Objective It is well known that a dual trigger treatment can improve clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization(IVF)in high or normal ovarian responders.However,it is not clear whether dual triggering also benefits p...Objective It is well known that a dual trigger treatment can improve clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization(IVF)in high or normal ovarian responders.However,it is not clear whether dual triggering also benefits patients with diminished ovarian reserve(DOR).The aim of this study was to investigate whether a dual trigger treatment of gonadotropin-releasing hormone(GnRH)agonist combined with human chorionic gonadotropin(hCG)for final follicular maturation improves the cumulative live birth rate(CLBR)during the GnRH-antagonist cycle in patients with DOR.Methods This retrospective study included patients with DOR who received a GnRH-antagonist protocol during IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection(IVF-ICSI)cycles at Peking University People’s Hospital from January 1,2017 through December 31,2017.Oocyte maturation was triggered by GnRH combined with hCG(n=110)or hCG alone(n=71).Embryos were transferred on the third day after oocyte retrieval or during a subsequent freeze-thaw cycle.Patients were followed up for 3 years.Results The dual trigger treatment did not affect CLBR,which is an overall determinant of the success rate of assisted reproductive technology(ART).Women in the dual trigger group had significantly higher rates of fertilization than those in the hCG group(90.1%vs.83.9%,P=0.040).Conclusion Dual trigger with GnRH agonist and hCG did not improve CLBR in patients with DOR,but did slightly improve fertilization rate,oocyte count,and embryo quality.展开更多
Background： Luteal support is a key to patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer （IVF-ET） with gonadotropin-releasing hormone （GnRH）-antagonist protocol. This study aimed to compare the effec...Background： Luteal support is a key to patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer （IVF-ET） with gonadotropin-releasing hormone （GnRH）-antagonist protocol. This study aimed to compare the effect between vaginal progesterone （VP） and intramuscular progesterone （IMP） with GnRH-antagonist protocol alter IVF-ET. Methods： A total of 1760 patients （18 years ≤ age ≤35 years） undergoing IVF-ET with GnRH-antagonist protocol were studied retrospectively between September 2014 and August 2015 in Peking University Third Hospital. In the patients, 1341 patients received VP （VP group） and 419 patients received IMP （IMP group） as luteal support. We compared clinical outcomes between these two groups. The primary objective of the study was the live birth rate. Measurement data between the two groups were conducted using independent samples t-test. The variables in line with non-normal distribution were expressed as median （p25 and p75） and were compared using nonparametric Mann. Whitney U-test. Results： Live birth rate in VP group was 38.55%, significantly higher than that in the IMP group, which was 30.79% （x^2 = 8.287, P= 0.004）. The clinical intrauterine pregnancy rate and implantation rate in VP group were also significantly higher than those in the IMP group （clinical intrauterine pregnancy rate 47.35% vs. 41.29%, x^2= 4.727, P = 0.030： implantation rate 30.99% vs. 25.26%, x^2=14.546, P 〈 0.001）. Any statistically significant differences in ectopic pregnancy and abortion rates between two groups were not observed. Conclusion： Luteal support with VP had better clinical outcomes for young women undergoing IVF-ET with GnRH-antagonist protocol.展开更多
Background Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome （OHSS） is one of the most life-threatening complications of assisted reproduction treatments. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists （GnRHanta） are thought to be ef...Background Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome （OHSS） is one of the most life-threatening complications of assisted reproduction treatments. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists （GnRHanta） are thought to be effective in preventing this complication, and some clinical trials have found lower incidences of OHSS in patients treated with GnRHanta. Our aim was to investigate the effects of GnRHanta on vascular permeability and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor （VEGF） and its receptors in a rat model of OHSS. Methods An immature early OHSS rat model was established. Three ovarian stimulation protocols were used： pregnant mare serum gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin （hCG） alone, with a GnRHanta, or with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists （GnRHa）. Blood and tissue samples were collected at 48 hours after hCG administration. Vascular permeability was evaluated by measuring the Evans-Blue content of extravasated peritoneal fluids. The expression of VEGF and its receptors, including fit-1 and KDR, were detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. Results Treatment with both a GnRHanta and a GnRHa resulted in significant reductions in serum estradiol and peritoneal vascular permeability, as well as decreased ovarian expression of VEGF and its two receptors. However, GnRHanta treatment caused a greater reduction in serum estradiol concentrations, and in VEGF receptor mRNA expression than GnRHa. There were no significant reductions in the expression of VEGF or its receptors in extra-ovarian tissues, including the liver, lungs and peritoneum. Conclusion Our results reveal that GnRHanta are more potent than GnRHa in preventing early OHSS through down-regulation of the expression of VEGF and its receptors in hyperstimulated ovaries.展开更多
基金supported by grants from the Scientific Research Development Fund of Peking University People’s Hospital(No.RDY2020-27)Clinical Medicine Plus X-Young Scholars Project,Peking University,and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(No.PKU2021LCXQ020).
文摘Objective It is well known that a dual trigger treatment can improve clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization(IVF)in high or normal ovarian responders.However,it is not clear whether dual triggering also benefits patients with diminished ovarian reserve(DOR).The aim of this study was to investigate whether a dual trigger treatment of gonadotropin-releasing hormone(GnRH)agonist combined with human chorionic gonadotropin(hCG)for final follicular maturation improves the cumulative live birth rate(CLBR)during the GnRH-antagonist cycle in patients with DOR.Methods This retrospective study included patients with DOR who received a GnRH-antagonist protocol during IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection(IVF-ICSI)cycles at Peking University People’s Hospital from January 1,2017 through December 31,2017.Oocyte maturation was triggered by GnRH combined with hCG(n=110)or hCG alone(n=71).Embryos were transferred on the third day after oocyte retrieval or during a subsequent freeze-thaw cycle.Patients were followed up for 3 years.Results The dual trigger treatment did not affect CLBR,which is an overall determinant of the success rate of assisted reproductive technology(ART).Women in the dual trigger group had significantly higher rates of fertilization than those in the hCG group(90.1%vs.83.9%,P=0.040).Conclusion Dual trigger with GnRH agonist and hCG did not improve CLBR in patients with DOR,but did slightly improve fertilization rate,oocyte count,and embryo quality.
基金This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of Key Program （No. 31230047）.
文摘Background： Luteal support is a key to patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer （IVF-ET） with gonadotropin-releasing hormone （GnRH）-antagonist protocol. This study aimed to compare the effect between vaginal progesterone （VP） and intramuscular progesterone （IMP） with GnRH-antagonist protocol alter IVF-ET. Methods： A total of 1760 patients （18 years ≤ age ≤35 years） undergoing IVF-ET with GnRH-antagonist protocol were studied retrospectively between September 2014 and August 2015 in Peking University Third Hospital. In the patients, 1341 patients received VP （VP group） and 419 patients received IMP （IMP group） as luteal support. We compared clinical outcomes between these two groups. The primary objective of the study was the live birth rate. Measurement data between the two groups were conducted using independent samples t-test. The variables in line with non-normal distribution were expressed as median （p25 and p75） and were compared using nonparametric Mann. Whitney U-test. Results： Live birth rate in VP group was 38.55%, significantly higher than that in the IMP group, which was 30.79% （x^2 = 8.287, P= 0.004）. The clinical intrauterine pregnancy rate and implantation rate in VP group were also significantly higher than those in the IMP group （clinical intrauterine pregnancy rate 47.35% vs. 41.29%, x^2= 4.727, P = 0.030： implantation rate 30.99% vs. 25.26%, x^2=14.546, P 〈 0.001）. Any statistically significant differences in ectopic pregnancy and abortion rates between two groups were not observed. Conclusion： Luteal support with VP had better clinical outcomes for young women undergoing IVF-ET with GnRH-antagonist protocol.
文摘Background Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome （OHSS） is one of the most life-threatening complications of assisted reproduction treatments. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists （GnRHanta） are thought to be effective in preventing this complication, and some clinical trials have found lower incidences of OHSS in patients treated with GnRHanta. Our aim was to investigate the effects of GnRHanta on vascular permeability and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor （VEGF） and its receptors in a rat model of OHSS. Methods An immature early OHSS rat model was established. Three ovarian stimulation protocols were used： pregnant mare serum gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin （hCG） alone, with a GnRHanta, or with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists （GnRHa）. Blood and tissue samples were collected at 48 hours after hCG administration. Vascular permeability was evaluated by measuring the Evans-Blue content of extravasated peritoneal fluids. The expression of VEGF and its receptors, including fit-1 and KDR, were detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. Results Treatment with both a GnRHanta and a GnRHa resulted in significant reductions in serum estradiol and peritoneal vascular permeability, as well as decreased ovarian expression of VEGF and its two receptors. However, GnRHanta treatment caused a greater reduction in serum estradiol concentrations, and in VEGF receptor mRNA expression than GnRHa. There were no significant reductions in the expression of VEGF or its receptors in extra-ovarian tissues, including the liver, lungs and peritoneum. Conclusion Our results reveal that GnRHanta are more potent than GnRHa in preventing early OHSS through down-regulation of the expression of VEGF and its receptors in hyperstimulated ovaries.
