Government to purchase public service is the Government＇ s administrative reform, important innovations in system, in recent years, the Government has to provide community organizations purchase basic public services...Government to purchase public service is the Government＇ s administrative reform, important innovations in system, in recent years, the Government has to provide community organizations purchase basic public services, and gradually become innovation in government provision of public services, improving public service quality, increased use of financial efficiency. This document from the Government buying the concept of public service, starting with the Carding the purchase of essential public services in practice there is a major problem, on how to move forward with the ourchase of essential nublic services, raising the effectiveness in the use of financial proposed countermeasures.展开更多
随着地方政府购买刑事法律援助实践的发展,购买成效如何、购买效果如何得到保证成为亟待解决的关键议题。现行评估模式停留于政府直接供给模式下对服务商单一主体服务质量的“事后”评估,尚难实现购买机制下对地方政府购买刑事法律援助...随着地方政府购买刑事法律援助实践的发展,购买成效如何、购买效果如何得到保证成为亟待解决的关键议题。现行评估模式停留于政府直接供给模式下对服务商单一主体服务质量的“事后”评估,尚难实现购买机制下对地方政府购买刑事法律援助服务绩效的完整评价。从地方政府购买全流程出发,综合考量多重委托代理下“购买者—生产者—接受者”三元主体的绩效感知与表现,通过扎根理论质性分析方法及德尔菲法构建全流程、多主体的地方政府购买法律援助服务评估模型。基于模糊综合评价法(Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation,FCE)和优劣解距离法(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution,TOPSIS)的S省购买绩效评估结果显示:地方政府购买总体绩效尚可,呈现“基本动作”规范、“自选动作”有待加强的特点;通过“政府购买”能够实现较好的服务过程绩效、服务回应性和社会效益,但服务满意有限;地方政府的购买绩效不足为主要薄弱环节;“充分竞争”不是绩效实现的必要条件。完善购买方案、促进购买价格与市场接轨为绩效改进的首要着力点。展开更多
文摘Government to purchase public service is the Government＇ s administrative reform, important innovations in system, in recent years, the Government has to provide community organizations purchase basic public services, and gradually become innovation in government provision of public services, improving public service quality, increased use of financial efficiency. This document from the Government buying the concept of public service, starting with the Carding the purchase of essential public services in practice there is a major problem, on how to move forward with the ourchase of essential nublic services, raising the effectiveness in the use of financial proposed countermeasures.
文摘随着地方政府购买刑事法律援助实践的发展,购买成效如何、购买效果如何得到保证成为亟待解决的关键议题。现行评估模式停留于政府直接供给模式下对服务商单一主体服务质量的“事后”评估,尚难实现购买机制下对地方政府购买刑事法律援助服务绩效的完整评价。从地方政府购买全流程出发,综合考量多重委托代理下“购买者—生产者—接受者”三元主体的绩效感知与表现,通过扎根理论质性分析方法及德尔菲法构建全流程、多主体的地方政府购买法律援助服务评估模型。基于模糊综合评价法(Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation,FCE)和优劣解距离法(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution,TOPSIS)的S省购买绩效评估结果显示:地方政府购买总体绩效尚可,呈现“基本动作”规范、“自选动作”有待加强的特点;通过“政府购买”能够实现较好的服务过程绩效、服务回应性和社会效益,但服务满意有限;地方政府的购买绩效不足为主要薄弱环节;“充分竞争”不是绩效实现的必要条件。完善购买方案、促进购买价格与市场接轨为绩效改进的首要着力点。
