Urban Cultural Excavation and Reconstruction in the Perspective of Cultural Interaction:An Example of Modern Counter-Industrial Development on the Suzhou Riverbank

Urban culture,as the core force of urban development,has been explored more deeply in the process of modern urban transformation and construction.However,cities have their own unique memories,and cultural continuity and heritage require further innovation.The Suzhou River was the center of Shanghai’s initial development and carries an important cultural heritage.In 1996,Shanghai launched the comprehensive environmental improvement of the Suzhou River,which has achieved the reverse industrialization of the Suzhou River through the fine management of the city,and has made a good achievement of urban management and a new culture of the Suzhou River.This paper takes,Shanghai,a maritime city,as the background,takes the management of Suzhou River as the entry point to explore the new path of building urban culture in the new era,and studies the cultural significance contained in the fine management of modern cities.

Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Land Uses in Modern Urbanization of China

Taking social statistic data as basic data,this paper extended the meaning of urban land uses,highlighted the meaning of urban land uses in modern urbanization,which includes direct,indirect and induced land uses,quantitatively simulated the indirect and induced land uses by the substitution method of agricultural consumption and urban carbon emission and then,analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of urban land uses in China during 1952–2005 by spatial analysis tool of Geographic Information System. The results indicate that the area of urban land use in China had been increasing since 1952,showing an inversed pyramid structure,i.e.,the direct<the indirect<the induced. Specifically,Chinese urban land use has changed from concentrated distribution in Northwest China to balanced spatial distribution,and the eastern coastal area is under great pressure. Moreover,the northeastern region has moved into the induced dominant stage,while the western region remains at the indirect dominant stage. Finally,it is proposed that in order to guarantee the future demand of urban land use in China,ensuring the induced land use in the eastern region should be taken as a priority goal of Chinese developing policy.

Administrative Urbanization and City-making in Post-reform China: A Case Study of Ordos City, Inner Mongolia

In post-reform China, local governments, instead of the central state, have become major promoters of urbanization. Differing from the existing literature based on Western theories, this article argues that a localized perspective, ‘administrative urbanization', can provide a contextual explanation for the mechanism of urbanization in the reform era. The case study of Ordos indicates that new town construction, especially in the inland area, has become the main strategy for investment attraction and economic development. The local government has played a dominant role in this construction through a series of administrative measures, including avoidance of central state regulations, land leasing, high standard infrastructure construction, relocation policies and industrial attraction. This article also explores the issue of unsustainability in the new town, and identifies that underdeveloped industrialization, slow population agglomeration and real estate bubbles are primary threats to the sustainability of administrative urbanization.

A study on the evolution of land use for modern urbanization in China:1952-2005

Modern cities and towns play as the central places of wealth accumulation for human-being, not only in the ways of settlement and material consumption as they were traditionally in ancient time, but also in the ways of social production and environmental pollution as they are mostly today. With such a transition, the meaning of land use for urbanization has broadened. According to the rule of human ecosystem, land use for modern urbanization can be divided into three types: namely, the direct, the indirect and the induced. However, its structure follows its own way of the direct < the indirect < the induced, rather different from what it normally happens in the natural ecosystem. This paper takes China as an example, calculates the evolution of the land used by cities and towns during 1952-2005 according to statistics, and then analyzes the evolvement of the structure. At last, it puts forward several countermeasures to ensure land resource requirement for urbanization in future.

A Discussion for the Protection of the Environnement in the Law of Planification in China

This article aims to answer the question that if the law of planification of China,really takes account of the objectives of environmental protection.The answer is based on,first of all,the reform of system of land ownership(direct link of the development of urbanization).This article cracks the problem by two approaches:the state and collective property right.The first part of the analysis is macro-perspective,i.e.,the course of land reform and the land users.In general,the state remains the sole owner of all the land and delegates the local governments to manage the use of land in China.However,the high interest undermines their roles,and degradation of environment in the process of urbanization continues.Based on this observation,we analyzed their administration,i.e.,who are the actors and how the powers are shared.The lack of transparency and independence is in its structure,i.e.,they have ambitions to have a good protection but the conflict appears frequently.In the further part,micro-vision was employed.We focused on the regulations of planification,procedures and formalities that is deeply involved.In fact,we find that the volume of law was expanded and a need of consolidation is urgent for the coherence,accessibility and understanding of law.Then it follows the analysis of two typical procedures:the procedure of environmental assessment as well as participation.These procedures are the practical implementation of the consideration of the environment.The fact is that rapid urbanization resulted in a reconfiguration of the urban space,and the appearance of a variety of interests.The degradation of environment,coupled with the importance of urbanization has become a challenge to governance.People realized more and more issues related to housing,welfare and citizenship.This forces the government to change their policies and acts.From different points of views-historical,political,administrative,legal and social-this research determines how a better environmental protection can play in law of planification.The reforms are envisaged,and there are still problems:the harmonization and consistency of the regulations,the clarity of the law for his efficiency and law security,the improvement of the process.Contrary to what is received,the government has intention to solve this question,as demonstrated by his consistency to innovation and reform in the field.At the present,planification,rather than a method of protection,works for the growth of the economy.Due to the lack of effective regulation,the real consideration of environment is still very limited.

On the Relationship Between Human Rights Protection and the Modernization of State Governance

The protection of human rights inherently related to modern state-governance. On the one hand, human rights protection is the foundation and criteria for modern state-governance, characterized by democracy, rule of law and civility, with human rights as a cross-cutting theme in all these elements. On the other hand, human rights protection provides conditions and motives for modernizing state governance. Human rights are pursued as a fundamental value in modern state-governance. Human rights protection is also a driving force for good governance and a touchstone for the modernity of governance.

The Modernization of State Governance Will Promote Protection of Civil and Political Rights

The modernization of state governance and innovation in governing measures will strengthen the protection of human rights in China, including civil and political rights. Firstly, legal control over public power will reduce arbitrary restrictions on civil rights. Secondly, public participation in policy-making will provide more opportunities for citizens to exercise their political rights. Thirdly, governing by law will better guarantee equal protection of law for all people. Fourthly, an effective accountability mechanism will reinforce people's right of supervision. Lastly, innovation in governing measures will help identify and satisfy citizens' demands.

Government's Role in Urban Construction Land Expansion

Focusing on urban construction land expansion,governmental influence on expansion of urban construction land in China is analyzed from fiscal decentralization,government game and land system.Due to fiscal decentralization and coupled with GDP-based performance evaluation system,local government seeks to maximizing economic profits.Whereas,land systems such as land property,land expropriation and land transfer system,let the local governments' profit seeking behavior achieved.The conclusion is that the government's role in urban construction land expansion is mainly from local governments.

中国式现代化进程中的城乡融合发展——从乡土中国向和美中国之变

党的二十大将中国独特的现代化实践总结为“中国式现代化”,提炼出五个重要特征,并将其提升至“人类文明新形态”的历史高度。推进中国式现代化和构建人类文明新形态,说到底就是推动乡土中国向城乡融合发展的现代转型。乡土文化中的“和谐共生”思想,是中华民族数千年生存智慧的体现,当代的科技革新和数字技术,也必将为中国的现代化注入生机活力。本文回顾中国城乡关系的变迁历程,以四川省成都市双流区的社区发展和基层治理为例,探讨从乡土中国向城乡融合的和美中国之变,尝试解释中国式现代化背景下传统与现代的弥合之处,总结当今中国社会及文化结构的深刻变化。

美好生活:城市数字化治理的实践逻辑——基于成都市的经验观察

城市治理逐渐向智能化、智慧化和敏捷性方向发展,同时不断融合绿色、宜居、包容等新理念。已有成果探究了美好生活的内涵、特征和建设路径,相对忽视了数字治理的生活维度,少有研究将美好生活置于城市数字化治理转型进程中予以详细分析。研究提出城市数字治理美好生活逻辑的新命题,重点揭示城市数字化治理转型过程中美好生活逻辑的实现机制。城市数字治理嵌入居民微观生活实践中,并通过改变居民个体进而改善群体生活模式和生活经验。成都市数字化治理转型过程中呈现出美好生活的逻辑转向,并通过五种机制逐步推动居民美好生活的实现,即通过政策设计机制实现高品质宜居引领市民生活方式变革、通过数字助推机制实现全链条的居民幸福美好生活、通过共建共治共享机制完善全领域的居民幸福美好生活、通过服务进阶机制健全全周期的居民幸福美好生活、通过托底与提升机制实现全覆盖的居民幸福美好生活。城市数字化治理折射出居民生活方式的全面变革,通过技术和社会的高度融合实现美好生活的建设,进而促进国家现代化。研究探索出一种具有中国特色和时代特征的城市生活治理新模式,拓展了城市治理中的生活维度,同时为相关部门建设高品质居民生活方式提供了重要启发。

中国式现代化城市治理:内涵、挑战与路径选择

中国式现代化城市治理,是以中国式现代化理论为依托,以习近平总书记关于城市治理现代化的重要论述为引领,以中国城市治理的生动实践为基础,探索形成旨在推动和保障中国式现代化目标行稳致远的独特新型城市治理模式,既有与全球所有城市相同的治理特征,更具有基于中国国情、体现时代特征、彰显我国社会主义制度优势的鲜明特色。在中国式现代化推进过程中,城市治理实践在公共服务供给、治理体制运行、城市结构分异、民众公共意识、风险韧性治理、城乡跨域协同等方面面临问题与挑战。因此,中国式现代化城市治理应以推动特大超大城市治理现代化为引领,着力构建完善以系统化、融合型党建为引领的城市治理新体系,通过政社合作共治和上下结合的社会化评价模式,推动实现包容共富型治理、整体性治理、数字智慧治理以及德法共治的融合治理。

中国式现代化进程中我国乡村治理:必要性、问题及实践路径

中国式现代化是区别于西式现代化的社会主义发展之道。乡村是中国社会发展的基础,但长期城乡二元体制导致现阶段我国乡村地区存在治理主体认知和能力不足,治理制度作用发挥不足,人才、资金、资源要素不足等问题。因此,在中国式现代化进程中乡村治理实践可施行双主体合作共治,提高村民、村干部素质和现代化治理能力;建立“三治”融合的现代乡村治理体系;消除城乡差距,吸引人才、资源、资金“逆流”乡村,以此不断推进乡村治理现代化发展。

中国共产党治国理政的路向探索及其现代学阐释

百年来中国共产党所致力探索的国家治理的善治路向与政党自身治理的合理路径,蕴含了马克思主义政党治国理政现代化的理论智慧和实践结晶,集中赋能现代化以中国风格、中国气派与中国精神。切入现代学的视域,在革命型治国理政的现代化初期,中国共产党在领导新民主主义与社会主义实践中展开局部和全面的治理图式,融入土地革命、根据地建设以及工业化模式等现代性元素;在改革型治国理政的现代化结构中,完成思想革命、注入市场要素、确立共同富裕目标,赋予社会主义以鲜明的“中国特色”;在转向新时代治国理政的新型现代化中,坚持发展中国道路以厚植中国式现代化,其表征为一般现代化发展共性与自身发展的特质,实现了现代化发展范式的转型与中国式现代学的建构,并在不断自我革命中趋于治国理政的臻美。

智慧城市发展推动中国式城市体育治理现代化建设研究

智慧城市发展推动城市体育治理研究有助于夯实城市体育治理体系和治理能力现代化基础。城市体育治理体系和治理能力现代化承续中国式治理现代化思想,秉持中国式体育治理实践的经验总结,反映体育治理现代化的内在要求,遵循中国式体育治理现代化的道路指引。本质上讲,中国式城市体育治理体系和治理能力现代化是坚持以人民至上、以人民为中心的发展思想为价值起点,以智慧城市建设作为实现依据,以数字化、信息化建设为实践路径,实现城市体育高质量发展。对智慧城市建设有利于推进中国式城市体育治理体系和治理能力现代化阐释的基础,提出了“推进智慧城市体育数字化建设”“加强智慧体育城市发展规划”“创新智慧城市体育治理模式”“推动智慧体育城市数字/数据共享机制建设”和“加强智慧体育城市的法治建设”等中国式城市体育治理体系和治理能力现代化发展路径;以期为推动中国式城市体育治理体系和治理能力现代化建设提供借鉴与参考。

中国特色超大城市治理法治化论纲

城市治理是国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的重要内容,超大城市治理在城市治理中举足轻重。中国特色超大城市既有国际超大城市的共同特征,又有扎根中国客观实际的历史和时代特征。把握中国特色超大城市的特殊内涵,是探索超大城市治理逻辑的必要前提。超大城市治理现代化的过程也是法治化的过程,在法治轨道上推进超大城市治理是国家治理现代化和中国式法治现代化的必然要求,是实现国家城市治理良法善治的必由之路。在中国特色城市发展和中国特色社会主义法治道路的实践探索中,形成了中国特色超大城市治理法治现代化理论,这既丰富了中国特色城市治理理论体系和中国特色社会主义法治理论体系,又能指导中国特色超大城市治理实践。

推进城市治理现代化的理论机理、主要挑战与应对路径——基于行动学习的视角

城市治理现代化是国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的重要内容。在国家治理体系和治理能力现代化加速推进,城镇化快速发展的双重背景下,将行动学习法应用于现代城市治理过程中,有利于提升城市治理的针对性、实效性、可行性、协同性、创新性。当前,以行动学习推进城市治理现代化面临着问题意识不强、创新理念欠缺、协同意愿不足、实践机制缺失等挑战。因此城市治理相关主体要积极运用行动学习方法,以树立问题为先的城市治理意识、确立创新为荣的城市治理理念、建立协同为主的城市治理方式、构建实践为要的城市治理机制为具体路径,积极推进城市治理现代化取得新的成效。

城乡融合发展的内在逻辑与路径选择:基于农民发展的思考

在城乡关系的不断演进中,我国的城乡融合发展形成了独特的内在逻辑与融合路径。“以农民发展为核心,以国家战略规划为引领,以制度优化创新为抓手,政府作用与市场力量协同推进”是新时代城乡融合发展的核心逻辑,其与农民中心逻辑、市场逻辑等具体逻辑,以及农民发展与市民发展协同、农民积极性创造性与农民收益协同、制度优化创新与战略规划协同、政府作用与市场力量协同等协同逻辑,共同构成一个系统化的逻辑体系。城乡融合发展具有全面性和长期性,必须坚持党中央集中统一领导。应深刻认识城乡关系的主要矛盾,全力推进以农民发展为核心的城乡融合发展;科学利用制度优化创新规律,全面推进战略规划引领的城乡融合发展;正确把握政府与市场的辩证关系,促使政府作用与市场力量协同推进城乡融合发展。

自主知识体系视角下的新时代中非减贫合作

贫困治理是“全球南方”国家发展振兴的核心关切,而中国式现代化的成功实践为其他发展中国家摆脱贫穷、实现经济社会可持续发展提供了宝贵经验,丰富了国际减贫理论与实践。进入新时代,在中非共建高质量“一带一路”倡议引领下,中非减贫合作以自主知识体系为标识,通过深化基础设施合作、加强产能合作、加速贸易畅通、促进人力资源开发等路径,有力推进了中非命运共同体建设。中国在合作共赢的对非减贫合作过程中,秉持“真实亲诚”与正确义利观,保持战略或政策对接、制度规则互通和理念协调一致,彰显中国式现代化模式的世界意义。未来,将中非“减贫之路”作为践行全球发展倡议的重要路径,提升中非减贫合作方案的精准性,探索中非减贫知识产品共享新机制,将是中非双方进一步努力的方向。

构建新发展格局视域下的营商环境治理研究

营商环境治理作为中国国家治理的重要部分,是国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的重要标志,也是中国式现代化在经济领域的突出表现,彰显着国家治理现代化水平。因此,要牢牢把握营商环境发展方向,坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想和党的二十大精神为指导、以中国式现代化为目标、以马克思主义中国化时代性成果和经验为基础,将营商环境的制度优势转化为国家治理效能。文章以中国式现代化作为营商环境治理的方向引领,以大国经济发展理论、新新贸易理论、马克思主义政治经济学为理论支撑,剖析了构建新发展格局视域下营商环境治理的内在机制,即大国经济理论从“人口规模巨大的现代化”出发,从人口规模多样性和市场多样性的现实角度,揭示了构建形成强大国内市场的重要意义;共同富裕、物质文明与精神文明相协调、人与自然和谐共生的中国式现代化目标,与新新贸易理论中基于企业异质性、挖掘企业潜力、关注企业参与度与社会责任感、最终实现产业整体效益的逻辑相符合;马克思主义政治经济学追求的国民经济良性循环目标,从国内国际“双循环”的角度,诠释了“和平发展道路”的政治经济学内涵。其次,文章基于三大理论基础,解析新发展格局视域下营商环境治理促进经济发展的多维动态逻辑,即基于大国经济发展理论的要素市场化配置逻辑、基于新新贸易理论的产业链供应链升级逻辑与基于马克思主义政治经济学的现代流通体系建设逻辑。最后,文章将营商环境治理的多维动态逻辑融入中国当前构建新发展格局的目标取向和战略选择中,提出构建新发展格局视域下营商环境治理的市场化改革路径、创新驱动路径和“放管服”改革路径,三条作用路径相辅相成、协同发力,以制度创新为新发展格局经济体系注入源源不断的活力。

中国式现代化的城镇化支撑与实现路径

实现中国式现代化,需要城镇化的全面支撑。在分析中国式现代化基本国情的基础上,重点阐述中国式现代化对城镇化提出的新要求,人口规模巨大的现代化对城镇化的新需求;全体人民共同富裕的现代化要求城乡协调发展;物质文明和精神文明相协调的现代化需要城镇化水平的不断提升;人与自然和谐共生的现代化要求城镇化必须走绿色发展道路;走和平发展道路的现代化要求城镇化必须走合作创新、互利共赢的道路。根据这些要求,针对性地提出推进中国式现代化建设过程中城镇化的实现路径:人口规模巨大的现代化需要多元化的城镇化发展模式;推进产业非农化与转型升级,实现共同富裕;重视文化软实力,不断提高市民素质,加强精神文明建设;走低碳节能、绿色发展的城镇化道路,推进人与自然和谐共生;走合作创新、开放包容的城镇化道路,促进和平发展等。