期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Comparison of Different Extraction Approaches for Heavy Metal Partitioning in Sediment Samples 被引量:1
1
作者 M. B. ARAIN T. G. KAZI +4 位作者 M. K. JAMALI J. A. BAIG H. I. AFRIDI N. JALBANI R. A. SARFRAZ1 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第4期476-485,共10页
Three extraction methods, ultrasonic assisted extraction (USE), microwave assisted extraction (MSE), and conventional single extraction (CSE), in conjunction with the modified three-stage BCR sequential extraction pro... Three extraction methods, ultrasonic assisted extraction (USE), microwave assisted extraction (MSE), and conventional single extraction (CSE), in conjunction with the modified three-stage BCR sequential extraction procedure (SEP) were applied to examine the contents of Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb and Zn from lake sediment samples, to know whether these techniques can reduce extraction time and improve reproducibility. The SEP and developed alternative single extrac- tion methods were validated by the analysis of certified reference material BCR 601. By the use of optimized sonication and microwave conditions, steps 1, 2 and 3 of the BCR sequential extraction methods (excluding the hydrogen peroxide digestion in step 3, which was not performed with sonication and microwave) could be completed in 15-30 min and 60- 150 s, respectively. The recoveries of total extractable metal contents in BCR 601, obtained by three single extractions ranged from 93.3%-102%, 88.9%-104% and 81.2%-96.2% for CSE, USE and MSE, respectively. The precision of the single extraction methods was found in the range of 3.7%-9.4% for all metals (n = 6). 展开更多
关键词 连续提取方法 湖泊沉积物 重金属 样品 微波辅助萃取 分割 小型企业 搜索引擎
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部