c...Objective:To study the clinical effect of modified circumcision in the treatment of phimosis and excessive foreskin.Methods:110 patients with overly long foreskin or phimosis were divided into experimental group and control group by random number table method,with 55 cases in each group.The experimental group was treated with modified circumcision,and the control group was treated with traditional manual cutting and suture.Then the clinical effects of the two treatments were compared.Results:Two different surgical procedures were performed.During the operation,the blood loss of the experimental group was less than that of the control group;the operation time and wound healing time were shorter than those of the control group;after the operation,the incidence of related complications in the experimental group was 14.55%,which was significantly lower than For 25.45%of the control group,the clinical treatment effect was obvious,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of modified circumcision in the treatment of patients with phimosis and excessive foreskin is good.Compared with the traditional manual cutting and suture treatment,it not only has the advantages of simple operation and clinical application,but also benefits the rehabilitation of patients.Rehabilitation time reduces the incidence of postoperative complications.It is an ideal treatment plan for this type of disease in the current clinic,and it is worthy of popularization and application in general surgery and reproductive surgery.展开更多
BACKGROUND Giant condyloma acuminatum(GCA)is an uncommon condition affecting the anogenital area.CASE SUMMARY Here,we report an 88-year-old male patient who presented with a 5-year history of a progressive appearance ...BACKGROUND Giant condyloma acuminatum(GCA)is an uncommon condition affecting the anogenital area.CASE SUMMARY Here,we report an 88-year-old male patient who presented with a 5-year history of a progressive appearance of multiple cauliflower-like warts over his penile shaft,pubis region,and groin as well as urine leakage along the distal penile shaft.Physical examination revealed an ulcerative skin perforation with pus discharge under the distal prepuce base,which was initially suspected to be a urethral fistula.However,during surgery,it was discovered that the perforation was caused by a giant condyloma lesion that had obliterated the prepuce opening,with infection and high pressure causing subsequent skin perforation.He underwent circumcision and wide excision with electrocauterization of the warts.He was discharged after the surgery,and the residual lesion was treated with imiquimod and low-dose oral tegafur-uracil.CONCLUSION Penile GCA can cause prepuce perforation and can be postoperatively treated with imiquimod and low-dose oral tegafur-uracil.展开更多
Aim： To study the clinical effects of a disposable circumcision device in treatment of male patients of different ages with either phimosis or excess foreskin. Methods： One thousand two hundred patients between the ...Aim： To study the clinical effects of a disposable circumcision device in treatment of male patients of different ages with either phimosis or excess foreskin. Methods： One thousand two hundred patients between the age of 5 and 95 years underwent circumcision using this procedure in the 2-year period between October 2005 and September 2007. Of these cases, 904 had excess foreskin and 296 were cases of phimosis. Results： In 96.33% of the cases the incision healed, leaving a minimal amount of the inner foreskin with no scarring and producing good cosmetic results. There were no incidents of device dislocation or damage to the frenulum. The average operative time was 2.5 min for excess foreskin, and 3.5 min for phimosis. During the 7 days of wearing the device, mild to moderate edema occurred in 10.08 % of cases with excess foreskin and in 2.58 % of those with phimosis. Edema in the frenulum was seen in 1.67% of patients, and only 0.67% had an infection of the incision. A total of 86.25% of patients reported pain due to penile erection. After removal of the device, 0.58% of the cases had minimal bleeding around the incision, and 2.42% had wound dehiscence. Conclusion： The new device can be applied to an overwhelming majority of patients with phimosis and excess foreskin. This technique is relatively simple to perform, and patients who underwent this surgery had very few complications. Antibiotics were not required and patients reported less pain than those who were circumcised using conventional methods. Circumcision with this device requires minimal tissue manipulation, and is quicker and safer than circumcision using conventional techniques.展开更多
文摘Objective:To study the clinical effect of modified circumcision in the treatment of phimosis and excessive foreskin.Methods:110 patients with overly long foreskin or phimosis were divided into experimental group and control group by random number table method,with 55 cases in each group.The experimental group was treated with modified circumcision,and the control group was treated with traditional manual cutting and suture.Then the clinical effects of the two treatments were compared.Results:Two different surgical procedures were performed.During the operation,the blood loss of the experimental group was less than that of the control group;the operation time and wound healing time were shorter than those of the control group;after the operation,the incidence of related complications in the experimental group was 14.55%,which was significantly lower than For 25.45%of the control group,the clinical treatment effect was obvious,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of modified circumcision in the treatment of patients with phimosis and excessive foreskin is good.Compared with the traditional manual cutting and suture treatment,it not only has the advantages of simple operation and clinical application,but also benefits the rehabilitation of patients.Rehabilitation time reduces the incidence of postoperative complications.It is an ideal treatment plan for this type of disease in the current clinic,and it is worthy of popularization and application in general surgery and reproductive surgery.
文摘BACKGROUND Giant condyloma acuminatum(GCA)is an uncommon condition affecting the anogenital area.CASE SUMMARY Here,we report an 88-year-old male patient who presented with a 5-year history of a progressive appearance of multiple cauliflower-like warts over his penile shaft,pubis region,and groin as well as urine leakage along the distal penile shaft.Physical examination revealed an ulcerative skin perforation with pus discharge under the distal prepuce base,which was initially suspected to be a urethral fistula.However,during surgery,it was discovered that the perforation was caused by a giant condyloma lesion that had obliterated the prepuce opening,with infection and high pressure causing subsequent skin perforation.He underwent circumcision and wide excision with electrocauterization of the warts.He was discharged after the surgery,and the residual lesion was treated with imiquimod and low-dose oral tegafur-uracil.CONCLUSION Penile GCA can cause prepuce perforation and can be postoperatively treated with imiquimod and low-dose oral tegafur-uracil.
基金Acknowledgment The project （The Fundamental Researches of the Reproductive Health） was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China （G1999055905, branch topic）.
文摘Aim： To study the clinical effects of a disposable circumcision device in treatment of male patients of different ages with either phimosis or excess foreskin. Methods： One thousand two hundred patients between the age of 5 and 95 years underwent circumcision using this procedure in the 2-year period between October 2005 and September 2007. Of these cases, 904 had excess foreskin and 296 were cases of phimosis. Results： In 96.33% of the cases the incision healed, leaving a minimal amount of the inner foreskin with no scarring and producing good cosmetic results. There were no incidents of device dislocation or damage to the frenulum. The average operative time was 2.5 min for excess foreskin, and 3.5 min for phimosis. During the 7 days of wearing the device, mild to moderate edema occurred in 10.08 % of cases with excess foreskin and in 2.58 % of those with phimosis. Edema in the frenulum was seen in 1.67% of patients, and only 0.67% had an infection of the incision. A total of 86.25% of patients reported pain due to penile erection. After removal of the device, 0.58% of the cases had minimal bleeding around the incision, and 2.42% had wound dehiscence. Conclusion： The new device can be applied to an overwhelming majority of patients with phimosis and excess foreskin. This technique is relatively simple to perform, and patients who underwent this surgery had very few complications. Antibiotics were not required and patients reported less pain than those who were circumcised using conventional methods. Circumcision with this device requires minimal tissue manipulation, and is quicker and safer than circumcision using conventional techniques.
