Retrospective analysis of interventional treatment of hepatic metastasis from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Objective： To analyze the angiography appearance of liver metastases from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors （GEP-NETs）, and evaluate the clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of interventional treatment for hepatic metastases. Methods： Fifty GEP-NETs patients with hepatic metastases were treated from January 2012 to December 2016, and received transarterial embolization （TAE） in the hepatic tumor or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy （HAIC）. All patients received 179 times of the intervention therapy in total. Results： Blood supplies were identified in the 50 eases with angiography, which showed that 35 cases had abundant vessels, while 15 eases had poor blood supply. Twenty-two cases were found either collateral blood supply, or portal vein invasion or arterial-portal vein fistula. The best curative efficacy was complete remission （CR） in 4 cases, partial remission （PR） in 28 cases and stable disease （SD） in 18 eases during the process of treatment. The angiography （P=0.047） and the frequency of intervention （P=0.037） showed significantly statistical difference with Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox analysis showed that more than 3 times of interventional therapy was an independent prognostic factor. Conclusions： Interventional treatment is safe and effective for GEP-NETs, and is beneficial to patients with main hepatic metastases after endocrine therapy.

New therapeutic approaches to metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors:A glimpse into the future

Neuroendocrine(NE) gastroenteropancreatic tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplasias arising from neuroendocrine cells of the embryological gut. Their incidence have increased significantly over the past 3 decades probably due to the improvements in imaging and diagnosis. The recent advances in molecular biology have translated into an expansion of therapeutic approaches to these patients. Somatostatin analogs, which initially were approved for control of hormonal syndromes, have recently been proven to inhibit tumor growth. Several new drugs such as antiangiogenics and others targeting mammalian target of rapamycin pathways have been approved to treat progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(NETs) although their role in nonpancreatic is still controversial. The treatment of NETs requires a coordinated multidisciplinary approach. The management of localized NETs primarily involves surgical resection followed by surveillance. However, the treatment of unresectable and/or metastatic disease may involve a combination of surgical resection, systemic therapy, and liver-directed therapies with the goal of alleviating symptoms of peptide release and controlling tumor growth. This article will review the current therapeutic strategies for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic NETs and will take a glimpse into the future approaches.

Temozolomide and capecitabine regimen as first-line treatment in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at a Latin American reference center

BACKGROUND Numerous studies have indicated that the temozolomide and capecitabine regimen(TEMCAP)exhibits a certain level of efficacy in treating advanced,welldifferentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(GEP-NET).However,published data from Peru are limited.We hypothesize that this regimen could be a viable therapeutic option for advanced GEP-NET in the Peruvian population.AIM To evaluate overall survival(OS)in patients diagnosed with advanced GEP-NET treated with TEMCAP at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas(INEN)in Lima-Perú.METHODS A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients with GEP-NEN treated with the TEMCAP regimen between 2011 and 2021 at the INEN.A total of thirtyeight patients were included in the final analysis:Thirty-five received TEMCAP as a first-line treatment,and three as a second-line treatment.The primary objective was to evaluate OS.The efficacy and safety of TEMCAP were assessed until the occurrence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.RESULTS The median age of the patients was 52 years(range 24-77 years),and 53.3%were female.The most common symptoms at diagnosis were abdominal pain in 31 patients(81.6%).Primary tumors included 12 in the rectum(31.6%),11 in the pancreas(28.9%),3 in the ileum(7.9%),2 in the mesentery(5.3%),2 in the small intestine(5.3%),1 in the appendix(2.6%),1 in the stomach(2.6%)and 6 cases of liver metastasis of unknown primary(15.8%).Five were neuroendocrine tumors(NET)G1(13.2%),33 were NET G2(86.8%),five had Ki67<3%(13.2%),and 33 had Ki67 between 3%and 20%(86.8%).TEMCAP was administered to 35(92.1%)patients as first-line treatment.OS at 12,36,and 60 months was estimated in 80%,66%,and 42%,respectively,with a median OS of 49 months.CONCLUSION TEMCAP therapy is a viable first-line option regarding efficacy and tolerability in areas where standard therapy is inaccessible.

Current status and future of targeted peptide receptor radionuclide positron emission tomography imaging and therapy of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors

Theranostics is the highly targeted molecular imaging and therapy of tumors.Targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has taken the lead in demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of this molecular approach to treating cancers.Metastatic,well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may be most effectively imaged and treated with DOTATATE ligands.We review the current practice,safety,advantages,and limitations of DOTATATE based theranostics.Finally,we briefly describe the exciting new areas of development and future directions of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor theranostics.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Therapeutic challenges and research limitations

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(PNETs)are known to be the second most common epithelial malignancy of the pancreas.PNETs can be listed among the slowest growing as well as the fastest growing human cancers.The prevalence of PNETs is deceptively low;however,its incidence has significantly increased over the past decades.According to the American Cancer Society’s estimate,about 4032(>7%of all pancreatic malignancies)individuals will be diagnosed with PNETs in 2020.PNETs often cause severe morbidity due to excessive secretion of hormones(such as serotonin)and/or overall tumor mass.Patients can live for many years(except for those patients with poorly differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors);thus,the prevalence of the tumors that is the number of patients actually dealing with the disease at any given time is fairly high because the survival is much longer than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Due to significant heterogeneity,the management of PNETs is very complex and remains an unmet clinical challenge.In terms of research studies,modest improvements have been made over the past decades in the identification of potential oncogenic drivers in order to enhance the quality of life and increase survival for this growing population of patients.Unfortunately,the majority of systematic therapies approved for the management of advanced stage PNETs lack objective response or at most result in modest benefits in survival.In this review,we aim to discuss the broad challenges associated with the management and the study of PNETs.

Neuroendocrine liver metastases: a contemporary review of treatment strategies

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors(NETs)are globally increasing in prevalence and the liver is the most common site of metastasis.Neuroendocrine liver metastases(NELM)are heterogeneous in clinical presentation and prognosis.Fortunately,recent advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies have improved the multidisciplinary management of this challenging condition.When feasible,surgical resection of NELM offers the best long-term outcomes.General indications for hepatic resection include performance status acceptable for major liver surgery,grade 1 or 2 tumors,absence of extrahepatic disease,adequate size and function of future liver remnant,and feasibility of resecting>90%of metastases.Adjunct therapies including concomitant liver ablation are generally safe when used appropriately and may expand the number of patients eligible for surgery.Among patients with synchronous resectable NELM,resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended.For patients who are not surgical candidates,liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization,chemoembolization,and radioembolization can provide locoregional control and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome.Multiple systemic therapy options also exist for patients with advanced or progressive disease.Ongoing research efforts are needed to identify novel biomarkers that will define the optimal indications for and sequencing of treatments to be delivered in a personalized fashion.