Giant Hernia with Incarceration

Introduction: Giant hernias induce changes which reduce the quality of life of patients and make their surgical management complex. Adequate preoperative preparation of the patient guarantees good postoperative progress. It is necessary to avoid resorting to a technique of separation of the compartments during the cure. Here we report the case of a patient who benefited a successful cure using the Ramirez technique. Observation: We report the case of a 60-year-old patient admitted to an outpatient clinic for abdominal swelling evolving for 30 years without the notion of trauma gradually increasing in volume. The interrogation and physical examination led to the diagnosis of a giant white line hernia with incarceration. A preoperative assessment and a preanesthetic consultation were carried out. Intraoperatively, the cecum, transverse colon, sigmoid, jejunum and greater omentum were incarcerated in the bag. After adhesiolysis we proceeded to resect the bag and cure it using the Ramirez technique. The consequences were simple and the patient was discharged on day 4 after her dressing and was seen on day 15, 1 month, 3 months and 1 year. The patient benefited from the placement of an abdominal compression sheath for 3 months. Conclusion: Success in the management of prosthetic material in the absence of prosthetic material depends on good preoperative preparation and the mastery of certain surgical techniques.

Gasless Laparoscopic Surgery plus Abdominal Wall Lifting for Giant Hiatal Hernia——Our Single-center Experience

Giant hiatal hernia（GHH） comprises 5% of hiatal hernia and is associated with significant complications.The traditional operative procedure,no matter transthoracic or transabdomen repair of giant hiatal hernia,is characteristic of more invasion and more complications.Although laparoscopic repair as a minimally invasive surgery is accepted,a part of patients can not tolerate pneumoperitoneum because of combination with cardiopulmonary diseases or severe posterior mediastinal and neck emphesema during operation.The aim of this article was to analyze our experience in gasless laparoscopic repair with abdominal wall lifting to treat the giant hiatal hernia.We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing gasless laparoscopic repair of GHH with abdominal wall lifting from 2012 to 2015 at our institution.The GHH was defined as greater than one-third of the stomach in the chest.Gasless laparoscopic repair of GHH with abdominal wall lifting was attempted in 27 patients.Mean age was 67 years.The results showed that there were no conversions to open surgery and no intraoperative deaths.The mean duration of operation was 100 min（range：90–130 min）.One-side pleura was injured in 4 cases（14.8%）.The mean postoperative length of stay was 4 days（range：3–7 days）.Median follow-up was 26 months（range：6–38 months）.Transient dysphagia for solid food occurred in three patients（11.1%）,and this symptom disappeared within three months.There was one patient with recurrent hiatal hernia who was reoperated on.Two patients still complained of heartburn three months after surgery.Neither reoperation nor endoscopic treatment due to signs of postoperative esophageal stenosis was required in any patient.Totally,satisfactory outcome was reported in 88.9% patients.It was concluded that the gasless laparoscopic approach with abdominal wall lifting to the repair of GHH is feasible,safe,and effective for the patients who cannot tolerate the pneumoperitoneum.

Outcomes and complications of open, laparoscopic, and hybrid giant ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND An incisional hernia is a common complication of abdominal surgery.AIM To evaluate the outcomes and complications of hybrid application of open and laparoscopic approaches in giant ventral hernia repair.METHODS Medical records of patients who underwent open,laparoscopic,or hybrid surgery for a giant ventral hernia from 2006 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed.The hernia recurrence rate and intra-and postoperative complications were calculated and recorded.RESULTS Open,laparoscopic,and hybrid approaches were performed in 82,94,and 132 patients,respectively.The mean hernia diameter was 13.11±3.4 cm.The incidence of hernia recurrence in the hybrid procedure group was 1.3%,with a mean follow-up of 41 mo.This finding was significantly lower than that in the laparoscopic(12.3%)or open procedure groups(8.5%;P<0.05).The incidence of intraoperative intestinal injury was 6.1%,4.1%,and 1.5%in the open,laparoscopic,and hybrid procedures,respectively(hybrid vs open and laparoscopic procedures;P<0.05).The proportion of postoperative intestinal fistula formation in the open,laparoscopic,and hybrid approach groups was 2.4%,6.8%,and 3.3%,respectively(P>0.05).CONCLUSION A hybrid application of open and laparoscopic approaches was more effective and safer for repairing a giant ventral hernia than a single open or laparoscopic procedure.

Hernia mesh prevent dislocation after wide excision and reconstruction of giant cell tumor distal radius

Giant cell tumor(GCT) remains as major health problem. GCT which located at the lower end of the radius tends to be more aggressive. Wide excision and reconstruction of the wrist in stage 3 of distal radius GCT lesion is an optimal modality to prevent tumor recurrence. However, dislocation often occurs as its complication. We are reporting patient with GCT of distal radius treated with wide excision and reconstruction using nonvascularized fibular graft and the addition of hernia mesh. Circumferential non-absorbable polypropylene hernia mesh was applied, covered radioulnar joint and volar aspect of radius, and served as additional support to prevent dislocation. During five years and two months of follow-up, we found no dislocation in our patient. Furthermore, good functional outcome was obtained. Our finding suggests that the addition of hernia mesh after wide excision and reconstruction with nonvascularized fibular graft may benefit to prevent dislocation and provides an excellent functional outcome.

Type III/Type IV Giant Para-Oesophageal Herniae: Our Technique of Gastropexy with Biological Prosthesis

Objective: To present our technique of laparoscopic repair of giant para-oesophageal hernia with biological prosthesis (porcine dermis). Method: Our technique involves creating a pneumoperitoneum with standard port placement for anti-reflux surgery, mediastinal sac dissection and excision, crura-plasty, tension free placement of the biological prosthesis for hiatal reinforcement, fundoplication and gastropexy. Conclusion: Our technique of laparoscopic repair of giant para-oesophageal hernia with biological mesh is feasible and safe with acceptable morbidity and outcome.

Laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia:analysis of 25 cases

Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics and feasibility of laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia. Methods From January 2008 to August 2010,25 consecutive patients with giant hiatal hernia underwent laparoscopic repair. Crural closure was performed by means of two or three interrupted nonabsorbable sutures plus a tailored PTFE / ePTFE composite mesh. It was patched across the defect and secured to each crura with staples. Laparoscopic fundoplication was performed concomitantly in 16 cases according to the specific conditions of patients. Para-operative clinical parameters

不同TAPP术治疗巨大腹股沟疝的疗效及对应激反应术后并发症的影响

目的:分析腹腔镜下经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(trans abdominal preperitoneal prosthesis,TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝患者应激反应、并发症情况。方法:对2021年10月至2022年12月我院行TAPP手术的腹股沟疝患者72例临床资料进行分析,随机将患者分为A组(36例)、B组(36例),两组患者均进行TAPP手术,A组在术中疝囊剥离与横断后,将残端疝囊进行缝合并固定,对照组则不进行处理。观察两组患者术后应激反应与并发症发生情况。结果:A组术中出血量要明显高于B组(P<0.05)。A组并发症术后血清肿发生率明显低于B组(P<0.05)。A、B两组患者术后N、NLR值明显>术前;LY明显<术前,术前、术后N、NLR差值比较,A组显著低于B组(P<0.05),LY差值明显高于B组(P<0.05)。结论:行TAPP手术的腹股沟疝患者,在手术过程中将残端疝囊进行缝合固定有助于减少术后血清肿的发生,同时减轻机体应激反应,为患者后续康复提供帮助。

使用大圆针行单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术在儿童巨大腹股沟疝治疗中的应用及解剖要点

目的探讨使用大圆针行单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术在治疗儿童巨大腹股沟疝的临床效果及该方法的安全性和优势。方法回顾分析广州市番禺区何贤纪念医院2017年1月至2023年6月使用大圆针行单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术治疗巨大腹股沟疝患儿191例,所有病例均采用单孔腹腔镜下大圆针体外一次缝合加筋膜闭合器二次缝合手术,即经脐部设置5 mm腹腔镜监视下,在内环口投射体外位置使用普通开放手术针持夹持大圆针,由体外刺入潜行于腹膜外,以外科缝合的方式缝合内环口下半周径,然后使用筋膜闭合器穿刺缝合上半周径,使缝线在内环口腹膜外形成完整线环高位结扎疝囊,以关闭疝环口。结果191例患儿均在单孔腹腔镜下成功施行疝囊高位结扎,无中转开放手术。其中术前诊断右侧95例,左侧50例,双侧46例,术中发现对侧隐匿性疝56例。单侧平均手术时问18 min(10~35 min),双侧疝平均手术时间25 min(18~45 min)。平均住院时间16 h。术中精索血管损伤至腹膜外血肿2例,术后随访时间1-15个月,复发1例。结论使用大圆针行单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术在治疗儿童巨大腹股沟疝安全有效,更加贴合外科医生的缝合操作习惯,减少手术并发症,且取材简单、便宜,值得临床上推广。

经脐单部位腹腔镜联合腹膜外注水法治疗儿童巨大腹股沟斜疝

目的探讨经脐单部位腹腔镜联合腹膜外注水法治疗儿童巨大腹股沟斜疝的效果。方法回顾性分析2019年6月~2022年9月我院65例内环口疝囊颈直径≥15 mm的原发性单侧巨大腹股沟斜疝患儿资料,其中37例行经脐单部位腹腔镜联合腹膜外注水法疝囊高位结扎术(经脐组),另28例行常规三孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术(三孔组)。比较2组手术时间、术后24小时切口疼痛评分、住院时间、切口并发症及术后1年复发和睾丸高位情况。结果2组均顺利完成手术,术中出血<2 ml,无术中并发症。经脐组术后24小时疼痛评分低于三孔组[1.0(1.0,1.0)分vs.3.0(2.0,3.0)分,Z=-6.182,P=0.000],2组手术时间、住院时间、切口并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组随访至术后1年,经脐组无复发、睾丸高位,三孔组1例复发(P=0.431),1例睾丸高位(P=0.422)。结论熟练掌握手术技巧后,经脐单部位腹腔镜联合腹膜外注水法治疗儿童巨大腹股沟斜疝,具有切口美观、恢复快、并发症少的优点。

腹膜外平片法无张力疝修补术在复杂腹股沟疝中的应用

目的观察腹膜外平片法行复杂腹股沟疝(复发性疝或巨大疝或双侧腹股沟疝)修补术的效果。方法选取内环口大于2·5cm的腹股沟疝40例,复发疝20例,双侧腹股沟疝16例,共76例,随机分为两组;治疗组38例行腹膜外平片法无张力疝修补术,对照组38例行传统疝修补术。观察两组患者的平均手术时间、抗生素应用时间、术后疼痛时间、平均住院时间、住院费用及复发情况。结果两组患者的平均手术时间、抗生素应用时间、住院费用间差别无显著性意义(P>0·05)。术后疼痛时间、平均住院时间、复发情况间差别有显著性意义(P<0·05)。结论复杂腹股沟疝应用腹膜外平片法无张力疝修补术可明显降低复发率。

自固定补片与钉合固定补片在巨大腹股沟疝行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的对比研究

目的对比分析腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)手术中使用自固定补片与钉合固定补片治疗巨大腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2016年1月首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院京西院区疝和腹壁外科收治的共80例行TAPP手术的巨大腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,其中42例患者应用自固定补片(观察组),38例应用钉合方法固定普通补片(对照组),对比2组间手术时间、术后住院时间、住院费用、术后视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、复发等术后合并症等指标。结果 2组均顺利完成手术,2组患者手术时间及复发等术后合并症差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后住院时间及住院费用差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后随访1年,2组间VAS差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用自固定补片可降低巨大腹股沟疝患者的住院费用及术后住院时间,不会增加手术时间及术后疝复发等合并症的风险,且具有术后慢性疼痛轻的优点,具有较高的临床应用价值。

聚丙烯网片修补腹壁巨大切口疝的围手术期护理

目的为避免聚丙烯网片修补腹壁巨大切口疝术后复发,减少术后并发症,促进早日康复,总结护理经验。方法总结16例采用聚丙烯网片无张力修补腹部巨大切口疝病人的护理经验,并随访观察长期疗效。结果随访术后1-5年,术后5年无复发的13例,术后2年内局部复发的1例。余2例术后才1年无复发。结论完整及时的围手术期护理是使用聚丙烯网片行无张力腹壁巨大切口疝修补术成功的重要保证。

补片法治疗腹壁巨大切口疝的临床应用

目的 探讨腹壁巨大切口疝的病因、治疗及围手术期处理。方法 对我院 1998年 4月～ 2 0 0 3年 12月收治的 3 1例腹壁巨大切口疝临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 所有患者采用复合补片 ( 19例 )或Marlex网片 ( 12例 )行巨大切口疝修补术。术后患者无严重并发症 ,均痊愈出院。随访 1～ 3年 ,无复发 ,疗效满意。结论 手术切口感染、腹内压增高和不规范手术操作是腹壁巨大切口疝的主要病因。围手术期处理对此病预后甚为关键 ,主要包括预防性应用抗生素和处理腹内压改变对机体产生的不良影响。应用人造补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝是一种安全、合理。

PHS术式治疗巨大腹股沟疝的临床分析

目的：探讨PHS（polypropylene hernia system,PHS）术式治疗巨大腹股沟疝的可行性和优越性。方法 ：自2007年7月至2011年7月,我院采用PHS术式治疗12例巨大腹股沟疝患者,入选病例疝环缺损直径》5cm并且疝直径》20cm,通过病历资料回顾获得随访数据。结果：12例患者手术时间为80-135分钟,平均98分钟,术后住院时间（5~8）天,平均6.8天,术后2例（16.67%）出现阴囊积液,经穿刺抽液后痊愈。术后随访10个月~40个月,平均22.4个月,无复发。结论：PHS术式治疗巨大腹股沟疝安全可行,具有复发率低等优点。

针刺治疗对腹壁巨大疝术后患者胃肠功能的临床观察

目的:观察针刺对于腹壁巨大疝手术后患者胃肠功能恢复的临床疗效。方法:选取2015年1月—2017年12月我院收治的行巨大腹壁疝手术的患者90例,随机分为对照组和研究组,每组各45例。对照组行常规治疗,研究组在常规治疗的基础上加用针刺足三里、内关、上巨虚、公孙穴位治疗,比较两组术后肠道功能恢复效果、并发症发生情况及临床疗效。结果:研究组排气时间、首次排便时间、肠鸣音恢复时间及住院时间均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。术后第1天,两组腹胀、胃肠反应分级、腹痛评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后第5天,研究组的腹胀、胃肠反应分级、腹痛评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。研究组并发症发生率为6.66%,显著低于对照组(20.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。研究组的总有效率为97.78%,显著优于对照组(71.11%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:针刺对于腹壁巨大疝术后胃肠功能恢复具有显著作用,且能减少并发症,安全性较好。

改良法腹腔镜手术治疗小儿腹股沟巨大疝

目的：探讨改进腹腔镜手术治疗小儿腹股沟巨大疝的效果。方法：采用拉幕状腹腔镜手术治疗7个月~11岁的小儿腹股沟巨大疝43例,28例右侧,15例左侧,其中8例为双侧,单侧疝中有3例隐性疝,术中发现对侧鞘突管未闭2例。结果：手术时间8~30 min（平均14 min）,术后2~3 d出院。所有患儿在术中和术后均未发生并发症。全部随访6个月~2年,无复发和不适感。结论：腹腔镜下拉幕状修复内环口治疗小儿腹股沟巨大疝是一种安全有效的手术方式。

术前护理干预对腹壁巨大切口疝术后恢复的影响及作用

目的探讨对腹壁巨大切口疝手术患者系统的护理干预,总结经验。方法回顾分析和了解2015年10月～2016年10月我院行腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的16例患者进行全面系统性的护理干预,内容包括术前健康宣教、呼吸功能干预、腹壁顺应性干预,皮肤和肠道的准备等;记录术前、手术、术后时间,观察术后心率、血氧饱和度、腹内压的变化。结果接受手术15例患者术前准备时间19.09±4.06天,手术时间161±39 min,术后住院时间11.2±3.7天,随访2～12月,无复发。结论全面、系统的术前干预可以取得患者的充分信任与配合,较好的完成各项术前准备工作,降低术后并发症的发生。

巨大腹壁切口疝采用小切口辅助腹腔镜修补术的价值分析

目的对巨大腹壁切口疝采用小切口辅助腹腔镜修补术的价值进行研究。方法将62例巨大腹壁切口疝患者分为治疗组和对照组,均为31例,通过不同方法治疗后对两组患者临床治疗效果展开对比分析。结果治疗组患者手术时间、术中出血量、腹壁缺损大小、术后住院时间和并发症发生率均同对照组患者之间存在一定差异性,P<0.05。结论在治疗巨大腹壁切口疝临床上小切口辅助腹腔镜修补术临床效果较为理想。

补片修补术治疗巨大腹壁切口疝37例临床效果观察

目的探讨补片修补术治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的临床效果。方法回顾性分析我院2010年1月～2012年6月间收治的37例巨大腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料,所有患者均采取补片修补术治疗,观察患者的临床疗效及并发症情况。结果本组37例巨大腹壁切口疝患者均痊愈出院,平均住院时间为(12.6±1.6)d,术后未出现切口感染、肠梗阻、肠粘连以及补片排异反应等并发症。术后随访3～6个月,无复发病例。结论采用补片修补术治疗巨大腹壁切口疝,临床疗效好,患者术后恢复快,且术后并发症发生率和复发率低,值得临床广泛推广使用。

疝环充填式无张力疝修补术在巨大腹股沟疝中的应用

目的 :观察用聚丙烯锥形网塞、网片行巨大疝修补术的效果。方法 :选取内环大于 3cm的腹股沟疝 68例 ,分为 2组 :一组 32例行充填式无张力疝修补术 ,另一组 36例行传统手术方法。结果 :充填式组出现复发 1例 ;传统组出现复发 8例 ,两组比较有显著性差异。结论 :巨大腹股沟疝应用填充式可明显降低复发率。