目的研究分析交锁髓内钉内固定术对胫腓骨干骨折患者治疗效果及并发症的影响。方法选取商河县人民医院2022年4月至2023年7月期间收治的胫腓骨干骨折患者87例,按照信封法随机分为观察组与对照组,分别为43例、44例。观察组采取交锁髓内钉...目的研究分析交锁髓内钉内固定术对胫腓骨干骨折患者治疗效果及并发症的影响。方法选取商河县人民医院2022年4月至2023年7月期间收治的胫腓骨干骨折患者87例,按照信封法随机分为观察组与对照组,分别为43例、44例。观察组采取交锁髓内钉内固定术治疗,对照组采取经皮锁定钢板内固定术治疗。对比两组治疗效果、临床指标、并发症发生情况。结果观察组治疗总有效率显著高于对照组,P<0.05;观察组术中出血量显著少于对照组,术后4 h VAS评分显著低于对照组,骨折愈合时间、住院时间均显著短于对照组,P<0.05;观察组术后并发症发生率略低于对照组,但两者对比,P>0.05。结论对胫腓骨干骨折患者采取交锁髓内钉内固定术治疗可减轻患者术后疼痛,减少术中出血量,缩短恢复时间,进而提高治疗效果。展开更多
Background： Fracture shaft humerus is a major cause of morbidity in patients with upper extremity injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of interlocking nail in humeral shaft fractures. Methods：...Background： Fracture shaft humerus is a major cause of morbidity in patients with upper extremity injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of interlocking nail in humeral shaft fractures. Methods： This study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery in SMS and R Sharda University from January 2010 to November 2013. Seventy-eight patients were recruited from emergency and out-patient department having a close fracture of humerus shaft. All patients were operated under general anesthesia and closed reamed interlocking nailing was done. All patients were followed for 9 months. Results： Out of 78 patients, 69 patients underwent union in 90-150 days with a mean of I 10.68 days. Complications found in four patients who had nonunion, and five patients had delayed union, which was treated with bone grafting. All the patients were assessed clinically and radiologically for fracture healing joint movements and implant thilure. The results were excellent in 88.46% and good in 6.41% patients. Complete subjective, functional, and clinical recovery had occurred in almost 100% of the patients. ConcLusions： The results of the present study indicates that in the presence of proper indications, reamed antegrade intramedullary interlocked nailing appears to be a method of choice for internal fixation ofosteoporotic and pathologic fractures.展开更多
目的:比较肱骨干骨折手术与非手术治疗方法的临床疗效,以期指导临床选择。方法:连续入选2005年3月至2012年10月间有完整随访资料的患者252例,根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为保守治疗组和手术内固定组,其中保守治疗组76例使用石膏或小夹...目的:比较肱骨干骨折手术与非手术治疗方法的临床疗效,以期指导临床选择。方法:连续入选2005年3月至2012年10月间有完整随访资料的患者252例,根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为保守治疗组和手术内固定组,其中保守治疗组76例使用石膏或小夹板固定骨折,手术内固定组176例使用切开复位钢板或髓内针固定骨折。对两组间并发症发生率、骨折愈合时间、骨折愈合率、Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分和Mayo肘关节功能评分等参数进行比较。结果:平均随访(31.24±20.06)个月。两组数据在年龄、开放骨折数量、骨折部位和AO(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen)分类方面差异没有统计学意义。骨折愈合率:保守治疗组96.1%(73/76),手术内固定组97.7%(172/176),P=0.46;骨折愈合时间:保守治疗组(10.24±2.93)周,手术内固定组(10.69±2.51)周,P=0.22;并发症发生率:保守治疗组5.3%(4/76例),手术内固定组15.3%(27/176例),P=0.025;其中骨折不愈合率:保守治疗组3.95%(3/76),手术内固定组2.3%(4/176),P=0.43;桡神经损伤:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组5.7%(10/176),P=0.035;骨劈裂:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组1.7%(3/176),P=0.556;肘僵硬:保守治疗组1.3%(1/76),手术内固定组0.6%(1/176),P=1.000;肩痛:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组5.1%(9/176),P=0.061。Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分:保守治疗组(97.37±4.94)分,手术内固定组(96.34±6.88)分,P=0.24;Mayo肘关节功能评分:保守治疗组(99.80±1.72)分,手术内固定组(99.49±2.73)分,P=0.36。结论:肱骨干骨折保守治疗与手术治疗的疗效相当,但并发症少。展开更多
文摘目的研究分析交锁髓内钉内固定术对胫腓骨干骨折患者治疗效果及并发症的影响。方法选取商河县人民医院2022年4月至2023年7月期间收治的胫腓骨干骨折患者87例,按照信封法随机分为观察组与对照组,分别为43例、44例。观察组采取交锁髓内钉内固定术治疗,对照组采取经皮锁定钢板内固定术治疗。对比两组治疗效果、临床指标、并发症发生情况。结果观察组治疗总有效率显著高于对照组,P<0.05;观察组术中出血量显著少于对照组,术后4 h VAS评分显著低于对照组,骨折愈合时间、住院时间均显著短于对照组,P<0.05;观察组术后并发症发生率略低于对照组,但两者对比,P>0.05。结论对胫腓骨干骨折患者采取交锁髓内钉内固定术治疗可减轻患者术后疼痛,减少术中出血量,缩短恢复时间,进而提高治疗效果。
文摘Background： Fracture shaft humerus is a major cause of morbidity in patients with upper extremity injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of interlocking nail in humeral shaft fractures. Methods： This study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery in SMS and R Sharda University from January 2010 to November 2013. Seventy-eight patients were recruited from emergency and out-patient department having a close fracture of humerus shaft. All patients were operated under general anesthesia and closed reamed interlocking nailing was done. All patients were followed for 9 months. Results： Out of 78 patients, 69 patients underwent union in 90-150 days with a mean of I 10.68 days. Complications found in four patients who had nonunion, and five patients had delayed union, which was treated with bone grafting. All the patients were assessed clinically and radiologically for fracture healing joint movements and implant thilure. The results were excellent in 88.46% and good in 6.41% patients. Complete subjective, functional, and clinical recovery had occurred in almost 100% of the patients. ConcLusions： The results of the present study indicates that in the presence of proper indications, reamed antegrade intramedullary interlocked nailing appears to be a method of choice for internal fixation ofosteoporotic and pathologic fractures.
文摘目的:比较肱骨干骨折手术与非手术治疗方法的临床疗效,以期指导临床选择。方法:连续入选2005年3月至2012年10月间有完整随访资料的患者252例,根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为保守治疗组和手术内固定组,其中保守治疗组76例使用石膏或小夹板固定骨折,手术内固定组176例使用切开复位钢板或髓内针固定骨折。对两组间并发症发生率、骨折愈合时间、骨折愈合率、Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分和Mayo肘关节功能评分等参数进行比较。结果:平均随访(31.24±20.06)个月。两组数据在年龄、开放骨折数量、骨折部位和AO(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen)分类方面差异没有统计学意义。骨折愈合率:保守治疗组96.1%(73/76),手术内固定组97.7%(172/176),P=0.46;骨折愈合时间:保守治疗组(10.24±2.93)周,手术内固定组(10.69±2.51)周,P=0.22;并发症发生率:保守治疗组5.3%(4/76例),手术内固定组15.3%(27/176例),P=0.025;其中骨折不愈合率:保守治疗组3.95%(3/76),手术内固定组2.3%(4/176),P=0.43;桡神经损伤:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组5.7%(10/176),P=0.035;骨劈裂:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组1.7%(3/176),P=0.556;肘僵硬:保守治疗组1.3%(1/76),手术内固定组0.6%(1/176),P=1.000;肩痛:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组5.1%(9/176),P=0.061。Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分:保守治疗组(97.37±4.94)分,手术内固定组(96.34±6.88)分,P=0.24;Mayo肘关节功能评分:保守治疗组(99.80±1.72)分,手术内固定组(99.49±2.73)分,P=0.36。结论:肱骨干骨折保守治疗与手术治疗的疗效相当,但并发症少。
