Objective:To investigate the clinical effects of applying the magnetic resonance double mismatch technique to endovascular treatment of acute anterior circulation,large vessel occlusion with cerebral infarction in an ...Objective:To investigate the clinical effects of applying the magnetic resonance double mismatch technique to endovascular treatment of acute anterior circulation,large vessel occlusion with cerebral infarction in an unknown time window.Methods:The research work was carried out in our hospital,the work was carried out from November 2018 to November 2019,the patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion with cerebral infarction who were treated in our hospital during this period,100 patients,50 patients with an unknown time window and 50 patients with definite time window were selected,and they were named as the experimental and control groups,given different examination methods,were given to investigate the clinical treatment effect.Results:Patients’data on HIHSS score before treatment,the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and rate of Mrs≤2 rating after 90 days of treatment were not significantly different(P>0.05),which was not meaningful.The differences in data between the two groups concerning HIHSS scores were relatively significant before,and after treatment(P<0.05).Conclusion:The magnetic resonance double mismatch technique will be applied in the endovascular treatment of acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion with cerebral infarction of unknown time window.展开更多
Background:To compare the safety and effectiveness of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for stroke with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours of onset.Methods:Retrospecti...Background:To compare the safety and effectiveness of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for stroke with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours of onset.Methods:Retrospectively collected from 66 patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to the Department of Neurology of Tongliao Hospital and Xuanwu Hospital from August 2019 to November 2021 within 4.5 hours.According to the different recanalization methods,30 patients were assigned to the direct thrombectomy treatment group,and 36 patients in the bridging treatment group(i.e.,the intravenous thrombolysis bridging mechanical thrombectomy treatment group).The primary outcome measure was the neurological outcome at the onset of 90d.Secondary outcome measures were intraoperative vascular recanalization and reperfusion,and the US National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours after surgery.The primary safety indicators are intracranial hemorrhage,including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and non-symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage,and 90d mortality.Results:The direct thrombectomy group had lower body mass index,hypertension and baseline Alberta early computed tomography score than the bridging treatment group,and longer time from onset to visit than the bridging group(206.5(119.5,256.25)min vs.150.5(25.205,212.75)min),the above difference were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in successful vascular reperfusion(93%vs.89%),24 hours postoperative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score(11(5,18)vs.11(5,20)),intracranial hemorrhage(11%vs.14%),symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage(7%vs.17%),90d mRS0 to 2 points(43%vs.36%)and 90d mortality(23%vs.22%)(P>0.05).Conclusion:Similar clinical efficacy and safety of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusive stroke within 4.5 hours of onset,direct thrombectomy can be used as an alternative scheme for acute anterior circulation intracranial large artery occlusive stroke.展开更多
目的探讨急性后循环大血管闭塞血管内治疗后90 d预后的危险因素。方法回顾性分析2019年3月—2023年6月江苏大学附属宜兴医院神经外科收治的64例患者资料,均为急性后循环大血管闭塞并行血管内治疗的病例。根据患者术后90 d改良Rankin量表...目的探讨急性后循环大血管闭塞血管内治疗后90 d预后的危险因素。方法回顾性分析2019年3月—2023年6月江苏大学附属宜兴医院神经外科收治的64例患者资料,均为急性后循环大血管闭塞并行血管内治疗的病例。根据患者术后90 d改良Rankin量表(modified rankin score,mRS)评分,mRS评分≤2分者为预后良好组,mRS评分≥3分者为预后不良组,将基线资料、临床资料及随访资料行组间比较。先行单因素分析筛选出危险因素,再行多因素logistic回归分析。结果共入组64例患者,其中预后良好组25例,预后不良组39例,单因素分析结果显示,2组间术前美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(National Institutes of Health stroke scale,NIHSS)评分及基底动脉闭塞血管造影侧支分级(angiographic collateral grading system for basilar artery occlusion,ACGS-BAO)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,术前NIHSS评分≥20分及ACGS-BAO分级≤2级与不良预后相关,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急性后循环大血管闭塞血管内治疗术后90 d不良预后与术前高NIHSS评分,低ACGS-BAO分级相关。展开更多
目的探讨围手术期血压管理对前循环大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS-LVO)血管再通患者预后的影响。方法回顾性纳入2018年3月至2019年6月我院脑血管病中心连续收治的行血管内治疗后血管成功再通[脑梗死溶栓(TICI)分级≥2b级]的前循环AIS-...目的探讨围手术期血压管理对前循环大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS-LVO)血管再通患者预后的影响。方法回顾性纳入2018年3月至2019年6月我院脑血管病中心连续收治的行血管内治疗后血管成功再通[脑梗死溶栓(TICI)分级≥2b级]的前循环AIS-LVO患者。对预后良好(改良Rankin量表评分≤2分)的影响因素进行单因素分析,将单因素分析中P<0.1的变量纳入多因素logistic回归分析,确定术后24 h平均收缩压(mSBP)对预后的影响。根据术后24 h mSBP将患者分为低mSBP[100~<120 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)]组、中mSBP(120~140 mmHg)组和高mSBP(>140~160 mmHg)组,比较3组患者术后3个月预后良好率、死亡率及术后24 h症状性颅内出血(sICH)发生率,然后将患者分为低中mSBP(100~140 mmHg)组与高mSBP(>140~160 mmHg)组进行预后分析。结果共纳入患者238例,其中术后3个月预后良好161例(67.65%),预后不良77例(32.35%)。预后良好组患者年龄、术前和术后24 h美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、术前核心梗死体积(脑血流量<30%的脑组织体积)及术后24 h mSBP均低于预后不良组,术前Alberta脑卒中计划早期计算机断层扫描评分(ASPECTS)高于预后不良组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,术前ASPECTS(OR=1.338,95% CI 1.081~1.657,P=0.007)、术后24 h NIHSS评分(OR=0.838,95% CI 0.785~0.894,P<0.001)和术后24 h mSBP(OR=0.966,95% CI 0.937~0.996,P=0.031)是预后的独立影响因素。随着mSBP增高,术后3个月死亡率和术后24 h sICH发生率均升高(P=0.001、0.032),而术后3个月预后良好率略有下降但差异无统计学意义(P=0.060)。低中mSBP组患者的术后3个月预后良好率高于高mSBP组(P=0.04),术后24 h sICH发生率低于高mSBP组(P=0.01),术后3个月死亡率与高mSBP组相比差异无统计学意义(P=0.19)。结论术后24 h mSBP是前循环AIS-LVO血管再通患者预后的独立影响因素。建议将此类患者术后24 h mSBP控制在≤140 mmHg,如果出血转化的风险大则可控制在≤120 mmHg。展开更多
文摘Objective:To investigate the clinical effects of applying the magnetic resonance double mismatch technique to endovascular treatment of acute anterior circulation,large vessel occlusion with cerebral infarction in an unknown time window.Methods:The research work was carried out in our hospital,the work was carried out from November 2018 to November 2019,the patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion with cerebral infarction who were treated in our hospital during this period,100 patients,50 patients with an unknown time window and 50 patients with definite time window were selected,and they were named as the experimental and control groups,given different examination methods,were given to investigate the clinical treatment effect.Results:Patients’data on HIHSS score before treatment,the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and rate of Mrs≤2 rating after 90 days of treatment were not significantly different(P>0.05),which was not meaningful.The differences in data between the two groups concerning HIHSS scores were relatively significant before,and after treatment(P<0.05).Conclusion:The magnetic resonance double mismatch technique will be applied in the endovascular treatment of acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion with cerebral infarction of unknown time window.
基金supported by Health Science and Technology Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2022(202201571).
文摘Background:To compare the safety and effectiveness of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for stroke with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours of onset.Methods:Retrospectively collected from 66 patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to the Department of Neurology of Tongliao Hospital and Xuanwu Hospital from August 2019 to November 2021 within 4.5 hours.According to the different recanalization methods,30 patients were assigned to the direct thrombectomy treatment group,and 36 patients in the bridging treatment group(i.e.,the intravenous thrombolysis bridging mechanical thrombectomy treatment group).The primary outcome measure was the neurological outcome at the onset of 90d.Secondary outcome measures were intraoperative vascular recanalization and reperfusion,and the US National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours after surgery.The primary safety indicators are intracranial hemorrhage,including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and non-symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage,and 90d mortality.Results:The direct thrombectomy group had lower body mass index,hypertension and baseline Alberta early computed tomography score than the bridging treatment group,and longer time from onset to visit than the bridging group(206.5(119.5,256.25)min vs.150.5(25.205,212.75)min),the above difference were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in successful vascular reperfusion(93%vs.89%),24 hours postoperative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score(11(5,18)vs.11(5,20)),intracranial hemorrhage(11%vs.14%),symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage(7%vs.17%),90d mRS0 to 2 points(43%vs.36%)and 90d mortality(23%vs.22%)(P>0.05).Conclusion:Similar clinical efficacy and safety of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusive stroke within 4.5 hours of onset,direct thrombectomy can be used as an alternative scheme for acute anterior circulation intracranial large artery occlusive stroke.
文摘目的探讨急性后循环大血管闭塞血管内治疗后90 d预后的危险因素。方法回顾性分析2019年3月—2023年6月江苏大学附属宜兴医院神经外科收治的64例患者资料,均为急性后循环大血管闭塞并行血管内治疗的病例。根据患者术后90 d改良Rankin量表(modified rankin score,mRS)评分,mRS评分≤2分者为预后良好组,mRS评分≥3分者为预后不良组,将基线资料、临床资料及随访资料行组间比较。先行单因素分析筛选出危险因素,再行多因素logistic回归分析。结果共入组64例患者,其中预后良好组25例,预后不良组39例,单因素分析结果显示,2组间术前美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(National Institutes of Health stroke scale,NIHSS)评分及基底动脉闭塞血管造影侧支分级(angiographic collateral grading system for basilar artery occlusion,ACGS-BAO)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,术前NIHSS评分≥20分及ACGS-BAO分级≤2级与不良预后相关,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急性后循环大血管闭塞血管内治疗术后90 d不良预后与术前高NIHSS评分,低ACGS-BAO分级相关。
文摘目的探讨围手术期血压管理对前循环大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS-LVO)血管再通患者预后的影响。方法回顾性纳入2018年3月至2019年6月我院脑血管病中心连续收治的行血管内治疗后血管成功再通[脑梗死溶栓(TICI)分级≥2b级]的前循环AIS-LVO患者。对预后良好(改良Rankin量表评分≤2分)的影响因素进行单因素分析,将单因素分析中P<0.1的变量纳入多因素logistic回归分析,确定术后24 h平均收缩压(mSBP)对预后的影响。根据术后24 h mSBP将患者分为低mSBP[100~<120 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)]组、中mSBP(120~140 mmHg)组和高mSBP(>140~160 mmHg)组,比较3组患者术后3个月预后良好率、死亡率及术后24 h症状性颅内出血(sICH)发生率,然后将患者分为低中mSBP(100~140 mmHg)组与高mSBP(>140~160 mmHg)组进行预后分析。结果共纳入患者238例,其中术后3个月预后良好161例(67.65%),预后不良77例(32.35%)。预后良好组患者年龄、术前和术后24 h美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、术前核心梗死体积(脑血流量<30%的脑组织体积)及术后24 h mSBP均低于预后不良组,术前Alberta脑卒中计划早期计算机断层扫描评分(ASPECTS)高于预后不良组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,术前ASPECTS(OR=1.338,95% CI 1.081~1.657,P=0.007)、术后24 h NIHSS评分(OR=0.838,95% CI 0.785~0.894,P<0.001)和术后24 h mSBP(OR=0.966,95% CI 0.937~0.996,P=0.031)是预后的独立影响因素。随着mSBP增高,术后3个月死亡率和术后24 h sICH发生率均升高(P=0.001、0.032),而术后3个月预后良好率略有下降但差异无统计学意义(P=0.060)。低中mSBP组患者的术后3个月预后良好率高于高mSBP组(P=0.04),术后24 h sICH发生率低于高mSBP组(P=0.01),术后3个月死亡率与高mSBP组相比差异无统计学意义(P=0.19)。结论术后24 h mSBP是前循环AIS-LVO血管再通患者预后的独立影响因素。建议将此类患者术后24 h mSBP控制在≤140 mmHg,如果出血转化的风险大则可控制在≤120 mmHg。
