We have designed a breathing paced television;a television that plays content in sync with users’ activity of exhaling through pursed lips, to achieve better motivation and compliance of such exercises. Described sys...We have designed a breathing paced television;a television that plays content in sync with users’ activity of exhaling through pursed lips, to achieve better motivation and compliance of such exercises. Described system has been tested with control group who have watched the same video. Breathing rate reduction was significantly higher in active group (54.48% ± 8.34%) than in control group (6.84% ± 17.21%), however, the proposed method of watching television is obviously not as trivial as watching television per se.展开更多
目的:利用生物电阻抗成像(EIT)技术探究不同自主呼吸训练方法对区域性肺通气的影响,以期为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在训练标准及方法选取上提供行之有效的康复指导方案。方法:共纳入28名健康志愿者,取舒适站立位并进行:(1)平静呼吸;...目的:利用生物电阻抗成像(EIT)技术探究不同自主呼吸训练方法对区域性肺通气的影响,以期为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在训练标准及方法选取上提供行之有效的康复指导方案。方法:共纳入28名健康志愿者,取舒适站立位并进行:(1)平静呼吸;(2)腹式呼吸;(3)缩唇呼吸;(4)腹式缩唇呼吸,每位被试的四种呼吸方式随机决定,整个过程中连续记录胸部EIT;分别对比四种呼吸方式期间的潮气量(TV)、呼气末肺阻抗(EELI)、通气中心(center of ventilation,Co V)、不均一指数(GI)、区域通气延迟(RVD)。结果:较平静呼吸,腹式呼吸、缩唇呼吸及腹式缩唇呼吸三种呼吸训练方法期间的TV明显增大(P<0.05);EELI明显降低(P<0.05);Co V明显减小(P<0.05,腹侧通气增多);腹式呼吸和腹式缩唇呼吸的GI明显减小(P<0.05,通气更均匀);缩唇呼吸和腹式缩唇呼吸RVD明显增加(P<0.05)。结论:腹式呼吸、缩唇呼吸、腹式缩唇呼三种呼吸训练方法均能有效增加肺通气量,减少肺功能残气量,但三种呼吸训练方法对肺通气的影响各不相同:缩唇呼吸通气向腹侧移动更显著(COV更小),区域通气延迟更显著(RVD更大),而腹式呼吸可改善通气均匀性(GI更小)。因此,从区域性肺通气的角度,建议COPD患者在进行呼吸训练时应腹式呼吸与缩唇呼吸独立交替进行,以达到更好的呼吸训练效果。展开更多
文摘We have designed a breathing paced television;a television that plays content in sync with users’ activity of exhaling through pursed lips, to achieve better motivation and compliance of such exercises. Described system has been tested with control group who have watched the same video. Breathing rate reduction was significantly higher in active group (54.48% ± 8.34%) than in control group (6.84% ± 17.21%), however, the proposed method of watching television is obviously not as trivial as watching television per se.
文摘目的:利用生物电阻抗成像(EIT)技术探究不同自主呼吸训练方法对区域性肺通气的影响,以期为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在训练标准及方法选取上提供行之有效的康复指导方案。方法:共纳入28名健康志愿者,取舒适站立位并进行:(1)平静呼吸;(2)腹式呼吸;(3)缩唇呼吸;(4)腹式缩唇呼吸,每位被试的四种呼吸方式随机决定,整个过程中连续记录胸部EIT;分别对比四种呼吸方式期间的潮气量(TV)、呼气末肺阻抗(EELI)、通气中心(center of ventilation,Co V)、不均一指数(GI)、区域通气延迟(RVD)。结果:较平静呼吸,腹式呼吸、缩唇呼吸及腹式缩唇呼吸三种呼吸训练方法期间的TV明显增大(P<0.05);EELI明显降低(P<0.05);Co V明显减小(P<0.05,腹侧通气增多);腹式呼吸和腹式缩唇呼吸的GI明显减小(P<0.05,通气更均匀);缩唇呼吸和腹式缩唇呼吸RVD明显增加(P<0.05)。结论:腹式呼吸、缩唇呼吸、腹式缩唇呼三种呼吸训练方法均能有效增加肺通气量,减少肺功能残气量,但三种呼吸训练方法对肺通气的影响各不相同:缩唇呼吸通气向腹侧移动更显著(COV更小),区域通气延迟更显著(RVD更大),而腹式呼吸可改善通气均匀性(GI更小)。因此,从区域性肺通气的角度,建议COPD患者在进行呼吸训练时应腹式呼吸与缩唇呼吸独立交替进行,以达到更好的呼吸训练效果。