Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis:A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes

BACKGROUND Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA)and high tibial osteotomy(HTO)are well-established operative interventions in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.However,which intervention is more beneficial to patients with knee osteoarthritis remains unknown and a topic of much debate.Simultaneously,there is a paucity of research assessing the relationship between radiographic parameters of knee joint alignment and patient-reported clinical outcomes,preoperatively and following HTO or UKA.AIM To compare UKAs and HTOs as interventions for medial-compartment knee osteoarthritis:Examining differences in clinical outcome and investigating the relationship of joint alignment with respect to this.METHODS This longitudinal observational study assessed a total of 42 patients that had undergone UKA(n=23)and HTO(n=19)to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.Patient-reported outcome measures(PROMs)were collected to evaluate clinical outcome.These included two disease-specific(Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score,Oxford Knee Score)and two generic(EQ-5D-5L,Short Form-12)PROMs.The radiographic parameters of knee alignment assessed were the:Hip-knee-ankle angle,mechanical axis deviation and angle of Mikulicz line.RESULTS Statistical analyses demonstrated significant(P<0.001),preoperative to postoperative,improvements in the PROM scores of both groups.There were,however,no significant inter-group differences in the postoperative PROM scores of the UKA and HTO group.Several significant correlations associated a more distolaterally angled Mikulicz line with worse knee function and overall health preoperatively(P<0.05).Postoperatively,two clusters of significant correlations were observed between the disease-specific PROM scores and knee joint alignment parameters(hip-knee-ankle angle,mechanical axis deviation)within the HTO group;yet no such associations were observed within the UKA group.CONCLUSION UKAs and HTOs are both efficacious operations that provide a comparable degree of clinical benefit to patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.Clinical outcome has a limited association with radiographic parameters of knee joint alignment postoperatively;however,a more distolaterally angled Mikulicz line appears associated with worse knee function/health-related quality of life preoperatively.

Health economics for intra-capsular hip fractures undertaking fixation

BACKGROUND Hip fracture is a common musculoskeletal injury in the elderly requiring surgery worldwide.The operative mainstay of intra-capsular hip fractures is arthroplasty with a smaller proportion for fixation.AIM To determine the most beneficial method of fixation for patients with intracapsular hip fractures.METHODS A registered audit from 2012-2018 was conducted on all intra-capsular hip fractures treated with 2 commonly used fixation methods.Patient notes,electronic records and clinical codes for cost benefit were evaluated.A validated quality of life measure was collected at least 1 year after surgery.RESULTS A total of 83 patients were identified with intra-capsular fractures undergoing fixation during the retrospective period.There were 47 cannulated cancellous screw and 36 sliding hip screw fixations with the case mix comparable for age,gender,co-morbidities and fracture configuration.There was no significant difference in blood loss,tip apex distance,radiation exposure,length of stay,radiological union time,collapse,avascular necrosis or re-operation between fixation methods.Logistic regression analysis demonstrated displaced intracapsular hip fractures correlated significantly with an undesirable outcome conferring a relative odds ratio of 7.25.There were 9(19%)and 4(11%)patients respectively,who required re-operation.There was no significant difference in health resource group tariff and implant cost with comparable EQ-5D and visual CONCLUSION No significant advantage was identified with differing fixation type,but irrespective there were a high number of patients requiring re-operation.This was predicted by initial fracture displacement and patient age.Arthroplasty may need to be carefully considered for health economics and patient benefit.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:Effect of graft tunnel position on early to mid-term clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND Patient reported outcome measures(PROMs)can be used to assess knee function following anterior cruciate ligament(ACL)reconstruction.Intra-operatively,femoral and tibial tunnels are created to accommodate the new ACL graft.It is postulated that there is an optimum position and orientation of these tunnels and that outcomes from this procedure are affected by their position.AIM To evaluate the influence of graft tunnel position on early to mid-term clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction.METHODS Six PROMs were collected following ACL reconstruction which included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score(KOOS),International Knee Documentation Committee,Lysholm,Tegner,EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 level,and Short Form 12-item Health Survey.A total of 8 radiological parameters were measured from post-operative X-rays relating to graft tunnel positions.This data was analysed to assess for any correlations between graft tunnel position and postoperative PROMs.RESULTS A total of 87 patients were included in the study with a mean post-operative follow-up of 2.3 years(range 1 to 7 years).Posterior position of tibial tunnel was associated with improved KOOS quality of life(rho=0.43,P=0.002)and EQ-5D VAS(rho=0.36,P=0.010).Anterior position of EndoButton femoral tunnel was associated with an improved EQ-5D index(rho=-0.38,P=0.028).There were no other significant correlations between any of the other radiological parameters and PROM scores.CONCLUSION Overall,graft tunnel position had very little correlation with clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction.A few(posterior)tibial tunnel and(anterior)EndoButton femoral tunnel measurements were associated with better PROMs.

High rate of clinically relevant improvement following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND The minimal clinically important difference(MCID)is defined as the smallest meaningful change in a health domain that a patient would identify as important.Thus,an improvement that exceeds the MCID can be used to define a successful treatment for the individual patient.AIM To quantify the rate of clinical improvement following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.METHODS Patients were treated with the Global Unite total shoulder platform arthroplasty between March 2017 and February 2019 at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital,Denmark.The patients were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months,6 months,12 months,and 24 months postoperatively using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index(WOOS),Oxford Shoulder Score(OSS)and Constant-Murley Score(CMS).The rate of clinically relevant improvement was defined as the proportion of patients who had an improvement 24 months postoperatively that exceeded the MCID.Based on previous literature,MCID for WOOS,OSS,and CMS were defined as 12.3,4.3,and 12.8 respectively.RESULTS Forty-nine patients with a Global Unite total shoulder platform arthroplasty were included for the final analysis.Mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years(range 49.0-79.0,SD:8.3)and 65%were women.One patient was revised within the two years follow-up.The mean improvement from the preoperative assessment to the two-year follow-up was 46.1 points[95%confidence interval(95%CI):39.7-53.3,P<0.005]for WOOS,18.2 points(95%CI:15.5-21.0,P<0.005)for OSS and 37.8 points(95%CI:31.5-44.0,P<0.005)for CMS.Two years postoperatively,41 patients(87%)had an improvement in WOOS that exceeded the MCID,45 patients(94%)had an improvement in OSS that exceeded the MCID,and 42 patients(88%)had an improvement in CMS that exceeded the MCID.CONCLUSION Based on three shoulder-specific outcome measures we find that approximately 90%of patients has a clinically relevant improvement.This is a clear message when informing patients about their prognosis.

Examining the“revisability”benefit of hip resurfacing arthroplasty

BACKGROUND Hip resurfacing arthroplasty(HRA)is an alternative to total hip arthroplasty(THA)that is typically reserved for young active patients because it preserves bone.However,the benefits of HRA only hold true if conversion THA after failed HRA provides acceptable outcomes.AIM To compare patient reported outcomes for conversion THA after HRA failure to primary THA.METHODS A retrospective review of 36 patients(37 hips)that underwent conversion THA for failed HRA between October 2006 and May 2019 by a single surgeon was performed.Patient reported outcomes[modified Harris Hip Score(mHHS),University of California Los Angeles(UCLA)activity score]were obtained via an email-based responder-anonymous survey.Outcomes were compared to normative data of a primary THA cohort with similar demographics.Subgroup analysis was performed comparing outcomes of conversion THA for adverse local tissue reaction(ALTR)vs all other causes for failure.RESULTS The study group had a lower mHHS than the control group(81.7±13.8 vs 90.2±11.6,P<0.01);however,both groups had similar UCLA activity levels(7.5±2.3 vs 7.2±1.6,P=0.51).Patients that underwent conversion for non-ATLR causes had similar mHHS(85.2±11.5 vs 90.2±11.6,P=0.11)and higher UCLA activity levels(8.5±1.8 vs 7.2±1.6,P<0.01)compared to the control group.Patients that underwent conversion for ATLR had worse mHHS(77.1±14.5 vs 90.2±11.6,P<0.01)and UCLA activity levels(6.1±2.3 vs 7.2±1.6,P=0.05)when compared to the control group.CONCLUSION Patient outcomes equivalent to primary THA can be achieved following HRA conversion to THA.However,inferior outcomes were demonstrated for ALTR-related HRA failure.Patient selection and perhaps further studies examining alternative HRA bearing surfaces should be considered.

Optimizing outcomes:Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery in orthopedic surgery

In the realm of orthopedics,the adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)protocols marks a significant stride towards enhancing patient well-being.By embracing a holistic approach that encompasses preoperative counseling,dietary optimization,minimally invasive procedures,and early postoperative mobilization,these protocols have ushered in a new era of surgical care.Despite encountering hurdles like resistance to change and resource allocation challenges,the efficacy of ERAS protocols in improving clinical outcomes is undeniable.Noteworthy benefits include shortened hospital stays and bolstered improved patient-safety measures.Looking ahead,the horizon for ERAS in orthopedics appears bright,with an emphasis on tailoring care to individual needs,integrating cutting-edge technologies,and perpetuating research endeavors.This shift towards a more personalized,streamlined,and cost-efficient model of care underscores the transformative potential of ERAS in reshaping not only orthopedic surgery but also the journey to patient recovery.This editorial details the scope and future of ERAS in the orthopedic specialty.

基于机器学习和波束配置的5G天线方位角智能优化算法及实践

随着5G的大规模建设,网络结构和工程参数管理更加复杂,获取现网真实的工程参数往往需要花费大量成本。5G中引入了Massive MIMO技术,提出利用5G波束空间分布的特征,使用大数据机器学习算法,结合基站网管系统的波束配置数据,对现场安装的天线方位角进行测算,获得准确的天线方位数据,通过现场测试验证,算法输出结果准确率高,可大幅度提升了5G网络的运维智能化水平和网络运行效率,有助于网络处于最佳运行状态,是人工智能辅助5G网络优化的一次很好工程尝试。

Technical development of operational in-situ marine monitoring and research on its key generic technologies in China

In China,operational in-situ marine monitoring is the primary means of directly obtaining hydrological,meteorological,and oceanographic environmental parameters across sea areas,and it is essential for applications such as forecast of marine environment,prevention and mitigation of disaster,exploitation of marine resources,marine environmental protection,and management of transportation safety.In this paper,we summarise the composition,development courses,and present operational status of three systems of operational in-situ marine monitoring,namely coastal marine automated network station,ocean data buoy and voluntary observing ship measuring and reporting system.Additionally,we discuss the technical development in these in-situ systems and achievements in the key generic technologies along with future development trends.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between total hip replacement and total knee replacement

BACKGROUND Total hip replacements(THR)and total knee replacements(TKR)are effective treatments for severe osteoarthritis(OA).Some studies suggest clinical outcomes following THR are superior to TKR,the reason for which remains unknown.This study compares clinical outcomes between THR and TKR.AIM To compare the clinic outcomes of THR anad TKR using a comprehensive range of patient reported outcome measures(PROMs).METHODS A prospective longitudinal observational study of patients with OA undergoing THR and TKR were evaluated using a comprehensive range of generic and joint specific PROMs pre-and post-operatively.RESULTS A total of 131 patients were included in the study which comprised the THR group(68 patients)and the TKR group(63 patients).Both groups demonstrated significant post-operative improvements in all PROM scores(P<0.001).There were no significant differences in post-operative PROM scores between the two groups:Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome scores(P=0.140),Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain(P=0.297)stiffness(P=0.309)and function(P=0.945),Oxford Hip and Knee Score(P=0.076),EuroQol-5D index(P=0.386)and Short-Form 12-item survey physical component score(P=0.106).Subgroup analyses showed no significant difference(P>0.05)between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilised prostheses in the TKR group and no significant difference(P>0.05)between cemented and uncemented fixation in the THR group.Obese patients had poorer outcomes following TKR but did not significantly influence the outcome following THR.CONCLUSION Contrary to some literature,THR and TKR are equally efficacious in alleviating the pain and disability of OA when assessed using a comprehensive range of PROMs.The varying knee prosthesis types and hip fixation techniques did not significantly influence clinical outcome.Obesity had a greater influence on the outcome following TKR than that of THR.

Investigating the Effect of COVID-19 Infection on Professional Athletes’ Post-Infection with a Focus on Fatigue and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Introduction and Objectives: COVID-19 has been reported to cause long-term sequela including persistent fatigue and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) in the general population. However, it remains to be seen if similar effects are observed in an athlete population. The aetiology and pathophysiology are poorly understood but is thought to be multi-factorial. Patient reported outcome measures are commonly used to improve patient-centred outcomes (PROMs). They are essential to assess patient quality of life post-COVID infection. This paper aims to assess the effect of COVID-19 on athletes’ long-term fatigue and CFS and identify the PROMs used to characterise this. Methodology: Articles were selected for extraction based on the eligibility criteria and PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria required papers to assess competitive athletes over eighteen years of age who were clinically diagnosed with COVID-19. Articles were extracted to assess different variables including type of sport, type of athlete and ethnicity. Key terms were obtained using MeSH trees and utilised with Web of Science and NCBI Pubmed. Papers were graded by quality using the Hawker quality assessment tool. Results and Discussion: Forty articles (N = 40) were identified for full-text screening (N = 8). Eight were selected for extraction based on the eligibility criteria. Data was obtained on athlete characteristics, sport characteristics, properties of PROM measurement techniques and fatigue presentation. Male athletes were found to be 10% - 50% more likely than female athletes to suffer from persistent fatigue symptoms (N = 2). Persistent fatigue was present in 9% - 10% Athletes from mixed backgrounds and genders (N = 2). Initial fatigue was documented to be between 47% - 56% (N = 2). A heterogenous range of PROMs were utilised to assess symptoms including fatigue and excluded emotional or mental fatigue. Conclusion: COVID-19 is associated with signs of persisting fatigue and potentially CFS in athlete populations. More work needs to be done to develop standardised and validated PROMs specific to CFS.

Arabic Version of the Modified Constant Murley Score

Objectives: “Patient-reported outcome measures” has been used extensively, and it has shown the diseases’ impact on patient quality of life and has enabled the clinician to evaluate the clinical care efficacy. In the literature, there are more than 34 shoulder function assessment scoring instruments;the Modified Constant Murley Score (M-CMS) is one of the most popular scores. Although, the M-CMS had been translated and culturally adapted to Danish, Brazilian and Turkish versions, there is no Arabic version found in the literature. We aim to translate and culturally adapt M-CMS into the Arabic language. Method: The M-CMS was translated using previously published guidelines. The translation and cultural adaptation were done in five stages, initial translation by two bilingual translators then a synthesis of the translations after that, back translation by two native English speakers. Then an expert committee meeting approved the pre-final Arabic version. Finally, a pilot test was conducted on 41 patients to ensure its validity. Results: The M-CMS was successfully translated from the original English version to the Arabic version;no difficulties in the translation process were faced. Conclusion: A validated Arabic version of the M-CMS was produced and ready to be used for functional assessment of different shoulder pathologies in Arabic-speaking countries. Future study is needed for translation and cultural adaptation of the English standardized test protocol to assure the reproducibility of the Arabic version of the M-CMS.

External validation of the Moroccan Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal(CR29)module:Monocentric study

BACKGROUND Quality of life(QoL)outcomes are a focal endpoint of cancer treatment strategies.AIM To externally validate the Moroccan Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC)QoL Questionnaire(QLQ)for colorectal cancer(CRC)patients(CR29).METHODS Both Moroccan Arabic modules of QLQ-CR29 and QLQ-C30 were administered to Moroccan CRC.Psychometric properties were retested by measuring Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for reliability and Intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)to examine test-retest reproducibility.The multitrait-scaling analysis was performed to demonstrate the validity of the instrument and known-groups comparison was used to test the score’s ability to discriminate between different groups of patients.RESULTS In total,221 patients were included in our study and 34 patients completed the questionnaire twice.The Urinary Frequency scale and Stool Frequency scale had good internal consistency with alpha Cronbach coefficients of 0.79 and 0.83 respectively,while the same coefficients were moderately lower for the Blood and Mucus in Stool scale(0.61)and the Body Image scale(0.67).The ICCs ranged from 0.88 to 1 indicating good to excellent reproducibility.In multitrait scaling analyses,the criterion for item convergent and divergent validity was satisfactory.The known-group comparison showed statistically significant differences between patients according to age,gender,stoma status,tumor location,and radiotherapy.CONCLUSION The Moroccan Arabic version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 is a valid and reliable tool that can be used safely for research and clinical purposes in Moroccan CRC patients.

Assessing disease activity using the pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index:Can we use subjective or objective parameters alone?

BACKGROUND The pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index(PCDAI)is used as a standard tool to assess disease activity in clinical trials for pediatric Crohn’s disease.AIM To examine which items on the PCDAI drive assessment of disease activity,and how subgroups of subjective and objective items reflect change in disease state over time.METHODS Selective raw data from three prospectively collected datasets were combined,including 703 children with full PCDAI data at baseline,at 3-mo(Q1,n=670),and 1-year(Q4,n=474).Change in individual PCDAI scores from baseline to Q1 and to Q4 were examined using the non-weighted PCDAI.RESULTS Abdominal pain,well-being,weight,and stooling had the highest change scores over time.Objective indicators including albumin,abdominal exam,and height velocity followed.Change scores for well-being and abdominal exam did not explain significant variance at Q1 but were significant predictors at Q4(P<0.001 and P<0.05).Subjective and objective subgroups of items predicted less variance(18%and 22%)on total PCDAI scores at Q1 and Q4 compared to the full PCDAI,or a composite scale(both 32%)containing significant predictors.CONCLUSION Although subjective items on the PCDAI change the most over time,the full PCDAI or a smaller composite of items including a combination of subjective and objective components classifies disease activity better than a subgroup of either subjective or objective items alone.Reliance on subjective or objective items as stand-alone proxies for disease activity measurement could result in misclassification of disease state.

Comparison of effects of six main gastrectomy procedures on patients’ quality of life assessed by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45

BACKGROUND The effects of various gastrectomy procedures on the patient’s quality of life(QOL)are not well understood.Thus,this nationwide multi-institutional crosssectional study using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45(PGSAS-45),a well-established questionnaire designed to clarify the severity and characteristics of the postgastrectomy syndrome,was conducted.AIM To compare the effects of six main gastrectomy procedures on the postoperative QOL.METHODS Eligible questionnaires retrieved from 2368 patients who underwent either of six gastrectomy procedures[total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction(TGRY;n=393),proximal gastrectomy(PG;n=193),distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction(DGRY;n=475),distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction(DGBI;n=909),pylorus-preserving gastrectomy(PPG;n=313),and local resection of the stomach(LR;n=85)]were analyzed.Among the 19 main outcome measures of PGSAS-45,the severity and characteristics of postgastrectomy syndrome were compared for the aforementioned six gastrectomy procedures using analysis of means.RESULTS TGRY and PG significantly impaired the QOL of postoperative patients.Postoperative QOL was excellent in LR(cardia and pylorus were preserved with minimal resection).In procedures removing the distal stomach,diarrhea subscale(SS)and dumping SS were less frequent in PPG than in DGBI and DGRY.However,there was no difference in the postoperative QOL between DGBI and DGRY.The most noticeable adverse effects caused by gastrectomy were mealrelated distress SS,dissatisfaction at the meal,and weight loss,with significant differences among the surgical procedures.CONCLUSION Postoperative QOL greatly differed among six gastrectomy procedures.The severity and characteristics of postgastrectomy syndrome should be considered to select gastrectomy procedures,overcome surgical shortcomings,and enhance postoperative care.

Patient reported outcome measures in anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction:The significance of outcome score prediction

BACKGROUND Numerous anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) clinical outcome measures exist.However,the result of one score does not equate to the findings of another even when evaluating the same patient group.AIM To investigate if statistically derived formulae can be used to predict the outcome of one knee scoring system when the result of another is known in patients with ACL rupture before and after reconstruction.METHODS Fifty patients with ACL rupture were evaluated using nine clinical outcome measures.These included Tegner Activity Score,Lysholm Knee Score,Cincinnati Knee Score,International Knee Documentation Committee(IKDC) Objective Knee Score,Tapper and Hoover Meniscal Grading Score,IKDC Subjective Knee Score,Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale(KOS-ADLS),Short Form-12 Item Health Survey and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.Thirtyfour patients underwent an ACL reconstruction and were reassessed post-operatively.RESULTS The mean total of each of the nine outcome scores appreciably differed from each other.Significant correlations and regressions were found between most of the outcome scores and were stronger post-operatively.The strongest correlation was found between Cincinnati and KOS-ADLS (r=0.91,P<0.001).The strongest regression formula was also found between Cincinnati and KOS-ADLS (R~2=0.84,P<0.001).CONCLUSION The formulae produced from this study can be used to predict the outcome of one knee score when the results of the other are known.These formulae could facilitate the conduct of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in studies relating to ACL injuries by allowing the pooling of substantially more data.

Saving time and effort:Best practice for adapting existing patientreported outcome measures in hepatology

It is increasingly recognised that collecting patient reported outcome measures(PROMs)data is an important part of healthcare and should be considered alongside traditional clinical assessments.As part of a more holistic view of healthcare provision,there has been an increased drive to implement PROM collection as part of routine clinical care in hepatology.This drive has resulted in an increase in the number of PROMs currently developed to be used in various liver conditions.However,the development and validation of a new PROM is time-consuming and costly.Therefore,before deciding to develop a new PROM,researchers should consider identifying existing PROMs to assess their appropriateness and,if necessary,make adaptations to existing PROMs to ensure their rigour when used with the target population.Little is written in the literature on how to identify and adapt the existing PROMs in hepatology.This article aims to provide a summary of the current literature and guidance regarding identifying and adapting existing PROMs in clinical practice.

Predictors of clinical outcomes after non-operative management of symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that non-surgical management can be an effective treatment strategy for many patients with rotator cuff tears.Despite the prevalence of rotator cuff disease,few studies have examined the patient and tear related factors that predict outcomes of nonsurgical management in this cohort of patients.AIM To identify factors that are associated with changes in patient reported outcomes over time in individuals with full-thickness rotator cuff tears treated without surgery.METHODS A cohort of 59 patients who underwent non-surgical management of full thickness rotator cuff tears with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were identified from our institutional registry.Patient demographics,comorbidities and tear characteristics were collected at initial presentation.Outcome measures were collected at baseline and at each clinical follow-up,which included Western Ontario Rotator Cuff(WORC)index,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score,Visual Analog Scale for pain and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation.Multi-and univariate regression analyses were used to determine the impact of each patient and tear related variable on final WORC scores and change in WORC scores throughout the study.RESULTS In this non-surgical cohort,all patient-reported outcome measures significantly improved compared to baseline at 1 and 2-year follow-up.There was no significant difference in outcomes between 1 and 2 years.The average improvement surpassed the published minimal clinically important differences values for WORC,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons,Visual Analog Scale pain and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores.Regression analysis identified female gender(β=-19.88,P=0.003),smoking(β=-29.98,P=0.014)and significant subscapularis fatty infiltration(β=-15.35,P=0.024)as predictors of less favorable WORC scores at 1 year,and female gender(β=-19.09,P=0.015)alone as a predictor of lower WORC scores at 2 years.Patients with symptom duration greater than 1 year at presentation reported less improvement in WORC scores at 1-year follow-up(β=-14.63,P=0.052)and patients with traumatic tears reported greater improvements in WORC scores at 2-year follow-up(β=17.37,P=0.031).CONCLUSION Patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears can achieve and maintain clinically meaningful benefit from non-surgical management through 2-year follow-up.Female patients,smokers,and those with significant subscapularis fatty infiltration tend to have lower overall WORC scores at 1-year follow-up,and females also have lower WORC scores at 2-year follow-up.Patients presenting with symptoms greater than 1 year had less clinical improvement at 1-year follow-up,and those with traumatic tears had greater clinical improvement at 2-year follow-up.

Evaluation of joint awareness after acetabular fracture:Validation of the Forgotten Joint Score according to the COSMIN checklist protocol

BACKGROUND A fracture of the acetabulum is an uncommon,but serious injury.Established outcome tools do not reflect the patient’s perspective after fracture of the hip joint.Originally designed for post-arthroplasty patients,the Forgotten Joint Score(FJS)is a patient-reported outcome measurement(PROM)tool evaluating the diseasespecific health-related quality of life(HR-QoL).AIM To validate the FJS in patients after acetabular fracture.METHODS In a prospective mono-centric cohort study,we evaluated 100 patients at mean 5.2±3.6 years after a fracture of the acetabulum.The validation study followed the complete COSMIN checklist protocol.For calculation of convergent validity,we used the Tegner-Activity Scale,the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index,the EuroQol-5D,and a subjective rating of change as an anchor variable.RESULTS We confirmed good internal consistency with a Cronbach‘s alpha of 0.95.With an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99(95%CI:0.97,0.99),test-retest reliability of the FJS was excellent.Correlation coefficients between the questionnaires were moderate to high ranging from|0.56|to|0.83|(absolute value).No relevant floor or ceiling effects occurred.Standard error of measurement was 3.2 and smallest detectable change(SDC)was 8.8.Thus,changes greater than 8.8 points between two assessments denote a real change in FJS.CONCLUSION The FJS is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of patient-reported outcome in posttraumatic condition after acetabular fracture.The SDC indicating a real clinical improvement was 8.8 points in the FJS.We could confirm responsiveness of the FJS and found no relevant floor-or ceiling effects.

Technological developments enable measuring and using patientreported outcomes data in orthopaedic clinical practice

Patient-reported outcomes measures form the backbone of outcomes evaluation in orthopaedics,with most of the literature now relying on these scoring tools to measure change in patient health status.This patient-reported information is increasingly collected routinely by orthopaedic providers but use of the data is typically restricted to academic research.Developments in electronic data capture and the outcome tools themselves now allow use of this data as part of the clinical consultation.This review evaluates the role of patient reported outcomes data as a tool to enhance daily orthopaedic clinical practice,and documents how developments in electronic outcome measures,computer-adaptive questionnaire design and instant graphical display of questionnaire can facilitate enhanced patientclinician shared decision making.

Evaluation of patient reported outcome measures post urethroplasty:Piloting a“Trifecta”approach

BACKGROUND Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty is the gold standard treatment for urethral stricture disease.Toowoomba has obtained a fellowship trained urethroplasty surgeon who has been performing urethroplasties for the last two years.Patient reported outcome measure(PROM)questionnaires allow for a detailed and standardized analysis of success and morbidity post urethroplasty and can be used as a reference point against which urethral surgeons can benchmark their performance.AIM To assess whether patient compliance rates improved with the use of an abridged PROM questionnaire.METHODS Our database of urethroplasty patients was searched to identify patients who had completed the original PROM.This is routinely requested to be completed at the 3-,6-and 12-mo mark.All patients are asked to complete the questionnaire and to bring it back to their next appointment.Our original PROM consists of the international prostate symptom score,the sexual health index measure and the Global Response Assessment.An abridged version of the questionnaire was derived focusing on urinary flow,sexual function and overall quality of life and consisted of three questions.RESULTS Sixty-six patients were included in our study.Fifty-four patients had been invited to complete the original PROM with an overall compliance rate of 30%.Compliance rates improved to 91%with the introduction of the modified PROM.No correlation between non-compliance and patient factors were found.There was also no significant difference in patient reported quality of life when comparing urinary flow and sexual function.CONCLUSION We recommend the use of PROMs pre-and post-operatively to accurately determine the level of patient satisfaction.We acknowledge the aversion of patients in completing PROMs due to the length of these questionnaires.We propose a simplistic version aimed at the“Trifecta”of urethroplasty comprising of three questions focusing each on urinary flow,sexual function and quality of life.Our modified PROM demonstrated markedly improved compliance rates and can be used as a screening tool to identify patients who might have had a poor outcome and who require a more in-depth assessment.