Advances and challenges of gastrostomy insertion in children

When oral feeding cannot provide adequate nutritional support to children,enteral tube feeding becomes a necessity.The overall aim is to ultimately promote appropriate growth,improve the patient’s quality of life and increase carer satisfaction.Nasogastric tube feeding is considered appropriate on a short-term basis.Alternatively,gastrostomy feeding offers a more convenient and safer feeding option especially as it does not require frequent replacements,and carries a lower risk of complications.Gastrostomy tube feeding should be considered when nasogastric tube feeding is required for more than 2-3 wk as per the ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition.Several techniques can be used to insert gastrostomies in children including endoscopic,image guided and surgical gastrostomy insertion whether open or laparoscopic.Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages.The timing of gastrostomy insertion,device choice and method of insertion is dependent on the local expertise,patient requirements and family preference,and should be individualized with a multidisciplinary team approach.We aim to review gastrostomy insertion in children including indications,contraindications,history of gastrostomy,insertion techniques and complications.

Time trends and outcomes of gastrostomy placement in a Swedish national cohort over two decades

BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG)and laparoscopically inserted gastrostomy have become the gold standard for adult patients and children,respectively,requiring long-term enteral nutrition support.Procedure-related mortality is a rare event,often reported to be zero in smaller studies.National data on 30-d mortality and long-term survival rates after gastrostomy placement are scarce in the literature.AIM To study the use of gastrostomies in Sweden from 1998-2019 and to analyze procedure-related mortality and short-term(<30 d)and long-term survival.METHODS In this retrospective,population-based cohort study,individuals that had received a gastrostomy between 1998-2019 in Sweden were included.Individuals were identified in the Swedish National Patient Register,and survival analysis was possible by cross-referencing the Swedish Death Register.The cohort was divided into three age groups:Children(0-18 years);adults(19-64 years);and elderly(≥65 years).Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test and Cox regression were used for survival analysis.RESULTS In total 48682 individuals(52%males,average age 60.9±25.3 years)were identified.The cohort consisted of 12.0%children,29.5%adults,and 58.5%elderly.An increased use of gastrostomies was observed during the study period,from 13.7/100000 to 22.3/100000 individuals(P<0.001).The use of PEG more than doubled(about 800 to 1800/year),with a corresponding decrease in open gastrostomy(about 700 to 340/year).Laparoscopic gastrostomy increased more than ten-fold(about 20 to 240/year).Overall,PEG,open gastrostomy,and laparoscopic gastrostomy constituted 70.0%(n=34060),23.3%(n=11336),and 4.9%(n=2404),respectively.Procedure-related mortality was 0.1%(n=44)overall(PEG:0.05%,open:0.24%,laparoscopic:0.04%).The overall 30-d mortality rate was 10.0%(PEG:9.8%,open:12.4%,laparoscopic:1.7%)and decreased from 11.6%in 1998-2009 vs 8.5%in 2010-2019(P<0.001).One-year and ten-year survival rates for children,adults,and elderly were 93.7%,67.5%,and 42.1%and 79.9%,39.2%,and 6.8%,respectively.The most common causes of death were malignancies and cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.CONCLUSION The annual use of gastrostomies in Sweden increased during the study period,with a shift towards more minimally invasive procedures.Although procedure-related death was rare,the overall 30-d mortality rate was high(10%).To overcome this,we believe that patient selection should be improved.

Endoscopic vs radiologic gastrostomy for enteral feeding:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG)and percutaneous radiological gastrostomy(PRG)are minimally invasive techniques commonly used for prolonged enteral nutrition.Despite safe,both techniques may lead to complications,such as bleeding,infection,pain,peritonitis,and tube-related complications.The literature is unclear on which technique is the safest.AIM To establish which approach has the lowest complication rate.METHODS A database search was performed from inception through November 2022,and comparative studies of PEG and PRG were selected following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.All included studies compared the two techniques directly and provided absolute values of the number of complications.Studies with pediatric populations were excluded.The primary outcome of this study was infection and bleeding.Pneumonia,peritonitis,pain,and mechanical complications were secondary outcomes.The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials(RoB2)and we used The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies(ROBINS-I)to analyze the retrospective studies.We also performed GRADE analysis to assess the quality of evidence.Data on risk differences and 95%confidence intervals were obtained using the Mantel-Haenszel test.RESULTS Seventeen studies were included,including two randomized controlled trials and fifteen retrospective cohort studies.The total population was 465218 individuals,with 273493 having undergone PEG and 191725 PRG.The only outcome that showed a significant difference was tube related complications in retrospective studies favoring PEG(95%CI:0.03 to 0.08;P<0.00001),although this outcome did not show significant difference in randomized studies(95%CI:-0.07 to 0.04;P=0.13).There was no difference in the analyses of the following outcomes:infection in retrospective(95%CI:-0.01 to 0.00;P<0.00001)or randomized(95%CI:-0.06 to 0.04;P=0.44)studies;bleeding in retrospective(95%CI:-0.00 to 0.00;P<0.00001)or randomized(95%CI:-0.06 to 0.02;P=0.43)studies;pneumonia in retrospective(95%CI:-0.04 to 0.00;P=0.28)or randomized(95%CI:-0.09 to 0.11;P=0.39)studies;pain in retrospective(95%CI:-0.05 to 0.02;P<0.00001)studies;peritonitis in retrospective(95%CI:-0.02 to 0.01;P<0.0001)studies.CONCLUSION PEG has lower levels of tube-related complications(such as dislocation,leak,obstruction,or breakdown)when compared to PRG.

“Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality,complications,or outcomes”:Commentary

In this commentary,we summarize some of the key points of the original paper“Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality,complications,or outcomes”and offer support for the proposed results.Specifically,we address how early percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG)tube placement may reduce hospital length of stay and costs.We also discuss topics related to the article including PEG weaning and post-stroke nutritional formulation.However,we note that concerns purported by previous studies that early PEG placement may worsen outcomes are not fully addressed,and further research is needed.

How far is the endoscopist to blame for a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complication?

BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG)is a well-established,minimally invasive,and easy to perform procedure for nutrition delivery,applied to individuals unable to swallow for various reasons.PEG has a high technical success rate of insertion between 95%and 100%in experienced hands,but varying complication rates ranging from 0.4%to 22.5%of cases.AIM To discuss the existing evidence of major procedural complications in PEG,mainly focusing on those that could probably have been avoided,had the endoscopist been more experienced,or less self-confident in relation to the basic safety rules for PEG performance.METHODS After a thorough research of the international literature of a period of more than 30 years of published“case reports”concerning such complications,we critically analyzed only those complications which were considered-after assessment by two experts in PEG performance working separately-to be directly related to a form of malpractice by the endoscopist.RESULTS Malpractice by the endoscopist were considered cases of:Gastrostomy tubes passed through the colon or though the left lateral liver lobe,bleeding after puncture injury of large vessels of the stomach or the peritoneum,peritonitis after viscera damage,and injuries of the esophagus,spleen,and pancreas.CONCLUSION For a safe PEG insertion,the overfilling of the stomach and small bowel with air should be avoided,the clinician should check thoroughly for the proper trans-illumination of the light source of the endoscope through the abdominal wall and ensure endoscopically visible imprint of finger palpation on the skin at the center of the site of maximum illumination,and finally,the physician should be more alert with obese patients and those with previous abdominal surgery.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy—Too often?Too late?Who are the right patients for gastrostomy?

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is an established method to provide nutrition to patients with restricted oral uptake of fluids and calories.Here,we review the methods,indications and complications of this procedure.While gastrostomy can be safely and easily performed during gastroscopy,the right patients and timing for this intervention are not always chosen.Especially in patients with dementia,the indication for and timing of gastrostomies are often improper.In this patient group,clear data for enteral nutrition are lacking;however,some evidence suggests that patients with advanced dementia do not benefit,whereas patients with mild to moderate dementia might benefit from early enteral nutrition.Additionally,other patient groups with temporary or permanent restriction of oral uptake might be a useful target population for early enteral nutrition to maintain mobilization and muscle strength.We plead for a coordinated study program for these patient groups to identify suitable patients and the best timing for tube implantation.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy:Indications and techniques

Nutritional support is essential in patients who have a limited capability to maintain their body weight.Therefore,oral feeding is the main approach for such patients.When physiological nutrition is not possible,positioning of a nasogastric,nasojejunal tube,or other percutaneous devices may be feasible alternatives.Creating a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG)is a suitable option to be evaluated for patients that need nutritional support for more than 4 wk.Many diseases require nutritional support by PEG,with neurological,oncological,and catabolic diseases being the most common.PEG can be performed endoscopically by various techniques,radiologically or surgically,with different outcomes and related adverse events(AEs).Moreover,some patients that need a PEG placement are fragile and are unable to express their will or sign a written informed consent.These conditions highlight many ethical problems that become difficult to manage as treatment progresses.The aim of this manuscript is to review all current endoscopic techniques for percutaneous access,their indications,postprocedural follow-up,and AEs.

Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes

BACKGROUND Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy(PEG)tubes are often placed for dysphagia following a stroke in order to maintain sufficient caloric intake.The 2011 ASGE guidelines recommend delaying PEG tube placement for two weeks,as half of patients with dysphagia improve within 2 wk.There are few studies comparing outcomes based on timing of PEG tube placement,and there is increasing demand for early PEG tube placement to meet requirements for timely discharge to rehab and skilled nursing facilities.AIM To assess the safety of early(≤7 d post stroke)vs late(>7 d post stroke)PEG tube placement and evaluate whether pre-procedural risk factors could predict mortality or complications.METHODS We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing PEG tube placement for dysphagia following a stroke at two hospitals in Saint Louis,MO between January 2011 and December 2017.Patients were identified by keyword search of endoscopy reports.Mortality,peri-procedural complication rates,and post-procedural complication rates were compared in both groups.Predictors of morbidity and mortality such as protein-calorie malnutrition,presence of an independent cardiovascular risk equivalent,and presence of Systemic inflammatory response syndrome(SIRS)criteria or documented infection were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression.RESULTS 154 patients had a PEG tube placed for dysphagia following a stroke,92 in the late group and 62 in the early group.There were 32 observed deaths,with 8 occurring within 30 d of the procedure.There was an increase in peri-procedural and post-procedural complications with delayed PEG placement which was not statistically significant.Hospital length of stay was significantly less in patients with early PEG tube placement(12.9 vs 22.34 d,P<0.001).Protein calorie malnutrition,presence of SIRS criteria and/or documented infection prior to procedure or having a cardiovascular disease risk equivalent did not significantly predict mortality or complications.CONCLUSION Early PEG tube placement following a stroke did not result in a higher rate of mortality or complications and significantly decreased hospital length of stay.Given similar safety outcomes in both groups,early PEG tube placement should be considered in the appropriate patient to potentially reduce length of hospital stay and incurred costs.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy:Indications,technique,complications and management

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the preferred route of feeding and nutritional support in patients with a functional gastrointestinal system who require long-term enteral nutrition. Besides its well-known advantages over parenteral nutrition, PEG offers superior access to the gastrointestinal system over surgical methods. Considering that nowadays PEG tube placement is one of the most common endoscopic procedures performed worldwide, knowing its indications and contraindications is of paramount importance in current medicine. PEG tubes are sometimes placed inappropriately in patients unable to tolerate adequate oral intake because of incorrect and unrealistic understanding of their indications and what they can accomplish. Broadly, the two main indications of PEG tube placement are enteral feeding and stomach decompression. On the other hand, distal enteral obstruction, severe uncorrectable coagulopathy and hemodynamic instability constitute the main absolute contraindications for PEG tube placement in hospitalized patients. Although generally considered to be a safe procedure, there is the potential for both minor and major complications. Awareness of these potential complications, as well as understanding routine aftercare of the catheter, can improve the quality of care for patients with a PEG tube. These complications can generally be classified into three major categories: endoscopic technical difficulties, PEG procedure-related complications and late complications associated with PEG tube use and wound care. In this review we describe a variety of minor and major tube-related complications as well as strategies for their management and avoidance. Different methods of percutaneous PEG tube placement into the stomach have been described in the literature with the &#x0201c;pull&#x0201d; technique being the most common method. In the last section of this review, the reader is presented with a brief discussion of these procedures, techniques and related issues. Despite the mentioned PEG tube placement complications, this procedure has gained worldwide popularity as a safe enteral access for nutrition in patients with a functional gastrointestinal system.

Effect of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically-ventilated patients

AIM： To investigate the effect of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy （PEG） on gastroesophageal reflux （GER） in mechanically-ventilated patients. METHODS ： In a prospective, randomized, controlled study 36 patients with recurrent or persistent ventilatorassociated pneumonia （VAP） and GER 〉 6% were divided into PEG group （n=16） or non-PEG group （n = 20）. Another 11 ventilated patients without reflux （GER 〈 3%） served as control group. Esophageal pH-metry was performed by the ＂pull through＂ method at baseline, 2 and 7 d after PEG. Patients were strictly followed up for semi-recumbent position and control of gastric nutrient residue. RESULTS： A significant decrease of median （range） reflux was observed in PEG group from 7.8 （6.2-15.6） at baseline to 2.7 （0-10.4） on d 7 post-gastrostomy （P 〈 0.01）, while the reflux increased from 9 （6.2-22） to 10.8 （6.3-36.6） （P〈 0.01） in non-PEG group. A significant correlation between GER （%） and the stay of nasogastric tube was detected （r= 0.56, P〈 0.01）. CONCLUSION： Gastrostomy when combined with semi- recumbent position and absence of nutrient gastric residue reduces the gastroesophageal reflux in ventilated patients.

Buried bumper syndrome:A complication of percutaneousendoscopic gastrostomy

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG) is a widely used method of nutrition delivery for patients with longterm insufficiency of oral intake. The PEG complication rate varies from 0.4% to 22.5% of cases, with minor complications being three times more frequent. Buried bumper syndrome(BBS) is a severe complication of this method, in which the internal fixation device migrates alongside the tract of the stoma outside the stomach. Excessive compression of tissue between the external and internal fixation device of the gastrostomy tube is considered the main etiological factor leading to BBS. Incidence of BBS is estimated at around 1%(0.3%-2.4%). Inability to insert, loss of patency and leakage around the PEG tube are considered to be a typical symptomatic triad. Gastroscopy is indicated in all cases in which BBS is suspected. The depth of disc migration in relation to the lamina muscularis propria of the stomach is critical for further therapy and can be estimated by endoscopic or transabdominal ultrasound. BBS can be complicated by gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, peritonitis, intra-abdominal and abdominal wall abscesses, or phlegmon, and these complications can lead to fatal outcomes. The most important preventive measure is adequate positioning of the external bolster. A conservative approach should be applied only in patients with high operative risk and dismal prognosis. Choice of the method of release is based on the type of the PEG set and depth of disc migration. A disc retained inside the stomach and completely covered by the overgrowing tissue can be released using some type of endoscopic dissection technique(needle knife, argon plasma coagulation, or papillotome through the cannula). Proper patient selection and dissection of the overgrowing tissue are the major determinants for successful endoscopic therapy. A disc localized out of the stomach(lamina muscularis propria) should be treated by a surgeon.

Investigation and prediction of enteral nutrition problems after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

AIM： To investigate and predict enteral nutrition problems after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy （PEG）. METHODS： We retrospectively analyzed data for 252 out of 285 patients who underwent PEG at our hospital from 1999 to 2008 after PEG were defined as： Enteral nutrition problems （1） patients who required ≥ 1 mo after surgery to switch to complete enteral nutrition, or who required additional parenteral alimentation continuously; or （2） patients who abandoned switching to enteral nutrition using the gastrostoma and employed other nutritional methods. We attempted to identify the predictors of problem cases by using a logistic regression analysis that examined the patients＇ backgrounds and the specific causes that led to their problems. RESULTS： Mean age of the patients was 75 years, and in general, their body weight was low and their overall condition was markedly poor. Blood testing revealed that patients tended to be anemic and malnourished. A total of 44 patients （17.5%） were diagnosed as having enteral nutrition problems after PEG. Major causes of the problems included pneumonia, acute enterocolitis （often Clostridium difficile-related）, paralytic ileus and biliary tract infection. A multivariate analysis identified the following independent predictors for problem cases： （1） enteral nutrition before gastrectomy （a risk reduction factor）; （2） presence of esophageal hiatal hernia; （3） past history of paralytic ileus; and （4） presence of chronic renal dysfunction. CONCLUSION： Enteral nutrition problems after PEG occurred at a comparatively high rate. Patient background analysis elucidated four predictive factors for the problem cases.

Laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy enables enteral nutrition even in patients with distorted anatomy

AIM:To analyzed whether laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG)could be a valuable option for patients with complicated anatomy.METHODS:A retrospective analysis of twelve patients(seven females,five males;six children,six young adults;mean age 19.2 years)with cerebral palsy,spastic quadriparesis,severe kyphoscoliosis and interposed organs and who required enteral nutrition(EN)due to starvation was performed.For all patients,standard PEG placement was impossible due to distorted anatomy.All the patients qualified for the laparoscopyassisted PEG procedure.RESULTS:In all twelve patients,the laparoscopy-assisted PEG was successful,and EN was introduced four to six hours after the PEG placement.There were no complications in the perioperative period,either technical or metabolic.All the patients were discharged from the hospital and were then effectively fed using bolus methods.CONCLUSION:Laparoscopy-assisted PEG should become the method of choice for gastrostomy tube placement and subsequent EN if PEG placement cannot be performed safely.

Inhibitory effects of carbon dioxide insufflation on pneumoperitoneum and bowel distension after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

AIM:To evaluate the inhibitory effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation on pneumoperitoneum and bowel distension after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).METHODS:A total of 73 consecutive patients who were undergoing PEG were enrolled in our study.After eliminating 13 patients who fitted our exclusion criteria,60 patients were randomly assigned to either CO2 (30 patients) or air insufflation (30 patients) groups.PEG was performed by pull-through technique after threepoint fixation of the gastric wall to the abdominal wall using a gastropexy device.Arterial blood gas analysis was performed immediately before and after the procedure.Abdominal X-ray was performed at 10 min and at 24 h after PEG to assess the extent of bowel distension.Abdominal computed tomography was performed at 24 h after the procedure to detect the presence of pneumoperitoneum.The outcomes of PEG for 7 d postprocedure were also investigated.RESULTS:Among 30 patients each for the air and the CO2 groups,PEG could not be conducted in 2 patients of the CO2 group,thus they were excluded.Analyses of the remaining 58 patients showed that the patients' backgrounds were not significantly different between the two groups.The elevation values of arterial partial pressure of CO2 in the air group and the CO2 group were 2.67 mmHg and 3.32 mmHg,respectively (P = 0.408).The evaluation of bowel distension on abdominal X ray revealed a significant decrease of small bowel distension in the CO2 group compared to the air group (P < 0.001) at 10 min and 24 h after PEG,whereas there was no significant difference in large bowel distension between the two groups.Pneumoperitoneum was observed only in the air group but not in the CO2 group (P = 0.003).There were no obvious differences in the laboratory data and clinical outcomes after PEG between the two groups.CONCLUSION:There was no adverse event associated with CO2 insufflation.CO2 insufflation is considered to be safer and more comfortable for PEG patients because of the lower incidence of pneumoperitoneum and less distension of the small bowel.

Nutritional support teams increase percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy uptake in motor neuron disease

AIM:To examine factors influencing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG) uptake and outcomes in motor neuron disease(MND) in a tertiary care centre.METHODS:Case notes from all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MND who had attended the clinic at the Repatriation General Hospital between January 2007 and January 2011 and who had since died,were audited.Data were extracted for demographics(age and gender),disease characteristics(date of onset,bulbar or peripheral predominance,complications),date and nature of discussion of gastrostomy insertion,nutritional status [weight measurements,body mass index(BMI)],date of gastrostomy insertion and subsequent progress(duration of survival) and quality of life(QoL) [Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised(ALSFRS-R)].In addition,the type of clinician initiating the discussion regarding gastrostomy was recorded as Nutritional Support Team(involved in providing nutrition input viz Gastroenterologist,Speech Pathologist,Dietitian) and other(involved in non-nutritional aspects of patient care).Factors affecting placement and outcomes including length of survival,change in weight and QoL were determined.RESULTS:Case records were available for all 86 patients(49 men,mean age at diagnosis 66.4 years).Thirty-eight patients had bulbar symptoms and 48 had peripheral disease as their presenting feature.Sixty-six patients reported dysphagia.Thirty-one patients had undergone gastrostomy insertion.The major indications for PEG placement were dysphagia and weight loss.Nine patients required immediate full feeding,whereas 17 patients initially used the gastrostomy to supplement oral intake,4 for medication administration and 1 for hydration.Initially the PEG regime met 73% ± 31% of the estimated total energy requirements,increasing to 87% ± 32% prior to death.There was stabilization of weight in patients undergoing gastrostomy [BMI at 3 mo(22.6 ± 2.2 kg/m 2) and 6 mo(22.5 ± 2.0 kg/m 2) after PEG placement compared to weight at the time of the procedure(22.5 ± 3.0 kg/m 2)].However,weight loss recurred in the terminal stages of the illness.There was a strong trend for longer survival from diagnosis among MND in PEG recipients with limb onset presentation compared to similar patients who did not undergo the procedure(P = 0.063).Initial discussions regarding PEG insertion occurred earlier after diagnosis when seen by nutrition support team(NST) clinicians compared to other clinicians.(5.4 ± 7.0 mo vs 11.9 ± 13.4 mo,P = 0.028).There was a significant increase in PEG uptake(56% vs 24%,P = 0.011) if PEG discussions were initiated by the NST staff compared to other clinicians.There was no change in the ALSFRS-R score in patients who underwent PEG(pre 34.1 ± 8.6 vs post 34.8 ± 7.4),although in non-PEG recipients there was a nonsignificant fall in this score(33.7 ± 7.9 vs 31.6 ± 8.8).Four patients died within one month of the procedure,4 developed bacterial site infection requiring antibiotics and 1 required endoscopic therapy for gastric bleeding.Less serious complications attributed to the procedure included persistent gastrostomy site discomfort,poor appetite,altered bowel function and bloating.CONCLUSION:Initial discussion with NST clinicians increases PEG uptake in MND.Gastrostomy stabilizes patient weight but weight loss recurs with advancing disease.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and gastrooesophageal reflux in neurologically impaired children

AIM:To investigate the effects of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG) feeding on gastro-oesophageal reflux(GOR) in a group of these children using combined intraluminal pH and multiple intraluminal impedance(pH/MII) . METHODS:Ten neurologically impaired children underwent 12 h combined pH/MII procedures at least 1 d before and at least 12 d after PEG placement. METHODS:Prior to PEG placement(pre-PEG) a total of 183 GOR episodes were detected,156(85.2%) were non-acidic.After PEG placement(post-PEG) a total of 355 episodes were detected,182(51.3%) were nonacidic.The total number of distal acid reflux events statistically significantly increased post-PEG placement(prePEG total 27,post-PEG total 173,P=0.028) and themean distal pH decreased by 1.1 units.The distal reflux index therefore also significantly increased post-PEG [pre-PEG 0.25(0-2) ,post-PEG 2.95(0-40) ].Average proximal pH was lower post-PEG but the within subject difference was not statistically significant(P=0.058) . Median number of non-acid GOR,average reflux height,total acid clearance time and total bolus clearance time were all lower pre-PEG,but not statistically significant. CONCLUSION:PEG placement increases GOR episodes in neurologically impaired children.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement:A simple procedure?

Replacement of gastrostomy tube in patients under-going percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is generally considered as a safe and simple procedure. However, it could be associated with serious complications, such as gastrocutaneous tract disruption and intraperitoneal tube placement, which may lead to chemical peritonitis and even death. When PEG tube needs a replacement (e.g., occlusion or breakage of the tube), clinicians must realize that the gastrocutaneous tract of PEG is more friable than that of surgical gastrostomy because there is no suture fixation between gastric wall and abdominal wall in PEG. In general, the tract of PEG begins to mature in 1-2 wk after placement and it is well formed in 4-6 wk. However, this process could take a longer period of time in some patients. Accordingly, this article describes three major principles of a safe PEG tube replacement: (1) good control of the replacement tube along the well-formed gastrocutaneous tract; (2) minimal insertion force during the replacement, and, most importantly; and (3) reliable methods for the confirmation of intragastric tube insertion. In addition, the management of patients with suspected intraperitoneal tube placement (e.g., patients having abdominal pain or signs of peritonitis immediately after PEG tube replacement or shortly after tube feeding was resumed) is discussed. If prompt investigation confirms the intraperitoneal tube placement, surgical intervention is usually required. This article also highlights the fact that each institute should have an optimal protocol for PEG tube replacement to prevent, or to minimize, such serious complications. Meanwhile, clinicians should be aware of these potential complications, particularly if there are any difficulties during the gastrostomy tube replacement.

Survival of geriatric patients after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in Japan

AIM: To examine the long term survival of geriatric patients treated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in Japan. METHODS: We retrospectively included 46 Japanese community and tertiary hospitals to investigate 931 consecutive geriatric patients (≥ 65 years old) with swallowing difficulty and newly performed PEG between Jan 1st 2005 and Dec 31st 2008. We set death as an outcome and explored the associations among patient’s characteristics at PEG using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty one patients were followed up for a median of 468 d. A total of 502 deaths were observed (mortality 53%). However, 99%, 95%, 88%, 75% and 66% of 931 patients survived more than 7, 30, 60 d, a half year and one year, respectively. In addition, 50% and 25% of the patients survived 753 and 1647 d, respectively. Eight deaths were considered as PEG-related, and were associated with lower serum albumin levels (P = 0.002). On the other hand, among 28 surviving patients (6.5%), PEG was removed. In a multivariate hazard model, older age [hazard ratio (HR), 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.03; P = 0.009], higher C-reactive protein (HR, 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07; P = 0.005), and higher blood urea nitrogen (HR, 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.02; P = 0.003) were significant poor prognostic factors, whereas higher albumin (HR, 0.67; 95% CI: 0.52-0.85; P = 0.001), female gender (HR, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.48-0.75; P < 0.001) and no previous history of ischemic heart disease (HR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54-0.88, P = 0.003) were markedly better prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that more than half of geriatric patients with PEG may survive longer than 2 years. The analysis elucidated prognostic factors.

Over-the-scope-clip closure of long lasting gastrocutaneous fistula after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal in immunocompromised patients:A single center case series

Over-the-scope-clips (OTSC®) have been shown to be an effective and safe endoscopic treatment option for the closure of gastrointestinal perforations, leakages and fistulae. Indications for endoscopic OTSC® treatment have grown in number and also include gastro cutaneous fistula (GCF) after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube removal. Non-healing GCF is a rare complication after removal of PEG tubes and may especially develop in immunosuppressed patients with multiple comorbidities. There is growing evidence in the literature that OTSC® closure of GCF after PEG tube removal is emerging as an effective, simple and safe endoscopic treatment option. However current evidence is limited to the geriatric population and short standing GCF, while information on closure of long standing GCF after PEG tube removal in a younger population with significant comorbidities is lacking. In this retrospective single-center case-series we report on five patients undergoing OTSC® closure of chronic GCF after PEG tube removal. Four out of five patients were afflicted with long lasting, symptomatic fistulae. All five patients suffered from chronic disease associated with a catabolic metabolism (cystic fibrosis, chemotherapy for neoplasia, liver cirrhosis). The mean patient age was 43 years. The mean dwell time of PEG tubes in all five patients was 808 d. PEG tube dwell time was shortest in patient 5 (21 d). The mean duration from PEG tube removal to fistula closure in patients 1-4 was 360 d (range 144-850 d). The intervention was well tolerated by all patients and no adverse events occured. Successful immediate and long-term fistula closure was accomplished in all five patients. This single center case series is the first to show successful endoscopic OTSC® closure of long lasting GCF in five consecutive middle-aged patients with significant comorbidities. Endoscopic closure of chronic persistent GCF after PEG tube removal using an OTSC® was achieved in all patients with no immediate or long-term complications. OTSC® is a promising endoscopic treatment option for this condition with a potentially high immediate and long term success rate in patients with multiple comorbidities.

Novel endoscopic management of buried bumper syndrome in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: The Olympus Hook Knife

Buried bumper syndrome(BBS) is an uncommon but serious complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. It involves the internal fixation device, or "bumper", migrating into the gastric wall and subsequent mucosal overgrowth. We described a case series of four patients with BBS treated with a novel endoscopic technique using a Hook Knife between June 2016 and February 2017. The Hook Knife is a rotating L-shaped cutting wire designed for hooking tissue and pulling it away from the gastric wall towards the lumen. The technique was successful in all four cases with no complications. Each patient was discharged on the day of treatment. The Hook Knife is a manoeuvrable, safe and effective device for endoscopic removal of buried bumpers and could avoid surgery in a high risk group of patients. To our knowledge this technique has not been described previously. We suggest that this technique should be added to the treatment algorithms for managing BBS.