Epidural catheterization is routinely used by anaesthesiologists to provide labour and post-operative analgesia. In most cases, catheter placement is without serious side effects and uneventful. However, epidural absc...Epidural catheterization is routinely used by anaesthesiologists to provide labour and post-operative analgesia. In most cases, catheter placement is without serious side effects and uneventful. However, epidural abscess is a rare complication that may result in severe morbidity. We present a case of epidural abscess after labour epidural catheter placement in a healthy 36-year-old female who presented on post-partum d 10 with complaints of fever and back pain. She was treated with intravenous antibiotics and fully recovered.展开更多
目的观察超声引导硬膜外导管个体化长度置管用于分娩镇痛的效果。方法选取2019年10月—2020年12月于蚌埠医学院第一附属医院产科行分娩镇痛的100例产妇。采用随机数字表法分为常规组和超声组,每组50例。常规组硬膜外导管置入4 cm,超声...目的观察超声引导硬膜外导管个体化长度置管用于分娩镇痛的效果。方法选取2019年10月—2020年12月于蚌埠医学院第一附属医院产科行分娩镇痛的100例产妇。采用随机数字表法分为常规组和超声组,每组50例。常规组硬膜外导管置入4 cm,超声组硬膜外导管置入L_(2)椎体长度。记录2组硬膜外注药后15 min麻醉平面阻滞范围;泵运行后30、60、90 min VAS评分;导管不良反应;局麻药用量;泵按压次数;产妇分娩方式;新生儿1 min、2 min Apgar评分;产妇不良反应。结果超声组麻醉平面阻滞范围为(5.24±1.89)个节段,高于常规组的(4.26±1.86)个节段(P<0.05);超声组泵运行后30、60、90 min VAS评分为(4.38±1.74)分、(3.52±1.92)分、(3.28±1.88)分,均低于常规组的(5.50±2.10)分、(4.46±1.98)分、(4.30±1.91)分(均P<0.05);超声组导管不良反应、局麻药用量、泵按压次数分别为10.0%、(21.96±12.01)mL、(3.48±1.88)次,均小于常规组的64.0%、(38.14±9.10)mL、(4.38±1.74)次(均P<0.05),余指标差异无统计学意义。结论超声引导硬膜外导个体化长度置管用于分娩镇痛能减少局麻药用量,降低导管不良反应,不影响母婴结局,减少泵按压次数,镇痛效果好。展开更多
文摘Epidural catheterization is routinely used by anaesthesiologists to provide labour and post-operative analgesia. In most cases, catheter placement is without serious side effects and uneventful. However, epidural abscess is a rare complication that may result in severe morbidity. We present a case of epidural abscess after labour epidural catheter placement in a healthy 36-year-old female who presented on post-partum d 10 with complaints of fever and back pain. She was treated with intravenous antibiotics and fully recovered.
文摘目的观察超声引导硬膜外导管个体化长度置管用于分娩镇痛的效果。方法选取2019年10月—2020年12月于蚌埠医学院第一附属医院产科行分娩镇痛的100例产妇。采用随机数字表法分为常规组和超声组,每组50例。常规组硬膜外导管置入4 cm,超声组硬膜外导管置入L_(2)椎体长度。记录2组硬膜外注药后15 min麻醉平面阻滞范围;泵运行后30、60、90 min VAS评分;导管不良反应;局麻药用量;泵按压次数;产妇分娩方式;新生儿1 min、2 min Apgar评分;产妇不良反应。结果超声组麻醉平面阻滞范围为(5.24±1.89)个节段,高于常规组的(4.26±1.86)个节段(P<0.05);超声组泵运行后30、60、90 min VAS评分为(4.38±1.74)分、(3.52±1.92)分、(3.28±1.88)分,均低于常规组的(5.50±2.10)分、(4.46±1.98)分、(4.30±1.91)分(均P<0.05);超声组导管不良反应、局麻药用量、泵按压次数分别为10.0%、(21.96±12.01)mL、(3.48±1.88)次,均小于常规组的64.0%、(38.14±9.10)mL、(4.38±1.74)次(均P<0.05),余指标差异无统计学意义。结论超声引导硬膜外导个体化长度置管用于分娩镇痛能减少局麻药用量,降低导管不良反应,不影响母婴结局,减少泵按压次数,镇痛效果好。
