Prevention and treatment of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) which is a serious complication after orthotopic liver transplanta- tion (OLT) remains a significant cause of graft loss. The purpose of this study was to sum up our experiences in the prevention, diagnosis and management of HAT after liver transplantation. METHODS: From April 1993 to September 2003, a total of 198 patients underwent OLT at our hospital. The hepatic artery was anastomosed using 7/0 prolane with running continuous suture in 96 patients (group 1) and with inter- rupted suture in 102 (group 2). Ultrasonography was per- formed every day in two weeks after operation and selec- tively afterwards. RESULTS: HAT occurred in 6 patients (6.3%, 6/96) of group 1, and in 1 (1%, 1/102) of group 2 (x2=4.027, P= 0.045). Six patients received emergency thrombectomy, and 1 conservative therapy but died from tumor recurrence eventually. Biliary complication developed in 3 patients af- ter thrombectomy of whom 2 died of liver failure and one waited for retransplantation. In the other 3 patients after thrombectomy, 1 died of renal failure, and 2 survived. The mortality of patients with HAT was 57.1% (4/7). CONCLUSIONS: The technique of hepatic arterial anasto- mosis is the key factor for the prevention of HAT. Routine ultrasonography is very important in early detection of HAT after OLT. Biliary complication is a severe outcome secondary to HAT.

Diagnosis and outcomes of collateral arterial formation after irreversible early hepatic artery thrombosis in pediatric liver recipients

BACKGROUND： Early hepatic artery thrombosis （eHAT） has been recognized as an important cause of graft loss and mortality. However, the incidence, etiology and outcome are not dear, especially for children. The present study was to investigate the formation of collateral artery flow after irreversible eHAT and its impact on patient＇s prognosis. METHODS： We analyzed eHAT after liver transplantation in children from October 2006 to April 2015 in our center, illustrated the formation of collateral hepatic artery flow after irreversible eHAT and explored the diagnosis, complications, treatment and prognosis. The basic and follow-up ultrasonographic images were also compared. RESULTS： Of the 330 pediatric liver recipients, 22 （6.67%） de- veloped eHAT within 1 month. Revascularization attempts in- duding surgical thrombectomy, interventional radiology and conservational treatment （thrombolysis） were successful in 5 patients. Among the 17 patients who had irreversible eHAT, follow-up ultrasonography revealed that collateral artery flow was developed as early as 2 weeks after eHAT. Liver abscess and bile duct complication occurred secondary to eHAT in variable time. CONCLUSIONS： Collateral arterial formation is a compensatory adaptation to eHAT to supply blood to liver grafts. However, the severe bile duct damage secondary to eHAT is irreversible and retransplantation is unavoidable.

Arcuate ligament syndrome inducing hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a frequent complication following liver transplantation, but it is rarely caused by arcuate ligament compression of the celiac artery. This article mainly describes our experience in managing a patient with celiac artery stenosis and HAT after liver transplantation. METHODS: A 44-year-old man with a 15-year history of hepatitis B was admitted to our hospital for hepatocellular carcinoma. Before the operatiori, he received transarterial chemoembolization once, and pretransplant MR angiography indicated a suspected stenosis at the initiation of the celiac artery, while color Doppler showed normal blood flow in the arterial system. In this case, orthotopic liver transplantation was performed for radical cure of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, B-ultrasonography detected poor blood flow in the intra- and extra-hepatic artery on the first posttransplant day, and during exploratory laparotomy a thrombus was found in the hepatic artery. Thus, re-transplantation was conducted with a bypass between the graft hepatic artery and the recipient abdominal aorta with the donor's splenic artery. RESULTS: The patient made an uneventful recovery and color Doppler showed good blood flow in the artery and portal system. Histology confirmed extensive thrombosis in the left and right hepatic artery of the explanted graft, indicating HAT. CONCLUSIONS: Although HAT caused by celiac trunk compression is rarely reported in liver transplantation, the diagnosis should be considered in patients with pretransplant hepatic artery stenosis on angiography and abnormal blood flow on B-ultrasonography. Once HAT is formed, treatment such as thrombectomy or retransplantation should be performed as early as possible.

Intra-arterial thrombolysis for early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND Early hepatic artery thrombosis(E-HAT)is a serious complication after liver transplantation(LT),which often results in graft failure and can lead to patient deaths.Treatments such as re-transplantation and re-anastomosis are conventional therapeutic methods which are restricted by the shortage of donors and the patient’s postoperative intolerance to re-laparotomy.Due to the advances in interventional techniques and thrombolytics,endovascular treatments are increasingly being selected by more and more centers.This study reviews and reports our single-center experience with intra-arterial thrombolysis as the first choice therapy for E-HAT after deceased donor LT.AIM To evaluate the feasibility and reasonability of intra-arterial thrombolysis for EHAT after deceased donor LT.METHODS A total of 147 patients who underwent deceased donor LT were retrospectively reviewed in our hospital between September 2011 and December 2016.Four patients were diagnosed with E-HAT.All of these patients underwent intraarterial thrombolysis with alteplase as the first choice therapy after LT.The method of arterial anastomosis and details of the diagnosis and treatment of EHAT were collated.The long-term prognosis of E-HAT patients was also recorded.The median follow-up period was 26 mo(range:23 to 30 mo).RESULTS The incidence of E-HAT was 2.7%(4/147).E-HAT was considered when Doppler ultrasonography showed no blood flow signals and a definite diagnosis was confirmed by immediate hepatic arterial angiography when complete occlusion of the hepatic artery was observed.The patients were given temporary thrombolytics(mainly alteplase)via a 5-Fr catheter which was placed in the proximal part of the thrombosed hepatic artery followed by continuous alteplase using an infusion pump.Alteplase dose was adjusted according to activated clotting time.The recanalization rate of intra-arterial thrombolysis in our study was 100%(4/4)and no thrombolysis-related mortality was observed.During the follow-up period,patient survival rate was 75%(3/4),and biliary complications were present in 50%of patients(2/4).CONCLUSION Intra-arterial thrombolysis can be considered first-line treatment for E-HAT after deceased donor LT.Early diagnosis of E-HAT is important and follow-up is necessary even if recanalization is successful.

Safety and efficacy of an integrated endovascular treatment strategy for early hepatic artery occlusion after liver transplantation

Background:Hepatic artery occlusion(HAO)after liver transplantation(LT)is typically comprised of hepatic artery thrombosis(HAT)and stenosis(HAS),both of which are severe complications that coexist and interdependent.This study aimed to evaluate an integrated endovascular treatment(EVT)strategy for the resolution of early HAO and identify the risk factors associated with early HAO as well as the procedural challenge encountered in the treatment strategy.Methods:Consecutive orthotopic LT recipients(n=366)who underwent transplantation between June 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively investigated.EVT was performed using an integrated strategy that involved thrombolytic therapy,shunt artery embolization plus vasodilator therapy,percutaneous transluminal angioplasty,and/or stent placement.Simple EVT was defined as the clinical resolution of HAO by one round of EVT with thrombolytic therapy and/or shunt artery embolization plus vasodilator therapy.Otherwise,it was defined as complex EVT.Results:Twenty-six patients(median age 52 years)underwent EVT for early HAO that occurred within 30 days post-LT.The median interval from LT to EVT was 7(6–16)days.Revascularization time(OR=1.027;95%CI:1.005–1.050;P=0.018)and the need for conduit(OR=3.558;95%CI:1.241–10.203,P=0.018)were independent predictors for early HAO.HAT was diagnosed in eight patients,and four out of those presented with concomitant HAS.We achieved 100%technical success and recanalization by performing simple EVT in 19 patients(3 HAT+/HAS-and 16 HAT-/HAS+)and by performing complex EVT in seven patients(1 HAT+/HAS-,4 HAT+/HAS+,and 2 HAT-/HAS+),without major complications.The primary assisted patency rates at 1,6,and 12 months were all 100%.The cumulative overall survival rates at 1,6,and 12 months were 88.5%,88.5%,and 80.8%,respectively.Autologous transfusion<600 mL(94.74%vs.42.86%,P=0.010)and interrupted suture for hepatic artery anastomosis(78.95%vs.14.29%,P=0.005)were more prevalent in simple EVT.Conclusions:The integrated EVT strategy was a feasible approach providing effective resolution with excellent safety for early HAO after LT.Appropriate autologous transfusion and interrupted suture technique helped simplify EVT.

Hepatic artery reconstruction in pediatric liver transplantation:Experience from a single group

Background:The reconstruction of hepatic artery is a challenging part of the pediatric liver transplantation procedure.Hepatic artery thrombosis(HAT)and stenosis are complications which may result in ischemic biliary injury,causing early graft lost and even death.Methods:Two hundred and fifty-nine patients underwent liver transplantation in 2017 in a single liver transplantation group.Among them,225 patients were living donor liver transplantation(LDLT)and 34 deceased donor liver transplantation(DDLT).Results:In LDLT all reconstructions of hepatic artery were microsurgical,while in DDLT either microsurgical reconstruction or traditional continuous suture technique was done depending on different conditions.There were five(1.9%)HATs:four(4/34,11.8%)in DDLT(all whole liver grafts)and one(1/225,0.4%)in LDLT(P=0.001).Four HATs were managed conservatively using anticoagulation,and 1 accepted salvage surgery with re-anastomosis.Until now,3 HAT patients remain in good condition,whereas two developed biliary complications.One of them needed to be re-transplanted,and the other patient died due to biliary complications.Conclusions:Microsurgical technique significantly improves the reconstruction of hepatic artery in pediatric liver transplantation.The risk for arterial complications is higher in DDLT.Conservative therapy can achieve good outcome in selected HAT cases.

Microsurgical reconstruction of hepatic artery in A-A LDLT:124 consecutive cases without HAT

AIM:To retrospectively investigate microsurgical hepatic artery(HA) reconstruction and management of hepatic thrombosis in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation(A-A LDLT).METHODS:From January 2001 to September 2009,182 recipients with end-stage liver disease underwent A-A LDLT.Ten of these patients received dual grafts.The 157 men and 25 women had an age range of 18 to 68 years(mean age,42 years).Microsurgical techniques and running sutures with back-wall first techniques were performed in all arterial reconstructions under surgical loupes(3.5 ×) by a group of vascular surgeons.Intimal dissections were resolved by interposition of the great saphenous vein(GSV) between the donor right hepatic artery(RHA) and recipient common HA(3 cases) or abdominal aorta(AA)(2 cases),by interposition of cryopreserved iliac vessels between the donor RHA and recipient AA(2 cases).RESULTS:In the 58 incipient patients in this series,hepatic arterial thrombosis(HAT) was encountered in 4 patients,and was not observed in 124 consecutive cases(total 192 grafts,major incidence,2.08%).All cases of HAT were suspected by routine color Doppler ultrasonographic examination and confirmed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and hepatic angiography.Of these cases of HAT,two occurred on the 1st and 7th d,respectively,following A-A LDLT,and were immediately revascularized with GSV between the graft and recipient AA.HAT in one patient occurred on the 46th postoperative day with no symptoms,and the remaining case of HAT occurred on the 3rd d following A-A LDLT,and was cured by thrombolytic therapy combined with an anticoagulant but died of multiorgan failure on the 36th d after A-A LDLT.No deaths were related to HAT.CONCLUSION:Applying microsurgical techniques and selecting an appropriate anastomotic artery for HA reconstruction are crucial in reducing the high risk of HAT during A-A LDLT.

Intraoperative thromboelastography as a tool to predict postoperative thrombosis during liver transplantation

BACKGROUND Thromboembolic complications are relatively common causes of increased morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period in liver transplant patients.Early postoperative portal vein thrombosis(PVT,incidence 2%-2.6%)and early hepatic artery thrombosis(HAT,incidence 3%-5%)have a poor prognosis in transplant patients,having impacts on graft and patient survival.In the present study,we attempted to identify the predictive factors of these complications for early detection and therefore monitor more closely the patients most at risk of thrombotic complications.AIM To investigate whether intraoperative thromboelastography(TEG)is useful in detecting the risk of early postoperative HAT and PVT in patients undergoing liver transplantation(LT).METHODS We retrospectively collected thromboelastographic traces,in addition to known risk factors(cold ischemic time,intraoperative requirement for red blood cells and fresh-frozen plasma transfusion,prolonged operating time),in 27 patients,selected among 530 patients(≥18 years old),who underwent their first LT from January 2002 to January 2015 at the Liver University Transplant Center and developed an early PVT or HAT(case group).Analyses of the TEG traces were performed before anesthesia and 120 min after reperfusion.We retrospectively compared these patients with the same number of nonconsecutive control patients who underwent LT in the same study period without developing these complications(1:1 match)(control group).The chosen matching parameters were:Patient graft and donor characteristics[age,sex,body mass index(BMI)],indication for transplantation,procedure details,United Network for Organ Sharing classification,BMI,warm ischemia time(WIT),cold ischemia time(CIT),the volume of blood products transfused,and conventional laboratory coagulation analysis.Normally distributed continuous data are reported as the mean±SD and compared using one-way Analysis of Variance(ANOVA).Nonnormally distributed continuous data are reported as the median(interquartile range)and compared using the Mann-Whitney test.Categorical variables were analyzed with Chi-square tests with Yates correction or Fisher’s exact test depending on best applicability.IBM SPSS Statistics version 24(SPSS Inc.,Chicago,IL,United States)was employed for statistical analysis.Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.RESULTS Postoperative thrombotic events were identified as early if they occurred within 21 d postoperatively.The incidence of early hepatic artery occlusion was 3.02%,whereas the incidence of PVT was 2.07%.A comparison between the case and control groups showed some differences in the duration of surgery,which was longer in the case group(P=0.032),whereas transfusion of blood products,red blood cells,fresh frozen plasma,and platelets,was similar between the two study groups.Thromboelastographic parameters did not show any statistically significant difference between the two groups,except for the G value measured at basal and 120’postreperfusion time.It was higher,although within the reference range,in the case group than in the control group(P=0.001 and P<0.001,respectively).In addition,clot lysis at 60 min(LY60)measured at 120’postreperfusion time was lower in the case group than in the control group(P=0.035).This parameter is representative of a fibrinolysis shutdown(LY60=0%-0.80%)in 85%of patients who experienced a thrombotic complication,resulting in a statistical correlation with HAT and PVT.CONCLUSION The end of surgery LY60 and G value may identify those recipients at greater risk of developing early HAT or PVT,suggesting that they may benefit from intense surveillance and eventually anticoagulation prophylaxis in order to prevent these serious complications after LT.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of extended right liver transplantation versus whole liver transplantation

Objective:To compare the differences in postoperative survival and complications between extended right liver transplantation(ERLT)and whole liver transplantation(WLT).Methods:The Chinese and English databases were searched for clinical studies on comparing ERLT with WLT for end-stage liver disease from the date of database construction to April 15,2022.The searched literature was de-duplicated and selected according to the order of title,abstract and content,after which NOS quality evaluation was performed for literature that matched the study.Postoperative complications and survival data were extracted from the eligible literature and subjected to Meta-analysis with Review Manager 5.3,and finally data sensitivity analysis and publication bias tests were performed.Results:The complication of ERLT such as biliary complications[OR=1.77,95%CI=(1.39,2.25),P<0.00001],biliary leakage[OR=2.16,95%CI=(1.64,2.84),P<0.0001],total vascular complications[OR=2.00,95%CI=(1.48,2.70),P<0.0001],hepatic arterial thrombosis[OR=2.06,95%CI=(1.50,2.83),P<0.00001],re-Transplantation[OR=1.93,95%CI=(1.53,2.45),P<0.00001]have a higher occurrence rate compared with WLT.While the biliary stenosis[OR=0.74,95%CI=(0.48,1.15),P=0.18],hepatic portal vein thrombosis[OR=1.72,95%CI=(0.84,3.49),P=0.14],primary non-function[OR=1.27,95%CI=(0.80,2.02),P=0.32]had no statistically difference in the incidence of complications after liver transplantation.In terms of survival,ERLT had lower 1-year graft survival rate[OR=0.64,95%CI=(0.54,0.76),P<0.00001]and patient survival rate[OR=0.75,95%CI=(0.62,0.91),P=0.003]than WLT.Fortunately,there was no statistically difference in 5-year graft survival rate[OR=0.97,95%CI=(0.76,1.23),P=0.78]and 5-year patient survival rate[OR=0.94,95%CI=(0.78,1.14),P=0.54].Conclusion:ERLT is a safe and effective treatment for adult end-stage liver disease.As a surgical method with postoperative complications and survival similar to that of WLT,ERLT can increase the source of donor liver.

Hepatic artery complications after orthotopic liver transplantation： interventional treatment or retransplantation？

Background The main therapeutic treatments for hepatic artery complications after orthotopic liver transplantation （OLT） include thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, stent placement, and liver retransplantation. The prognosis of hepatic artery complications after OLT is not only related to the type, extent, and timing but also closely associated with the selection and timing of the therapeutic methods. However, there is no consensus of opinion regarding the treatment of these complications. The aim of this study was to determine optimal treatment for hepatic artery complications after OLT. Methods The clinical data of 25 patients diagnosed with hepatic artery thrombosis （HAT） and hepatic artery stenosis （HAS） between October 2003 and March 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatments included liver retransplantation and interventions which contain thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement. Results Among five patients with HAT, 3 were treated with thrombolysis. One recovered, one died after thrombolysis and another one died of multi-organ failure after retransplantation because of recurrent HAT. The remaining 2 patients underwent successful retransplantation and have survived after that. Among 12 patients presented with HAS within 1 month postoperatively, 2 patients underwent retransplantation due to irreversible liver failure and another 10 patients were treated with interventions. The liver function failed to improve in 3 patients and retransplantations were performed in 4 patients after stent placement because of ischemic cholangitis. Among 6 patients undergoing liver retransplantations, two died of intracranial hemorrhage and infection respectively. Eight patients presented with HAS after 1 month postoperatively, 5 patients were treated with interventional management and recovered after stent placement. Among another 3 patients presented with HAS, 2 patients’ liver function was stable and one patient received late liver retransplantation due to ischemic bile duct lesion. Conclusions Individualized therapeutic regimens should be adopted in treating hepatic artery complications after OLT, according to postoperative periods, types and whether ischemic bile duct lesion exists or not. Liver retransplantation is the best treatment for patients with hepatic artery thrombosis. Interventional treatments of late HAS without irreversible liver failure or bile duct ischemia are appropriate, whereas retransplantation is recommended for early HAS.

Liver retransplantation: indications and outcomes

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is a life-saving the- rapeutic modality for patients with end-stage liver diseases. After liver transplantation, however, more than 10% pa- tients may lose the grafts caused by a variety of reasons. This review covers the most frequent indications for liver retransplantation as well as the results and specific problems with each indication. DATA RESOURCES: Searching MEDLINE (1997-2003) for articles on liver retransplantation. RESULTS: The most frequent indications of liver retrans- plantation are primary non-function, hepatic artery throm- bosis, graft rejection and recurrent diseases. The results af- ter liver retransplantation remain inferior to those after first transplantation. CONCLUSION: Liver retransplantation, which is the only means of prolonging survival in those patients whose initial graft has failed, makes an important contribution to overall survival.

Feasible management of median arcuate ligament syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation recipients

BACKGROUND In orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT)recipients,median arcuate ligament syndrome(MALS)is considered a risk factor for hepatic arterial thrombosis(HAT),which is dreadful for OLT recipients.Different alternative surgical procedures have been proposed to overcome the impact of MALS on transplantation,but clinical evidence is still scarce.AIM To evaluate the feasible surgical management of MALS to reduce complications in OLT patients.METHODS Data for 288 consecutive patients who underwent OLT at The First Hospital of Jilin University between January 2017 and July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed.The surgical management of median arcuate ligament(MAL)and modifications to the arterial anastomosis were recorded.The perioperative and long-term prognosis of MALS recipients were noted.Detailed preoperative and postoperative data of patients were analyzed in a descriptive manner.RESULTS Eight patients with MALS were included in this study.The first patient with MALS received no intervention during the primary surgery and developed postoperative HAT.Salvage liver transplantation with MAL division was successfully performed.Gastroduodenal artery(GDA)preservation with splenic artery ligation was performed on three patients,only GDA preservation was performed on two patients,and no intervention was performed on two patients.No patient developed HAT after surgery and postoperative recovery was satisfactory.CONCLUSION The preservation of collateral circulation between the superior mesenteric artery and celiac trunk via the GDA with or without splenic artery ligation is a safe and feasible alternative to MAL division.