Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracotomy and traditional median stemotomy through right atrium in treatment of common congenital heart diseases. Methods:...Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracotomy and traditional median stemotomy through right atrium in treatment of common congenital heart diseases. Methods: Clinical data of 59 cases of common congenital heart diseases treated with minimally invasive right axillary vertical thoracotomy from May, 2011 to February, 2013 and 77 cases of same diseases with traditional median stemotomy in the past three years were retrospectively analyzed, including atrial septal defect, membranous ventricular septal defect and partial endocardial cushion defect. The results were compared from the two groups, including the time for operation and cardiopulmonary bypass, amount of blood transfusion, postoperative drainage, ventilation time, hospital stay, and prognosis. Results: No severe complications happened in both groups, like deaths or secondary surgery caused by bleeding. No significant differences were in CPB time and postoperative ventilator time between groups (P>0.05), while for all of the operative time, the length of incision, postoperative drainage and hospital stay, minimally invasive right axillary vertical thoracotomy was superior to median stemotomy, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). In six month followup after operation, no complications of residual deformity and pericardial effusion were found in both groups by doing echocardiography, but mild pectus carinatum was found in 8 patients in the traditional median sternotomy group (traditional group), whereas patients in another group were well recovered. Conclusions: Minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracotomy for common congenital heart diseases is as safe as traditional median stemotomy, without the increasing incidence of postoperative complications. Additionally, compared with traditional median stemotomy, minimally - invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracotomy is better in the aspects of hidden incision, appearance, and postoperative recovery.展开更多
Single incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS) is a minimally invasive platform with specific benefits over traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery. The safety and feasibility of SILS has been proven, and the applicati...Single incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS) is a minimally invasive platform with specific benefits over traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery. The safety and feasibility of SILS has been proven, and the applications continue to grow with experience. After 500 cases at a high-volume, single-institution, we were able to standardize instrumentation and operative steps, as well as develop adaptations in technique to help overcome technical and ergonomic challenges. These technical adaptations have allowed the successful application of SILS to technically difficult patient populations, such as pelvic cases, inflammatory bowel disease cases, and high body mass index patients. This review is a frame of reference for the application and wider integration of the single incision laparoscopic platform in colorectal surgery.展开更多
More than 20 years have passed since the first report of laparoscopic colectomy in 1991. Thereafter, laparoscopic surgery for the management of colorectal diseases has been widely accepted as a prevailing option becau...More than 20 years have passed since the first report of laparoscopic colectomy in 1991. Thereafter, laparoscopic surgery for the management of colorectal diseases has been widely accepted as a prevailing option because of improved cosmetic outcomes, less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay in comparison with open surgery. To further the principle of minimally invasive surgery, two new approaches have been developed in this rapidly evolving field. The first is the totally laparoscopic approach. Currently most of standard techniques inevitably involve an abdominalincision for retrieval of the specimen and preparation for anastomosis, which might compromise the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. The totally laparoscopic approach dispenses with this incision by combining completely intraperitoneal anastomosis with retrieval of the specimen via a natural orifice, such as the anus or the vagina. Our new and reliable technique for intraperitoneal anastomosis is also described in detail in this article. The second is the single-incision approach. While three to six ports are needed in standard laparoscopic surgery, the single-incision approach uses the umbilicus as the sole access to the abdominal cavity. All of the laparoscopic procedures are performed entirely through the umbilicus, in which the surgical scar eventually becomes hidden, achieving virtually scarless surgery. This article reviews the current status of these two approaches and discusses the future of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal diseases.展开更多
目的探讨不同切口手术联合加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)理念指导下的呼吸功能训练在肺癌患者中的应用效果。方法选择2020年1月至2022年12月在苏州大学附属太仓医院择期行肺癌根治术的患者200例,随机分为4组,每...目的探讨不同切口手术联合加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)理念指导下的呼吸功能训练在肺癌患者中的应用效果。方法选择2020年1月至2022年12月在苏州大学附属太仓医院择期行肺癌根治术的患者200例,随机分为4组,每组50例。A组接受单孔胸腔镜手术,术前ERAS宣教,呼吸训练器和常规呼吸功能训练;B组接受腋下肌肉非损伤性小切口手术,术前ERAS宣教,呼吸训练器和常规呼吸功能训练;C组接受腋下肌肉非损伤性小切口手术,术前常规宣教和常规呼吸功能训练;D组接受单孔胸腔镜手术,术前常规宣教和常规呼吸功能训练。比较4组患者术后恢复情况及术后疼痛评分。结果与其他3组相比,A组患者肺部并发症发生率降低,下床时间更早,置管时间、住院时间均缩短(P<0.05);与B组、C组相比,A组患者术后疼痛显著减轻(P<0.05)。与C组相比,B组患者肺部并发症发生率降低,下床时间、置管时间、住院时间缩短(P<0.05)。手术切口相同组间的术后疼痛差异无统计学意义。结论单孔胸腔镜肺癌手术联合ERAS理念指导下的呼吸功能训练可明显降低患者术后肺部并发症发生率,减轻术后疼痛,加速康复。展开更多
基金supported by college medical journal clinicalspecial funds(11321587)
文摘Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracotomy and traditional median stemotomy through right atrium in treatment of common congenital heart diseases. Methods: Clinical data of 59 cases of common congenital heart diseases treated with minimally invasive right axillary vertical thoracotomy from May, 2011 to February, 2013 and 77 cases of same diseases with traditional median stemotomy in the past three years were retrospectively analyzed, including atrial septal defect, membranous ventricular septal defect and partial endocardial cushion defect. The results were compared from the two groups, including the time for operation and cardiopulmonary bypass, amount of blood transfusion, postoperative drainage, ventilation time, hospital stay, and prognosis. Results: No severe complications happened in both groups, like deaths or secondary surgery caused by bleeding. No significant differences were in CPB time and postoperative ventilator time between groups (P>0.05), while for all of the operative time, the length of incision, postoperative drainage and hospital stay, minimally invasive right axillary vertical thoracotomy was superior to median stemotomy, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). In six month followup after operation, no complications of residual deformity and pericardial effusion were found in both groups by doing echocardiography, but mild pectus carinatum was found in 8 patients in the traditional median sternotomy group (traditional group), whereas patients in another group were well recovered. Conclusions: Minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracotomy for common congenital heart diseases is as safe as traditional median stemotomy, without the increasing incidence of postoperative complications. Additionally, compared with traditional median stemotomy, minimally - invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracotomy is better in the aspects of hidden incision, appearance, and postoperative recovery.
文摘Single incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS) is a minimally invasive platform with specific benefits over traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery. The safety and feasibility of SILS has been proven, and the applications continue to grow with experience. After 500 cases at a high-volume, single-institution, we were able to standardize instrumentation and operative steps, as well as develop adaptations in technique to help overcome technical and ergonomic challenges. These technical adaptations have allowed the successful application of SILS to technically difficult patient populations, such as pelvic cases, inflammatory bowel disease cases, and high body mass index patients. This review is a frame of reference for the application and wider integration of the single incision laparoscopic platform in colorectal surgery.
文摘More than 20 years have passed since the first report of laparoscopic colectomy in 1991. Thereafter, laparoscopic surgery for the management of colorectal diseases has been widely accepted as a prevailing option because of improved cosmetic outcomes, less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay in comparison with open surgery. To further the principle of minimally invasive surgery, two new approaches have been developed in this rapidly evolving field. The first is the totally laparoscopic approach. Currently most of standard techniques inevitably involve an abdominalincision for retrieval of the specimen and preparation for anastomosis, which might compromise the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. The totally laparoscopic approach dispenses with this incision by combining completely intraperitoneal anastomosis with retrieval of the specimen via a natural orifice, such as the anus or the vagina. Our new and reliable technique for intraperitoneal anastomosis is also described in detail in this article. The second is the single-incision approach. While three to six ports are needed in standard laparoscopic surgery, the single-incision approach uses the umbilicus as the sole access to the abdominal cavity. All of the laparoscopic procedures are performed entirely through the umbilicus, in which the surgical scar eventually becomes hidden, achieving virtually scarless surgery. This article reviews the current status of these two approaches and discusses the future of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal diseases.
文摘目的探讨不同切口手术联合加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)理念指导下的呼吸功能训练在肺癌患者中的应用效果。方法选择2020年1月至2022年12月在苏州大学附属太仓医院择期行肺癌根治术的患者200例,随机分为4组,每组50例。A组接受单孔胸腔镜手术,术前ERAS宣教,呼吸训练器和常规呼吸功能训练;B组接受腋下肌肉非损伤性小切口手术,术前ERAS宣教,呼吸训练器和常规呼吸功能训练;C组接受腋下肌肉非损伤性小切口手术,术前常规宣教和常规呼吸功能训练;D组接受单孔胸腔镜手术,术前常规宣教和常规呼吸功能训练。比较4组患者术后恢复情况及术后疼痛评分。结果与其他3组相比,A组患者肺部并发症发生率降低,下床时间更早,置管时间、住院时间均缩短(P<0.05);与B组、C组相比,A组患者术后疼痛显著减轻(P<0.05)。与C组相比,B组患者肺部并发症发生率降低,下床时间、置管时间、住院时间缩短(P<0.05)。手术切口相同组间的术后疼痛差异无统计学意义。结论单孔胸腔镜肺癌手术联合ERAS理念指导下的呼吸功能训练可明显降低患者术后肺部并发症发生率,减轻术后疼痛,加速康复。
