AIMTo determine if the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) could be helpful in predicting survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients diag...AIMTo determine if the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) could be helpful in predicting survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the VA North Texas Healthcare System from January 2005 to December 2010. The LMR was calculated from peripheral blood cell counts obtained at the time of diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by dividing the absolute lymphocyte count by the absolute monocyte count. A Univariable Cox regression analysis was performed using these data, and hazard ratios (HR) and 95%CI were calculated. The median LMR (2.05) was used to dichotomize patients into high-LMR and low-LMR groups and the log rank test was used to compare survival between the two groups. RESULTSWe identified 97 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (all men, 66% white, 30% African-American). The mean age and weight at diagnosis were 66.0 ± 0.9 (SEM) years and 80.4 ± 1.7 kg respectively. Mean absolute lymphocyte and monocyte values were 1.50 ± 0.07 K/μL and 0.74 ± 0.03 K/μL respectively. Mean, median and range of LMR was 2.36, 2.05 and 0.4-12 respectively. In the univariable Cox regression analysis, we found that an increased LMR was a significant indicator of improved overall survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.83; 95%CI: 0.70-0.98; P = 0.027). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an overall median survival of 128 d (95%CI: 80-162 d). The median survival of patients in the high-LMR (> 2.05) group was significantly greater than the low-LMR group (≤ 2.05) (194 d vs 93 d; P = 0.03), validating a significant survival advantage in patients with a high LMR. CONCLUSIONThe LMR at diagnosis is a significant predictor for survival and can provide useful prognostic information in the management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.展开更多
Objective This study aimed to explore the combined prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio(NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR) in newly diagnosed IE/II...Objective This study aimed to explore the combined prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio(NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR) in newly diagnosed IE/IIE extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma(ENKTL) treated with a P-Gemox regimen combined with radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone.Methods A total of 132 patients from 2009 to 2017 at the Sichuan Cancer Hospital were enrolled in the study. The cutoff values of NLR, LMR, and PLR using overall survival(OS) rate as an endpoint were obtained by the receiver operating curve. Results The cutoff value of NLR was 3.5. Patients with high NLR had significantly shorter progressionfree survival(PFS)(P < 0.001) and OS(P < 0.001) than those with low NLR. Similarly, the cutoff value of LMR was 3.0. The high LMR group had significantly longer PFS(P=0.001) and OS(P < 0.001) than the low LMR group. Similarly, the cutoff value of PLR was 191.7. The high PLR group was significantly associated with poor PFS(P < 0.001) and OS(P < 0.001) than the low PLR group. Furthermore, combining NLR, LMR, and PLR to build a new model to stratify patients into low-, intermediate-, intermediate-high-, and high-risk groups, there were also significant differences in PFS(P < 0.001) and OS(P < 0.001). The univariate analysis showed that presenting B symptoms, stage IIE, local tumor invasion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2, elevated lactate dehydrogenase level, elevated NLR, decreased LMR, and elevated PLR were significantly associated with poor survival. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that PLR was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS(hazard ratio [HR]= 2.073, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 1.080–3.981, P = 0.028) and OS(HR = 2.127, 95% CI = 1.102–4.107, P = 0.025).Conclusion Elevated pretreatment PLR was a novel simple predictor of poor survival in patients with stage IE/IIE ENKTL. Combining NLR, LMR, and PLR could provide additional stratification.展开更多
目的探讨接受早期宫颈癌根治术患者术前外周血中中性粒/淋巴细胞(neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio,NLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞(platelet to lymphocyte ratio,PLR)及单核/淋巴细胞(Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio,LMR)与预后的关系。方法分析...目的探讨接受早期宫颈癌根治术患者术前外周血中中性粒/淋巴细胞(neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio,NLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞(platelet to lymphocyte ratio,PLR)及单核/淋巴细胞(Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio,LMR)与预后的关系。方法分析2012-2018年新疆医科大学第一附属医院妇科确诊为宫颈癌(I-IIa期)并接受早期根治术的116例患者的相关资料并计算NLR、PLR、LMR,讨论高、低比值组与临床资料的相关性及其对预后的影响。结果高、低NLR组在年龄、肿块大小方面的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高低PLR组在年龄、淋巴结转移、肿块大小、脉管浸润方面的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高、低LMR组在年龄、脉管浸润方面的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。高NLR组患者5年生存率(34.4%)低于低NLR组(63.3%),高PLR组患者5年生存率(45.6%)低于低PLR组(55.8%),高LMR组患者5年生存率(57.6%)高于低LMR组(37.6%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单因素分析显示,浸润深度≥1/2、NLR≥2.77、PLR≥133.57、LMR<4.04、临床分期为II期、有淋巴结转移是影响患者生存情况的危险因素。多因素分析显示,NLR≥2.77、浸润深度≥1/2、临床分期为II期是影响患者生存率的独立危险因素。结论宫颈癌患者术前高NLR、高PLR及低LMR是提示预后不良的指标,NLR较其他2个比值对预后的预测更具意义。展开更多
Here,we developed a prostate cancer(PCa)risk nomogram including lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(LMR)for initial prostate biopsy,and internal and external validation were further conducted.A prediction model was developed...Here,we developed a prostate cancer(PCa)risk nomogram including lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(LMR)for initial prostate biopsy,and internal and external validation were further conducted.A prediction model was developed on a training set.Significant risk factors with P<0.10 in multivariate logistic regression models were used to generate a nomogram.Discrimination,calibration,and clinical usefulness of the model were assessed using C-index,calibration plot,and decision curve analysis(DCA).The nomogram was re-examined with the internal and external validation set.A nomogram predicting PCa risk in patients with prostate-specific antigen(PSA)4-10 ng ml^(-1)was also developed.The model displayed good discrimination with C-index of 0.830(95%confidence interval[Cl]:0.812-0.852).High C-index of 0.864(95%Cl:0.840-0.888)and 0.871(95%Cl:0.861-0.881)was still reached in the internal and external validation sets,respectively.The nomogram exhibited better performance compared to the nomogram with PSA only(C-index:0.763,95%Cl:0.746-0.780,P<0.001)and the nomogram with LMR excluded(C-index:0.824,95%Cl:0.804-0.844,P<0.010).The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement in the internal and external validation sets.DCA showed that the nomogram was useful at the threshold probability of>4%and<99%.The nomogram predicting PCa risk in patients with PSA 4-10 ng ml^(-1)also displayed good calibration and discrimination performance(C-index:0.734,95%Cl:0.708-0.760).This nomogram incorporating age,PSA,digital rectal examination,abnormal imaging signals,PSA density,and LMR could be used to facilitate individual PCa risk prediction in initial prostate biopsy.展开更多
Advanced therapies for patients with mild-to-severe ulcerative colitis(UC)may result in treatment failure.We examined whether the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(L/M ratio)could predict the failure of advanced therapies....Advanced therapies for patients with mild-to-severe ulcerative colitis(UC)may result in treatment failure.We examined whether the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(L/M ratio)could predict the failure of advanced therapies.This retrospective,observational,cohort study included 73 patients who were treated with advanced therapies at the Hamamatsu University School of Medicine(Shizuoka,Japan)between February 2011 and November 2020.The patients were divided into the nonfailure and failure groups,and their leukocyte counts and ratios before induction were examined.Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors.Advanced therapies failed within 3 months in 15(20.5%)patients.Only the L/M ratio was significantly lower in the failure group than in the non-failure group(P=0.004).Receiveroperating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis revealed that an L/M ratio of ≤3.417 was predictive of treatment failure;the area under the curve(AUC)was 0.747(95%CI,0.620–0.874).Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that the failure-free rate was significantly lower in the group with an L/M ratio of≤3.417 than in the group with an L/M ratio of>3.417(log-rank test P=0.002).Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified an L/M ratio of≤3.417 as an independent risk factor for failure within 3 months after the induction of advanced therapies.Furthermore,ROC analysis of patients who did not receive immunomodulators also revealed that the cut-off L/M ratio was 3.417 and the AUC was 0.796(95%CI,0.666–0.925).In patients receiving advanced therapies for active UC,the L/M ratio can predict treatment failure within 3 months.L/M ratios could facilitate the transition from advanced therapies to subsequent treatments.展开更多
Background The no-reflow phenomenon is correlated with adverse effects on short-term and long-term outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventio...Background The no-reflow phenomenon is correlated with adverse effects on short-term and long-term outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(LMR) is a novel inflammatory marker which is associated with slow coronary flow. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of LMR for no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Methods A total of 1350 STEMI patients were enrolled in this study from January 2014 to January 2018. Blood samples were obtained at initial admission for analysis of LMR.The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to study the relationship between LMR and no-reflow phenomenon. Results All the 156 patients among the study population suffered from no-reflow phenomenon during the procedure. The LMR level was significantly lower in patients with no-reflow(1.6 ±1.0 vs. 3.25 ± 1.8, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LMR was independently associated with no-reflow post primary PCI in STEMI patients.(OR 2.356, 95% CI 1.201-5.945;P=0.030). The area under the ROC curve for the LMR was 0.757 [95% confidence interval(CI) 0.686-0.828, P<0.001]. Conclusions LMR at admission could serve as a biomarker for no-reflow phenomenon in patients undertaken primary PCI for STEMI.[S Chin J Cardiol 2019;20(4):228-235]展开更多
BACKGROUND Platelet count or complete blood count(CBC)-based ratios including lymphocyteto-monocyte(LMR),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte(NLR),hemoglobin-to-platelet(HPR),red blood cell count distribution width-to-platelet(RP...BACKGROUND Platelet count or complete blood count(CBC)-based ratios including lymphocyteto-monocyte(LMR),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte(NLR),hemoglobin-to-platelet(HPR),red blood cell count distribution width-to-platelet(RPR),and platelet-tolymphocyte(PLR)ratio are good predictors of colorectal cancer(CRC)survival.Their change in time is not well documented,however.AIM To investigate the effect of longitudinal CBC ratio changes on CRC survival and their possible associations with clinicopathological properties,comorbidities,and anamnestic data.METHODS A retrospective longitudinal observational study was conducted with the inclusion of 835 CRC patients,who attended at Semmelweis University,Budapest.CBC ratios and two additional newly defined personalized platelet count metrics(pPLT_(D)and pPLT_(S),the platelet counts relative to the measurement at the time of CRC diagnosis and to the one 4-6 wk after tumor removal surgery,respectively)were recorded.RESULTS The 835 CRC patients had a total of 4608 measurements(5.52 visits/patient,in average).Longitudinal survival models revealed that the increases/decreases in LMR[hazard ratio(HR):0.4989,P<0.0001],NLR(HR:1.0819,P<0.0001),HPR(HR:0.0533,P=0.0038),pPLT_(D)(HR:4.9229,P<0.0001),and pPLT_(S)(HR:4.7568,P<0.0001)values were poor prognostic signs of disease-specific survival.The same was obtained for all-cause mortality.Most abnormal changes occurred within the first 3 years after the diagnosis of CRC.RPR and PLR had an only marginal effect on diseasespecific(P=0.0675)and all-cause mortality(Bayesian 95%credible interval:0.90–186.05),respectively.CONCLUSION LMR,NLR,and HPR are good metrics to follow the prognosis of the disease.pPLT_(D)and pPLT_(S)perform just as well as the former,while the use of RPR and PLR with the course of the disease is not recommended.Early detection of the abnormal changes in pPLT_(D),pPLT_(S),LMR,NLR,or HPR may alert the practicing oncologist for further therapy decisions in a timely manner.展开更多
目的比较阿帕替尼联合化疗与阿帕替尼单药治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的疗效和安全性。方法共纳入62例患者,将其分为阿帕替尼联合化疗组(联合组)和阿帕替尼单药组(单药组)。记录并评估2组的无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、客观反应率(O...目的比较阿帕替尼联合化疗与阿帕替尼单药治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的疗效和安全性。方法共纳入62例患者,将其分为阿帕替尼联合化疗组(联合组)和阿帕替尼单药组(单药组)。记录并评估2组的无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、客观反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、治疗前后的实验室检查结果和治疗相关不良事件。此外,进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析PFS和OS的独立预后因素。结果与单药组相比,联合组显著延长了OS(8.1 m vs 7.7 m,P=0.021),但2组PFS比较差异无统计学意义(3.65 m vs 3.15 m,P=0.100)。联合组的ORR为8.3%(3/36),DCR为80.6%(29/36),单药组的ORR和DCR分别为7.7%(2/26)、61.5%(16/26)。多因素分析提示治疗方案[风险比(HR)=1.946,95%CI:1.014~3.738,P=0.045]和原发肿瘤的位置(HR=3.486,95%CI:1.374~8.844,P=0.009)是OS的重要因素。联合组治疗后的平均红细胞体积(MCV)和平均红细胞体积与红细胞比值(MCV/RBC)均高于单药组(P<0.05),而联合组治疗后的淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)和血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板计数评分(HALP评分)均低于单药组(P<0.05)。联合组3/4级血小板减少(11.1%)高于单药治疗组(0%),其他不良反应2组比较差异无统计学意义。结论在mCRC后线治疗中,阿帕替尼联合化疗比单药治疗能延长OS,且未增加不良反应。展开更多
文摘AIMTo determine if the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) could be helpful in predicting survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the VA North Texas Healthcare System from January 2005 to December 2010. The LMR was calculated from peripheral blood cell counts obtained at the time of diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by dividing the absolute lymphocyte count by the absolute monocyte count. A Univariable Cox regression analysis was performed using these data, and hazard ratios (HR) and 95%CI were calculated. The median LMR (2.05) was used to dichotomize patients into high-LMR and low-LMR groups and the log rank test was used to compare survival between the two groups. RESULTSWe identified 97 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (all men, 66% white, 30% African-American). The mean age and weight at diagnosis were 66.0 ± 0.9 (SEM) years and 80.4 ± 1.7 kg respectively. Mean absolute lymphocyte and monocyte values were 1.50 ± 0.07 K/μL and 0.74 ± 0.03 K/μL respectively. Mean, median and range of LMR was 2.36, 2.05 and 0.4-12 respectively. In the univariable Cox regression analysis, we found that an increased LMR was a significant indicator of improved overall survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.83; 95%CI: 0.70-0.98; P = 0.027). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an overall median survival of 128 d (95%CI: 80-162 d). The median survival of patients in the high-LMR (> 2.05) group was significantly greater than the low-LMR group (≤ 2.05) (194 d vs 93 d; P = 0.03), validating a significant survival advantage in patients with a high LMR. CONCLUSIONThe LMR at diagnosis is a significant predictor for survival and can provide useful prognostic information in the management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
文摘Objective This study aimed to explore the combined prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio(NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR) in newly diagnosed IE/IIE extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma(ENKTL) treated with a P-Gemox regimen combined with radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone.Methods A total of 132 patients from 2009 to 2017 at the Sichuan Cancer Hospital were enrolled in the study. The cutoff values of NLR, LMR, and PLR using overall survival(OS) rate as an endpoint were obtained by the receiver operating curve. Results The cutoff value of NLR was 3.5. Patients with high NLR had significantly shorter progressionfree survival(PFS)(P < 0.001) and OS(P < 0.001) than those with low NLR. Similarly, the cutoff value of LMR was 3.0. The high LMR group had significantly longer PFS(P=0.001) and OS(P < 0.001) than the low LMR group. Similarly, the cutoff value of PLR was 191.7. The high PLR group was significantly associated with poor PFS(P < 0.001) and OS(P < 0.001) than the low PLR group. Furthermore, combining NLR, LMR, and PLR to build a new model to stratify patients into low-, intermediate-, intermediate-high-, and high-risk groups, there were also significant differences in PFS(P < 0.001) and OS(P < 0.001). The univariate analysis showed that presenting B symptoms, stage IIE, local tumor invasion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2, elevated lactate dehydrogenase level, elevated NLR, decreased LMR, and elevated PLR were significantly associated with poor survival. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that PLR was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS(hazard ratio [HR]= 2.073, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 1.080–3.981, P = 0.028) and OS(HR = 2.127, 95% CI = 1.102–4.107, P = 0.025).Conclusion Elevated pretreatment PLR was a novel simple predictor of poor survival in patients with stage IE/IIE ENKTL. Combining NLR, LMR, and PLR could provide additional stratification.
文摘目的探讨接受早期宫颈癌根治术患者术前外周血中中性粒/淋巴细胞(neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio,NLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞(platelet to lymphocyte ratio,PLR)及单核/淋巴细胞(Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio,LMR)与预后的关系。方法分析2012-2018年新疆医科大学第一附属医院妇科确诊为宫颈癌(I-IIa期)并接受早期根治术的116例患者的相关资料并计算NLR、PLR、LMR,讨论高、低比值组与临床资料的相关性及其对预后的影响。结果高、低NLR组在年龄、肿块大小方面的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高低PLR组在年龄、淋巴结转移、肿块大小、脉管浸润方面的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高、低LMR组在年龄、脉管浸润方面的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。高NLR组患者5年生存率(34.4%)低于低NLR组(63.3%),高PLR组患者5年生存率(45.6%)低于低PLR组(55.8%),高LMR组患者5年生存率(57.6%)高于低LMR组(37.6%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单因素分析显示,浸润深度≥1/2、NLR≥2.77、PLR≥133.57、LMR<4.04、临床分期为II期、有淋巴结转移是影响患者生存情况的危险因素。多因素分析显示,NLR≥2.77、浸润深度≥1/2、临床分期为II期是影响患者生存率的独立危险因素。结论宫颈癌患者术前高NLR、高PLR及低LMR是提示预后不良的指标,NLR较其他2个比值对预后的预测更具意义。
基金This study was partly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81502195).
文摘Here,we developed a prostate cancer(PCa)risk nomogram including lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(LMR)for initial prostate biopsy,and internal and external validation were further conducted.A prediction model was developed on a training set.Significant risk factors with P<0.10 in multivariate logistic regression models were used to generate a nomogram.Discrimination,calibration,and clinical usefulness of the model were assessed using C-index,calibration plot,and decision curve analysis(DCA).The nomogram was re-examined with the internal and external validation set.A nomogram predicting PCa risk in patients with prostate-specific antigen(PSA)4-10 ng ml^(-1)was also developed.The model displayed good discrimination with C-index of 0.830(95%confidence interval[Cl]:0.812-0.852).High C-index of 0.864(95%Cl:0.840-0.888)and 0.871(95%Cl:0.861-0.881)was still reached in the internal and external validation sets,respectively.The nomogram exhibited better performance compared to the nomogram with PSA only(C-index:0.763,95%Cl:0.746-0.780,P<0.001)and the nomogram with LMR excluded(C-index:0.824,95%Cl:0.804-0.844,P<0.010).The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement in the internal and external validation sets.DCA showed that the nomogram was useful at the threshold probability of>4%and<99%.The nomogram predicting PCa risk in patients with PSA 4-10 ng ml^(-1)also displayed good calibration and discrimination performance(C-index:0.734,95%Cl:0.708-0.760).This nomogram incorporating age,PSA,digital rectal examination,abnormal imaging signals,PSA density,and LMR could be used to facilitate individual PCa risk prediction in initial prostate biopsy.
文摘Advanced therapies for patients with mild-to-severe ulcerative colitis(UC)may result in treatment failure.We examined whether the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(L/M ratio)could predict the failure of advanced therapies.This retrospective,observational,cohort study included 73 patients who were treated with advanced therapies at the Hamamatsu University School of Medicine(Shizuoka,Japan)between February 2011 and November 2020.The patients were divided into the nonfailure and failure groups,and their leukocyte counts and ratios before induction were examined.Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors.Advanced therapies failed within 3 months in 15(20.5%)patients.Only the L/M ratio was significantly lower in the failure group than in the non-failure group(P=0.004).Receiveroperating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis revealed that an L/M ratio of ≤3.417 was predictive of treatment failure;the area under the curve(AUC)was 0.747(95%CI,0.620–0.874).Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that the failure-free rate was significantly lower in the group with an L/M ratio of≤3.417 than in the group with an L/M ratio of>3.417(log-rank test P=0.002).Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified an L/M ratio of≤3.417 as an independent risk factor for failure within 3 months after the induction of advanced therapies.Furthermore,ROC analysis of patients who did not receive immunomodulators also revealed that the cut-off L/M ratio was 3.417 and the AUC was 0.796(95%CI,0.666–0.925).In patients receiving advanced therapies for active UC,the L/M ratio can predict treatment failure within 3 months.L/M ratios could facilitate the transition from advanced therapies to subsequent treatments.
文摘Background The no-reflow phenomenon is correlated with adverse effects on short-term and long-term outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(LMR) is a novel inflammatory marker which is associated with slow coronary flow. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of LMR for no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Methods A total of 1350 STEMI patients were enrolled in this study from January 2014 to January 2018. Blood samples were obtained at initial admission for analysis of LMR.The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to study the relationship between LMR and no-reflow phenomenon. Results All the 156 patients among the study population suffered from no-reflow phenomenon during the procedure. The LMR level was significantly lower in patients with no-reflow(1.6 ±1.0 vs. 3.25 ± 1.8, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LMR was independently associated with no-reflow post primary PCI in STEMI patients.(OR 2.356, 95% CI 1.201-5.945;P=0.030). The area under the ROC curve for the LMR was 0.757 [95% confidence interval(CI) 0.686-0.828, P<0.001]. Conclusions LMR at admission could serve as a biomarker for no-reflow phenomenon in patients undertaken primary PCI for STEMI.[S Chin J Cardiol 2019;20(4):228-235]
基金Supported by the New National Excellence Program of the Hungarian Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the National Research,Development and Innovation Fund,No.UNKP-20-4-Ithe Hungarian National Research,Development and Innovation Office,No.NVKP_16-1-2016-0042.
文摘BACKGROUND Platelet count or complete blood count(CBC)-based ratios including lymphocyteto-monocyte(LMR),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte(NLR),hemoglobin-to-platelet(HPR),red blood cell count distribution width-to-platelet(RPR),and platelet-tolymphocyte(PLR)ratio are good predictors of colorectal cancer(CRC)survival.Their change in time is not well documented,however.AIM To investigate the effect of longitudinal CBC ratio changes on CRC survival and their possible associations with clinicopathological properties,comorbidities,and anamnestic data.METHODS A retrospective longitudinal observational study was conducted with the inclusion of 835 CRC patients,who attended at Semmelweis University,Budapest.CBC ratios and two additional newly defined personalized platelet count metrics(pPLT_(D)and pPLT_(S),the platelet counts relative to the measurement at the time of CRC diagnosis and to the one 4-6 wk after tumor removal surgery,respectively)were recorded.RESULTS The 835 CRC patients had a total of 4608 measurements(5.52 visits/patient,in average).Longitudinal survival models revealed that the increases/decreases in LMR[hazard ratio(HR):0.4989,P<0.0001],NLR(HR:1.0819,P<0.0001),HPR(HR:0.0533,P=0.0038),pPLT_(D)(HR:4.9229,P<0.0001),and pPLT_(S)(HR:4.7568,P<0.0001)values were poor prognostic signs of disease-specific survival.The same was obtained for all-cause mortality.Most abnormal changes occurred within the first 3 years after the diagnosis of CRC.RPR and PLR had an only marginal effect on diseasespecific(P=0.0675)and all-cause mortality(Bayesian 95%credible interval:0.90–186.05),respectively.CONCLUSION LMR,NLR,and HPR are good metrics to follow the prognosis of the disease.pPLT_(D)and pPLT_(S)perform just as well as the former,while the use of RPR and PLR with the course of the disease is not recommended.Early detection of the abnormal changes in pPLT_(D),pPLT_(S),LMR,NLR,or HPR may alert the practicing oncologist for further therapy decisions in a timely manner.
文摘目的比较阿帕替尼联合化疗与阿帕替尼单药治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的疗效和安全性。方法共纳入62例患者,将其分为阿帕替尼联合化疗组(联合组)和阿帕替尼单药组(单药组)。记录并评估2组的无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、客观反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、治疗前后的实验室检查结果和治疗相关不良事件。此外,进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析PFS和OS的独立预后因素。结果与单药组相比,联合组显著延长了OS(8.1 m vs 7.7 m,P=0.021),但2组PFS比较差异无统计学意义(3.65 m vs 3.15 m,P=0.100)。联合组的ORR为8.3%(3/36),DCR为80.6%(29/36),单药组的ORR和DCR分别为7.7%(2/26)、61.5%(16/26)。多因素分析提示治疗方案[风险比(HR)=1.946,95%CI:1.014~3.738,P=0.045]和原发肿瘤的位置(HR=3.486,95%CI:1.374~8.844,P=0.009)是OS的重要因素。联合组治疗后的平均红细胞体积(MCV)和平均红细胞体积与红细胞比值(MCV/RBC)均高于单药组(P<0.05),而联合组治疗后的淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)和血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板计数评分(HALP评分)均低于单药组(P<0.05)。联合组3/4级血小板减少(11.1%)高于单药治疗组(0%),其他不良反应2组比较差异无统计学意义。结论在mCRC后线治疗中,阿帕替尼联合化疗比单药治疗能延长OS,且未增加不良反应。