AIM: To investigate the prevalence of relevant incidental findings(RIFs) detected during routine abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography(Ce CT).METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the reports of a consecutiv...AIM: To investigate the prevalence of relevant incidental findings(RIFs) detected during routine abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography(Ce CT).METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the reports of a consecutive series of abdominal Ce CT studies performed between January and May 2013. For each report, patients' age and sex, admission as inpatient or outpatient, clinical suspicion as indicated by the requesting physician, availability of a previous abdominal examination, and name of the reporting radiologist were recorded. Based on the clinical suspicion, the presence and features of any RIFs(if needing additional workup) was noted.RESULTS: One thousand forty abdominal Ce CT were performed in 949 patients(528 males, mean age 66 ±14 years). No significant difference was found between inpatients and outpatients age and sex distribution(P > 0.472). RIFs were found in 195/1040(18.8%) Ce CT [inpatients = 108/470(23.0%); outpatients = 87/570(15.2%); P = 0.002]. RIFs were found in 30/440(6.8%) Ce CT with a previous exam and in 165/600(27.5%) without a previous exam(P < 0.001). Radiologists' distribution between inpatients or outpatients was significantly different(P < 0.001). RIFs prevalence increased with aging, except for a peak in 40-49 year group. Most involved organs were kidneys, gallbladder, and lungs.CONCLUSION: A RIF is detected in 1/5 patients undergoing abdominal Ce CT. Risk of overdiagnosis should be taken into account.展开更多
AIM:To investigate the incidence and rel ated factors of dysphagia in stroke patients.METHODS:Water drinking test were applied to 100patients who received continuously by neurology and rehabilitation department afte r...AIM:To investigate the incidence and rel ated factors of dysphagia in stroke patients.METHODS:Water drinking test were applied to 100patients who received continuously by neurology and rehabilitation department afte r their condition was stable.RESULTS:Dysphagia incidence of the 100cases of stroke patients was 33%.CONCLUSION:Analysis of related factors indi-cates that incidence of dysphagia has no relationship with sex,age,position of the lesion and complications,but sh ows correlation with status of consc ious-ness,cognitive skill,character of the lesion,position,course,exerc ise abili-ty,daily life activities,buccofac ial apraxia,speech apraxia and aphasia.展开更多
AIM:To assesse the rate of bile duct injuries(BDI)and overall biliary complications during single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SPLC)compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy(CLC).METHODS:SPLC has rece...AIM:To assesse the rate of bile duct injuries(BDI)and overall biliary complications during single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SPLC)compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy(CLC).METHODS:SPLC has recently been proposed as an innovative surgical approach for gallbladder surgery.So far,its safety with respect to bile duct injuries has not been specifically evaluated.A systematic review of the literature published between January 1990 and November 2012 was performed.Randomized controlled trials(RCT)comparing SPLC versus CLC reporting BDI rate and overall biliary complications were included.The quality of RCT was assessed using the Jadad score.Analysis was made by performing a meta-analysis,using Review Manager 5.2.This study was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.A retrospective study including all retrospective reports on SPLC was also performed alongside.RESULTS:From 496 publications,11 RCT including 898patients were selected for meta-analysis.No studies were rated as high quality(Jadad score≥4).Operative indications included benign gallbladder disease operated in an elective setting in all studies,excluding all emergency cases and acute cholecystitis.The median follow-up was 1 mo(range 0.03-18 mo).The incidence of BDI was 0.4%for SPLC and 0%for CLC;the difference was not statistically different(P=0.36).The incidence of overall biliary complication was 1.6%for SPLC and 0.5%for CLC,the difference did not reached statistically significance(P=0.21,95%CI:0.66-15).Sixty non-randomized trials including 3599 patients were also analysed.The incidence of BDI reported then was 0.7%.CONCLUSION:The safety of SPLC cannot be assumed,based on the current evidence.Hence,this new technology cannot be recommended as standard technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.展开更多
文摘AIM: To investigate the prevalence of relevant incidental findings(RIFs) detected during routine abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography(Ce CT).METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the reports of a consecutive series of abdominal Ce CT studies performed between January and May 2013. For each report, patients' age and sex, admission as inpatient or outpatient, clinical suspicion as indicated by the requesting physician, availability of a previous abdominal examination, and name of the reporting radiologist were recorded. Based on the clinical suspicion, the presence and features of any RIFs(if needing additional workup) was noted.RESULTS: One thousand forty abdominal Ce CT were performed in 949 patients(528 males, mean age 66 ±14 years). No significant difference was found between inpatients and outpatients age and sex distribution(P > 0.472). RIFs were found in 195/1040(18.8%) Ce CT [inpatients = 108/470(23.0%); outpatients = 87/570(15.2%); P = 0.002]. RIFs were found in 30/440(6.8%) Ce CT with a previous exam and in 165/600(27.5%) without a previous exam(P < 0.001). Radiologists' distribution between inpatients or outpatients was significantly different(P < 0.001). RIFs prevalence increased with aging, except for a peak in 40-49 year group. Most involved organs were kidneys, gallbladder, and lungs.CONCLUSION: A RIF is detected in 1/5 patients undergoing abdominal Ce CT. Risk of overdiagnosis should be taken into account.
文摘AIM:To investigate the incidence and rel ated factors of dysphagia in stroke patients.METHODS:Water drinking test were applied to 100patients who received continuously by neurology and rehabilitation department afte r their condition was stable.RESULTS:Dysphagia incidence of the 100cases of stroke patients was 33%.CONCLUSION:Analysis of related factors indi-cates that incidence of dysphagia has no relationship with sex,age,position of the lesion and complications,but sh ows correlation with status of consc ious-ness,cognitive skill,character of the lesion,position,course,exerc ise abili-ty,daily life activities,buccofac ial apraxia,speech apraxia and aphasia.
文摘AIM:To assesse the rate of bile duct injuries(BDI)and overall biliary complications during single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SPLC)compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy(CLC).METHODS:SPLC has recently been proposed as an innovative surgical approach for gallbladder surgery.So far,its safety with respect to bile duct injuries has not been specifically evaluated.A systematic review of the literature published between January 1990 and November 2012 was performed.Randomized controlled trials(RCT)comparing SPLC versus CLC reporting BDI rate and overall biliary complications were included.The quality of RCT was assessed using the Jadad score.Analysis was made by performing a meta-analysis,using Review Manager 5.2.This study was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.A retrospective study including all retrospective reports on SPLC was also performed alongside.RESULTS:From 496 publications,11 RCT including 898patients were selected for meta-analysis.No studies were rated as high quality(Jadad score≥4).Operative indications included benign gallbladder disease operated in an elective setting in all studies,excluding all emergency cases and acute cholecystitis.The median follow-up was 1 mo(range 0.03-18 mo).The incidence of BDI was 0.4%for SPLC and 0%for CLC;the difference was not statistically different(P=0.36).The incidence of overall biliary complication was 1.6%for SPLC and 0.5%for CLC,the difference did not reached statistically significance(P=0.21,95%CI:0.66-15).Sixty non-randomized trials including 3599 patients were also analysed.The incidence of BDI reported then was 0.7%.CONCLUSION:The safety of SPLC cannot be assumed,based on the current evidence.Hence,this new technology cannot be recommended as standard technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
