Cohesive zone model-based analyses of localized leakage of segmentally lined tunnels

This paper presents a novel approach for simulating the localized leakage behavior of segmentally lined tunnels based on a cohesive zone model.The proposed approach not only simulates localized leakage at the lining segment,but also captures the hydromechanically coupled seepage behavior at the segmental joints.It is first verified via a tunnel drainage experiment,which reveals its merits over the existing local hydraulic conductivity method.Subsequently,a parametric study is conducted to investigate the effects of the aperture size,stratum permeability,and spatial distribution of drainage holes on the leakage behavior,stratum seepage field,and leakage-induced mechanical response of the tunnel lining.The proposed approach yields more accurate results than the classical local hydraulic conductivity method.Moreover,it is both computationally efficient and stable.Localized leakage leads to reduced local ground pressure,which further induces outward deformation near the leakage point and slight inward deformation at its diametrically opposite side.A localized stress arch spanning across the leakage point is observed,which manifests as the rotation of the principal stresses in the adjacent area.The seepage field depends on both the number and location of the leakage zones.Pseudostatic seepage zones,in which the seepage rate is significantly lower than that of the adjacent area,appear when multiple seepage zones are considered.Finally,the importance of employing the hydromechanical coupled mechanism at the segment joints is highlighted by cases of shallowly buried tunnels subjected to surface loading and pressure tunnels while considering internal water pressure.

Numerical modeling and performance evaluation of passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier(PC-PRB)

The passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier(PC-PRB)was proposed to address the limitations of traditional PRB configurations.To evaluate the hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of the PC-PRB system,we developed a simulation code named PRB-Trans.This code uses the two-dimensional(2D)finite element method to simulate groundwater flow and solute transport.Case studies demonstrate that PC-PRB technology is more efficient and cost-effective than continuous permeable reactive barrier(C-PRB)in treating the same contaminated plume.Implementation of PC-PRB technology results in a 33.3%and 72.7%reduction in PRB length(L_(PRB))and height(H_(PRB)),respectively,while increasing 2D horizontal and 2D vertical pollutant treatment efficiencies of PRB by 87.8%and 266.8%,respectively.In addition,the PC-PRB technology has the ability to homogenize the pollutant concentration and pollutant flux through the PRB system,which can mitigate the problems arising from uneven distribution of pollutants in the C-PRB to some extent.The L_(PRB)required for PC-PRB decreases as the water pipe length(L_(p))increases,while the H_(PRB)required initially decreases and then increases with increasing L_(p).The effect of passive well height(Hw)on H_(PRB)is not as significant as that of L_(p)on H_(PRB).Overall,PC-PRB presents a promising and advantageous PRB configuration in the effective treatment of various types of contaminated plumes.

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PERFORMANCE OF HORIZONTAL AND WAVY SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS

A three-dimensional numerical model is proposed for modeling the TP transport in the Horizontal Subsurface Flow （HSSF） and Wavy subsurface Flow （WSSF） constructed wetland in this article. Both numerical simulations and physical experiments indicate that the removal efficiency of WSSF is higher than that of HSSF. The difference ofperforrnance in removing pollutants, e.g., Total Phosphorus （TP）, between HSSF and WSSF is numerically analyzed from three interactive aspects, that is, the hydraulic behavior, the substrate and the plant roots. It is shown that the dead zone volume in WSSF is smaller than in HSSF with less short circuiting. The soil in the top layer is more used in WSSF than in HSSF. The TP uptake by the plant roots in WSSF is higher than that in HSSF.