The Profound Revelation of Human Social Relations and the Profound Realization of Information Right of Citizens——The social significance of network technique advancement in the perspective of “Entity Cube”

The R＆D group of relationship searching in Microsoft Asia Research Institute explains ＂Entity Cube＂ launched in 2008 as follows：

On the Expansion and Realization of the Right to Environmental Information in Environmental Protection Supervision

As an innovation in the environmental governance system that breaks the traditional hierarchical structure,environmental protection supervision has not only played a significant role in protecting tangible environmental rights but also expanded the basic scope of the right to environmental information—part of procedural environmental rights.In the supervision of environmental protection,the objects of the right to environmental information and the subjects of the obligation to provide environmental information have been both expanded,with the focus shifting from government information to Party information and from administrative organs to Party organs.This vividly demonstrates the Communist Party of China’s concrete efforts to protect human rights in the field of the endeavor to build an ecological civilization.At present,the realization of the right to environmental information in environmental protection supervision still faces problems such as insufficient standards and norms,disordered practice and operation,and lack of liability guarantee.In this context,based on renewing relevant subjects’cognition of the right to know in environmental protection supervision,we should further improve and specify the rule for disclosing information about environmental protection supervision,rationally distribute the obligations for information disclosure in environmental protection supervision,and clarify the accountability rules for violating relevant requirements for information disclosure,so as to promote the overall development of the environmental protection supervision system while guaranteeing the realization of the right to environmental information.

Why The Constitution Should Protect Personal Credit Information?——An Approach of Right Argumentation

Protecting personal credit information through constitutional rights is not only essemtial for individuals to defend against infringements on their personal credit information rights and interests by public power in the social credit system,but also a requirement for unified legislation on social credit to explore the basis for constitutional norms.In the era of the credit economy,personal credit information has become a vital resource for realizing personal autonomy.Along with the increase in the state’s supervision and control of personal credit,the realization of the autonomous value in the interests related to personal credit information has also set more obligations for the state.Therefore,interests related to personal credit information should be regarded as a constitutional right.Because of its significant economic interest and value,the right to personal credit information should be classified as a constitutional property right.As a constitutional property right,the right to personal credit information can not only help protect people’s economic interests,but also achieve the goal of safeguarding their personality interests.

The Bundle of Personal Information Rights from the Perspective of State Protection

The bundle of personal information rights refers to a set of rights belonging to the subject of personal information,including the right to know,decide,inquire,correct,copy,delete,etc.Such a bundle of rights is usually understood in Chinese civil rights legal circles as a civil right falling under the paradigm of individual autonomy and control,and is interpreted as a specific right to personal information.This understanding somewhat misinterprets the nature and function of the bundle of personal information rights.In terms of its nature,the bundle of personal information rights is the outcome of the state’s obligation to actively protect and empower individuals through institutional safeguards,and is thus essentially a means and a tool of protection granted to individuals by the state under the concept of protective law.In terms of its function,the bundle of personal information rights is both a tool enabling individuals to check and counterbalance processors of information and a strategy for the state to regulate data processors.Understanding the nature and functions of the bundle of rights from the perspective of state protection and regulation strategies helps to construct a fairer,more transparent and rational order of public law data governance under the concept of protective law and promotes the structural optimization and capacity enhancement of the data governance system.As an instrumental right under the state’s regulatory strategy,the implementation of the bundle of personal information rights needs to focus on facilitating the individual’s knowledge,participation and ability to negotiate under procedural justice,as well as the reasonable allocation of rights and obligations between individuals and information processors under distributive justice,with a view to continuously developing and enhancing the state’s regulatory rationality.

Impact of Enforcement of Right of Communication through Information Network

On 27 October 2001, the Standing Committee of the People's Congress reviewed and passed the Amendment to the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China. In Article 10 of the amended Copyright Law as of 2001 has been incorporated a new subject matter under the copyright protection: the right of communication through information network, that is, the right to make a work available to the public by wire or by wireless means, so that people may have access to the work from a place and at a time individu...

THE JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS Information for Authors

The Journal of Human Rights publishes original works in law,philosophy,political science and other disciplines which deal with concepts,measurement tools and policy alternatives from human rights perspectives.Please submit your manuscripts to the following e-mail address:JHRsubmissions@cupl.edu.cn.Manuscripts accepted for review should satisfy the following format specifications:

Regulations for the Protection of the Right of Communication through Information Network

Article 1 These Regulations have been formulated under the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Copyright Law) with a view to protecting the right of communication through information network enjoyed by copyright owners, performers and producers of sound recordings and video recordings (hereinafter collectively referred to as the right owners) and to encouraging creation and communication of works conducive to the building of a socialist society that is advanced ethically and materially.

THE JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS Information for Authors

The journal of human Rights publishes original works in law,philosophy,political science and other disciplines which deal with concepts,measurement tools and policy alternatives from human rights perspectives.Please submit your manuscripts to the following e-mail address:JHRsubmissions@cupl.edu.cn.

On China's Protection of Citizens' Right to Be Informed and Construction of Government Information Publicity System

I. The Unfolding Situation of the Philosophy of Right to Be Informed in China and Early Construction of Government Information Publicity System The origin of the thought,known as China＇s protection of right to be informed and the construction of government information publicity system

Enforcement of Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Disclosure of Government Information and Continual Development of a Group of Basic Human Rights

Introduction 2013 saw the sixth anniversary of the formulation of Regulations of the People＇s Republic of China on Disclosure of Government Information （hereinafter referred to as the Regulations） and the fifth anniversary of their being put into effect. As the Regulations were stipulated and put into force,

THE JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Articles from researchers,scholars,legal practitioners,and postgraduates in the field of human rights are welcomed.We especially seek original papers written in English.Manuscripts should be submitted via www.humanrightscn.com.Authors should not simultaneously submit the manuscript to another journal.

Legal Protection of the Right of Informed Consent of the Subjects of Human Clinical Trials in China

The “informed consent principle” in human clinical trials is the product of the extension of the concept of human rights in the field of human trials and a reflection of the progress of human civilization in biomedical research. In recent years, the legal protection of the right to informed consent for research subjects has been gradually improved in China. The right to informed consent for research subjects has been improved from an ethical norm to a legal norm. The legal status of legal norms has also been gradually improved. Based on the public law regulations, private law relief has been added to the legal relief system for the infringement of the right to informed consent for research subjects. As a result, the protection of rights has been enhanced. The domestic informed consent protection system is partially in line with international norms. The protection of the right to informed consent depends on the perfection of the legal system and the social consensus to respect human rights and the right to self-determination.

Information for Authors

The Journal of Human Rights publishes original works in law,philosophy,political science and other disciplines which deal with concepts,measurement tools and policy alternatives from human rights perspectives.Please submit your manuscripts to the following e-mail address:JHRsubmissions@cupl.edu.cn.Manuscripts accepted for review should satisfy the following format specifications:

Human Rights Jurisprudence in Hospice Care——Thoughts on the Concept and Boundary of “Death with Dignity”

Death with dignity is the embodiment of the dignity of human life in the context of end-of-life medical care.However,in the development of its concept,it has been alienated into a single way of death and is often confused with the concept of euthanasia.It is therefore a theoretical and practical necessity to re-expand the connotations of death with dignity Death with dignity is the subjective value of dignity reflected in the context of dying.It takes equality,freedom,and virtue as the core,and uses the right to life as its external support.It is projected onto the medical context and incorporates the patient’s right to informed consent.Subject to public interest,legal paternalism,and the principles of public order and good customs,the boundary of the right to death with dignity should be between active treatment and natural death,and active euthanasia in the form of giving up the right to life should not be included in the right to death with dignity.

Submission Information

Articles from researchers,scholars,legal practitioners,and postgraduates in the field of human rights are welcomed.We especially seek original papers written in English.Manuscripts should be submitted via www.humanrightscn.com.A uthors should not simultaneously submit the manuscript to another journal.

建立林权流转中信息共享平台

基于林权改革的实际需求,本文提出林权流转中要建立统一的、面向全国"大市场"的信息共享平台,以解决林权流转中信息共享只限于林权宗地本地的状况及信息不对称问题,目的是保证林农利益最大化。本文提出林权流转信息共享平台数据框架、信息共享操作机制和业务流程框架,并指出林权流转信息共享平台实施过程中可能存在的问题。

信息化侦查中的程序控制与公民信息权保障

犯罪控制与人权保障的冲突在刑侦领域尤为凸显,刑侦部门对信息资源的高度依赖决定刑侦信息化在有效侦破案件的同时也会存在侵犯权利的风险。实现侦查程序的控制,并对侦查机关采集、使用个人信息过程进行规范,就可以达到保障公民信息权利乃至人权的终极目的。

关于信息技术与未来战争若干问题的思考

每个时代的战争都有自己的技术基础。技术基础不同 ,战争的形态、样式、特点也不同。人类已经经历了农业时代的冷兵器战争 ,近代的热兵器战争以及工业时代的机械化战争。随着信息技术的发展及广泛应用 ,信息化战争将逐步取代工业时代的机械化战争 ,在信息化武器、软件信息武器、C4I系统的支持下 ,呈现出制信息权、非线式战场、脱离接触的战斗等一些新特点 ,战争中信息的收集。

拓展海军作战支撑技术,提高海洋权益维护能力

初步探讨了未来信息化战争的特征和谋略,认为海上空海一体化战争离不开信息化技术的支撑,特别是掌握航天技术大国之间作战,即使在战争第一阶段相互摧毁天基侦察、通讯平台,还需要拓展新的技术领域,发展空基、海基、陆基等平台,构建新的信息网络。中远海战场的C4ISR功能的实现,对广域网络更是特别依赖。海军在中远海执行任务,不一定都是作战,有可能是在非战争情况下保护国家战略大通道和相关海域的国家权益。执行这种任务的技术支撑有新的特色需求和技术保障,文中对潜艇碰撞和防海盗事件作了分析,提出了技术支撑建议。

医疗信息化语境下患者隐私权的法律保护与伦理思考

医疗信息化为医疗事业发展带来价值应当肯定,但其同时亦对患者个人隐私的保护带来挑战,应当重视。本文就医疗信息化语境下患者隐私权的基本概念和法律界限、患者隐私权保护的具体内容及其保护中的相关权利冲突,从一般隐私权损害之认定的角度来阐释患者隐私权的损害认定标准,并从医疗机构内部加强管理及立法保护隐私权双路径来探讨对患者隐私权的保护与相关法律制度完善,亦对患者隐私权保护所涉伦理问题作了思考。