We report a series of patients operated for one or multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (with and without spondylolisthesis) using the minimal invasive bilateral interlaminar decompression. We discuss our results, compar...We report a series of patients operated for one or multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (with and without spondylolisthesis) using the minimal invasive bilateral interlaminar decompression. We discuss our results, comparing this procedure (from a technical point of view) with the muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD) and the unilateral approach for bilateral decompression (ULBD). Clinical and outcome data of 62 consecutive patients were reviewed, using the Visual Analogue Scale for both low back pain (LBP) and legs pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for the degree of disability. Mean age was 68.88 ± 9.54 years and mean follow-up (FU) was 16.38 ± 11.12 months. A statistically significant improvement of LBP, legs pain and ODI was globally observed. At latest FU, patients with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis significantly improved all scores and patients with spondylolisthesis significantly decreased their disability. No major complications occurred. Two cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collections were treated conservatively. No wound infection occurred. No progression of spondylolisthesis was observed. No reoperation was needed. Although efficacious in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, MILD and ULBD can have both some limitations. MILD has been found to decrease lumbar function in multilevel decompression (increasing sagittal translation and lumbar lordosis probably due to the removal of half of the spinous processes) and ULBD shows some disadvantages due to the difficulty of manipulating instruments through a small portal and the inadequate decompression due to a minimal exposure. The minimal invasive bilateral interlaminar decompression (in this technique, the access is bilateral but the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments and the spinous processes are preserved) allows wide access (bilateral exposure) with minimal invasiveness and very low morbidity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis at one or more levels.展开更多
BACKGROUND Disc herniation(DH)is a fragment of the disc nucleus that is pushed out of the annulus into the spinal canal due to a tear or rupture in the annulus.It is a common cause of lumbar and leg pains.Substantial ...BACKGROUND Disc herniation(DH)is a fragment of the disc nucleus that is pushed out of the annulus into the spinal canal due to a tear or rupture in the annulus.It is a common cause of lumbar and leg pains.Substantial advancements have been made to determine the cause of DH and to ensure accurate diagnosis,imaging,and treatment of this condition.Total endoscopic discectomy is an alternative surgical technique that is less invasive.AIM To study the optimal approach for a total endoscopic discectomy and its influence on lumbar and leg function in DH patients.METHODS This prospective study enrolled 120 patients with lumbar DH who were treated in our hospital from February 2018 to January 2021.All patients were randomly divided into the following two groups:The observation group,comprising 62 patients who underwent surgery using the interlaminar approach,and the control group,comprising 58 patients who were operated through the foramina approach.The treatment effects,perioperative indicators,functional recovery,pain,and quality of life were compared between the two groups.RESULTS The treatment effect in the observation group(93.55%)was significantly better than that in the control group(77.59%).There was no difference in the operative time and intraoperative blood loss amount between the two groups(P>0.05).The hospitalization time of the observation group(4.34±1.33 d)was significantly shorter than that of the control group(5.38±1.57 days)(P<0.05).The Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Oswestry Disability Index scores decreased significantly in both groups after treatment,but the scores were lower in the observation group than in the control group.The visual analog scale scores of the lower back and legs of the two groups were significantly reduced after treatment,but scores were lower in the observation group(2.18±0.88 in the lower back and 1.42±0.50 in the leg)than in the control group(3.53±0.50 in the lower back and 2.21±0.52 in the leg).A short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 measurement scale(AIMS2-SF)score and Barthel index of the lower back of the two groups increased significantly after treatment,with the observation group having a significantly higher AIMS2-SF score(95.16±1.74)and Barthel index(97.29±1.75)than the control group(84.95±2.14 and 89.16±2.71,respectively)(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Through total endoscopic discectomy with the interlaminar approach,the degree of pain in the waist and leg was reduced,and the lumbar function considerably recovered.展开更多
文摘We report a series of patients operated for one or multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (with and without spondylolisthesis) using the minimal invasive bilateral interlaminar decompression. We discuss our results, comparing this procedure (from a technical point of view) with the muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD) and the unilateral approach for bilateral decompression (ULBD). Clinical and outcome data of 62 consecutive patients were reviewed, using the Visual Analogue Scale for both low back pain (LBP) and legs pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for the degree of disability. Mean age was 68.88 ± 9.54 years and mean follow-up (FU) was 16.38 ± 11.12 months. A statistically significant improvement of LBP, legs pain and ODI was globally observed. At latest FU, patients with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis significantly improved all scores and patients with spondylolisthesis significantly decreased their disability. No major complications occurred. Two cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collections were treated conservatively. No wound infection occurred. No progression of spondylolisthesis was observed. No reoperation was needed. Although efficacious in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, MILD and ULBD can have both some limitations. MILD has been found to decrease lumbar function in multilevel decompression (increasing sagittal translation and lumbar lordosis probably due to the removal of half of the spinous processes) and ULBD shows some disadvantages due to the difficulty of manipulating instruments through a small portal and the inadequate decompression due to a minimal exposure. The minimal invasive bilateral interlaminar decompression (in this technique, the access is bilateral but the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments and the spinous processes are preserved) allows wide access (bilateral exposure) with minimal invasiveness and very low morbidity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis at one or more levels.
基金Science and Technology Support Plan of Guizhou Science and Technology Department,No.[2019]2812and National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.82060415.
文摘BACKGROUND Disc herniation(DH)is a fragment of the disc nucleus that is pushed out of the annulus into the spinal canal due to a tear or rupture in the annulus.It is a common cause of lumbar and leg pains.Substantial advancements have been made to determine the cause of DH and to ensure accurate diagnosis,imaging,and treatment of this condition.Total endoscopic discectomy is an alternative surgical technique that is less invasive.AIM To study the optimal approach for a total endoscopic discectomy and its influence on lumbar and leg function in DH patients.METHODS This prospective study enrolled 120 patients with lumbar DH who were treated in our hospital from February 2018 to January 2021.All patients were randomly divided into the following two groups:The observation group,comprising 62 patients who underwent surgery using the interlaminar approach,and the control group,comprising 58 patients who were operated through the foramina approach.The treatment effects,perioperative indicators,functional recovery,pain,and quality of life were compared between the two groups.RESULTS The treatment effect in the observation group(93.55%)was significantly better than that in the control group(77.59%).There was no difference in the operative time and intraoperative blood loss amount between the two groups(P>0.05).The hospitalization time of the observation group(4.34±1.33 d)was significantly shorter than that of the control group(5.38±1.57 days)(P<0.05).The Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Oswestry Disability Index scores decreased significantly in both groups after treatment,but the scores were lower in the observation group than in the control group.The visual analog scale scores of the lower back and legs of the two groups were significantly reduced after treatment,but scores were lower in the observation group(2.18±0.88 in the lower back and 1.42±0.50 in the leg)than in the control group(3.53±0.50 in the lower back and 2.21±0.52 in the leg).A short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 measurement scale(AIMS2-SF)score and Barthel index of the lower back of the two groups increased significantly after treatment,with the observation group having a significantly higher AIMS2-SF score(95.16±1.74)and Barthel index(97.29±1.75)than the control group(84.95±2.14 and 89.16±2.71,respectively)(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Through total endoscopic discectomy with the interlaminar approach,the degree of pain in the waist and leg was reduced,and the lumbar function considerably recovered.
