The rule of law is the basic form of national governance and the rule of law model is the necessary direction for the governance of online society.Online society is in essence a new pattern of social relationships and...The rule of law is the basic form of national governance and the rule of law model is the necessary direction for the governance of online society.Online society is in essence a new pattern of social relationships and structural forms comprising relationships among citizens,legal persons,organizational bodies,etc.,formed and brought together on the basis of Internet technology;and also a reflection,expansion and expression,singly or in synthesis,of various relationships in the fields of the real economy,politics,culture,society and the environment.The rule of law model of Internet governance refers to governance theories,systems and practices that employ rule of law thinking and the rule of law model to bring the elements,structures,procedures and functions of Internet governance into the scope of the rule of law and its operational track.Reviewing the tortuous course of the development of rule of law Internet governance in China,summarizing useful experience in the construction of rule of law Internet governance,and reflecting on existing legislative,law enforcement and judicial dilemmas will enable us to build up a rule of law system of online governance with comprehensive norms,effective implementation,strict supervision and strong guarantees.This will be marked by Chinese characteristics and will ensure the application of rule of law thinking and the rule of law model in governing,operating,using and safeguarding the Internet,thus achieving sound and orderly Internet operation and development along the path of the rule of law and advancing the modernization of the Internet governance system and governance capability.展开更多
2021 marks the 30;anniversary of China’s first white paper on human rights.Textual sorting and discourse analysis of the white papers over the years since then reveals how China’s expression of“human rights”demons...2021 marks the 30;anniversary of China’s first white paper on human rights.Textual sorting and discourse analysis of the white papers over the years since then reveals how China’s expression of“human rights”demonstrates its endogenous power and sense of autonomy in human rights development.As a discourse practice,the white papers on human rights have gradually refined the rights to subsistence and development,expanded and expressed social rights,responded to the real needs of society,and charted the progress in the legal protection of human rights.The white paper on human rights is the official text for understanding China’s human rights cause,as it proceeds from a“practical”perspective to give full play to the social and cultural functions of subject identity,concept cultivation,and communication media and unleash the potential power of multiculturalism,thus laying a solid foundation for enhancing the discourse power of domestic and international human rights.展开更多
基金the phased result of the special project “An Original Jurisprudence Theory of Social Governance”(Grant No.:16@ZH024)of the National Social Science Fund of China
文摘The rule of law is the basic form of national governance and the rule of law model is the necessary direction for the governance of online society.Online society is in essence a new pattern of social relationships and structural forms comprising relationships among citizens,legal persons,organizational bodies,etc.,formed and brought together on the basis of Internet technology;and also a reflection,expansion and expression,singly or in synthesis,of various relationships in the fields of the real economy,politics,culture,society and the environment.The rule of law model of Internet governance refers to governance theories,systems and practices that employ rule of law thinking and the rule of law model to bring the elements,structures,procedures and functions of Internet governance into the scope of the rule of law and its operational track.Reviewing the tortuous course of the development of rule of law Internet governance in China,summarizing useful experience in the construction of rule of law Internet governance,and reflecting on existing legislative,law enforcement and judicial dilemmas will enable us to build up a rule of law system of online governance with comprehensive norms,effective implementation,strict supervision and strong guarantees.This will be marked by Chinese characteristics and will ensure the application of rule of law thinking and the rule of law model in governing,operating,using and safeguarding the Internet,thus achieving sound and orderly Internet operation and development along the path of the rule of law and advancing the modernization of the Internet governance system and governance capability.
基金the China Society for Human Rights Studies’short-term project in 2021“The Communist Party of China and Human Rights Protection,”“Human Rights Theory and Practice of the Communist Party of China in Yan’an Period.”the 2021 Chongqing Graduate Research Innovation Project“Evolution of the Rights of Members of the Communist Party of China in the Past 100 Years”(CYB21164)
文摘2021 marks the 30;anniversary of China’s first white paper on human rights.Textual sorting and discourse analysis of the white papers over the years since then reveals how China’s expression of“human rights”demonstrates its endogenous power and sense of autonomy in human rights development.As a discourse practice,the white papers on human rights have gradually refined the rights to subsistence and development,expanded and expressed social rights,responded to the real needs of society,and charted the progress in the legal protection of human rights.The white paper on human rights is the official text for understanding China’s human rights cause,as it proceeds from a“practical”perspective to give full play to the social and cultural functions of subject identity,concept cultivation,and communication media and unleash the potential power of multiculturalism,thus laying a solid foundation for enhancing the discourse power of domestic and international human rights.
