BACKGROUND Lumbar disc herniation is a common disease.Endoscopic treatment may have more advantages than traditional surgery.AIM To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of microendoscopic discectomy(MED)and open d...BACKGROUND Lumbar disc herniation is a common disease.Endoscopic treatment may have more advantages than traditional surgery.AIM To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of microendoscopic discectomy(MED)and open discectomy with lamina nucleus enucleation in the treatment of singlesegment lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.METHODS Ninety-six patients who were operated at our hospital were selected for this study.Patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation were admitted to the hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 and were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 48 cases in each group.The former group underwent lumbar discectomy and the latter underwent laparotomy and nucleus pulpectomy.Surgical effects were compared between the two groups.RESULTS In terms of surgical indicators,the observation group had a longer operation time,shorter postoperative bedtime and hospital stay,less intraoperative blood loss,and smaller incision length than the control group(P<0.05).The excellent recovery rate did not differ significantly between the observation group(93.75%)and the control group(91.67%).Visual analogue scale pain scores were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group at 1 d,3 d,1 mo,and 6 mo after surgery(P<0.05).The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(6.25%vs 22.92%,P<0.05).CONCLUSION Both MED and open discectomy can effectively improve single-segment lumbar disc herniation,but MED is associated with less trauma,less bleeding,and a lower incidence of complications.展开更多
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy is a minimally invasive surgery with little pain, less blood loss, less hospital stay and the surgery can be done in local anesthesia, which was started during late 20...Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy is a minimally invasive surgery with little pain, less blood loss, less hospital stay and the surgery can be done in local anesthesia, which was started during late 20th century. Kambin and Gellmann in 1973 in the United States and Hijikata in Japanin 1977 individually preformed posterolateral percutaneous nucleotomy for the resection of the nucleus pulposus and release of compressed exiting nerve root, which is now spreading through the world and many surgeons are developing their skill but it needs experience and patience for successful outcomes. Along with advanced instruments now the surgery can be performed only giving a small skin incision of 8 - 10 mm and is as effective as the conventional method of surgery and open microdiscectomy surgery for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. In this review, we are explaining the technique of minimally invasive Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy surgery along its advantages and complications which can be encountered while performing this technique.展开更多
Objective:To investigate the early efficacy of two approaches for lumbar disc herniation under spinal endoscopy.Methods:45 cases of lumbar disc herniation were divided into interlaminar approach(27 cases)and intervert...Objective:To investigate the early efficacy of two approaches for lumbar disc herniation under spinal endoscopy.Methods:45 cases of lumbar disc herniation were divided into interlaminar approach(27 cases)and intervertebral foramen approach(18 cases)according to different surgical approaches.Postoperative pain visual analogue scale(VAS)was used.Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)lumbar spine score(JOA)and modified Macnab criteria were used to evaluate the postoperative outcome.Results:(1)VAS score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=0.620,P=0.603).There were statistically significant differences in pain VAS scores between preoperative and postoperative time points,that is,there was a time effect(F=2157.488,P=0.000).The overall VAS scores of the two groups were compared,and the difference was not statistically significant,that is,there was no grouping effect(F=2.610,P=0.114).The VAS score of pain in both groups decreased with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);JOA score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=1.296,P=0.280).The difference of JOA score between preoperative and postoperative time points was statistically significant,that is,there was a time effect(F=1464.830,P=0.000).JOA scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);(2)The improved Macnab standard was used to evaluate the excellent and good rate at 3 months after surgery.In the interlaminar group,12 cases were excellent,13 cases were good and 2 cases were fair.The excellent and good rate was 92.6%.In the intervertebral foramen group,7 cases were excellent,10 cases were good and 1 case was fair.The excellent and good rate was 94.4%.The overall excellent and good rate of the two groups was 93.3%.Conclusion:Both approaches can achieve satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation,which is worthy of clinical application.However,for beginners,l5-s1 lumbar disc herniation is more suitable for intervertebral disc approach,so as to achieve satisfactory efficacy.展开更多
目的探讨侧后路经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中的应用效果。方法选取2017年1月—2019年12月福建医科大学附属闽东医院91例腰椎间盘突出症患者为对照组,采取后路椎板间开窗髓核摘除术治疗;并选取2020年1月—2022年12月福...目的探讨侧后路经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中的应用效果。方法选取2017年1月—2019年12月福建医科大学附属闽东医院91例腰椎间盘突出症患者为对照组,采取后路椎板间开窗髓核摘除术治疗;并选取2020年1月—2022年12月福建医科大学附属闽东医院91例腰椎间盘突出症患者为观察组,采取侧后路经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术治疗。对比治疗效果,包括术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、颈脊髓功能评分法(Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores,JOA)、视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分和并发症发生情况。结果观察组术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间长于对照组,但术后住院时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后,观察组JOA评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后1、3 d VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组并发症总发生率为5.49%,低于对照组的15.39%(P<0.05)。结论侧后路经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中应用价值较高,不仅可以减少整体治疗时间及术中出血量,且能够提高腰椎功能,减轻疼痛。此外,该方法有助于降低术后并发症发生率。展开更多
Background Nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs has proinflammatory characteristics that play a key role in neuropathic pain in lumbar herniated intervertebral disc. One of the most commonly used animal models （t...Background Nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs has proinflammatory characteristics that play a key role in neuropathic pain in lumbar herniated intervertebral disc. One of the most commonly used animal models （the traditional model） of non-compressive lumbar herniated intervertebral disc is created by L4-L5 hemilaminectomy and the application of autologous nucleus pulposus to cover the left L4 and L5 nerve roots in rats. However, such procedures have the disadvantages of excessive trauma and low success rate. We proposed a modified model of non-compressive lumbar herniated intervertebral disc in which only the left L5 dorsal root ganglion is exposed and transplanted with autologous nucleus pulposus following incision of epineurium. We aimed to compare the modified model with the traditional one with regard to trauma and success rate. Methods Thirty Sprague-Dawley male rats were randomized into three groups： sham operation group （n=6）, traditional group （n=12）, and modified group （n=12）. The amount of blood loss and operative time for each group were analyzed. The paw withdrawal threshold of the left hind limb to mechanical stimuli and paw withdrawal latency to heat stimuli were examined from the day before surgery to day 35 after surgery. Results Compared with the traditional group, the modified group had shorter operative time, smaller amount of blood loss, and higher success rate （91.7% versus 58.3%, P 〈0.05）. There was no decrease in paw withdrawal latency in any group. The sham operation group had no decrease in postoperative paw withdrawal threshold, whereas the modified and traditional groups had significant reduction in paw withdrawal threshold after surgery （mechanical hyperalgesia）. Conclusions Transplantation of nucleus pulposus onto the L5 dorsal root ganglion following incision of epineurium in rats established an improved animal model of non-compressive lumbar herniated intervertebral disc with less trauma and more stable pain ethology.展开更多
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the analgesic effect of Gua Sha and its underlying mechanism in rats with noncompressive lumbar disk herniation induced by autologous nucleus pulposus.METHODS: A rat model of noncompressive l...OBJECTIVE: To investigate the analgesic effect of Gua Sha and its underlying mechanism in rats with noncompressive lumbar disk herniation induced by autologous nucleus pulposus.METHODS: A rat model of noncompressive lumbar disk herniation was established and rats were randomly divided into model group, sham group, and Gua Sha group(24 in each group). Gua Sha was performed from the 5 th day after the surgery, once every other day, 3 times for a course of treatment,and totally 3 courses. The thermal withdrawal latency was evaluated using the intelligent hot plate one day before the surgery, and on days 4(the day before the treatment), 10(the end of the firstcourse), 16(the end of the second course) and 22(the end of the third course). On days 4, 10, 16 and22, six rats in each group were picked randomly and their blood samples were drawn to assess the expression of interleukin-1β(IL-1β), interleukin-6(IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α).RESULTS: Compared to rats in the sham group, the application of nucleus pulposus to right L5 dorsal root ganglion induced prolonged thermal hyperalgesia, and up-regulated the expression of IL-1β,IL-6 and TNF-α in serum(P < 0.01). The therapy of Gua Sha attenuated thermal hyperalgesia potently,inhibited the expression of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in a time-dependent manner(P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the thermal withdrawal latency and the expression of inflammatory cytokines between the sham and Gua Sha groups at the end of the treatment(P > 0.01).CONCLUSION: The current study showed that Gua Sha might alleviate thermal hyperalgesia in rats with lumbar disc herniation induced by autologous nucleus pulposus via inhibiting the expression of proinflammatory cytokins.展开更多
目的比较三种工作通道下治疗腰5/骶1椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法回顾分析2017年3月至2020年3月空军军医大学西京医院收治的113例腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床资料,其中37例行传统单纯髓核摘除术(传统组),42例行Quadrant通道下单纯髓核摘除术(...目的比较三种工作通道下治疗腰5/骶1椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法回顾分析2017年3月至2020年3月空军军医大学西京医院收治的113例腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床资料,其中37例行传统单纯髓核摘除术(传统组),42例行Quadrant通道下单纯髓核摘除术(Quadrant组),34例行Zista固定通道下精确开窗髓核摘除术(Zista组)。所有患者均随访1年,比较三组患者手术切口长度、术中出血量、术后引流量、腰痛、腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、腰椎Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)分析。结果Zista组手术切口长度、术中出血量、术后引流量均小于Quadrant组及传统组(P<0.05),而Quadrant组进一步优于传统组(P<0.05)。腰痛VAS评分术后7 d Zista组及Quadrant组优于传统组(P<0.05),术后1年Zista组优于Quadrant组(P<0.05),而Quadrant组与传统组相当(P>0.05)。腿痛VAS评分三组术后7 d、术后1年均相当(P>0.05)。ODI评分Zista组术后7 d优于Quadrant组及传统组(P<0.05),而Quadrant组及传统组相当(P>0.05),术后1年Zista组优于Quadrant组(P<0.05),且进一步优于传统组(P<0.05)。结论三种手术方式均可以达到相对满意的临床疗效,而Quadrant组较传统组术后短期内改善更佳,而Zista组整体治疗效果优于Quadrant组和传统组,值得推广。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Lumbar disc herniation is a common disease.Endoscopic treatment may have more advantages than traditional surgery.AIM To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of microendoscopic discectomy(MED)and open discectomy with lamina nucleus enucleation in the treatment of singlesegment lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.METHODS Ninety-six patients who were operated at our hospital were selected for this study.Patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation were admitted to the hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 and were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 48 cases in each group.The former group underwent lumbar discectomy and the latter underwent laparotomy and nucleus pulpectomy.Surgical effects were compared between the two groups.RESULTS In terms of surgical indicators,the observation group had a longer operation time,shorter postoperative bedtime and hospital stay,less intraoperative blood loss,and smaller incision length than the control group(P<0.05).The excellent recovery rate did not differ significantly between the observation group(93.75%)and the control group(91.67%).Visual analogue scale pain scores were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group at 1 d,3 d,1 mo,and 6 mo after surgery(P<0.05).The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(6.25%vs 22.92%,P<0.05).CONCLUSION Both MED and open discectomy can effectively improve single-segment lumbar disc herniation,but MED is associated with less trauma,less bleeding,and a lower incidence of complications.
文摘Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy is a minimally invasive surgery with little pain, less blood loss, less hospital stay and the surgery can be done in local anesthesia, which was started during late 20th century. Kambin and Gellmann in 1973 in the United States and Hijikata in Japanin 1977 individually preformed posterolateral percutaneous nucleotomy for the resection of the nucleus pulposus and release of compressed exiting nerve root, which is now spreading through the world and many surgeons are developing their skill but it needs experience and patience for successful outcomes. Along with advanced instruments now the surgery can be performed only giving a small skin incision of 8 - 10 mm and is as effective as the conventional method of surgery and open microdiscectomy surgery for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. In this review, we are explaining the technique of minimally invasive Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy surgery along its advantages and complications which can be encountered while performing this technique.
基金Anhui Province from Cong Qingwu Old Chinese Medicine Studio Project.Project No:2100601.
文摘Objective:To investigate the early efficacy of two approaches for lumbar disc herniation under spinal endoscopy.Methods:45 cases of lumbar disc herniation were divided into interlaminar approach(27 cases)and intervertebral foramen approach(18 cases)according to different surgical approaches.Postoperative pain visual analogue scale(VAS)was used.Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)lumbar spine score(JOA)and modified Macnab criteria were used to evaluate the postoperative outcome.Results:(1)VAS score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=0.620,P=0.603).There were statistically significant differences in pain VAS scores between preoperative and postoperative time points,that is,there was a time effect(F=2157.488,P=0.000).The overall VAS scores of the two groups were compared,and the difference was not statistically significant,that is,there was no grouping effect(F=2.610,P=0.114).The VAS score of pain in both groups decreased with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);JOA score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=1.296,P=0.280).The difference of JOA score between preoperative and postoperative time points was statistically significant,that is,there was a time effect(F=1464.830,P=0.000).JOA scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);(2)The improved Macnab standard was used to evaluate the excellent and good rate at 3 months after surgery.In the interlaminar group,12 cases were excellent,13 cases were good and 2 cases were fair.The excellent and good rate was 92.6%.In the intervertebral foramen group,7 cases were excellent,10 cases were good and 1 case was fair.The excellent and good rate was 94.4%.The overall excellent and good rate of the two groups was 93.3%.Conclusion:Both approaches can achieve satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation,which is worthy of clinical application.However,for beginners,l5-s1 lumbar disc herniation is more suitable for intervertebral disc approach,so as to achieve satisfactory efficacy.
文摘目的探讨侧后路经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中的应用效果。方法选取2017年1月—2019年12月福建医科大学附属闽东医院91例腰椎间盘突出症患者为对照组,采取后路椎板间开窗髓核摘除术治疗;并选取2020年1月—2022年12月福建医科大学附属闽东医院91例腰椎间盘突出症患者为观察组,采取侧后路经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术治疗。对比治疗效果,包括术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、颈脊髓功能评分法(Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores,JOA)、视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分和并发症发生情况。结果观察组术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间长于对照组,但术后住院时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后,观察组JOA评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后1、3 d VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组并发症总发生率为5.49%,低于对照组的15.39%(P<0.05)。结论侧后路经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中应用价值较高,不仅可以减少整体治疗时间及术中出血量,且能够提高腰椎功能,减轻疼痛。此外,该方法有助于降低术后并发症发生率。
基金The study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China-Guangdong Joint Funding （No. u0732001）.
文摘Background Nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs has proinflammatory characteristics that play a key role in neuropathic pain in lumbar herniated intervertebral disc. One of the most commonly used animal models （the traditional model） of non-compressive lumbar herniated intervertebral disc is created by L4-L5 hemilaminectomy and the application of autologous nucleus pulposus to cover the left L4 and L5 nerve roots in rats. However, such procedures have the disadvantages of excessive trauma and low success rate. We proposed a modified model of non-compressive lumbar herniated intervertebral disc in which only the left L5 dorsal root ganglion is exposed and transplanted with autologous nucleus pulposus following incision of epineurium. We aimed to compare the modified model with the traditional one with regard to trauma and success rate. Methods Thirty Sprague-Dawley male rats were randomized into three groups： sham operation group （n=6）, traditional group （n=12）, and modified group （n=12）. The amount of blood loss and operative time for each group were analyzed. The paw withdrawal threshold of the left hind limb to mechanical stimuli and paw withdrawal latency to heat stimuli were examined from the day before surgery to day 35 after surgery. Results Compared with the traditional group, the modified group had shorter operative time, smaller amount of blood loss, and higher success rate （91.7% versus 58.3%, P 〈0.05）. There was no decrease in paw withdrawal latency in any group. The sham operation group had no decrease in postoperative paw withdrawal threshold, whereas the modified and traditional groups had significant reduction in paw withdrawal threshold after surgery （mechanical hyperalgesia）. Conclusions Transplantation of nucleus pulposus onto the L5 dorsal root ganglion following incision of epineurium in rats established an improved animal model of non-compressive lumbar herniated intervertebral disc with less trauma and more stable pain ethology.
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China:Differential proteomics-based research on the intervention effects,and mechanism of scraping therapy,treating lumbar disc herniation(No.81473791)Natural Science Foundation of Basic Research Program in Jiangsu Province:Proteomics research on the intervention effects,and mechanism of scraping therapy for lumbar disc herniation based on i TRAQ technology(No.BK20141464)
文摘OBJECTIVE: To investigate the analgesic effect of Gua Sha and its underlying mechanism in rats with noncompressive lumbar disk herniation induced by autologous nucleus pulposus.METHODS: A rat model of noncompressive lumbar disk herniation was established and rats were randomly divided into model group, sham group, and Gua Sha group(24 in each group). Gua Sha was performed from the 5 th day after the surgery, once every other day, 3 times for a course of treatment,and totally 3 courses. The thermal withdrawal latency was evaluated using the intelligent hot plate one day before the surgery, and on days 4(the day before the treatment), 10(the end of the firstcourse), 16(the end of the second course) and 22(the end of the third course). On days 4, 10, 16 and22, six rats in each group were picked randomly and their blood samples were drawn to assess the expression of interleukin-1β(IL-1β), interleukin-6(IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α).RESULTS: Compared to rats in the sham group, the application of nucleus pulposus to right L5 dorsal root ganglion induced prolonged thermal hyperalgesia, and up-regulated the expression of IL-1β,IL-6 and TNF-α in serum(P < 0.01). The therapy of Gua Sha attenuated thermal hyperalgesia potently,inhibited the expression of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in a time-dependent manner(P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the thermal withdrawal latency and the expression of inflammatory cytokines between the sham and Gua Sha groups at the end of the treatment(P > 0.01).CONCLUSION: The current study showed that Gua Sha might alleviate thermal hyperalgesia in rats with lumbar disc herniation induced by autologous nucleus pulposus via inhibiting the expression of proinflammatory cytokins.
文摘目的比较三种工作通道下治疗腰5/骶1椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法回顾分析2017年3月至2020年3月空军军医大学西京医院收治的113例腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床资料,其中37例行传统单纯髓核摘除术(传统组),42例行Quadrant通道下单纯髓核摘除术(Quadrant组),34例行Zista固定通道下精确开窗髓核摘除术(Zista组)。所有患者均随访1年,比较三组患者手术切口长度、术中出血量、术后引流量、腰痛、腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、腰椎Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)分析。结果Zista组手术切口长度、术中出血量、术后引流量均小于Quadrant组及传统组(P<0.05),而Quadrant组进一步优于传统组(P<0.05)。腰痛VAS评分术后7 d Zista组及Quadrant组优于传统组(P<0.05),术后1年Zista组优于Quadrant组(P<0.05),而Quadrant组与传统组相当(P>0.05)。腿痛VAS评分三组术后7 d、术后1年均相当(P>0.05)。ODI评分Zista组术后7 d优于Quadrant组及传统组(P<0.05),而Quadrant组及传统组相当(P>0.05),术后1年Zista组优于Quadrant组(P<0.05),且进一步优于传统组(P<0.05)。结论三种手术方式均可以达到相对满意的临床疗效,而Quadrant组较传统组术后短期内改善更佳,而Zista组整体治疗效果优于Quadrant组和传统组,值得推广。
