Gastric cancer liver metastasis will reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors augment the antitumor activity of T cells by inhibiting the negative regulatory pathway of T cells,leading to notable efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer,melanoma,and other malignancies through immunotherapy utilization.However,secondary malignant liver tumors not only lower the liver's sensitivity to immunotherapy but also trigger systemic immune suppression,resulting in reduced overall effectiveness of immune therapy.Patients receiving immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma experience reduced response rates,progression-free survival,and overall survival when secondary malignant tumors develop in the liver.Through Liu's retrospective analysis,valuable insights are provided for the future clinical management of these patients.Therefore,in patients with gastric cancer(GC),the occurrence of liver metastasis might be indicative of reduced efficacy of immuno-therapy.Overcoming liver immune tolerance mechanisms and their negative impacts allows for the potential benefits of immunotherapy in patients with GC and liver metastasis.INTRODUCTION Gastric cancer(GC)ranks among the prevalent malignancies affecting the digestive system globally.Based on the latest epidemiological data[1,2],it holds the fifth position for incidence and the fourth position for mortality among all malignant tumors.GC cases and fatalities in China make up roughly half of the worldwide figures.Earlier investigations[3]have demonstrated that the median overall survival(mOS)among advanced GC patients left untreated typically ranges from 3 to 4 months.Systemic chemotherapy recipients often experience a mOS of around one year,accompanied by a marked improvement in the quality of life among patients with advanced GC.The mainstay of treatment for advanced GC patients involves chemotherapeutic medications such as fluoropyrimidines,platinum compounds,and taxanes.However,their efficacy in tumor control is constrained by acquired resistance and primary resistance.The rise of personalized precision therapy has propelled immunotherapy into the spotlight as a crucial component of comprehensive treatment[4].By blocking the negative regulatory pathways of T cells,immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)boost the anti-tumor effect of T cells.Immunotherapy has brought about significant therapeutic benefits for patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer,melanoma,and related illnesses[5,6],instilling newfound hope in those with advanced GC[7].However,phase III clinical trial data[8-12]reveals that the incorporation of immunotherapy into chemotherapy regimens improves overall survival(OS)outcomes for patients with advanced GC.The liver's immune-exempt nature renders it less responsive to immunotherapy when secondary malignant tumors are present,fostering systemic immune suppression and yielding unfavorable outcomes in immune therapy[13-15].In retrospective research[16-20]pertaining to non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma,it has been observed that the presence of secondary liver malignancies may lower the response rate,progression-free survival(PFS),and OS rates in patients treated with immunotherapy,independent of factors such as tumor mutation burden and PD-L1 expression.Despite this,there is a paucity of studies examining whether the existence of secondary malignant liver tumors affects the effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients diagnosed with advanced HER-2 negative GC.

Role of immunotherapy in gastric cancer with liver metastasis

Gastric cancer continues to be a significant issue for public health,marked by its widespread occurrence and high mortality rates,even as the incidence of the disease shows a declining trend.The liver is the primary site for metastatic spread,with the peritoneum,lungs,and bones also being common targets.With the advent of biologic treatments and the introduction of immunotherapy for patients with metastatic conditions,the options to treat metastatic gastric cancer have expanded.This diversified therapeutic approach is designed to enhance patient quality of life and prolong survival,showcasing the progress in treatment modalities for individuals with gastric cancer and liver metastases.

Analysis of the impact of immunotherapy efficacy and safety in patients with gastric cancer and liver metastasis

BACKGROUND Gastric cancer(GC)is the fifth most common type of cancer and has the fourth highest death rate among all cancers.There is a lack of studies examining the impact of liver metastases on the effectiveness of immunotherapy in individuals diagnosed with GC.AIM To investigate the influence of liver metastases on the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in patients with advanced GC.METHODS This retrospective investigation collected clinical data of patients with advanced stomach cancer who had immunotherapy at our hospital from February 2021 to January 2023.The baseline attributes were compared using either the Chi-square test or the Fisher exact probability method.The chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were employed to assess the therapeutic efficacy and survival duration in GC patients with and without liver metastases.RESULTS The analysis comprised 48 patients diagnosed with advanced GC,who were categorized into two groups:A liver metastasis cohort(n=20)and a non-liver metastatic cohort(n=28).Patients with liver metastasis exhibited a more deteriorated physical condition compared to those without liver metastasis.The objective response rates in the cohort with metastasis and the cohort without metastasis were 15.0%and 35.7%(P>0.05),respectively.Similarly,the disease control rates in these two cohorts were 65.0%and 82.1%(P>0.05),respectively.The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months in one group and 11.2 months in the other group,with a hazard ratio of 0.40 and a significance level(P)less than 0.05.The median overall survival was 12.0 months in one group and 19.0 months in the other group,with a significance level(P)greater than 0.05.CONCLUSION Immunotherapy is less effective in GC patients with liver metastases compared to those without liver metastasis.

Immunotherapy for gastric cancer and liver metastasis: Is it time to bid farewell

Patients with metastatic gastric cancer have a grim prognosis.Palliative che-motherapy offers a limited survival improvement,but recent advancements in immunotherapy have sparked hope.However,the effectiveness of immunothe-rapy in patients with liver metastases remains debated.This article reviews a recent study by Liu et al and evaluates conflicting evidence on the impact of liver metastases on response to immunotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer.While some studies suggest no significant difference in treatment response based on liver involvement,others report varied response rates.The present study,a re-trospective analysis of 48 patients by Liu et al,examines this issue and concludes that immunotherapy is less effective in patients with liver metastases.Despite methodological limitations and a small sample size,the study contributes to the ongoing discourse.The nuanced response to immunotherapy in certain patients underscores the importance of understanding the tumor microenvironment,immune cell infiltration,and the expression of immune checkpoints.Rather than dismissing immunotherapy for patients with gastric cancer and liver metastases,a shift towards personalized treatment strategies and a more profound under-standing of tumor-specific biomarkers is essential.By unraveling the molecular intricacies of individual cases,clinicians may tailor more effective and customized treatments,offering a glimmer of hope for this challenging patient group.

Immunotherapy in gastric cancer with liver metastasis:Challenges and opportunities

In this editorial,we review the article by Liu et al published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery investigating the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in patients with gastric cancer(GC)and liver metastasis.GC,the fifth most com-monly diagnosed malignancy worldwide,presents a significant challenge due to its multifactorial etiology and a grim prognosis for unresectable or recurrent cases.The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)has revolutionized oncology;yet liver metastasis has been associated with reduced response rates,progression-free survival,and overall survival in various malignancies.The Che-ckMate-649 and KEYNOTE-859 trials demonstrated promising results with ICIs in advanced GC,particularly in patients with liver metastasis.However,a meta-analysis of liver metastatic solid tumors revealed worse outcomes with ICIs,high-lighting the need for further investigation.While combined therapies,including ICIs with local treatments,show promise in improving outcomes,the nuanced landscape of ICIs in liver metastatic GC necessitates continued research for robust conclusions.The current contradictions in the literature underscore the impor-tance of cautious interpretation and the exploration of tailored approaches to enhance clinical efficacy in this challenging patient population.

Prognosis of HER2 over-expressing gastric cancer patients with liver metastasis

AIM:To study the risk factors for liver metastasis and the prognosis in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2) over-expressing gastric cancer(GC).METHODS:A total of 84 GC patients recruited from the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army(PLA) between 2003 and 2010 were randomly enrolled in this study.HER2 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry in 84 GC patients with liver metastases.The study group consisted of 66 men and 18 women,with an average age of 54 years(range:19-74 years).Liver metastasis was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography.Patients were followed-up and predictive factors of liver metastasis were evaluated.RESULTS:The median follow-up period was 47 mo(range:6-85 mo).The characteristics of 35(25.7%) patients with HER2 over-expression of liver metastatic GC are presented.HER2 over-expression was detected in 23 out of 49(46.9%) patients with intestinal GC,and 9 out of 35(25.7%) patients with diffuse GC.29 out of 59(49.2%) patients aged < 60 years were HER2positive,while 8 out of 25(32%) patients aged ≥ 60 were HER2-positive;a significant difference(P < 0.05).Univariate analysis(log-rank test) showed that HER2 over-expression,sex,Lauren classification,differentiation and disease-free interval were correlated with poor survival(P < 0.05).Survival analysis with a survival curve showed that HER2 over-expression was significantly relevant,with a reduced survival time in GC patients with liver metastases(P < 0.01).2-year survival was not associated with the patient's age.A diseasefree survival longer than 12 mo has a significant association with extended overall survival(OS) in GC patients with liver metastases.The median survival time after the diagnosis of liver metastases was 18 mo [95% confidence interval(CI):9.07-26.94] among HER2 positive GC patients with liver metastases.In comparison,for 49(69.4%) out of 84 HER2 negative patients with liver metastatic GC,the median survival time was 47 mo(95% CI:19.37-74.63).In patients with HER2 positive liver metastatic GC,the median OS was significantly shorter than in HER2 negative patients(median,20.32 mo;95% CI:16.51-24.13 vs median,50.14 mo;95% CI:37.83-62.45;P < 0.01).CONCLUSION:HER2 over-expressing GC patients with liver metastases have a poor prognosis.Overall survival was significantly lower in HER2 positive patients.HER2overexpression is correlated with a lower survival rate.

Cystic liver metastasis of gastric cancer:report and analysis of two cases

Cystic liver metastasis, which lacks specific clinical manifestations and standardized treatment, rarely occurs after radical gastrectomy. This study presented two gastric cancer cases with cystic liver metastasis treated in Wuxi People＇s Hospital from September 2008 to November 2012. The two female patients were 66 and 65 years old, respectively. Poorly differentiated ulcerated adenocarcinoma classified as stage III B [Tumor, Node, and Metastasis Classification （T4aN2MQ）] and clinical manifestations of abdominal distension and ascites were detected in both patients. Cyst fluids were subjected to cy- tological analysis. Results confirmed the presence of liver metastasis of gastric cancer. The two patients benefited from local intracavitary chemotherapy or systemic intravenous chemotherapy.

Pembrolizumab in patients with gastric cancer and liver metastases: A paradigm shift in immunotherapy

In this editorial,we explore the impact of immunotherapy and its safety in pa-tients with advanced gastric cancer(GC)and liver involvement.GC,a formidable adversary in the oncology landscape,presents its most challenging battlefront when it reaches stage IV,often characterized by liver metastases.The prognosis for patients at this advanced stage is daunting,with systemic chemotherapy tra-ditionally offering a median overall survival slightly over a year.However,the landscape of treatment is evolving,with new strategies and therapies offering a glimmer of hope.

Treatment strategy and therapy based on immune response in patients with gastric cancers

In this editorial,we highlight the significance of a retrospective study“Analysis of the impact of immunotherapy efficacy and safety in patients with gastric cancer and liver metastasis”performed by Liu et al.The authors utilized data collected from gastric cancer(GC)patients and assessed immunotherapy effectiveness and survival status.They found significant differences in treatment response.Because immunotherapy seems to be a beneficial strategy for advanced GC patients,strati-fication of the data based on metastasis status may further improve treatment strategies.

Surgical treatment of gastric cancer:Current status and future directions

Surgery is the most important and effective method for the treatment of gastric cancer.Since the first gastrectomy in the early 19th century,surgical treatment of gastric cancer has undergone more than 100 years of development.With the increasing understanding of gastric cancer and the promotion of a series of clinical trials,the concept of gastric cancer surgery has evolved from the initial"bigger is better"to today’s"standardized surgery"and is developing towards individualized surgery focusing on accurate resection and quality of life.This trend has had a tremendous impact on the development of surgical treatments,such as minimally invasive surgeries,functionpreserving surgeries,and the optimal extent of lymph node dissection.Understanding the development and current status of gastric cancer surgery and exploring the remaining academic controversies are goals that every gastric surgeon should constantly pursue.However,how should gastric cancer surgery develop in the future?What opportunities and challenges will we encounter?In this review,we elaborate on the development and current status of gastric cancer surgery based on a series of clinical studies and discuss the controversy in the development of gastric cancer surgery.

Do liver metastases from gastric cancer contraindicate aggressive surgical resection?A 14-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND Advanced gastric cancer(GC)with liver metastasis is often characterized by multiple and bilobular metastases and may also be associated with extrahepatic metastatic lesions.Hence,many physicians consider that radical surgeries are contraindicated for liver metastases from GC(LMGC).According to the 2017 Japanese treatment guideline for GC,a smaller number of liver metastases without unresectable factors may be an indication for liver resection(LR)with curability.The actual 5-year overall survival(OS)rate ranges from 0 to 0.37.AIM To present the institutional indications for LR for LMGC and identify important factors for prognostic outcomes.METHODS In total,30 patients underwent LR for LMGC during a 14-year period,and we evaluated the clinical,surgical,and oncological findings.In all patients,radical surgery with intentional lymphadenectomy was performed for the primary GC.The median follow-up duration after the initial LR was 33.7 mo,and three patients with no recurrence died of causes unrelated to the LMGC.The OS and recurrence-free survival rates after the initial LR were assessed.RESULTS Seventeen patients had metachronous LMGC.The initial LR achieved curability in 29 patients.Perioperative chemotherapy was introduced in 23 patients.The median greatest LMGC dimension was 30 mm,and the median number of LMGC was two.Twenty-two patients had unilobular LMGC.The 5-year OS and recurrence-free survival rates were 0.48 and 0.28,respectively.The median survival duration and recurrence-free duration after the initial LR were 16.8 and 8.6 mo,respectively.Twenty-one patients developed recurrence after the initial LR.Additional surgeries for recurrence were performed in nine patients,and these surgeries clearly prolonged the patients’survival.Pathological serosal invasion was an independent predictor of a poor prognostic outcome after the initial LR.Aggressive LR may be indicated for carefully selected patients with LMGC.CONCLUSION Our results of LR for LMGC seem acceptable.Additional surgeries for recurrence after the initial LR might prolong OS.Pathological serosal invasion is important for poor prognostic outcomes.

Predictive factors improving survival after gastric and hepatic surgical treatment in gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases

Background The prognosis for patients with gastric cancer and synchronous liver metastases is very poor.However,a standard therapeutic strategy has not been well established.The clinical benefit and prognostic factors after hepatic surgical treatment for liver metastases from gastric cancer remain controversial.Methods Records of 105 patients who underwent gastrectomy regardless of hepatic surgical treatment for gastric cancer with synchronous liver-only metastases in our center between 1995 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed.Results The overall survival rate for the 105 patients was 42.1%,17.2%,and 10.6% at 1,2,and 3 years,respectively,with a median survival time of 11 months.Multivariate survival analysis revealed that the extent of lymphadenectomy （D） （P 〈0.001）,lymph node metastases （P 〈0.001）,extent of liver metastases （H） （P=0.008）,and lymphovascular invasion （P=-0.002） were significant independent prognostic factors for survival.Among patients who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy,those who underwent hepatic surgical treatment had a significantly improved survival compared with those who underwent gastrectomy alone （median survival,24 vs.12 months; P 〈0.001）.However,hepatic surgical treatment was not a prognostic factor for patients who underwent D1 lymphadenectomy （median survival,8 vs.8 months;P=0.495）.For the 35 patients who underwent gastrectomy plus hepatic surgical treatment,D2 lymphadenectomy （P 〈0.001）,lymph node metastases （P=-0.015）,and extent of liver metastases （H1 vs.H2 and H3） （P=-0.017） were independent significant prognostic factors for survival.Conclusions D2 lymphadenectomy plus hepatic surgical treatment may provide hope for long-term survival of judiciously selected patients with hepatic metastases from gastric cancer.Patients with a low degree of lymph node metastases and H1 liver metastases would make the most appropriate candidates.However,if D2 dissection cannot be achieved,hepatic surgical treatment is not recommended.

Liver metastasis is the only independent prognostic factor in AFP-producing gastric cancer

AIM:To investigate differences between common gastric cancer andα-fetoprotein(AFP)-producing gastric cancer according to the presence or absence of liver metastasis.METHODS:Between 1997 and 2011,1299 patients underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer(GC)at our institute and their hospital records were reviewed retrospectively.Patients were immunohistochemically divided into two groups:23 patients(1.8%)with AFPproducing GC and 1276 patients(98.2%)without it.RESULTS:AFP-producing GC patients had a significantly higher incidence of deeper tumors,venous invasion,lymphatic invasion,lymph node metastasis,and liver metastasis and a poorer prognosis(P<0.005)than those without AFP-producing GC.However,multi-variate analysis revealed that AFP-positivity was not an independent prognostic factor.The prognosis of AFPproducing GC was similar to that of AFP-non producing GC according to the presence or absence of liver metastasis.Concerning recurrence,47.8%of patients(11/23)with AFP-producing GC and 20.0%of patients(256/1276)without AFP-producing GC exhibited recurrence.Liver metastasis[90.9%(10/11)]was the most prevalent in AFP-producing GC patients.Multivariate analysis revealed that liver metastasis was the only independent prognostic factor in AFP-producing GC(HR=17.6,95%CI:2.1-147.1;P=0.0081).CONCLUSION:AFP-producing GC is similar to common GC without liver metastasis,which should be specifically targeted in an effort to improve the prognosis of AFP-producing GC patients.

CXCR7/CXCL12 axis is involved in lymph node and liver metastasis of gastric carcinoma

AIM To investigate the role of CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR)-7 and CXCL12 in lymph node and liver metastasis of gastric carcinoma. METHODS In 160 cases of gastric cancer, the expression of CXCR7 and CXCL12 in tumor and matched tumoradjacent non-cancer tissues, in the lymph nodes around the stomach and in the liver was detected using immunohistochemistry to analyze the relationship between CXCR7/CXCL12 expression and clinicopathological features and to determine whether CXCR7 and CXCL12 constitute a biological axis to promote lymph node and liver metastasis of gastric cancer. Furthermore, the CXCR7 gene was silenced and overexpressed in human gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells, and cell proliferation, migration and invasiveness were measured by the MTT, wound healing and Transwell assays, respectively. RESULTS CXCR7 expression was up-regulated in gastric cancer tissues (P = 0.011). CXCR7/CXCL12 expression was significantly related to high tumor stage and lymph node (r = 0.338, P = 0.000) and liver metastasis (r = 0.629, P = 0.000). The expression of CXCL12 in lymph node and liver metastasis was higher than that in primary gastric cancer tissues (chi(2) = 6.669, P = 0.010; chi(2) = 25379, P = 0.000), and the expression of CXCL12 in lymph node and liver metastasis of gastric cancer was consistent with the positive expression of CXCR7 in primary gastric cancer (r = 0.338, P = 0.000; r = 0.629, P = 0.000). Overexpression of the CXCR7 gene promoted cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Silencing of the CXCR7 gene suppressed SGC-7901 cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Human gastric cancer cell lines expressed CXCR7 and showed vigorous proliferation and migratory responses to CXCL12. CONCLUSION The CXCR7/CXCL12 axis is involved in lymph node and liver metastasis of gastric cancer. CXCR7 is considered a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of gastric cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF ANGIOGENESISINHIBITOR TNP-470 ON THE GROWTH AND METASTASISOF GASTRIC CANCER IN VIVO

Objective: To study the effect of angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 on the growth and metastasis of gastric cancer in vivo. Methods: Metastatic model simulating human gastric cancer was established by orthotopic implantation of histologically intact tumor tissue into gastric wall of nude mice. TNP-470 was administrated S.C. at doses of 0 mg/kg, 15 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg every other day for eight weeks. Ten weeks after implantation, the mice were sacrificed and the tumor size measured and the presence of metastasis recorded. The microvascular density was examined by immunohistochemical staining with anti-human factor VIII antibody. Results: Compared to the untreated controls, growth of the orthotopically implanted tumor was significantly reduced in size in the mice treated with TNP-470 with an inhibition rate of 59.9%, 77.0% and 84.9% at the dosage of 15 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg, respectively. Tumor metastasis to the liver and peritoneum was also significantly inhibited in a dose-dependent manner. The microvascular density was also decreased significantly in the treated mice. Conclusion: Angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 has strong inhibitory effect both on tumor growth and metastasis of human gastric cancer in nude mice.

Review of surgical strategies in gastric cancer

Successful and effective management of gastric cancer involves a multidisciplinary approach.Accurate and appropriate staging of gastric cancer is mandatory to define the optimum treatment strategy.Safe surgery achieving R0 resection is considered potentially curative.Surgery remains the cornerstone of multimodal therapy.There is a well-defined role for neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.Newermedications and chemotherapy combinations have improved tumor response rates,which have translated into more effective surgery and reduced local recurrences and improved long-term survivals.

Current status and progress in gastric cancer with liver metastasis

Objective This review discusses the current status and progress in studies on gastric cancer with liver metastasis （GCLM）, involving the routes, subtypes, and prognosis of GCLM; the genes and molecules associated with metastasis;the feasibility and value of each imaging modality; and current treatment options.Data sources The data used in this review were mainly from Medline and PubMed published in English from 2005 to August 2010. The search terms were ＂gastric cancer＂ and ＂liver metastasis＂.Study selection Articles regarding the characteristics, diagnostic modalities, and vadous therapeutic options of GCLM were selected.Results The prognosis of GCLM is influenced by the clinicopathological characteristics of primary tumors, as well as the presence of liver metastases. Improved understanding of related genes and molecules will lead to the development of methods of early detection and targeted therapies. For the diagnosis of GCLM, each imaging modality has its relative benefits. There remains no consensus regarding therapeutic options.Conclusions Early detection and characterization of liver metastases is crucial for the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Multidisciplinary team discussions are required to design optimal treatment strategies, which should be based on the clinicopathological characteristics of each patient.

Wingless/It/β-catenin signaling in liver metastasis from colorectal cancer:A focus on biological mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities

The liver is the most common site of metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.Colorectal liver metastases(CRLMs)are the result of molecular mechanisms that involve different cells of the liver microenvironment.The aberrant activation of Wingless/It(Wnt)/β-catenin signals downstream of Wnt ligands initially drives the oncogenic transformation of the colon epithelium,but also the progression of metastatization through the epithelial-mesenchymal transition/mesenchymalepithelial transition interactions.In liver microenvironment,metastatic cells can also survive and adapt through dormancy,which makes them less susceptible to pro-apoptotic signals and therapies.Treatment of CRLMs is challenging due to its variability and heterogeneity.Advances in surgery and oncology have been made in the last decade and a pivotal role for Wnt/β-catenin pathway has been recognized in chemoresistance.At the state of art,there is a lack of clear understanding of why and how this occurs and thus where exactly the opportunities for developing anti-CRLMs therapies may lie.In this review,current knowledge on the involvement of Wnt signaling in the development of CRLMs was considered.In addition,an overview of useful biomarkers with a revision of surgical and non-surgical therapies currently accepted in the clinical practice for colorectal liver metastasis patients were provided.

Surgical treatment of liver cancer and pancreatic cancer under the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups payment system

BACKGROUND Data from the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer reported that China had the highest prevalence of cancer and cancer deaths in 2022.Liver and pancreatic cancers accounted for the highest number of new cases.Real-world data(RWD)is now widely preferred to traditional clinical trials in various fields of medicine and healthcare,as the traditional research approach often involves highly selected populations and interventions and controls that are strictly regulated.Additionally,research results from the RWD match global reality better than those from traditional clinical trials.AIM To analyze the cost disparity between surgical treatments for liver and pancreatic cancer under various factors.METHODS This study analyzed RWD 1137 cases within the HB1 group(patients who underwent pancreatectomy,hepatectomy,and/or shunt surgery)in 2023.It distinguished different expenditure categories,including medical,nursing,technical,management,drug,and consumable costs.Additionally,it assessed the contribution of each expenditure category to total hospital costs and performed cross-group comparisons using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test.This study used the Steel–Dwass test for post-hoc multiple comparisons and the Spearman correlation coefficient to examine the relationships between variables.RESULTS The study found that in HB11 and HB13,the total hospitalization costs were significantly higher for pancreaticoduodenectomy than for pancreatectomy and hepatectomy.Although no significant difference was observed in the length of hospital stay between patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and pancreatectomy,both were significantly longer than those who underwent liver resection.In HB15,no significant difference was observed in the total cost of hospitalization between pancreaticoduodenectomy and pancreatectomy;however,both were significantly higher than those in hepatectomy.Additionally,the length of hospital stay was significantly longer for patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy than for those who underwent pancreatectomy or liver resection.CONCLUSION China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups payment system positively impacts liver and pancreatic cancer surgeries by improving medical quality and controlling costs.Further research could refine this grouping system and ensure continuous effectiveness and sustainability.

Does the discrepancy in histologic differentiation between a forceps biopsy and an endoscopic specimen necessitate additional surgery in early gastric cancer?

To investigate the clinicopathological variables in early gastric cancer (EGC) patients in relation to differentiation discrepancy. METHODSThe data of 265 specimens from 240 patients with EGC, who had undergone radical operation at Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital from 2010 to 2015, were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological data according to histological discrepancy. RESULTSClinically significant discrepancy rate showed the difference in differentiated type (well and moderately differentiated) and undifferentiated type (poorly differentiated and signet ring cell) between endoscopic biopsies and postoperative specimens was 9.4% (25/265). There were no differences in tumor location, size, gross pattern, and number of biopsies. Specimens having histological discrepancy showed more submucosal invasion (72.0% vs 49.6%, P = 0.033) and lymph node involvement (24.0% vs 7.9%, P = 0.009) than specimens having non-discrepancy. The rate of a positive epidermal growth factor receptor status was higher in specimens having discrepancy than in specimens having non-discrepancy (81.0% vs 55.4%, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONThe discordance of histologic differentiation is associated with higher submucosal invasion and lymph node metastases in EGC. Patients have histological discrepancy may require additional surgical treatments.