BACKGROUND At present,laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)is the main surgical treatment for gallstones.But,after gallbladder removal,there are many complications.Therefore,it is hoped to remove stones while preserving th...BACKGROUND At present,laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)is the main surgical treatment for gallstones.But,after gallbladder removal,there are many complications.Therefore,it is hoped to remove stones while preserving the function of the gallbladder,and with the development of endoscopic technology,natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery came into being.AIM To compare the quality of life,perioperative indicators,adverse events after LC and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery(EGPS)in patients with gallstones.METHODS Patients who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from 2020 to 2022 were retrospectively collected.We adopted propen-sity score matching(1:1)to compare EGPS and LC patients.RESULTS A total of 662 cases were collected,of which 589 cases underwent LC,and 73 cases underwent EGPS.Propensity score matching was performed,and 40 patients were included in each of the groups.In the EGPS group,except the gastr-ointestinal defecation(P=0.603),the total score,physical well-being,mental well-being,and gastrointestinal digestion were statistically significant compared with the preoperative score after surgery(P<0.05).In the LC group,except the mental well-being,the total score,physical well-being,gastrointestinal digestion,the gastrointestinal defecation was statistically significant compared with the preoperative score after surgery(P<0.05).When comparing between groups,gastrointestinal defecation had significantly difference(P=0.002)between the two groups,there was no statistically significant difference in the total postoperative score and the other three subscales.In the surgery duration,hospital stay and cost,LC group were lower than EGPS group.The recurrence factors of gallstones after EGPS were analyzed:and recurrence was not correlated with gender,age,body mass index,number of stones,and preoperative score.CONCLUSION Whether EGPS or LC,it can improve the patient’s symptoms,and the EGPS has less impact on the patient’s defecation.It needed to,prospective,multicenter,long-term follow-up,large-sample related studies to prove.展开更多
BACKGROUND Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment option for symptomatic gallstones.However,another option is gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy which preserves the normal physiological functions of the ga...BACKGROUND Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment option for symptomatic gallstones.However,another option is gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy which preserves the normal physiological functions of the gallbladder in patients desiring to avoid surgical resection.AIM To compare the feasibility,safety and effectiveness of pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)for symptomatic gallstones.METHODS We adopted propensity score matching(1:1)to compare trans-rectal NOTES cholecystolithotomy and LC patients with symptomatic gallstones.We reviewed 2511 patients with symptomatic gallstones from December 2017 to December 2020;517 patients met the matching criteria(NOTES,110;LC,407),yielding 86 pairs.RESULTS The technical success rate for the NOTES group was 98.9%vs 100%for the LC group.The median procedure time was 119 min[interquartile ranges(IQRs),95-175]with NOTES vs 60 min(IQRs,48-90)with LC(P<0.001).The frequency of post-operative pain was similar between NOTES and LC:4.7%(4/85)vs 5.8%(5/95)(P=0.740).The median duration of post-procedure fasting with NOTES was 1 d(IQRs,1-2)vs 2 d with LC(IQRs,1-3)(P<0.001).The median post-operative hospital stay for NOTES was 4 d(IQRs,3-6)vs 4 d for LC(IQRs,3-5),(P=0.092).During follow-up,diarrhea was significantly less with NOTES(5.8%)compared to LC(18.6%)(P=0.011).Gallstones and cholecystitis recurrence within a median of 12 mo(range:6-40 mo)following NOTES was 10.5%and 3.5%,respectively.Concerns regarding the presence of abdominal wall scars were present in 17.4%(n=15/86)of patients following LC(mainly women).CONCLUSION NOTES provides a feasible new alternative scar-free treatment for patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo cholecystectomy.This minimally invasive organ-sparing procedure both removes the gallstones and preserves the physiological function of the gallbladder.Reducing gallstone recurrence is essential to achieving widespread clinical adoption of NOTES.展开更多
Objective:Traditionally,gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology.However,adverse consequence after cholecystectomy,though rare,still occa-sionally occurs.This ...Objective:Traditionally,gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology.However,adverse consequence after cholecystectomy,though rare,still occa-sionally occurs.This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy.Methods:All consecutive robotic left hepatectomy cases between December 2010 and January 2022 in Prince of Wales Hospital,the Chinese University of Hong Kong were retrieved from a prospectively collected database.The gallbladder was preserved by moving the liver transection line just away from the gallbladder fossa.Patients were divided into two groups:gallbladder preservation(GBP)and non-gallbladder preservation(NGBP).Operative results and long-term outcomes were compared between these two groups.Results:There were 11 cases in the GBP group and 25 cases in the NGBP group.The two groups were comparable in terms of the patient demographics and disease characteristics.There was no operative mortality.There was no difference between the two groups in operative time(GBP 270 min vs.NGBP 332 min,p=0.132),blood loss(GBP 50 mL vs.NGBP 150 mL,p=0.115)or complication rate(GBP 27.3%vs.NGBP 24.0%,p>0.999).There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival.In the GBP group,no patient developed specific symptoms or complications related to the preserved gallbladder.Follow-up ultrasound or computed tomography revealed a normal appearance of the preserved gallbladders except in one patient who developed a 3-mm gallbladder polyp.On the other hand,one(4%)patient in the NGBP group developed troublesome diarrhoea after surgery.Conclusion:Gallbladder preservation is safe and feasible during robotic left hepatectomy.The preserved gallbladder does not lead to any symptoms,while postcholecystectomy diarrhoea can be avoided.展开更多
目的评价腹腔镜联合胆道镜微创保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的临床应用价值。方法收集我院2006年1月～2010年12月收治的胆囊结石患者120例,均采取经腹腔镜下切开胆囊底部应用纤维胆道镜进行取石,保留功能良好的胆囊。术后第2 w B超复查结石...目的评价腹腔镜联合胆道镜微创保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的临床应用价值。方法收集我院2006年1月～2010年12月收治的胆囊结石患者120例,均采取经腹腔镜下切开胆囊底部应用纤维胆道镜进行取石,保留功能良好的胆囊。术后第2 w B超复查结石取尽率,术后1年复查胆囊收缩功能、胆囊壁厚度及胆囊结石复发。结果全部病例成功实现了保胆取石术,平均手术时间55 min,平均住院时间4.2 d。术后第2 w B超检查结石取净率100%,术后1年复查胆囊收缩功能和胆囊壁厚比术前明显改善,术后随访1年胆结石复发6例。结论经腹腔镜微创保胆取石术具有安全性高、创伤小、痛苦少、恢复快、复发率低等特点,且可保留有功能的胆囊,具有临床推广价值。展开更多
基金The study was reviewed and approved by The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University Institutional Review Board(No.K202311-33).
文摘BACKGROUND At present,laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)is the main surgical treatment for gallstones.But,after gallbladder removal,there are many complications.Therefore,it is hoped to remove stones while preserving the function of the gallbladder,and with the development of endoscopic technology,natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery came into being.AIM To compare the quality of life,perioperative indicators,adverse events after LC and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery(EGPS)in patients with gallstones.METHODS Patients who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from 2020 to 2022 were retrospectively collected.We adopted propen-sity score matching(1:1)to compare EGPS and LC patients.RESULTS A total of 662 cases were collected,of which 589 cases underwent LC,and 73 cases underwent EGPS.Propensity score matching was performed,and 40 patients were included in each of the groups.In the EGPS group,except the gastr-ointestinal defecation(P=0.603),the total score,physical well-being,mental well-being,and gastrointestinal digestion were statistically significant compared with the preoperative score after surgery(P<0.05).In the LC group,except the mental well-being,the total score,physical well-being,gastrointestinal digestion,the gastrointestinal defecation was statistically significant compared with the preoperative score after surgery(P<0.05).When comparing between groups,gastrointestinal defecation had significantly difference(P=0.002)between the two groups,there was no statistically significant difference in the total postoperative score and the other three subscales.In the surgery duration,hospital stay and cost,LC group were lower than EGPS group.The recurrence factors of gallstones after EGPS were analyzed:and recurrence was not correlated with gender,age,body mass index,number of stones,and preoperative score.CONCLUSION Whether EGPS or LC,it can improve the patient’s symptoms,and the EGPS has less impact on the patient’s defecation.It needed to,prospective,multicenter,long-term follow-up,large-sample related studies to prove.
基金Supported by Outstanding Foreign Scientist Studio Project of Henan Province,No.GZS2020006.
文摘BACKGROUND Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment option for symptomatic gallstones.However,another option is gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy which preserves the normal physiological functions of the gallbladder in patients desiring to avoid surgical resection.AIM To compare the feasibility,safety and effectiveness of pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)for symptomatic gallstones.METHODS We adopted propensity score matching(1:1)to compare trans-rectal NOTES cholecystolithotomy and LC patients with symptomatic gallstones.We reviewed 2511 patients with symptomatic gallstones from December 2017 to December 2020;517 patients met the matching criteria(NOTES,110;LC,407),yielding 86 pairs.RESULTS The technical success rate for the NOTES group was 98.9%vs 100%for the LC group.The median procedure time was 119 min[interquartile ranges(IQRs),95-175]with NOTES vs 60 min(IQRs,48-90)with LC(P<0.001).The frequency of post-operative pain was similar between NOTES and LC:4.7%(4/85)vs 5.8%(5/95)(P=0.740).The median duration of post-procedure fasting with NOTES was 1 d(IQRs,1-2)vs 2 d with LC(IQRs,1-3)(P<0.001).The median post-operative hospital stay for NOTES was 4 d(IQRs,3-6)vs 4 d for LC(IQRs,3-5),(P=0.092).During follow-up,diarrhea was significantly less with NOTES(5.8%)compared to LC(18.6%)(P=0.011).Gallstones and cholecystitis recurrence within a median of 12 mo(range:6-40 mo)following NOTES was 10.5%and 3.5%,respectively.Concerns regarding the presence of abdominal wall scars were present in 17.4%(n=15/86)of patients following LC(mainly women).CONCLUSION NOTES provides a feasible new alternative scar-free treatment for patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo cholecystectomy.This minimally invasive organ-sparing procedure both removes the gallstones and preserves the physiological function of the gallbladder.Reducing gallstone recurrence is essential to achieving widespread clinical adoption of NOTES.
文摘Objective:Traditionally,gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology.However,adverse consequence after cholecystectomy,though rare,still occa-sionally occurs.This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy.Methods:All consecutive robotic left hepatectomy cases between December 2010 and January 2022 in Prince of Wales Hospital,the Chinese University of Hong Kong were retrieved from a prospectively collected database.The gallbladder was preserved by moving the liver transection line just away from the gallbladder fossa.Patients were divided into two groups:gallbladder preservation(GBP)and non-gallbladder preservation(NGBP).Operative results and long-term outcomes were compared between these two groups.Results:There were 11 cases in the GBP group and 25 cases in the NGBP group.The two groups were comparable in terms of the patient demographics and disease characteristics.There was no operative mortality.There was no difference between the two groups in operative time(GBP 270 min vs.NGBP 332 min,p=0.132),blood loss(GBP 50 mL vs.NGBP 150 mL,p=0.115)or complication rate(GBP 27.3%vs.NGBP 24.0%,p>0.999).There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival.In the GBP group,no patient developed specific symptoms or complications related to the preserved gallbladder.Follow-up ultrasound or computed tomography revealed a normal appearance of the preserved gallbladders except in one patient who developed a 3-mm gallbladder polyp.On the other hand,one(4%)patient in the NGBP group developed troublesome diarrhoea after surgery.Conclusion:Gallbladder preservation is safe and feasible during robotic left hepatectomy.The preserved gallbladder does not lead to any symptoms,while postcholecystectomy diarrhoea can be avoided.
文摘目的评价腹腔镜联合胆道镜微创保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的临床应用价值。方法收集我院2006年1月～2010年12月收治的胆囊结石患者120例,均采取经腹腔镜下切开胆囊底部应用纤维胆道镜进行取石,保留功能良好的胆囊。术后第2 w B超复查结石取尽率,术后1年复查胆囊收缩功能、胆囊壁厚度及胆囊结石复发。结果全部病例成功实现了保胆取石术,平均手术时间55 min,平均住院时间4.2 d。术后第2 w B超检查结石取净率100%,术后1年复查胆囊收缩功能和胆囊壁厚比术前明显改善,术后随访1年胆结石复发6例。结论经腹腔镜微创保胆取石术具有安全性高、创伤小、痛苦少、恢复快、复发率低等特点,且可保留有功能的胆囊,具有临床推广价值。
