Two-micrometer thulium laser resection of the prostate-tangerine technique in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsy

The 2-1μm thulium laser resection of the prostate-tangerine technique （TmLRP-TT） has been introduced as a minimally invasive treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）. This study was undertaken to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of TmLRP-TT for the treatment of BPH patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsy. A prospective analysis of 51 patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsy who underwent surgical treatment using TmLRP-TT was performed from December 2011 to December 2013. Preoperative status, surgical details, and perioperative complications were recorded. The follow-up outcome was evaluated with subjective and objective tests at I and 6 months. TmLRP-TT was successfully completed in all patients. Mean prostate volume, operative duration, and catheterization time were 93.3 ± 37.9 ml, 69.5 ± 39.5 min, and 6.5 ± 1.3 days, respectively. The mean International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, maximum urinary flow rate, and post-void residual urine volume changed notably at 6-month follow-up （22.5 ± 6.9 vs 6.1 ± 3.2, 4.8 ± 1.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.9, 7.3 ± 4.5 vs 18.9 ± 7.1 ml s^-1, and 148.7 ± 168.7 vs 28.4 ± 17.9 ml）. Two （3.9%） patients required blood transfusion perioperatively, while 3 （5.9%） patients experienced transient hematuria postoperatively, and 2 （3.9%） patients received 3 days recatheterization due to clot retention. TmLRP-TT is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsy during the 6-month follow-up. This promising technology may be a feasible surgical method for previously negative transrectal prostate biopsy in the future.

Recurrent oropharyngeal cancer: Analysis of surgical treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND The main goal of our research is to introduce transoral robotic surgery and laser resection(TLR)as a considerable way of treating patients with recurrent oropha-ryngeal malignancies.AIM To develop a foundation of minimally invasive transoral surgical technique for patients with oropharyngeal recurrence.METHODS This study prospectively and retrospectively included patients with recurrent tumors from 2003 to 2018.Subjects were allocated into two groups:(1)Group I;underwent TLR;and(2)Group II(control);underwent open surgeries of varying volume.Evaluation was done with intraoperative blood loss,postoperative infection incidence,and quality of life using the scale for patients with head and neck tumors known as the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head&Neck Scale.RESULTS One-hundred and forty one patients were included(103 males and 38 females),in 82 cases(85.4%),a recurrent tumor developed earlier than a year after primary tumor therapy;forty-six were in group I and 69 in group II,age ranging from 18 years to 86 years(average:57.6 years).The first group showed a statistically significant less amount of blood loss and a decreased incidence of infectious complications(P<0.05).Additionally,there was a significant difference in functional outcomes(quality of life scores)but no significant difference in survival curves.CONCLUSION In properly elected patients,TLR is not just reasonable but tends to be a favorable alternative for recurrent oropharyngeal cancers compared to the outcomes of the open surgery group.

Holmium laser versus conventional transurethral resection of the bladder tumor

Background Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor （TURBT） remains the gold standard for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer （NMIBC）. Laser techniques have been widely used in urology. This analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of holmium resection of the bladder tumor （HoLRBT）vs. TURBT. Methods A systemic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library as well as manual bibliography searches were performed to identify the relevant studies. The pooled estimates of operation time, obturator nerve reflex rate, bladder perforation rate, bladder irrigation rate, catheterization time, hospital stay, and one- and two-year recurrence free survivals were calculated. Results Five studies were enrolled into our meta-analysis. No significant difference was observed in the operation time between groups （weighted mean difference （WMD） 1.01, 95% confidential interval （95% CI） -3.52-5.54, P=0.66）. The significant difference in the obturator nerve reflex （OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.04, P=0.004）, bladder perforation （OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.61, P=-0.009）, bladder irrigation （OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.45, P=0.001）, catheterization time （WMD -0.96, 95% C1-1.11 to-0.82, P 〈0.00001）, and hospital stay （WMD-1.46, 95% C1-1.65 to-1.27, P 〈0.00001）showed advantages of HoLRBT over TURBT. The 2-year recurrence free survival rate favors the HoLRBT group （OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.11, P=-0.04）. Conclusions As a promising technique, HoLRBT is safe and efficient, and showed several advantages over TURBT. HoLRBT can be used as an alternative procedure for TURBT in terms of low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma or low-grade early TNM-stage urothelial carcinoma.