In this paper, the limit set of the elementary cellular automaton of rule 22 is considered. The limit language is defined from limit set and its complexity is studied by using formal language theory. It is proved that...In this paper, the limit set of the elementary cellular automaton of rule 22 is considered. The limit language is defined from limit set and its complexity is studied by using formal language theory. It is proved that this language is not a regular language. This result shows that the dynamics of this cellular automaton is actually complicated.展开更多
This essay argues that poetic language offers the possibility of meaning and value,and simultaneously points beyond itself,to the limits of language,to a space differently confi gured as erasure,silence,the unsignifi ...This essay argues that poetic language offers the possibility of meaning and value,and simultaneously points beyond itself,to the limits of language,to a space differently confi gured as erasure,silence,the unsignifi able.What does it suggest,epistemologically and ontologically,if we acknowledge this double action of poetic language?What might this space beyond language be,and what difference does it make if we acknowledge this space?The essay examines four poems and the different ways in which they acknowledge such a space,drawing on the historically distinct approaches of Meister Eckhart and Jacques Derrida in order to ask what the space beyond language might be.The argument of the essay is that in acknowledging such a space something opens up for writers and readers of poetry:a different approach to knowing,and a potentially humbled ontological position.展开更多
文摘In this paper, the limit set of the elementary cellular automaton of rule 22 is considered. The limit language is defined from limit set and its complexity is studied by using formal language theory. It is proved that this language is not a regular language. This result shows that the dynamics of this cellular automaton is actually complicated.
文摘This essay argues that poetic language offers the possibility of meaning and value,and simultaneously points beyond itself,to the limits of language,to a space differently confi gured as erasure,silence,the unsignifi able.What does it suggest,epistemologically and ontologically,if we acknowledge this double action of poetic language?What might this space beyond language be,and what difference does it make if we acknowledge this space?The essay examines four poems and the different ways in which they acknowledge such a space,drawing on the historically distinct approaches of Meister Eckhart and Jacques Derrida in order to ask what the space beyond language might be.The argument of the essay is that in acknowledging such a space something opens up for writers and readers of poetry:a different approach to knowing,and a potentially humbled ontological position.
