Science diplomacy is attracting increasing attention in the international relations literature.This study investigates how Chinese scientists understand this term and explores China’s dynamic praxis in Arctic climate...Science diplomacy is attracting increasing attention in the international relations literature.This study investigates how Chinese scientists understand this term and explores China’s dynamic praxis in Arctic climate governance.It conducts a theoretical and practical examination of science diplomacy in terms of three dimensions—science in diplomacy,diplomacy for science,and science for diplomacy—thus achieving a high degree of consistency.A multi-method approach,combining qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and involving the adoption of a literature review,participant interviews,and questionnaires,is adopted.Data were collected from interviews with 16 Chinese scientists involved in Arctic climate governance and from 130 valid questionnaires collected from Chinese natural scientists working in the climate change field.Drawing on qualitative and quantitative findings,the study reveals that the three-dimensional framework of science diplomacy can provide insight into Chinese scientists’understandings of the topic.In contrast to the participants’vague theoretical responses,the outlines of China’s Arctic climate governance can be clearly identified within this framework.The study concludes by underlining the tension between theory and practice in terms of science diplomacy and highlighting the emerging challenges for China in developing its Arctic science diplomacy against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine conflict.Moreover,it is suggested that,to further develop China’s Arctic science diplomacy,it is vital to take account of the deficiencies in China’s science diplomacy.The study’s empirical results contribute to an understanding of the dynamic nature of science diplomacy in the Chinese context.展开更多
以中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science(WOS)数据库中的国有风险投资文献为研究对象,运用CiteSpace软件对2005—2021年间的文献进行科学挖掘和可视化分析,描绘了国有风险投资研究的知识图谱。综合计量分析结果,梳理了国有风险投资研究脉络,...以中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science(WOS)数据库中的国有风险投资文献为研究对象,运用CiteSpace软件对2005—2021年间的文献进行科学挖掘和可视化分析,描绘了国有风险投资研究的知识图谱。综合计量分析结果,梳理了国有风险投资研究脉络,提炼了国有风险投资领域的热点主题。在此基础上,从研究主题入手进一步对国有风险投资的研究进展进行综述,归纳整合出了“行为动机—市场表现—影响效应”分析框架,系统梳理了国有风险投资的研究现状,提炼了主要的研究成果,揭示了不同研究主题之间的关联,并对未来研究进行展望。展开更多
基金supported by the National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences as part of the project titled“Strategic Competition and Cooperation in the Arctic among China,Russia,and the United States from the Perspective of Sustainable Development”(Grant no.20BGJ045)。
文摘Science diplomacy is attracting increasing attention in the international relations literature.This study investigates how Chinese scientists understand this term and explores China’s dynamic praxis in Arctic climate governance.It conducts a theoretical and practical examination of science diplomacy in terms of three dimensions—science in diplomacy,diplomacy for science,and science for diplomacy—thus achieving a high degree of consistency.A multi-method approach,combining qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and involving the adoption of a literature review,participant interviews,and questionnaires,is adopted.Data were collected from interviews with 16 Chinese scientists involved in Arctic climate governance and from 130 valid questionnaires collected from Chinese natural scientists working in the climate change field.Drawing on qualitative and quantitative findings,the study reveals that the three-dimensional framework of science diplomacy can provide insight into Chinese scientists’understandings of the topic.In contrast to the participants’vague theoretical responses,the outlines of China’s Arctic climate governance can be clearly identified within this framework.The study concludes by underlining the tension between theory and practice in terms of science diplomacy and highlighting the emerging challenges for China in developing its Arctic science diplomacy against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine conflict.Moreover,it is suggested that,to further develop China’s Arctic science diplomacy,it is vital to take account of the deficiencies in China’s science diplomacy.The study’s empirical results contribute to an understanding of the dynamic nature of science diplomacy in the Chinese context.
文摘以中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science(WOS)数据库中的国有风险投资文献为研究对象,运用CiteSpace软件对2005—2021年间的文献进行科学挖掘和可视化分析,描绘了国有风险投资研究的知识图谱。综合计量分析结果,梳理了国有风险投资研究脉络,提炼了国有风险投资领域的热点主题。在此基础上,从研究主题入手进一步对国有风险投资的研究进展进行综述,归纳整合出了“行为动机—市场表现—影响效应”分析框架,系统梳理了国有风险投资的研究现状,提炼了主要的研究成果,揭示了不同研究主题之间的关联,并对未来研究进行展望。
