目的探究CT严重指数(CTSI)联合APACHE-Ⅱ评分对急性胰腺炎(AP)患者严重程度及预后的评估价值。方法回顾性分析2011年5月至2016年5月间本院收治316例AP患者的临床资料。比较重症急性胰腺炎(重症AP)患者与轻症急性胰腺炎(轻症AP)患者CTSI...目的探究CT严重指数(CTSI)联合APACHE-Ⅱ评分对急性胰腺炎(AP)患者严重程度及预后的评估价值。方法回顾性分析2011年5月至2016年5月间本院收治316例AP患者的临床资料。比较重症急性胰腺炎(重症AP)患者与轻症急性胰腺炎(轻症AP)患者CTSI与APACHE-Ⅱ评分,通过受试者工作曲线(ROC曲线)分析CTSI、APACHE-Ⅱ评分及两者联合对AP患者疾病严重程度及预后的评估价值。结果重症AP患者的CTSI及APACHE-Ⅱ评分均明显高于轻症AP患者(P<0.05)。采用CTSI或APACHE-Ⅱ评分评估AP患者疾病严重程度时ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.804及0.798,采用CTSI联合APACHE-Ⅱ评分评估AP患者疾病严重程度时AUC为0.892,明显高于两者单独检测时的AUC(P<0.05)。采用CTSI或APACHE-Ⅱ评分预测AP患者的病死时AUC分别为0.824及0.813,采用CTSI联合APACHE-Ⅱ评分预测AP患者的病死时AUC为0.912,明显高于两者单独检测时的A U C (P<0.05)。结论 CTSI及APACHE-Ⅱ评分均是评估AP患者疾病严重程度及预后的可靠指标,两者联合检测能更准确的评估AP患者疾病严重程度及预后。展开更多
BACKGROUND Many scores have been suggested to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis upon onset.The extrapancreatic necrosis volume is a novel,promising score that appears to be superior to other scores investigate...BACKGROUND Many scores have been suggested to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis upon onset.The extrapancreatic necrosis volume is a novel,promising score that appears to be superior to other scores investigated so far.AIM To evaluate the discriminatory power of extrapancreatic necrosis volume to identify severe cases of acute pancreatitis.METHODS A total of 123 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis at Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,St Spiridon Hospital between January 1,2017 and December 31,2019 were analyzed retrospectively.Pancreatitis was classified according to the revised Atlanta classification(rAC)as mild,moderate,or severe.Severity was also evaluated by computed tomography and classified according to the computed tomography severity index(CTSI)and the modified CTSI(mCTSI).The results were compared with the extrapancreatic volume necrosis to establish the sensitivity and specificity of each method.RESULTS The CTSI and mCTSI imaging scores and the extrapancreatic necrosis volume were highly correlated with the severity of pancreatitis estimated by the rAC(r=0.926,P<0.001 and r=0.950,P<0.001;r=0.784,P<0.001,respectively).The correlation of C-reactive protein with severity was positive but not as strong,and was not significant(r=0.133,P=0.154).The best predictor for the assessment of severe pancreatitis was the extrapancreatic necrosis volume[area under the curve(AUC)=0.993;95%confidence interval(CI):0.981-1.005],with a 99.5%sensitivity and 99.0%specificity at a cutoff value of 167 mL,followed by the mCTSI 2007 score(AUC=0.972;95%CI:0.946-0.999),with a 98.0%sensitivity and 96.5%specificity,and the CTSI 1990 score(AUC=0.969;95%CI:0.941-0.998),with a 97.0%sensitivity and 95.0%specificity.CONCLUSION Radiological severity scores correlate strongly and positively with disease activity.Extrapancreatic necrosis volume shows the best diagnostic accuracy for severe cases.展开更多
文摘目的探究CT严重指数(CTSI)联合APACHE-Ⅱ评分对急性胰腺炎(AP)患者严重程度及预后的评估价值。方法回顾性分析2011年5月至2016年5月间本院收治316例AP患者的临床资料。比较重症急性胰腺炎(重症AP)患者与轻症急性胰腺炎(轻症AP)患者CTSI与APACHE-Ⅱ评分,通过受试者工作曲线(ROC曲线)分析CTSI、APACHE-Ⅱ评分及两者联合对AP患者疾病严重程度及预后的评估价值。结果重症AP患者的CTSI及APACHE-Ⅱ评分均明显高于轻症AP患者(P<0.05)。采用CTSI或APACHE-Ⅱ评分评估AP患者疾病严重程度时ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.804及0.798,采用CTSI联合APACHE-Ⅱ评分评估AP患者疾病严重程度时AUC为0.892,明显高于两者单独检测时的AUC(P<0.05)。采用CTSI或APACHE-Ⅱ评分预测AP患者的病死时AUC分别为0.824及0.813,采用CTSI联合APACHE-Ⅱ评分预测AP患者的病死时AUC为0.912,明显高于两者单独检测时的A U C (P<0.05)。结论 CTSI及APACHE-Ⅱ评分均是评估AP患者疾病严重程度及预后的可靠指标,两者联合检测能更准确的评估AP患者疾病严重程度及预后。
文摘BACKGROUND Many scores have been suggested to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis upon onset.The extrapancreatic necrosis volume is a novel,promising score that appears to be superior to other scores investigated so far.AIM To evaluate the discriminatory power of extrapancreatic necrosis volume to identify severe cases of acute pancreatitis.METHODS A total of 123 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis at Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,St Spiridon Hospital between January 1,2017 and December 31,2019 were analyzed retrospectively.Pancreatitis was classified according to the revised Atlanta classification(rAC)as mild,moderate,or severe.Severity was also evaluated by computed tomography and classified according to the computed tomography severity index(CTSI)and the modified CTSI(mCTSI).The results were compared with the extrapancreatic volume necrosis to establish the sensitivity and specificity of each method.RESULTS The CTSI and mCTSI imaging scores and the extrapancreatic necrosis volume were highly correlated with the severity of pancreatitis estimated by the rAC(r=0.926,P<0.001 and r=0.950,P<0.001;r=0.784,P<0.001,respectively).The correlation of C-reactive protein with severity was positive but not as strong,and was not significant(r=0.133,P=0.154).The best predictor for the assessment of severe pancreatitis was the extrapancreatic necrosis volume[area under the curve(AUC)=0.993;95%confidence interval(CI):0.981-1.005],with a 99.5%sensitivity and 99.0%specificity at a cutoff value of 167 mL,followed by the mCTSI 2007 score(AUC=0.972;95%CI:0.946-0.999),with a 98.0%sensitivity and 96.5%specificity,and the CTSI 1990 score(AUC=0.969;95%CI:0.941-0.998),with a 97.0%sensitivity and 95.0%specificity.CONCLUSION Radiological severity scores correlate strongly and positively with disease activity.Extrapancreatic necrosis volume shows the best diagnostic accuracy for severe cases.
