Human germline genome editing has inherent risks in the use of the technologies, as well as unknown genetic and social risks. The application of such technologies by the present generations will adversely affect human...Human germline genome editing has inherent risks in the use of the technologies, as well as unknown genetic and social risks. The application of such technologies by the present generations will adversely affect human dignity, right to life and health, right to biological information integrity, genetic autonomy and other specific rights of future generations. Legal protection should be provided for the rights of future generations affected by human germline genome editing, which is supported by the theories of intergenerational equity,the intergenerational social contract and an intergenerational community with a shared future for human beings. In spite of the continuously improved regulation of germline genome editing in China, the attention paid to the rights of future generations remains insufficient.Learning from international legislation, in combination with the current research and applications of germline genome editing, China can strengthen the protection of the rights of future generations in the context of human germline gene editing from three aspects: clarifying the principles and contents regarding the rights protection of future generations, strengthening the oversight of germline genome editing,and promoting the implementation of laws and regulations such as the Biosecurity Law.展开更多
It is difficult to interpret traditional connotation of the right to peace properly, when facing the increasing changes of international and domestic security situation. As 'the third generation of human rights...It is difficult to interpret traditional connotation of the right to peace properly, when facing the increasing changes of international and domestic security situation. As 'the third generation of human rights', for lack of the key element of the right to peace with the intensive nature of the international collective human rights, the right to peace does not highlight the function of protecting peace. It is imperative to build the right to peace system of a Multi-layer and dual meaning, which includes the domestic and international human rights, the collective and individual rights and 'peace' and 'safety'.展开更多
文摘Human germline genome editing has inherent risks in the use of the technologies, as well as unknown genetic and social risks. The application of such technologies by the present generations will adversely affect human dignity, right to life and health, right to biological information integrity, genetic autonomy and other specific rights of future generations. Legal protection should be provided for the rights of future generations affected by human germline genome editing, which is supported by the theories of intergenerational equity,the intergenerational social contract and an intergenerational community with a shared future for human beings. In spite of the continuously improved regulation of germline genome editing in China, the attention paid to the rights of future generations remains insufficient.Learning from international legislation, in combination with the current research and applications of germline genome editing, China can strengthen the protection of the rights of future generations in the context of human germline gene editing from three aspects: clarifying the principles and contents regarding the rights protection of future generations, strengthening the oversight of germline genome editing,and promoting the implementation of laws and regulations such as the Biosecurity Law.
文摘It is difficult to interpret traditional connotation of the right to peace properly, when facing the increasing changes of international and domestic security situation. As 'the third generation of human rights', for lack of the key element of the right to peace with the intensive nature of the international collective human rights, the right to peace does not highlight the function of protecting peace. It is imperative to build the right to peace system of a Multi-layer and dual meaning, which includes the domestic and international human rights, the collective and individual rights and 'peace' and 'safety'.
