Clinical movement screening tests are gaining popularity as a means to determine injury risk and to implement training programs to prevent sport injury. While these screens are being used readily in the clinical field...Clinical movement screening tests are gaining popularity as a means to determine injury risk and to implement training programs to prevent sport injury. While these screens are being used readily in the clinical field, it is only recently that some of these have started to gain attention from a research perspective. This limits applicability and poses questions to the validity, and in some cases the reliability, of the clinical movement tests as they relate to injury prediction, intervention, and prevention. This editorial will review the following clinical movement screening tests: Functional Movement Screen?, Star Excursion Balance Test, Y Balance Test, Drop Jump Screening Test, Landing Error Scoring System, and the Tuck Jump Analysis in regards to test administration, reliability, validity, factors that affect test performance, intervention programs, and usefulness for injury prediction. It is important to review the aforementioned factors for each of these clinical screening tests as this may help clinicians interpret the current body of literature. While each of these screening tests were developed by clinicians based on what appears to be clinical practice, this paper brings to light that this is a need for collaboration between clinicians and researchers to ensure validity of clinically meaningful tests so that they are used appropriately in future clinical practice. Further, this editorial may help to identify where the research is lacking and, thus, drive future research questions in regards to applicability and appropriateness of clinical movement screening tools.展开更多
目的:分析测试前有无热身运动对功能性运动筛查(FMS^(TM))测试结果的影响,为统一测试条件、检验FMS^(TM)重复测试可靠性和讨论各研究结果可比性提供参考。方法:采用完全相同的口令和过程先后对12名青年男子排球专业运动员进行无热身和...目的:分析测试前有无热身运动对功能性运动筛查(FMS^(TM))测试结果的影响,为统一测试条件、检验FMS^(TM)重复测试可靠性和讨论各研究结果可比性提供参考。方法:采用完全相同的口令和过程先后对12名青年男子排球专业运动员进行无热身和有热身测试,使用二维运动解析系统Dartfish Prosuite 8.0对两台摄像机同步记录的视频数据进行解析。结果:在前后两次测试中,跨栏步得分(1.75±0.62 vs 2.42±0.52)和总分(13.50±2.20 vs 16.42±2.15)表现为有热身非常显著高于无热身测试(P<0.01)。此外,在深蹲(1.58±0.67 vs 1.92±0.67)、直线弓步蹲(2.00±0.43 vs 2.50±0.52)、主动直腿上抬(1.50±0.67 vs 2.00±0.60)、转体稳定性(1.42±0.52 vs 1.92±0.29)中得分表现为显著提高(P<0.05)。结论:测试前进行热身运动能够提高FMS^(TM)的测试结果,这种仅靠目测观察到的异常动作模式可能不能真实反映运动"功能障碍"。在忽略测试前热身因素情况下,针对运动表现进行反馈和制定训练策略,这种预测受伤风险和评估训练效果的结论其参考价值可能具有一定的局限性。展开更多
文摘Clinical movement screening tests are gaining popularity as a means to determine injury risk and to implement training programs to prevent sport injury. While these screens are being used readily in the clinical field, it is only recently that some of these have started to gain attention from a research perspective. This limits applicability and poses questions to the validity, and in some cases the reliability, of the clinical movement tests as they relate to injury prediction, intervention, and prevention. This editorial will review the following clinical movement screening tests: Functional Movement Screen?, Star Excursion Balance Test, Y Balance Test, Drop Jump Screening Test, Landing Error Scoring System, and the Tuck Jump Analysis in regards to test administration, reliability, validity, factors that affect test performance, intervention programs, and usefulness for injury prediction. It is important to review the aforementioned factors for each of these clinical screening tests as this may help clinicians interpret the current body of literature. While each of these screening tests were developed by clinicians based on what appears to be clinical practice, this paper brings to light that this is a need for collaboration between clinicians and researchers to ensure validity of clinically meaningful tests so that they are used appropriately in future clinical practice. Further, this editorial may help to identify where the research is lacking and, thus, drive future research questions in regards to applicability and appropriateness of clinical movement screening tools.
文摘目的:分析测试前有无热身运动对功能性运动筛查(FMS^(TM))测试结果的影响,为统一测试条件、检验FMS^(TM)重复测试可靠性和讨论各研究结果可比性提供参考。方法:采用完全相同的口令和过程先后对12名青年男子排球专业运动员进行无热身和有热身测试,使用二维运动解析系统Dartfish Prosuite 8.0对两台摄像机同步记录的视频数据进行解析。结果:在前后两次测试中,跨栏步得分(1.75±0.62 vs 2.42±0.52)和总分(13.50±2.20 vs 16.42±2.15)表现为有热身非常显著高于无热身测试(P<0.01)。此外,在深蹲(1.58±0.67 vs 1.92±0.67)、直线弓步蹲(2.00±0.43 vs 2.50±0.52)、主动直腿上抬(1.50±0.67 vs 2.00±0.60)、转体稳定性(1.42±0.52 vs 1.92±0.29)中得分表现为显著提高(P<0.05)。结论:测试前进行热身运动能够提高FMS^(TM)的测试结果,这种仅靠目测观察到的异常动作模式可能不能真实反映运动"功能障碍"。在忽略测试前热身因素情况下,针对运动表现进行反馈和制定训练策略,这种预测受伤风险和评估训练效果的结论其参考价值可能具有一定的局限性。
基金2020年河南省社科联调研课题阶段性成果(项目名称:Motor Learning and Control模式下的体育专业学生专项体能训练研究,项目编号:SKL—2020—2275)2020年洛阳市社会科学规划项目阶段性成果(项目名称:基于动作学习与控制理论功能性动作训练练习创编,项目编号:2020B268)洛阳师范学院2020年校级高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目(2020xjgj036)。
