China’s State Administration of Taxationstipulates in its notice concerning the transfertax of Chinese-made products bearing foreignbrands:Ⅰ.In accordance with the currenttaxation laws,intangible asset transfers toC...China’s State Administration of Taxationstipulates in its notice concerning the transfertax of Chinese-made products bearing foreignbrands:Ⅰ.In accordance with the currenttaxation laws,intangible asset transfers toChinese enterprises from foreign enterprisesthat do not have representation in Chinabelong to intangible asset transfers withinChina.Business tax should be collected onthose transfers taking effect after January 1,1994.Ⅱ.Business tax should be levied onproject design and service that are not listedon the transfer contract.Ⅲ.The due businesstax of foreign enterprises that do not haverepresentative organs in China should展开更多
The Environmental Protection Tax Law that took effect in 2018 gave local authorities a certain amount of discretionary power to set the local rates for environmental protection tax.The inter-provincial gradient tax ra...The Environmental Protection Tax Law that took effect in 2018 gave local authorities a certain amount of discretionary power to set the local rates for environmental protection tax.The inter-provincial gradient tax rates pattern may induce strategic relocation of enterprises,leading to unintended policy results.Combined with the data on trans-regional investment of listed companies,this paper employs the Difference-in-Difference(DID)approach to study the impact of inter-provincially different environmental tax rates on the trans-regional migration of polluting enterprises.The study shows that due to the regional differences in the tax rates,the polluting enterprises opt for the relocation strategy of"avoiding high tax rates and opting for low rates",setting up more subsidiaries in regions with relatively low tax rates.Further research demonstrates that the trans-regional migration induced by different tax rates can help reduce production costs and increase corporate profits,while dampening the corporate enthusiasm for green innovation in the short term and resulting in pollution transfer.This paper reveals the unintended policy effects that may derive from the environmental tax reform,providing concrete proof for the comprehensive evaluation and understanding of the actual policy effects of existing environmental tax reform.展开更多
The confluence of several factors including government fiscal pressures and growing opportunities for tax minimization in a digital economy prompted the OECD to embark on a program to reduce base erosion and profit sh...The confluence of several factors including government fiscal pressures and growing opportunities for tax minimization in a digital economy prompted the OECD to embark on a program to reduce base erosion and profit shifting(BEPS).At the same time,countries became increasingly unhappy about international tax rules that left them unable to impose income taxes on companies earning profits by selling to customers inside their country without establishing a taxable presence there.The frustration led to unilateral responses that prompted the OECD to develop proposals to address this problem as well.The OECD’s proposals to reduce profit shifting and enhance taxing rights of sales destination countries evolved into what are now known as Pillar One and Pillar Two international tax reforms.This paper provides an overview of the operation of each of the Pillars and notes the limitations that prevent them from addressing the underlying causes of profit shifting and providing full taxing rights to sales destination jurisdictions.展开更多
文摘China’s State Administration of Taxationstipulates in its notice concerning the transfertax of Chinese-made products bearing foreignbrands:Ⅰ.In accordance with the currenttaxation laws,intangible asset transfers toChinese enterprises from foreign enterprisesthat do not have representation in Chinabelong to intangible asset transfers withinChina.Business tax should be collected onthose transfers taking effect after January 1,1994.Ⅱ.Business tax should be levied onproject design and service that are not listedon the transfer contract.Ⅲ.The due businesstax of foreign enterprises that do not haverepresentative organs in China should
基金Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of China"Research on Local Financial System Reform in the Development of Equal Access to Basic Public Services"(18ZDA096)the Sci-Tech Innovation Program for Postgraduates of Department of Finance at the School of Economics of Xiamen University"Research on Financial Pressure and Coping Strategies of Local Governments".The authors would like to express appreciation for the valuable suggestions from anonymous reviewers and the editorial department.The authors take sole responsibility for the paper.
文摘The Environmental Protection Tax Law that took effect in 2018 gave local authorities a certain amount of discretionary power to set the local rates for environmental protection tax.The inter-provincial gradient tax rates pattern may induce strategic relocation of enterprises,leading to unintended policy results.Combined with the data on trans-regional investment of listed companies,this paper employs the Difference-in-Difference(DID)approach to study the impact of inter-provincially different environmental tax rates on the trans-regional migration of polluting enterprises.The study shows that due to the regional differences in the tax rates,the polluting enterprises opt for the relocation strategy of"avoiding high tax rates and opting for low rates",setting up more subsidiaries in regions with relatively low tax rates.Further research demonstrates that the trans-regional migration induced by different tax rates can help reduce production costs and increase corporate profits,while dampening the corporate enthusiasm for green innovation in the short term and resulting in pollution transfer.This paper reveals the unintended policy effects that may derive from the environmental tax reform,providing concrete proof for the comprehensive evaluation and understanding of the actual policy effects of existing environmental tax reform.
文摘The confluence of several factors including government fiscal pressures and growing opportunities for tax minimization in a digital economy prompted the OECD to embark on a program to reduce base erosion and profit shifting(BEPS).At the same time,countries became increasingly unhappy about international tax rules that left them unable to impose income taxes on companies earning profits by selling to customers inside their country without establishing a taxable presence there.The frustration led to unilateral responses that prompted the OECD to develop proposals to address this problem as well.The OECD’s proposals to reduce profit shifting and enhance taxing rights of sales destination countries evolved into what are now known as Pillar One and Pillar Two international tax reforms.This paper provides an overview of the operation of each of the Pillars and notes the limitations that prevent them from addressing the underlying causes of profit shifting and providing full taxing rights to sales destination jurisdictions.
