Laparoscopic spleen-preserving total pancreatectomy for the treatment of low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors:Two case reports and review of literature

BACKGROUND Function-preserving pancreatectomy can improve the long-term quality of life of patients with benign or low-grade malignant tumors,such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms(IPMNs)and mucinous cystic neoplasms.However,there is limited literature on laparoscopic spleen-preserving total pancreatectomy(LSpTP)due to technical difficulties.CASE SUMMARY Patient 1 was a 51-year-old male diagnosed with IPMN based on preoperative imaging,showing solid nodules in the pancreatic head and diffuse dilation of the main pancreatic duct with atrophy of the distal pancreas.We performed L-SpTP with preservation of the splenic vessels,and the postoperative pathology report revealed IPMN with invasive carcinoma.Patient 2 was a 60-year-old male with multiple cystic lesions in the pancreatic head and body.L-SpTP was performed,and intraoperatively,the splenic vein was injured and required ligation.Postoperative pathology revealed a mucinous cystic tumor of the pancreas with low-grade dysplasia.Both patients were discharged on postoperative day 7,and there were no major complications during the perioperative period.CONCLUSION We believe that L-SpTP is a safe and feasible treatment for low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors,but more case studies are needed to evaluate its safety,efficacy,and long-term outcomes.

Laparoscopic vs open surgery for gastric cancer: Assessing time, recovery, complications, and markers

BACKGROUND Gastric cancer(GC)is one of the most common cancers worldwide.Morbidity and mortality have increased in recent years,making it an urgent issue to address.La-paroscopic radical surgery(LRS)is a crucial method for treating patients with GC;However,its influence on tumor markers is still under investigation.The data of 194 patients treated at Chongqing University Cancer Hospital bet-ween January 2018 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients who underwent traditional open surgery and LRS were assigned to the control(n=90)and observation groups(n=104),respectively.Independent sample t-tests andχ2 tests were used to compare the two groups based on clinical efficacy,changes in tumor marker levels after treatment,clinical data,and the incidence of posto-perative complications.To investigate the association between tumor marker levels and clinical efficacy in patients with GC,three-year recurrence rates in the two groups were compared.RESULTS Patients in the observation group had a shorter duration of operation,less in-traoperative blood loss,an earlier postoperative eating time,and a shorter hospital stay than those in the control group(P<0.05).No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the number of lymph node dissections(P>0.05).After treatment,the overall response rate in the control group was significantly lower than that in the observation group(P=0.001).Furthermore,after treatment,the levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9,cancer antigen 72-4,carcinoembryonic antigen,and cancer antigen 125 decreased significantly.The observation group also exhibited a significantly lower incidence rate of postoperative complications compared to the control group(P<0.001).Additionally,the two groups did not significantly differ in terms of three-year survival and recurrence rates(P>0.05).CONCLUSION LRS effectively treats early gastric cancer by reducing intraoperative bleeding,length of hospital stays,and postoperative complications.It also significantly lowers tumor marker levels,thus improving the short-term prognosis of the disease.

Effects of dexmedetomidine combined with dezocine on tumor factors, immune function levels and related serum factors in patients with laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cancer

Objective:To study the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with dezocine on tumor factors, immune function levels and related serum factors in patients with laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cancer.Methods: To select 120 cases of laparoscopic ovarian cancer treated and planned to undergo laparoscopic radical operation in our hospital were randomly and equally divided into control group and treatment group. The patients in control group were treated with dezocine, the treatment group were treated with dexmedetomidine combined with dezocine. To detect and compare the serum HE4, YKL-40, TSGF, NSE, S100β protein, MDA, SOD and peripheral blood CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and calculate CD4+/CD8+ before and after operation. Results: Before the surgery, there was no significant difference in serum HE4, YKL-40, TSGF, NSE, S100β protein, MDA and SOD between the two groups(P>0.05). After surgery, there were significant differences between the two groups in serum HE4, YKL-40, TSGF, NSE, S100β protein, MDA and SOD levels and the same group before surgery (P<0.05), the improvement of each index in the treatment group was better than those in the control group, and the differences were significantly (P<0.05). Before the surgery, the differences between the two groups in peripheral blood CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ had no significant difference (P>0.05), After surgery, the differences between the two groups and the same group before operation in peripheral blood CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ levels and CD4+/CD8+ were significantly (P<0.05), the improvement of each index in the treatment group was better than that in the control group, the differences were significantly (P<0.05).Conclusion:Dexmedetomidine combined with dezocine can reduce the serum HE4, YKL-40, TSGF, NSE, S100β protein levels in patients with ovarian cancer after laparoscopic operation, reduce the oxidative stress reaction, has smaller effect on cellular immune function.

Is There Re-staging Surgery Necessity for Borderline Ovarian Tumors

Objective:This study assessed the necessity of surgical re-staging in women with borderline ovarian tumors(BOTs)and evaluated the impact of complete surgical staging,lymphadenectomy,and omentectomy on disease recurrence and survival.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with BOTs.A total of 901 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study,and we evaluated some of the variables and clinical/surgical characteristics of the cases.The effects of the type of surgical procedure,surgical staging,and complete or incomplete staging on recurrence were calculated.The rates of disease-free survival,overall survival,and recurrence were compared according to complete surgical staging.A Cox regression analysis was performed to identify potential prognostic factors,and survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results:The overall recurrence rate was 13.9%,and recurrence was comparable between the complete surgical staging group and the incomplete groups(P>0.05).The performance of complete surgical staging did not show an effect on long-term survival,and complete surgical staging,omentectomy,and lymphadenectomy had no effect on recurrence.In multivariate analyses,only radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were risk factors for the recurrence of BOTs.Furthermore,we found that omentectomy led to a relatively low recurrence rate in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO)stage>Ⅰ(P=0.022).Conclusion:Our results suggest that complete surgical staging should be considered a standard treatment for patients with advanced stage BOTs but not for those at FIGO stageⅠ.It might be safe to reduce the scope of surgical procedures in patients with early-stage BOTs.However,it is not necessary to perform re-staging operations for BOTs with a macroscopically normal extra-ovarian appearance.

New-style laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric stromal tumors

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new style of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), an improved method of laparoscopic intragastric surgery (LIGS) for the treatment of gastric stromal tumors (GSTs). METHODS: Six patients were treated with the newstyle LECS. Surgery was performed according to the following procedures: (1) Exposing and confirming the location of the tumor with gastroscopy; (2) A laparoscopy light was placed in the cavity using the trocar at the navel, and the other two trocars penetrated both the abdominal and stomach walls; (3) With gastroscopy monitoring, the operation was carried out in the gastric lumen using laparoscopic instruments and the tumor was resected; and (4) The tumor tissue was removed orally using a gastroscopy basket, and puncture holes and perforations were sutured using titanium clips. RESULTS: Tumor size ranged from 2.0 to 4.5 cm (average 3.50 ± 0.84 cm). The operative time ranged from 60 to 130 min (average 83.33 ± 26.58 min). Blood loss was less than 20 mL and hospital stay ranged from 6 to 8 d (average 6.67 ± 0.82 d). The patients were allowed out of bed 12 h later. A stomach tube was inserted for 72 h after surgery, and a liquid diet was then taken. All cases had single tumors which were completely resected using the new-style LECS. No postoperative complications occurred. Pathology of all resected specimens showed GST: no cases of implantation or metastasis were found.CONCLUSION: New-style LECS for GSTs is a quick, optimized, fast recovery, safe and effective therapy.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric tumors: Perspective for actual practice and oncological benefits

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery(LECS) is a surgical technique that combines laparoscopic partial gastrectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection. LECS requires close collaboration between skilled laparoscopic surgeons and experienced endoscopists. For successful LECS, experience alone is not sufficient. Instead, familiarity with the characteristics of both laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic intervention is necessary to overcome various technical problems. LECS was developed mainly as a treatment for gastric submucosal tumors without epithelial lesions, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs). Local gastric wall dissection without lymphadenectomy is adequate for the treatment of gastric GISTs. Compared with conventional simple wedge resection with a linear stapler, LECS can provide both optimal surgical margins and oncological benefit that result in functional preservation of the residual stomach. As technical characteristics, however, classic LECS involves intentional opening of the gastric wall, resulting in a risk of tumor dissemination with contamination by gastric juice. Therefore, several modified LECS techniques have been developed to av-oid even subtle tumor exposure. Furthermore, LECS for early gastric cancer has been attempted according tothe concept of sentinel lymph node dissection. LECS is a prospective treatment for GISTs and might become a future therapeutic option even for early gastric cancer. Interventional endoscopists and laparoscopic surgeons collaboratively explore curative resection. Simultaneous intraluminal approach with endoscopy allows surgeons to optimizes the resection area. LECS, not simple wedge resection, achieves minimally invasive treatment and allows for oncologically precise resection. We herein present detailed tips and pitfalls of LECS and discuss various technical considerations.

Sporadic gastric carcinoid tumor successfully treated by two-stage laparoscopic surgery:A case report

We report a case of sporadic gastric carcinoid tumor successfully treated by two-stage laparoscopic surgery.A 38-year old asymptomatic woman was referred to our hospital for evaluation of a submucosal tumor of the stomach.Endoscopic examination showed a solitary submucosal tumor without ulceration or central depression on the posterior wall of the antrum and biopsy specimens were not sufficient to determine the diagnosis.Endoscopic ultrasound revealed a tumor nearly 2 cm in diameter arising from the muscle layer and a computed tomography scan showed the tumor enhanced in the arterial phase.Laparoscopic wedge resection was performed for definitive diagnosis.Pathologically,the tumor was shown to be gastric carcinoid infiltrating the muscle layer which indicated the probability of lymph node metastasis.Serum gastrin levels were normal.As a radical treatment,laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with regional lymphadenectomy was performed 3 wk after the initial surgery.Finally,pathological examination revealed no lymph node metastasis.

Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric submucosal tumors

AIM:To assess the feasibility,safety,and advantages of minimally invasive laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery(LECS)for gastric submucosal tumors(SMT).METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed 101 consecutive patients,who had undergone partial,proximal,or distal gastrectomy using LECS for gastric SMT at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from June 2006to April 2013.All patients were followed up by visit or telephone.Clinical data,surgical approach,pathological features such as the size,location,and pathological type of each tumor;and follow-up results were analyzed.The feasibility,safety and effectiveness of LECS for gastric SMT were evaluated,especially for patients with tumors located near the cardia or pylorus.RESULTS:The 101 patients included 43(42.6%)menand 58(57.4%)women,with mean age of 51.2±13.1 years(range,14-76 years).The most common symptom was belching.Almost all(n=97)patients underwent surgery with preservation of the cardia and pylorus,with the other four patients undergoing proximal or distal gastrectomy.The mean distance from the lesion to the cardia or pylorus was 3.4±1.3 cm,and the minimum distance from the tumor edge to the cardia was 1.5 cm.Tumor pathology included gastrointestinal stromal tumor in 78 patients,leiomyoma in 13,carcinoid tumors in three,ectopic pancreas in three,lipoma in two,glomus tumor in one,and inflammatory pseudotumor in one.Tumor size ranged from 1 to8.2 cm,with 65(64.4%)lesions<2 cm,32(31.7%)>2 cm,and four>5 cm.Sixty-six lesions(65.3%)were located in the fundus,21(20.8%)in the body,10(9.9%)in the antrum,three(3.0%)in the cardia,and one(1.0%)in the pylorus.During a median follow-up of 28 mo(range,1-69 mo),none of these patients experienced recurrence or metastasis.The three patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy experienced symptoms of regurgitation and belching.CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery is feasible and safe for patients with gastric submucosal tumor.Endoscopic intraoperative localization and support can help preserve the cardia and pylorus during surgery.

Laparoscopic vs.open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction:A multicenter,retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting

Objective:Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs).However,the laparoscopic approach for GISTs located in the esophagogastric junction(EGJ-GIST)is surgically challenging.This study compares the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and the open procedure for EGJ-GIST through the propensity score weighting(PSW)method.Methods:Between April 2006 and April 2018,1,824 surgical patients were diagnosed with primary gastric GIST at four medical centers in South China.Of these patients,228 were identified as EGJ-GISTs and retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological characteristics,operative information,and long-term outcomes.PSW was used to create the balanced cohorts.Results:PSW was carried out in laparoscopic and open-surgery cohorts according to year of surgery,sex,age,body mass index(BMI),tumor size,mitotic rates and recurrence risk.After PSW,438 patients consisting of 213 laparoscopic(L group)and 225 open surgery(O group)patients were enrolled.After PSW,the following measures in the L group were superior to those in the O group:median operative time[interquartile range(IQR)]:100.0(64.5-141.5)vs.149.0(104.0-197.5)min,P<0.001;median blood loss(IQR):30.0(10.0-50.0)vs.50.0(20.0-100.0)mL,P=0.002;median time to liquid intake(IQR):3.0(2.0-4.0)vs.4.0(3.0-5.0)d,P<0.001;median hospital stay(IQR):6.0(4.0-8.0)vs.7.0(5.0-12.0)d,P<0.001;and postoperative complications(10.3%vs.22.7%,P=0.001).The median follow-up was 55(range,2-153)months in the entire cohort.No significant differences were detected in either relapse-free survival(RFS)[hazard ratio(HR):0.372,95%confidence interval(95%CI):0.072-1.910,P=0.236]or overall survival(OS)(HR:0.400,95%CI:0.119-1.343,P=0.138)between the two groups.Conclusions:Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is associated with the advantages of shorter operative time,reduced blood loss,shorter time to liquid intake,and shorter length of stay,all without compromising postoperative outcomes and long-term survival.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic co-operative surgery for nonampullary duodenal tumors

AIM To assess the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and endoscopic co-operative surgery(LECS) for early nonampullary duodenal tumors.METHODS Twelve patients with a non-ampullary duodenal tumor underwent LECS at our hospital. One patient had two mucosal lesions in the duodenum. The indication for this procedure was the presence of duodenal tumors with a low risk for lymph node metastasis. In particular, the tumors included small(less than 10 mm) submucosal tumors(SMT) and epithelial mucosal tumors, such as mucosal cancers or large mucosal adenomas with malignant suspicion. The LECS procedures, such as full-thickness dissection for SMT and laparoscopic reinforcement after endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) for epithelial tumors, were performed for the 13 early duodenal lesions in 12 patients. Here we present the short-term outcomes and evaluate the safety and feasibility of this new technique.RESULTS Two SMT-like lesions and eleven superficial epithelial tumor-like lesions were observed. Seven and Six lesions were located in the second and third parts of the duodenum, respectively. All lesions were successfully resected en bloc. The defect in the duodenal wall was manually sutured after resection of the duodenal SMT. For epithelial duodenal tumors, the ulcer bed was laparoscopically reinforced via manual suturing after ESD. Intraoperative perforation occurred in two out of eleven epithelial tumor-like lesions during ESD; however, they were successfully laparoscopically repaired. The median operative time and intraoperative estimated blood loss were 322 min and 0 mL, respectively. Histological examination of the tumors revealed one adenoma with moderate atypia, ten adenocarcinomas, and two neuroendocrine tumors. No severe postoperative complications(Clavien-Dindo classification grade Ⅲ or higher) were reported in this series, but minor leakage secondary to pancreatic fistula occurred in one patient.CONCLUSION LECS can be a safe and minimally invasive treatment option for non-ampullary early duodenal tumors.

Review of the literature laparoscopic surgery for metastatic hepatic leiomyosarcoma associated with smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential: Case report

Metastatic hepatic leiomyosarcoma is a rare malignant smooth muscle tumor.We report a case of metastatic hepatic leiomyosarcoma associated with smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential(STUMP).A 68-year-old female presented with a liver mass(60 mm × 40 mm, Segment 4).She underwent left salpingooophorectomy for an ovary tumor with STUMP in a broad ligament 6 years ago.Though FDG-PET showed obvious metabolically active foci, abnormal metabolically active foci other than the lesion were not detected.A malignant liver tumor was strongly suspected and laparoscopic partial liver resection was performed with vessel-sealing devices using the crush clamping method and Pringle maneuver.Immunohistochemical findings revealed metastatic liver leiomyosarcoma associated with STUMP in a broad ligament.This case is an extremely rare case of malignant transformation from primary STUMP to metastatic hepatic leiomyosarcoma.It provides important evidence regarding the treatment for metastatic hepatic leiomyosarcoma associated with STUMP.

Impact of circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

Laparoscopic surgery has recently been widely used for various benign colorectal diseases as well as colorectal cancer. Although laparoscopic surgery has been shown to be with similar prognostic results for certain groups of colorectal cancer patients. The influence of laparoscopic procedures on the oncologist results, especially freetumor cell spreading is still a concern for some surgeons. Tumor cells found in the peripheral blood of patients with cancer are termed circulating tumor cells(CTCs). Presence of CTCs in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer has been reported to be associated with disease stage, poor prognosis, tumor progression, response to therapy, and drug resistance. Whether laparoscopic procedure enhances tumor spreading during operation remains unknown. Significantly less CTC detected during laparoscopic surgery than open surgery for colorectal cancer has been reported. In our previous experience, no significant elevation in CTC level was found in most patients during laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. We have shown that laparoscopic surgery had no significantly deleterious effect on CTCs in colorectal cancer patients. In this review, we aim at the impact of CTCs in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The prognostic significance of CTCs in patients with colorectal cancer will also be addressed.

Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas

AIM:To compare short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor(SPT)of the pancreas.METHODS:This retrospective study included 28 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for SPT of the pancreas between 1998 and 2012.The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach:the laparoscopic surgery group and the open surgery group.The patients’demographic data,operative results,pathological reports,hospital courses,morbidity and mortality,and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.RESULTS:Fifteen patients with SPT of the pancreas underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy(LDP),and 13 underwent open distal pancreatectomy(ODP).Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups except for a female predominance in the LDP group(100.0%vs 69.2%,P=0.035).Mortality,morbidity(33.3%vs 38.5%,P=1.000),pancreatic fistula rates(26.7%vs 30.8%,P=0.728),and reoperation rates(0.0%vs 7.7%,P=0.464)were similar in the two groups.There were no significant differences in the operating time(171 min vs 178 min,P=0.755)between the two groups.The intraoperative blood loss(149 mL vs 580 mL,P=0.002),transfusion requirement(6.7%vs 46.2%,P=0.029),first flatus time(1.9d vs 3.5 d,P=0.000),diet start time(2.3 d vs 4.9 d,P=0.000),and postoperative hospital stay(8.1 d vs 12.8d,P=0.029)were significantly less in the LDP group than in the ODP group.All patients had negative surgical margins at final pathology.There were no significant differences in number of lymph nodes harvested(4.6 vs6.4,P=0.549)between the two groups.The median follow-up was 33(3-100)mo for the LDP group and 45(17-127)mo for the ODP group.All patients were alive with one recurrence.CONCLUSION:LDP for SPT has short-term benefits compared with ODP.Long-term outcomes of LDP are similar to those of ODP.

Laparoscopic management of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective 10-year single-center experience

AIM To determine the feasibility,safety,and oncological outcome of laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)based on favorable or unfavorable location.METHODS Our hospital database included 207 patients who underwent laparoscopic removal of gastric GISTs from January 2004 to September 2015.Patient demographics,clinical presentation,surgery,histopathology,postoperative course,and oncological outcomes were reviewed and analyzed.RESULTS Gastric GIST in favorable locations was present in81/207(39.1%)cases,and in unfavorable locations in 126/207(60.9%)cases.Overall mean tumor size was 3.28±1.82 cm.No conversions occurred,and complete R0 resection was achieved in 207(100%)cases.There were three incidences of iatrogenic tumor rupture.The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery were comparable in both groups with no statistical difference between unfavorable and favorable location groups,respectively:for operative time:83.86±44.41 vs 80.77±36.46 min,P=0.627;conversion rate:0%vs 0%;estimated blood loss:27.74±45.2vs 29.59±41.18 m L,P=0.780;tumor rupture during surgery:0.90%vs 2.82%,P=0.322;or postoperative complications:3.74%vs 7.04%,P=0.325.The follow-up period recurrence rate was 1.89%with no significant differences between the two groups(3.03%vs 0%,P=0.447).Overall 5-year survival rate was98.76%and survival rates were similar between the two groups:98.99%vs 98.39%,P=0.623(unfavorable vs favorable,respectively).CONCLUSION The laparoscopic approach for gastric GISTs is safe and feasible with well-accepted oncological surgical outcomes.Strategies for laparoscopic resection should be selected according to the location and size of the tumor.Laparoscopic treatment of gastric GISTs in unfavorable locations should not be restricted in gastrointestinal centers.

Comparison of short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

AIM To compare the short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic(LR) vs open resection(OR) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors(g GISTs).METHODS In total, 301 consecutive patients undergoing LR or OR for pathologically confirmed g GISTs from 2005 to 2014 were enrolled in this retrospective study. After exclusion of 77 patients, 224 eligible patients were enrolled(122 undergoing LR and 102 undergoing OR). The demographic, clinicopathologic, and survival data of all patients were collected. The intraoperative, postoperative, and long-term oncologic outcomes were compared between the LR and OR groups following the propensity score matching to balance the measured covariates between the two groups.RESULTS After 1:1 propensity score matching for the set of covariates including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology score, tumor location, tumor size, surgical procedures, mitotic count, and risk stratification, 80 patients in each group were included in the final analysis. The baseline parameters of the two groups were comparable after matching. TheLR group was significantly superior to the OR group with respect to the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative first flatus, time to oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay(P < 0.05). No differences in perioperative blood transfusion or the incidence of postoperative complications were observed between the two groups(P > 0.05). No significant difference was found in postoperative adjuvant therapy(P = 0.587). The mean follow-up time was 35.30 ± 26.02(range, 4-102) mo in the LR group and 40.99 ± 25.07(range, 4-122) mo in the OR group with no significant difference(P = 0.161). Survival analysis showed no significant difference in the disease-free survival time or overall survival time between the two groups(P > 0.05).CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery for g GISTs is superior to open surgery with respect to intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes without compromising longterm oncological outcomes.

Laparoscopic transduodenal local resection of periampullary neuroendocrine tumor: A case report

Studies on laparoscopic transduodenal local resection have not been readily available.Only three cases have been reported in the English-language literature.We describe herein a case of 25-year-old woman with periampullary neuroendocrine tumor(NET).Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a duodenal papilla mass originated from the submucosa and close to the ampulla.The periampullary tumor was successfully managed with laparoscopic transduodenal local resection without any procedure-related complications.Pathological examination showed a NET(Grade 2)with negative margin.The patient was followed up for six months without signs of recurrence.This case suggests that laparoscopic transduodenal local resection is a feasible procedure in selected patients with periampullary tumor.

Intragastric surgery using laparoscopy and oral endoscopy for gastric submucosal tumors

We review the techniques and outcomes of the intragastric resection for gastric submucosal tumors(GSTs) using laparoscope and oral endoscope. In the literature, the mean operation time, intraoperative blood loss, pathological size of the tumor and postoperative hospital stay were 134 min, minimal, 31 mm and 6.4 d, respectively. There were no particular perioperative complications during the follow-up period(mean: 121.3 mo). Intragastric surgery using laparoscopy and oral endoscopy can be considerably beneficial for patients with GSTs locating in the upper third of the stomach between 2-5 cm in diameter and < 8 cm2 in crosssectional area and located in the upper third of the stomach.

Premature Puberty Revealing an Ovarian Tumor in a Five-Year-Old Girl

Background: Ovarian tumors in the girl child are sometimes revealed by the development of secondary sexual characteristics. The authors report the case of a five-year-old girl in whom the disease was revealed by early puberty. Case presentation: A five-year-old girl with an enlarged abdomen for about four months. The onset of pain and the sensation of a mass prompted the consultation. The development of secondary sexual characteristics (SSC) noted by the family had not been mentioned. The patient was classified as pubertal stage 2 according to the Tanner classification. An abdominal ultrasound and a CT scan showed a large left ovarian mass, an enlarged uterus for the patient’s age and a normal right ovary. The hormonal workup was not contributive. The treatment consisted only of a left salpingo-ovarectomy, without complementary chemotherapy. Anatomic pathological examination of the surgical specimen concluded to a juvenile tumor of the granulosa. The evolution was good with a beginning of regression of the HSC one month after the ovarectomy. Discussion: Granulosa tumors are sometimes secretory cancers, generally with a low potential for malignancy and therefore a very good prognosis. Surgery based on total adnexectomy is the first-line treatment. The large size of the tumor, the presence of ascites and capsular rupture are factors of poor prognosis, hence the importance of early diagnosis. Conclusion: Routine comprehensive physical examination should be de rigueur for abdominal masses in girls, especially in the context of various beliefs that may impede early referral to care.

Laparoscopic-extracorporeal surgery performed with a fixation device for adnexal masses complicating pregnancy: Report of two cases

The potential complications associated with an adnexal mass discovered during early pregnancy call for surgical treatment. Ideally, surgery is performed after gestational week 12, but uterine expansion after the first trimester makes surgery difficult. We report two pregnancies complicated by adnexal masses for which we used an organ fixation device for safe performance of single-site umbilical laparoscopic surgery. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging depicted a dichorionic, diamniotic twin pregnancy and 60-mm right adnexal mass in the first patient and bilateral adnexae in the second. All three masses were suspected mature cystic teratomas. Both patients underwent laparoscopic surgery during gestational week 14. With use of an organ fixation device, traction was applied until the mass reached the umbilicus; tumor resection was performed extracorporeally. In the second patient, the second mass was simply aspirated because adhesions were encountered. Our single-site laparoscopicextracorporeal technique proved to be a safe approach to an otherwise high-risk situation.

Laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(PNETs)are a rare heterogeneous group of endocrine neoplasms.Surgery remains the best curative option for this type of tumor.Over the past two decades,with the development of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery,an increasingly larger number of PNET resections are being performed by these minimally-invasive techniques.In this review article,the various laparoscopic surgical options for the excision of PNETs are discussed.In addition,a summary of the literature describing the outcome of these treatment modalities is presented.