AIM: To find out the outcome of laser photocoagulation in clinically significant macular edema (CSME) by optical coherence tomography (OCT). · METHODS: It was a prospective, non-controlled, case series study enro...AIM: To find out the outcome of laser photocoagulation in clinically significant macular edema (CSME) by optical coherence tomography (OCT). · METHODS: It was a prospective, non-controlled, case series study enrolling 81 eyes of 64 patients with CSME between August 2008 and January 2010. All patients received modified grid photocoagulation with frequency doubled Nd: YAG laser. Each patient was evaluated in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and regression or progression of maculopathy after laser therapy at 1, 3 and 6 months. Spearman’s correlation test was used to show the correlation between BCVA and total macular volume (TMV). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare among groups and independent t-test was used to compare in each group. · RESULTS: There is high correlation between BCVA and TMV (P ≤0.001). BCVA improved in 50.6%, remained static in 39.5 % and deteriorated in 9.9% patients after 6 month of treatment. The Baseline TMV (mean and SD) were 9.26±1.83, 10.4±2.38, 11.5±3.05, 8.89±0.75 and 9.47±1.98 mm3 for different OCT patterns, ST (sponge like thickening), CMO (cystoid macular edema), SFD (subfoveal detachment), VMIA (Vitreo macular interface abnormality) and average TMV respectively (P =0.04). After 6 months of laser treatment, the mean TMV decreased from 9.47±1.98mm3 to 8.77±1.31mm3(P =0.01). In ST there was significant decrease in TMV, P =0.01, Further within these groups at 6 months, they were significantly different, P =0.01. · CONCLUSION: OCT showed the different morphological variant of CSME while the response of treatment is different. TMV decreased the most and hence showed the improvement in vision after 6 months of laser treatment. In the era of Anti vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), efficacy of laser seems to be in shadow but it is still first line of treatment in developing nation like Nepal where antiVEGFs may not be easily available and affordable.展开更多
Purpose: To assess the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with grid photocoagulation in the management of recurrent macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods: This is a prospect...Purpose: To assess the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with grid photocoagulation in the management of recurrent macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods: This is a prospective, non-randomized, interventional study. Thirty five eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and 15 eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) were treated with grid photocoagulation combined with IVB for recurrent macular edema. The visual acuity, central macular thickness and intraocular pressure were outcome measures. The mean duration of follow-up was 18.1 ± 3.6 months. Results: One month after treatment, 45 of the 50 eyes showed complete resolution of the cystoid space. Compared with initial values, final central macular thickness was reduced significantly in both BRVO and CRVO groups (P < 0.001), but improvement in VA was significant only for eyes with BRVO (P = 0.012). The total number of IVB was 1.8 ± 0.3 for eyes with either BRVO or CRVO. Conclusion: IVB combined with grid photocoagulation is an effective treatment for reducing recurrent macular edema associated with RVO.展开更多
AIM：To compare changes in visual acuity and macular edema in patients with central retinal vein occlusion（CRVO）treated with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab,macular grid photocoagulation combined with pan ret...AIM：To compare changes in visual acuity and macular edema in patients with central retinal vein occlusion（CRVO）treated with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab,macular grid photocoagulation combined with pan retinal photocoagulation（PRP）,or both（bevacizumab＋grid＋PRP）.· METHODS：Our study is a retrospective cohort clinical study that examined patients that suffered from ischemic CRVO with macular edema.Study inclusion criteria were ischemic CRVO with macula edema and the availability of complete medical records for at least 12 mo after treatment.Excluded were patients with diabetes or any other retinal disease.We reviewed the medical records of patients treated in one ophthalmology departmentcomparing changes in visual acuity and macular edema in patients treated with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab vs those that were treated with macular grid photocoagulation and PRP or both.The main outcome measures were the differences in best corrected visual acuity（BCVA） and in macular thickness,as assessed by optical coherence tomography,between the enrollment and the final follow up visits.· RESULTS：Sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria.There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in the mean changes in macular thickness as measured by ocular coherence tomography（131.5±41.2,108.6±29.2,and 121.1±121.1,P=0.110）,or in visual acuity（0.128±0.077,0.088±0.057,and 0.095±0.065）,for intravitreal injections,macular grid photocoagulation＋PRP and a combination of the treatments,respectively,P =0.111.The proportions of patients with macular edema after treatment were：26.1%,28.6%,and 14.3%,respectively,P=0.499.· CONCLUSION：Similar benefit was observed for intravitreal injections,laser photocoagulation,or a combined regimen in the treatment of CRVO.A nonstatistically significant trend for reduction in macular edema was observed following combined treatment.展开更多
Diabetic retinopathy(DR)is the leading cause of vision loss of working-age adults,and diabetic macular edema(DME)is the most frequent cause of vision loss related to diabetes.The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabe...Diabetic retinopathy(DR)is the leading cause of vision loss of working-age adults,and diabetic macular edema(DME)is the most frequent cause of vision loss related to diabetes.The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy found the 14-year incidence of DME in type 1 diabetics to be 26%.Similarly the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial reported that 27% of type 1 diabetic patients develop DME within9 years of onset.The most common type of diabetes,type 2,is strongly associated with obesity and a sedentary lifestyle.An even higher incidence of macular edema has been reported in older patients with type 2diabetes.Within the last 5 years,the use of intravitreal corticosteroids and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)agents have come into clinical practice for the management of DME and several recent randomized clinical trials have shown improved effectiveness of ranibizumab compared to focal/grid laser.In this theme issue,we discuss the classification of DR and the treatment options currently available for the treatment of DME including corticosteroids,anti-VEGF agents,combined therapy,enzymatic vitrectomy(vitreolysis),and new therapies.展开更多
基金Supported by Natinoal Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Nepal
文摘AIM: To find out the outcome of laser photocoagulation in clinically significant macular edema (CSME) by optical coherence tomography (OCT). · METHODS: It was a prospective, non-controlled, case series study enrolling 81 eyes of 64 patients with CSME between August 2008 and January 2010. All patients received modified grid photocoagulation with frequency doubled Nd: YAG laser. Each patient was evaluated in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and regression or progression of maculopathy after laser therapy at 1, 3 and 6 months. Spearman’s correlation test was used to show the correlation between BCVA and total macular volume (TMV). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare among groups and independent t-test was used to compare in each group. · RESULTS: There is high correlation between BCVA and TMV (P ≤0.001). BCVA improved in 50.6%, remained static in 39.5 % and deteriorated in 9.9% patients after 6 month of treatment. The Baseline TMV (mean and SD) were 9.26±1.83, 10.4±2.38, 11.5±3.05, 8.89±0.75 and 9.47±1.98 mm3 for different OCT patterns, ST (sponge like thickening), CMO (cystoid macular edema), SFD (subfoveal detachment), VMIA (Vitreo macular interface abnormality) and average TMV respectively (P =0.04). After 6 months of laser treatment, the mean TMV decreased from 9.47±1.98mm3 to 8.77±1.31mm3(P =0.01). In ST there was significant decrease in TMV, P =0.01, Further within these groups at 6 months, they were significantly different, P =0.01. · CONCLUSION: OCT showed the different morphological variant of CSME while the response of treatment is different. TMV decreased the most and hence showed the improvement in vision after 6 months of laser treatment. In the era of Anti vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), efficacy of laser seems to be in shadow but it is still first line of treatment in developing nation like Nepal where antiVEGFs may not be easily available and affordable.
文摘Purpose: To assess the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with grid photocoagulation in the management of recurrent macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods: This is a prospective, non-randomized, interventional study. Thirty five eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and 15 eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) were treated with grid photocoagulation combined with IVB for recurrent macular edema. The visual acuity, central macular thickness and intraocular pressure were outcome measures. The mean duration of follow-up was 18.1 ± 3.6 months. Results: One month after treatment, 45 of the 50 eyes showed complete resolution of the cystoid space. Compared with initial values, final central macular thickness was reduced significantly in both BRVO and CRVO groups (P < 0.001), but improvement in VA was significant only for eyes with BRVO (P = 0.012). The total number of IVB was 1.8 ± 0.3 for eyes with either BRVO or CRVO. Conclusion: IVB combined with grid photocoagulation is an effective treatment for reducing recurrent macular edema associated with RVO.
文摘AIM：To compare changes in visual acuity and macular edema in patients with central retinal vein occlusion（CRVO）treated with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab,macular grid photocoagulation combined with pan retinal photocoagulation（PRP）,or both（bevacizumab＋grid＋PRP）.· METHODS：Our study is a retrospective cohort clinical study that examined patients that suffered from ischemic CRVO with macular edema.Study inclusion criteria were ischemic CRVO with macula edema and the availability of complete medical records for at least 12 mo after treatment.Excluded were patients with diabetes or any other retinal disease.We reviewed the medical records of patients treated in one ophthalmology departmentcomparing changes in visual acuity and macular edema in patients treated with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab vs those that were treated with macular grid photocoagulation and PRP or both.The main outcome measures were the differences in best corrected visual acuity（BCVA） and in macular thickness,as assessed by optical coherence tomography,between the enrollment and the final follow up visits.· RESULTS：Sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria.There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in the mean changes in macular thickness as measured by ocular coherence tomography（131.5±41.2,108.6±29.2,and 121.1±121.1,P=0.110）,or in visual acuity（0.128±0.077,0.088±0.057,and 0.095±0.065）,for intravitreal injections,macular grid photocoagulation＋PRP and a combination of the treatments,respectively,P =0.111.The proportions of patients with macular edema after treatment were：26.1%,28.6%,and 14.3%,respectively,P=0.499.· CONCLUSION：Similar benefit was observed for intravitreal injections,laser photocoagulation,or a combined regimen in the treatment of CRVO.A nonstatistically significant trend for reduction in macular edema was observed following combined treatment.
文摘Diabetic retinopathy(DR)is the leading cause of vision loss of working-age adults,and diabetic macular edema(DME)is the most frequent cause of vision loss related to diabetes.The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy found the 14-year incidence of DME in type 1 diabetics to be 26%.Similarly the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial reported that 27% of type 1 diabetic patients develop DME within9 years of onset.The most common type of diabetes,type 2,is strongly associated with obesity and a sedentary lifestyle.An even higher incidence of macular edema has been reported in older patients with type 2diabetes.Within the last 5 years,the use of intravitreal corticosteroids and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)agents have come into clinical practice for the management of DME and several recent randomized clinical trials have shown improved effectiveness of ranibizumab compared to focal/grid laser.In this theme issue,we discuss the classification of DR and the treatment options currently available for the treatment of DME including corticosteroids,anti-VEGF agents,combined therapy,enzymatic vitrectomy(vitreolysis),and new therapies.
