Natural resources and the environment,environmental capacity of China has been approaching the red alert,and long-term accumulation of ecological debt needs to be solved. The transformation of economic development mod...Natural resources and the environment,environmental capacity of China has been approaching the red alert,and long-term accumulation of ecological debt needs to be solved. The transformation of economic development mode and green economic development path are inevitable choices. The complexity and the pressureof the ecological environment governance force Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan region to change the ecological governance method. The " government-market-society" is taken as the overall framework,to build a diversified body of eco-environment collaborative governance platform. Through collaborative governance among governments,government-market collaborative governance and government-society collaborative governance,ecological capital stock is improvedin the quantity and quality,thus contributing to benigndevelopment of regional economy and society.展开更多
Ecological civilization construction is a new concept and trend in the era of China's high-quality development.It requires the collaborative propulsion of an ecological economic civilization,ecological social civi...Ecological civilization construction is a new concept and trend in the era of China's high-quality development.It requires the collaborative propulsion of an ecological economic civilization,ecological social civilization,and ecological environment civilization.Reducing carbon emission intensity is an important issue facing the Chinese government in the backdrop of global warming.Thus,studying the influence of ecological civilization construction on carbon emission intensity from different perspectives has important theoretical and practical significance.In this study,the influences of the three subsystems of an ecological civilization on carbon emission intensity are empirically analyzed using Chinese provincial panel data from 2004 to 2016 and a spatial Durbin model based on the STIRPAT model.First,the Moran's I of carbon emission intensity in Chinese provinces was between 0.425 and 0.473.This indicates positive spatial correlation and illustrates that the carbon emission intensity of China's provinces can influence each other.The reasons behind this correlation include close ties between neighboring provinces and similarities in natural,economic,and social characteristics.Second,the correlation coefficients of ecological economic civilization,ecological social civilization,and ecological environment civilization to carbon emission intensity are−4.743139,2.865884,and−0.3246447,respectively.This illustrates that an ecological economic civilization and ecological environment civilization can reduce carbon emission intensity,while an ecological social civilization can increase it.To reduce total carbon emission intensity,the three subsystems of ecological civilization should have a negative relationship with carbon emission intensity,so the effect of ecological social civilization on carbon emission intensity should be changed.Third,the spatial spillover effect of ecological social civilization did not pass the significance test.The correlation coefficients of spatial spillover effect to ecological economic civilization and ecological environment civilization are 2.046531 and−3.238323,respectively.Improving the ecological economic civilization can increase the carbon emission intensity of periphery provinces,while improving the ecological environment civilization can reduce it.Thus,it is necessary to enhance cooperation between periphery provinces and establish a trans-provincial cooperation mechanism for reducing carbon emissions.展开更多
This study investigates the sustainability implications of the theoretical models of industrialization and urbanization pioneered by Dixit and Stiglitz^(1) so to open the theoretical “black box” of the unsustainabil...This study investigates the sustainability implications of the theoretical models of industrialization and urbanization pioneered by Dixit and Stiglitz^(1) so to open the theoretical “black box” of the unsustainability of the traditional industrialization mode, and shows how to reshape the relationship between the environment and development under the paradigm of ecological civilization. It finds that the theoretical models that “perfectly” simulate the traditional industrialization mode all have the implicit consequence of environmental unsustainability. Nonetheless, this limitation is not due to the problems of the models themselves but is more a result of the limitations of the traditional developmental and neoclassical economics paradigms of the industrial era. Therefore, the consequences of unsustainability cannot simply be avoided through external policies such as technological progress and environmental regulations, nor can they be prevented by simply adjusting some parameters in these theoretical models. Instead, a shift is required in both the developmental and the economics paradigms formed in the traditional industrial era. From an ecological civilization perspective, this study rethinks the basic issues of economics along the two lines of the ends(what) and the means(how) of development;briefly reviews the history of economic thought;and uses a conceptual framework to reorganize the relevant intellectual profundities that are neglected in standard neoclassical economics. The study further formalizes the conceptual framework in a general form model and shows how a paradigm shift in development could shift the trade-offs from the multiple goals of the economy, the environment, and well-being in the traditional industrial era to mutual reinforcement in ecocivilization.展开更多
基金Supported by Fund Project of Hunan Provincial Social Science Association(XSP18YBC143,16YBX008)
文摘Natural resources and the environment,environmental capacity of China has been approaching the red alert,and long-term accumulation of ecological debt needs to be solved. The transformation of economic development mode and green economic development path are inevitable choices. The complexity and the pressureof the ecological environment governance force Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan region to change the ecological governance method. The " government-market-society" is taken as the overall framework,to build a diversified body of eco-environment collaborative governance platform. Through collaborative governance among governments,government-market collaborative governance and government-society collaborative governance,ecological capital stock is improvedin the quantity and quality,thus contributing to benigndevelopment of regional economy and society.
基金supported by the Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province[Grant number.2020RKB01112]Philosophy and Social Science Project of Jinan City[Grant number.JNSK20C13]+1 种基金Key Project of Social Science Planning of Shandong Province[Grant number.20BJJJ06]National Natural Science Foundation of China[Grant number.72004124).
文摘Ecological civilization construction is a new concept and trend in the era of China's high-quality development.It requires the collaborative propulsion of an ecological economic civilization,ecological social civilization,and ecological environment civilization.Reducing carbon emission intensity is an important issue facing the Chinese government in the backdrop of global warming.Thus,studying the influence of ecological civilization construction on carbon emission intensity from different perspectives has important theoretical and practical significance.In this study,the influences of the three subsystems of an ecological civilization on carbon emission intensity are empirically analyzed using Chinese provincial panel data from 2004 to 2016 and a spatial Durbin model based on the STIRPAT model.First,the Moran's I of carbon emission intensity in Chinese provinces was between 0.425 and 0.473.This indicates positive spatial correlation and illustrates that the carbon emission intensity of China's provinces can influence each other.The reasons behind this correlation include close ties between neighboring provinces and similarities in natural,economic,and social characteristics.Second,the correlation coefficients of ecological economic civilization,ecological social civilization,and ecological environment civilization to carbon emission intensity are−4.743139,2.865884,and−0.3246447,respectively.This illustrates that an ecological economic civilization and ecological environment civilization can reduce carbon emission intensity,while an ecological social civilization can increase it.To reduce total carbon emission intensity,the three subsystems of ecological civilization should have a negative relationship with carbon emission intensity,so the effect of ecological social civilization on carbon emission intensity should be changed.Third,the spatial spillover effect of ecological social civilization did not pass the significance test.The correlation coefficients of spatial spillover effect to ecological economic civilization and ecological environment civilization are 2.046531 and−3.238323,respectively.Improving the ecological economic civilization can increase the carbon emission intensity of periphery provinces,while improving the ecological environment civilization can reduce it.Thus,it is necessary to enhance cooperation between periphery provinces and establish a trans-provincial cooperation mechanism for reducing carbon emissions.
基金This study is sponsored by the RIEco Innovation Project"Economics in the Perspective of Ecocivilization and Its Policy Implications"(2022STSA02)at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
文摘This study investigates the sustainability implications of the theoretical models of industrialization and urbanization pioneered by Dixit and Stiglitz^(1) so to open the theoretical “black box” of the unsustainability of the traditional industrialization mode, and shows how to reshape the relationship between the environment and development under the paradigm of ecological civilization. It finds that the theoretical models that “perfectly” simulate the traditional industrialization mode all have the implicit consequence of environmental unsustainability. Nonetheless, this limitation is not due to the problems of the models themselves but is more a result of the limitations of the traditional developmental and neoclassical economics paradigms of the industrial era. Therefore, the consequences of unsustainability cannot simply be avoided through external policies such as technological progress and environmental regulations, nor can they be prevented by simply adjusting some parameters in these theoretical models. Instead, a shift is required in both the developmental and the economics paradigms formed in the traditional industrial era. From an ecological civilization perspective, this study rethinks the basic issues of economics along the two lines of the ends(what) and the means(how) of development;briefly reviews the history of economic thought;and uses a conceptual framework to reorganize the relevant intellectual profundities that are neglected in standard neoclassical economics. The study further formalizes the conceptual framework in a general form model and shows how a paradigm shift in development could shift the trade-offs from the multiple goals of the economy, the environment, and well-being in the traditional industrial era to mutual reinforcement in ecocivilization.
