With patients undergoing first time 1st metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using graft material when it was required to fill cystic bone voids, we retrospectively compared the time to fusion (clinical and radiograp...With patients undergoing first time 1st metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using graft material when it was required to fill cystic bone voids, we retrospectively compared the time to fusion (clinical and radiographic), and non-union rate between the patient’s own bone autograft (n = 62) versus a mesenchymal stem cell impregnated allograft group (n = 51). A third control group (n = 52) was included in which an end-to-end arthrodesis was performed and no graft interposition was used or necessary. The non-union rate was 4% (n = 2) in the control group, 5.9% (n = 4) in the autograft group, and 9.5% (n = 5) in the mesenchymal stem cell allograft group. The time for radiographic fusion was 6.46 weeks for the control group, 6.52 weeks for the autograft group, and 6.53 weeks for the mesenchymal stem cell allograft group. The difference in time to clinical and radiographic union and the non-union rate were not found to be statistically significant among all 3 groups. Patient comorbidities and their possible effects on union rates were also analyzed within the populations. Some comorbidities had statistically significantly non-unions within the population, notably smoking (p = 0.024) and Rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.001), however the populations were fairly small. The use of allogeneic bone graft impregnated with mesenchymal stem cells yields a similar fusion rate as with the use of autologous bone graft harvested from the surrounding area. The allograft impregnated with mesenchymal stem cells is a viable alternative yielding similar results when local autogenous bone graft is not available, not obtainable, or conditions warrant its use.展开更多
Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal(MTP)joint has been established as the“gold standard”for the treatment of several first ray disorders,due to its perceived efficacy and the consistently reported good resu...Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal(MTP)joint has been established as the“gold standard”for the treatment of several first ray disorders,due to its perceived efficacy and the consistently reported good results in the literature.Arthrodesis is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of end stage arthritis,rheumatoid arthritis with severe deformity,selected cases of severe hallux valgus(with or without signs of degenerative joint disease),as well as a salvage procedure after failed previous operation of the first ray.The goals of a successful 1st MTP arthrodesis are pain alleviation and deformity correction in order to restore a comfortable gait pattern and to improve shoe wear.Several techniques have been reported with several proposals regarding the preparation of the articular surfaces and the method of definitive fixation.As with any given surgical procedure,various complications may occur after arthrodesis of the 1st MTP joint,namely delayed union,nonunion,malunion,irritating hardware,etc.展开更多
<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Little is known about the rate and reasons for revision after prim...<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Little is known about the rate and reasons for revision after primary Metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) arthrodesis with </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">latest implants. While it is commonly assumed that nonunion accounts for most reoperations, we hypothesized that malposition is the leading cause of revision. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and reasons for revision after MTP1 arthrodesis using cup- and cone-reamers and </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">latest locking plate technology. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Method:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Between 2015 and 2017, 120 consecutive MTP1 fusions in 114 patients were performed with a low profile, pre</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">contoured titanium dorsal locking plate and a plantar metatarsophalangeal screw. The rate and reasons for revision within a minimum one</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">year follow-up period (</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">average </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">16 months</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> [12</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">26]</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) after index procedure</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> were </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">documented </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and analyzed. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">revision was defined as any reoperation following the index procedure excluding hardware removal.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Seventeen of 120 feet (14%) underwent revision. Four patients developed a nonunion (3.3%) and needed revision, and 11 feet (9%) required revision for painful malposition;insufficient extension and excessive valgus accounted for the majority. Two patients required medial sesamoidectomy. No infection or wound healing problems occurred. Twelve patients </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">requested hardware removal.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Nonunion revision rate after</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> MTP1 fusion with </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">latest locking plate technology is low. The leading cause of revision is malposition followed by nonunion. Excessive valgus and insufficient extension account for most symptomatic malposition. A recommendation of 0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">10 degrees of valgus in the horizontal plane may contribute to diminishing revision rates;no conclusions could be drawn regarding an optimal position in the sagittal plane.展开更多
BACKGROUND Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal(MTP1)joint is a common surgery performed to correct hallux rigidus,hallux rigidus et valgus and other painful degenerative diseases of the MTP1.AIM To assess outcomes...BACKGROUND Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal(MTP1)joint is a common surgery performed to correct hallux rigidus,hallux rigidus et valgus and other painful degenerative diseases of the MTP1.AIM To assess outcomes of our surgical technique including non-union rates,accuracy and aims of correction.METHODS Between September 2011 and November 2020 a total 72 of MTP1 fusions were performed using a low profile,pre-contoured dorsal locking plate and a plantar compression screw.Union and revision rates were analyzed with a minimum clinical and radiological follow up of at least 3 mo(range 3-18 mo).The following parameters were evaluated on pre-and postoperative conventional radiographs:Intermetatarsal angle,Hallux-valgus angle,dorsal extension of the proximal phalanx(P1)in relation to the floor and the angle between the Metatarsal 1 and the P1(MT1-P1 angle).Descriptive statistical analysis was performed.Pearson analysis was used to assess for correlations between radiographic parameters and achievement of fusion.RESULTS An overall union rate of 98.6%(71/72)was achieved.Two out of 72 patients did not primarily fuse with one patient suffering from a non-union,whilst the other demonstrating a radiological delayed union without clinical symptoms,with eventually complete fusion after 18 mo.There was no correlation between the measured radiographic parameters and the achievement of fusion.We believe the reason for the non-union was mainly attributed to the patient’s incompliance without wearing the therapeutic shoe leading to a fracture of the P1.Furthermore,we didn`t find any correlation between fusion and the degree of correction.CONCLUSION With our surgical technique,high union rates(98%)can be achieved using a compression screw and a dorsal variable-angle locking plate to treat degenerative diseases of the MTP1.展开更多
Hallux rigidus describes the osteoarthritis of the firstmetatarsophalangeal joint. It was first mentioned in 1887. Since then a multitude of terms have been introduced referring to the same disease. The main complaint...Hallux rigidus describes the osteoarthritis of the firstmetatarsophalangeal joint. It was first mentioned in 1887. Since then a multitude of terms have been introduced referring to the same disease. The main complaints are pain especially during movement and a limited range of motion. Radiographically the typical signs of osteoarthritis can be observed starting at the dorsal portion of the joint. Numerous classifications make the comparison of the different studies difficult. If non-operative treatment fails to resolve the symptoms operative treatment is indicated. The most studied procedure with reproducible results is the arthrodesis. Nevertheless, many patients refuse this treatment option, favouring a procedure preserving motion. Different motion preserving and joint sacrificing operations such as arthroplasty are available. In this review we focus on motion and joint preserving procedures. Numer-ous joint preserving osteotomies have been described. Most of them try to relocate the viable plantar cartilage more dorsally, to decompress the joint and to increase dorsiflexion of the first metatarsal bone. Multiple studies are available investigating these procedures. Most of them suffer from low quality, short follow up and small patient numbers. Consequently the grade of recommendation is low. Nonetheless, joint preserving procedures are appealing because if they fail to relief the symptoms an arthrodesis or arthroplasty can still be performed thereafter.展开更多
BACKGROUND Cheilectomy of the 1^(st)metatarsophalangeal joint(MTPJ)is one of the most common procedures for the management of hallux rigidus.However,there is no consensus regarding outcomes following minimally invasiv...BACKGROUND Cheilectomy of the 1^(st)metatarsophalangeal joint(MTPJ)is one of the most common procedures for the management of hallux rigidus.However,there is no consensus regarding outcomes following minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy(MIDC)for the management of hallux rigidus.AIM To evaluate outcomes following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus.METHODS During November 2023,the PubMed,EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies examining outcomes following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus.RESULTS Six studies were included.In total,348 patients(370 feet)underwent MIDC for hallux rigidus at a weighted mean follow-up of 37.9±16.5 months.The distribution of patients by Coughlin and Shurna's classification was recorded in 4 studies as follows:Ⅰ(58 patients,27.1%),Ⅱ(112 patients,52.3%),Ⅲ(44 patients,20.6%).Three studies performed an additional 1^(st)MTPJ arthroscopy and debridement following MIDC.Retained intra-articular bone debris was observed in 100%of patients in 1 study.The weighted mean American orthopedic foot and ankle society score improved from a preoperative score of 68.9±3.2 to a postoperative score of 87.1.The complication rate was 8.4%,the most common of which was persistent joint pain and stiffness.Thirty-two failures(8.7%)were observed.Thirty-three secondary procedures(8.9%)were performed at a weighted mean time of 8.6±3.2 months following the index procedure.CONCLUSION This systematic review demonstrated improvements in subjective clinical outcomes together with a moderate complication rate following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus at short-term follow-up.A moderate reoperation rate at short-term follow-up was recorded.The marked heterogeneity between included studies and paucity of high quality comparative studies limits the generation of any robust conclusions.展开更多
Hallux rigidus occurs mainly at the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint,causing localized pain and degenerative arthritis.1 This condition frequently occurs together with hallux valgus and is difficult to treat.Fo...Hallux rigidus occurs mainly at the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint,causing localized pain and degenerative arthritis.1 This condition frequently occurs together with hallux valgus and is difficult to treat.For hallux rigidus affecting only one joint,the treatment choices include articular debridement,resection arthroplasty,prosthetic arthroplasty,and arthrodesis,depending on the degree of arthritis.展开更多
文摘With patients undergoing first time 1st metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using graft material when it was required to fill cystic bone voids, we retrospectively compared the time to fusion (clinical and radiographic), and non-union rate between the patient’s own bone autograft (n = 62) versus a mesenchymal stem cell impregnated allograft group (n = 51). A third control group (n = 52) was included in which an end-to-end arthrodesis was performed and no graft interposition was used or necessary. The non-union rate was 4% (n = 2) in the control group, 5.9% (n = 4) in the autograft group, and 9.5% (n = 5) in the mesenchymal stem cell allograft group. The time for radiographic fusion was 6.46 weeks for the control group, 6.52 weeks for the autograft group, and 6.53 weeks for the mesenchymal stem cell allograft group. The difference in time to clinical and radiographic union and the non-union rate were not found to be statistically significant among all 3 groups. Patient comorbidities and their possible effects on union rates were also analyzed within the populations. Some comorbidities had statistically significantly non-unions within the population, notably smoking (p = 0.024) and Rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.001), however the populations were fairly small. The use of allogeneic bone graft impregnated with mesenchymal stem cells yields a similar fusion rate as with the use of autologous bone graft harvested from the surrounding area. The allograft impregnated with mesenchymal stem cells is a viable alternative yielding similar results when local autogenous bone graft is not available, not obtainable, or conditions warrant its use.
文摘Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal(MTP)joint has been established as the“gold standard”for the treatment of several first ray disorders,due to its perceived efficacy and the consistently reported good results in the literature.Arthrodesis is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of end stage arthritis,rheumatoid arthritis with severe deformity,selected cases of severe hallux valgus(with or without signs of degenerative joint disease),as well as a salvage procedure after failed previous operation of the first ray.The goals of a successful 1st MTP arthrodesis are pain alleviation and deformity correction in order to restore a comfortable gait pattern and to improve shoe wear.Several techniques have been reported with several proposals regarding the preparation of the articular surfaces and the method of definitive fixation.As with any given surgical procedure,various complications may occur after arthrodesis of the 1st MTP joint,namely delayed union,nonunion,malunion,irritating hardware,etc.
文摘<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Little is known about the rate and reasons for revision after primary Metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) arthrodesis with </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">latest implants. While it is commonly assumed that nonunion accounts for most reoperations, we hypothesized that malposition is the leading cause of revision. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and reasons for revision after MTP1 arthrodesis using cup- and cone-reamers and </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">latest locking plate technology. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Method:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Between 2015 and 2017, 120 consecutive MTP1 fusions in 114 patients were performed with a low profile, pre</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">contoured titanium dorsal locking plate and a plantar metatarsophalangeal screw. The rate and reasons for revision within a minimum one</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">year follow-up period (</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">average </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">16 months</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> [12</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">26]</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) after index procedure</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> were </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">documented </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and analyzed. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">revision was defined as any reoperation following the index procedure excluding hardware removal.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Seventeen of 120 feet (14%) underwent revision. Four patients developed a nonunion (3.3%) and needed revision, and 11 feet (9%) required revision for painful malposition;insufficient extension and excessive valgus accounted for the majority. Two patients required medial sesamoidectomy. No infection or wound healing problems occurred. Twelve patients </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">requested hardware removal.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Nonunion revision rate after</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> MTP1 fusion with </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">latest locking plate technology is low. The leading cause of revision is malposition followed by nonunion. Excessive valgus and insufficient extension account for most symptomatic malposition. A recommendation of 0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">10 degrees of valgus in the horizontal plane may contribute to diminishing revision rates;no conclusions could be drawn regarding an optimal position in the sagittal plane.
文摘BACKGROUND Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal(MTP1)joint is a common surgery performed to correct hallux rigidus,hallux rigidus et valgus and other painful degenerative diseases of the MTP1.AIM To assess outcomes of our surgical technique including non-union rates,accuracy and aims of correction.METHODS Between September 2011 and November 2020 a total 72 of MTP1 fusions were performed using a low profile,pre-contoured dorsal locking plate and a plantar compression screw.Union and revision rates were analyzed with a minimum clinical and radiological follow up of at least 3 mo(range 3-18 mo).The following parameters were evaluated on pre-and postoperative conventional radiographs:Intermetatarsal angle,Hallux-valgus angle,dorsal extension of the proximal phalanx(P1)in relation to the floor and the angle between the Metatarsal 1 and the P1(MT1-P1 angle).Descriptive statistical analysis was performed.Pearson analysis was used to assess for correlations between radiographic parameters and achievement of fusion.RESULTS An overall union rate of 98.6%(71/72)was achieved.Two out of 72 patients did not primarily fuse with one patient suffering from a non-union,whilst the other demonstrating a radiological delayed union without clinical symptoms,with eventually complete fusion after 18 mo.There was no correlation between the measured radiographic parameters and the achievement of fusion.We believe the reason for the non-union was mainly attributed to the patient’s incompliance without wearing the therapeutic shoe leading to a fracture of the P1.Furthermore,we didn`t find any correlation between fusion and the degree of correction.CONCLUSION With our surgical technique,high union rates(98%)can be achieved using a compression screw and a dorsal variable-angle locking plate to treat degenerative diseases of the MTP1.
文摘Hallux rigidus describes the osteoarthritis of the firstmetatarsophalangeal joint. It was first mentioned in 1887. Since then a multitude of terms have been introduced referring to the same disease. The main complaints are pain especially during movement and a limited range of motion. Radiographically the typical signs of osteoarthritis can be observed starting at the dorsal portion of the joint. Numerous classifications make the comparison of the different studies difficult. If non-operative treatment fails to resolve the symptoms operative treatment is indicated. The most studied procedure with reproducible results is the arthrodesis. Nevertheless, many patients refuse this treatment option, favouring a procedure preserving motion. Different motion preserving and joint sacrificing operations such as arthroplasty are available. In this review we focus on motion and joint preserving procedures. Numer-ous joint preserving osteotomies have been described. Most of them try to relocate the viable plantar cartilage more dorsally, to decompress the joint and to increase dorsiflexion of the first metatarsal bone. Multiple studies are available investigating these procedures. Most of them suffer from low quality, short follow up and small patient numbers. Consequently the grade of recommendation is low. Nonetheless, joint preserving procedures are appealing because if they fail to relief the symptoms an arthrodesis or arthroplasty can still be performed thereafter.
文摘BACKGROUND Cheilectomy of the 1^(st)metatarsophalangeal joint(MTPJ)is one of the most common procedures for the management of hallux rigidus.However,there is no consensus regarding outcomes following minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy(MIDC)for the management of hallux rigidus.AIM To evaluate outcomes following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus.METHODS During November 2023,the PubMed,EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies examining outcomes following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus.RESULTS Six studies were included.In total,348 patients(370 feet)underwent MIDC for hallux rigidus at a weighted mean follow-up of 37.9±16.5 months.The distribution of patients by Coughlin and Shurna's classification was recorded in 4 studies as follows:Ⅰ(58 patients,27.1%),Ⅱ(112 patients,52.3%),Ⅲ(44 patients,20.6%).Three studies performed an additional 1^(st)MTPJ arthroscopy and debridement following MIDC.Retained intra-articular bone debris was observed in 100%of patients in 1 study.The weighted mean American orthopedic foot and ankle society score improved from a preoperative score of 68.9±3.2 to a postoperative score of 87.1.The complication rate was 8.4%,the most common of which was persistent joint pain and stiffness.Thirty-two failures(8.7%)were observed.Thirty-three secondary procedures(8.9%)were performed at a weighted mean time of 8.6±3.2 months following the index procedure.CONCLUSION This systematic review demonstrated improvements in subjective clinical outcomes together with a moderate complication rate following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus at short-term follow-up.A moderate reoperation rate at short-term follow-up was recorded.The marked heterogeneity between included studies and paucity of high quality comparative studies limits the generation of any robust conclusions.
文摘Hallux rigidus occurs mainly at the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint,causing localized pain and degenerative arthritis.1 This condition frequently occurs together with hallux valgus and is difficult to treat.For hallux rigidus affecting only one joint,the treatment choices include articular debridement,resection arthroplasty,prosthetic arthroplasty,and arthrodesis,depending on the degree of arthritis.