Modified procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: Lower recurrence, higher satisfaction

BACKGROUND Hemorrhoidal prolapse is a common benign disease with a high incidence.The treatment procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)remains an operative method used for internal hemorrhoid prolapse.Although it is related to less posoperative pain,faster recovery and shorter hospital stays,the postoperative recurrence rate is higher than that of the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy(MMH).We have considered that recurrence could be due to shortage of the pulling-up effect.This issue may be overcome by using lower purse-string sutures[modified-PPH(M-PPH)].AIM To compare the therapeutic effects and the patients’satisfaction after M-PPH,PPH and MMH.METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 1163 patients(M-PPH,461;original PPH,321;MMH,381)with severe hemorrhoids(stage III/IV)who were admitted to The 2nd Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from 2012 to 2014.Early postoperative complications,efficacy,postoperative anal dysfunction and patient satisfaction were compared among the three groups.Established criteria were used to assess short-and long-term postoperative complications.A visual analog scale was used to evaluate postoperative pain.Follow-up was conducted 5 years postoperatively.RESULT Length of hospital stay and operating time were significantly longer in the MMH group(8.05±2.50 d,19.98±4.21 min;P<0.0001)than in other groups.The incidence of postoperative anastomotic bleeding was significantly lower after MPPH than after PPH or MMH(1.9%,5.1%and 3.7%;n=9,16 and 14;respectively).There was a significantly higher rate of sensation of rectal tenesmus after M-PPH than after MMH or PPH(15%,8%and 10%;n=69,30 and 32;respectively).There was a significantly lower rate of recurrence after M-PPH than after PPH(8.7%and 18.8%,n=40 and 61;P<0.0001).The incidence of postoperative anal incontinence differed significantly only between the MMH and M-PPH groups(1.3%and 4.3%,n=5 and 20;P=0.04).Patient satisfaction was significantly greater after M-PPH than after other surgeries.CONCLUSION M-PPH has many advantages for severe hemorrhoids(Goligher stage III/IV),with a low rate of anastomotic bleeding and recurrence and a very high rate of patient satisfaction.

Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids vs traditional surgery for outlet obstructive constipation

AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies of two surgical procedures for hemorrhoid rectal prolapse with outlet obstruction-induced constipation.METHODS: One hundred eight inpatients who underwent surgery for outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse and circumferential hemorrhoids at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2012 to June 2013 were prospectively included in the study.The patients with rectal prolapse hemorrhoids with outlet obstructioninduced constipation were randomly divided into two groups to undergo either a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)(n = 54) or conventional surgery(n = 54; control group).Short-term(operative time,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative urinary retention,postoperative perianal edema,and postoperative pain) and long-term(postoperative anal stenosis,postoperative sensory anal incontinence,postoperative recurrence,and postoperative difficulty in defecation) clinical effects were compared between the two groups.The short- and long-term efficacies of the two procedures were determined.RESULTS: In terms of short-term clinical effects,operative time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the PPH group than in the control group(24.36 ± 5.16 min vs 44.27 ± 6.57 min,2.1 ± 1.4 d vs 3.6 ± 2.3 d,both P < 0.01).The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was higher in the PPH group than in the control group,but the difference was not statistically significant(48.15% vs 37.04%).Theincidence of perianal edema was significantly lower in the PPH group(11.11% vs 42.60%,P < 0.05).The visual analogue scale scores at 24 h after surgery,first defecation,and one week after surgery were significantly lower in the PPH group(2.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.3 ± 1.1,2.0 ± 0.5 vs 6.5 ± 0.8,and 1.7 ± 0.5 vs 5.0 ± 0.7,respectively,all P < 0.01).With regard to long-term clinical effects,the incidence of anal stenosis was lower in the PPH group than in the control group,but the difference was not significant(1.85% vs 5.56%).The incidence of sensory anal incontinence was significantly lower in the PPH group(3.70% vs 12.96%,P < 0.05).The incidences of recurrent internal rectal prolapse and difficulty in defecation were lower in the PPH group than in the control group,but the differences were not significant(11.11% vs 16.67% and 12.96% vs 24.07%,respectively).CONCLUSION: PPH is superior to the traditional surgery in the management of outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse with circumferential hemorrhoids.

Clinical Experience Sharing Of 218 Cases without Hemorrhage after Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids

Objective:To summarize the experience without hemorrhage after PPH of 218 patients with mixed hemorrhoid.Methods:PPH(Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids)was performed routinely.During operation,it is paid attention that the hemorrhoid artery should be completely mutilated,the anastomat should be squeezed before and after the anastomosis,the anastomosis should be carefully examined,the hemostasis should be completely performed,and relevant hemostasis measures should be taken after the operation.Results:None of the 218 patients had postoperative hemorrhage.Conclusion:Relevant measures can be taken after operation to prevent the occurrence of postoperative hemorrhage.

Modified stapled hemorrhoidopexy for lower postoperative stenosis: A five-year experience

BACKGROUND Stapled hemorrhoidopexy(SH)is currently a widely accepted method for treating the prolapse of internal hemorrhoids.Postoperative anal stenosis is a critical complication of SH.A remedy for this involves the removal of the circumferential staples of the anastomosis,followed by the creation of a hand-sewn anastomosis.Numerous studies have reported modified SH procedures to improve outcomes.We hypothesized that our modified SH technique may help reduce complications of anal stenosis after SH.AIM To compare outcomes of staple removal at the 3-and 9-o’clock positions during modified SH in patients with mixed hemorrhoids.METHODS This was a single-center,retrospective,observational study.Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who underwent standard or modified SH at our colorectal center between January 1,2015,and January 1,2020,were included.The operation time,blood loss,length of hospital stay,and incidence of minor or major complic-ations were recorded.RESULTS Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who underwent standard or modified SH at our colorectal center between January 1,2015 and January 1,2020,were included.Operation time,blood loss,length of hospital stay,and incidence of minor or major complications were recorded.We investigated 187 patients(mean age,50.9 years)who had undergone our modified SH and 313 patients(mean age,53.0 years)who had undergone standard SH.In the modified SH group,54%of patients had previously undergone surgical intervention for hemorrhoids,compared with the 40.3%of patients in the standard SH group.The modified SH group included five(2.7%)patients with anal stenosis,while 21(6.7%)patients in the standard SH group had complications of anal stenosis.There was a significant relationship between the rate of postoperative anal stenosis and the modified SH:0.251(0.085-0.741)and 0.211(0.069-0.641)in multiple regression analysis.The modified SH technique is a safe surgical method for advanced grade hemorrhoids and might result in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis than standard SH.CONCLUSION The modified SH technique is a safe surgical method for advanced grade hemorrhoids and might result in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis than standard SH.

Modified Gant procedure for treatment of internal rectal prolapse in elderly women

BACKGROUND Although rectal prolapse is not a life-threatening condition,it can cause defecation disorders,anal incontinence,sensory abnormalities,and other problems that can seriously affect quality of life.AIM To study the efficacy of the modified Gant procedure for elderly women with internal rectal prolapse.METHODS Sixty-three elderly female patients with internal rectal prolapse underwent the modified Gant procedure.The preoperative and postoperative anal symptoms,Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life(PAC-QOL),Wexner incontinence score,incontinence quality of life score,and complications(massive hemorrhage,infection,anorectal stenosis,and anorectal fistula)were compared.RESULTS The improvement rates of postoperative symptoms were defecation disorders(84.5%),anal distention(69.6%),defecation sensation(81.4%),frequent defecation(88.7%),and anal incontinence(42.9%)(P<0.05).All dimensions and total scores of the PAC-QOL after the procedure were lower than those before the operation(P<0.05).The postoperative anal incontinence score and Wexner score were significantly lower than those before the procedure(P<0.05).The quality of life and total scores of postoperative anal incontinence were significantly higher than those before the procedure(P<0.05).There were no serious complications and no deaths.CONCLUSION The modified Gant procedure has significant advantages in the treatment of elderly women with internal rectal prolapse.

State of the Art Hemorrhoidal Stapler Using a Modified Technique: A Step towards the Goals of Implement

Background: Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) has emerged as an alternative surgical treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids. The operative technique along with the device to be used is constantly evolving. Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate results of PPH using a modified technique and an innovative circular stapler. Material and Methods: A prospective, comparative study of patients undergoing PPH for symptomatic Grade II and Grade III internal hemorrhoids with either 32 mm or 34 mm stapler diameter (Circular Stapler for Hemorrhoids-CSH 32/34) during a 36 month period (1/1/2012-1/1/2015) was performed. A modified operative technique using two purse string sutures was employed. Patients were evaluated and compared in terms of postoperative complications, operation time, length of hospital stay and time to return to normal activities. Results: A total of 100 patients were included: 50 in the CSH 32 group and 50 in the CSH 34 group. Complication rates were equal for both stapler diameters (32 mm and 34 mm). Serious or life threatening complications were not encountered and need for reintervention was never met. Operation time, length of hospital stay and time to return to normal activities were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Our study suggests that there are no significant differences between the two available diameters of a new-fangled circular stapler, using a modified technique. It seems that progress of hemorrhoidal staplers has led to a step towards the goals of implement and from then on complications of surgical practice could be merely a matter of operative technique.

Clinical efficacy of integral theory–guided laparoscopic integral pelvic floor/ligament repair in the treatment of internal rectal prolapse in females

BACKGROUND Internal rectal prolapse(IRP)is one of the most common causes of obstructive constipation.The incidence of IRP in women is approximately three times that in men.IRP is mainly treated by surgery,which can be divided into two categories:Abdominal procedures and perineal procedures.This study offers a better procedure for the treatment of IRP.AIM To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic integral pelvic floor/ligament repair(IPFLR)combined with a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)and the laparoscopic IPFLR alone in the treatment of IRP in women.METHODS This study collected the clinical data of 130 female patients with IRP who underwent surgery from January 2012 to October 2014.The patients were divided into groups A and B.Group A had 63 patients who underwent laparoscopic IPFLR alone,and group B had 67 patients who underwent the laparoscopic IPFLR combined with PPH.The degree of internal rectal prolapse(DIRP),Wexner constipation scale(WCS)score,Wexner incontinence scale(WIS)score,and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index(GIQLI)score were compared between groups and within groups before surgery and 6 mo and 2 years after surgery.RESULTS All laparoscopic surgeries were successful.The general information,number of bowel movements before surgery,DIRP,GIQLI score,WIS score,and WCS score before surgery were not significantly different between the two groups(all P>0.05).The WCS score,WIS score,GIQLI score,and DIRP in each group 6 mo,and 2 years after surgery were significantly better than before surgery(P<0.001).In group A,the DIRP and WCS score gradually improved from 6 mo to 2 years after surgery(P<0.001),and the GIQLI score progressively improved from 6 mo to 2 years after surgery(P<0.05).In group B,the DIRP,WCS score and WIS score significantly improved from 6 mo to 2 years after surgery(P<0.05),and the GIQLI score 2 years after surgery was significantly higher than that 6 mo after surgery(P<0.05).The WCS score,WIS score,GIQLI score,and DIRP of group B were significantly better than those of group A 6 mo and 2 years after surgery(all P<0.001,Bonferroni)except DIRP at 2 years after surgery.There was a significant difference in the recurrence rate of IRP between the two groups 6 mo after surgery(P=0.011).There was no significant difference in postoperative grade I-III complications between the two groups(P=0.822).CONCLUSION Integral theory–guided laparoscopic IPFLR combined with PPH has a higher cure rate and a better clinical efficacy than laparoscopic IPFLR alone.

PPH联合聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂注射治疗直肠黏膜脱垂中的应用

目的探索PPH联合泡沫硬化剂在直肠黏膜脱垂新的治疗方法,为疾病治疗方式的选择提供参照。方法回顾性分析2023年4月—2024年4月在本院接受手术治疗直肠黏膜脱垂的86例患者的临床资料。根据患者手术方式不同分为观察组和对照组两组,观察组44例患者采用PPH联合聚多卡醇硬化剂注射治疗;对照组42例患者采用PPH治疗。分析两组患者便秘改善程度、临床治愈率和并发症等指标。结果两组患者在治疗前CAS、PAC-SYM、SAS和SDS比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组患者在治疗后CAS、PAC-SYM、SAS和SDS均较治疗显著降低,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。但观察组在CAS、PAC-SYM、SAS和SDS治疗后降低程度高于对照组,差异具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。两组患者有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(44/0比41/1,χ^(2)=1.060,P=0.303)。但观察组治愈率显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(42/2比33/9,χ^(2)=5.491,P=0.019)。两组患者在的短、长期并发症、术后疼痛和术后炎症指标的比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论PPH联合聚多卡醇硬化剂注射治疗对治疗直肠黏膜脱垂效果显著,可增加临床治愈率,是一种安全有效的治疗方法。

基于跨理论模型的护理管理对吻合器痔上黏膜环切术后混合痔患者疼痛、心理和康复质量的影响

目的 探讨基于跨理论模型的护理管理对混合痔患者采用吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)后疼痛、心理及康复质量的影响。方法 前瞻性纳入2019年1月至2022年12月安徽省亳州市人民医院采用PPH进行治疗的混合痔患者120例。采用随机数字法将其分为对照组和观察组,各60例。对照组采用常规专科护理,观察组应用基于跨理论模型的护理管理。比较两组术后12、24 h和48 h视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分,比较两组术前,术后3、7 d的焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评表(SDS),康复质量(术后首次排尿时间和持续时间、首次排便时间和持续时间、肛门创缘水肿和便血评分及便秘发生率)。结果 整体分析发现:两组VAS评分组间、时间点比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。进一步两两比较,组内比较:两组术后24、48 h的VAS评分低于术后12 h,术后48 h的VAS评分低于术后24 h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间比较,观察组术后12、24、48 h的VAS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。整体分析发现:两组SAS、SDS评分组间、时间点及交互作用比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。进一步两两比较,组内比较:术后3、7 d的SAS、SDS评分低于术前,术后7 d的SAS、SDS评分低于术后3 d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间比较,观察组术后3、7 d的SAS、SDS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组首次排尿时间和持续时间、首次排便时间和持续时间短于对照组,水肿和便血评分低于对照组,便秘发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 基于跨理论模型的护理管理能够进一步减轻混合痔患者PPH术后的疼痛体验,降低焦虑和抑郁风险,改善康复质量,是一种新型优质护理模式,值得推广应用。

PPH和MMH治疗重度混合痔对性功能影响的临床观察

目的探讨吻合器痔上粘膜环形切除术和外切内扎术治疗重度混合痔对患者性功能的影响。方法收集2022年10月至2023年6月于梅州市人民医院行重度混合痔手术的患者资料81例,包括PPH组41例行吻合器痔上粘膜环形切除术,MMH组40例行外切内扎术,采用国际勃起功能指数量表(IIEF-5评分:≥22分为无障碍)评价男性性功能,采用女性性功能指数量表(FSFI评分:>26.55分为无障碍)评价女性性功能。所有入组患者中,有62例完成术前术后性功能评价量问卷调查表。根据量表评估两种临床最常用的手方式对患者性功能的影响。结果两组患者基线资料对比无统计学差异。PPH组术前男性性功能评分为22.0(3.5)分,术后22.0(5.0)分,P>0.05;女性术前为21.4(8.1)分,术后为23.6(6.8)分,P>0.05。MMH组术前男性性功能评分为22.5(4.0)分,术后23.0(5.0)分,P>0.05;女性术前为24.6±7.5分,术后为22.4±8.0分,P>0.05。两组男性患者手术前后IIEF-5评分中位数均≥22分,两组女性患者手术前后FSFI评分量表6个维度评分均无统计学差异。结论PPH和MMH治疗重度混合痔后患者性功能均无明显变化,手术对性功能影响方面是安全的。

PPH术与STARR术对Ⅳ度混合痔患者康复效果的影响

目的:比较吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合(Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids,PPH)术与经肛吻合器直肠切除(Stapled trans-anal rectal resection,STARR)术对Ⅳ度混合痔患者康复效果的影响。方法:选取2021年1月至2023年12月南阳市第二人民医院收治的Ⅳ度混合痔患者86例,随机分为STARR术组和PPH术组(n=43),分别采用STARR术和PPH术治疗。住院期间比较两组手术及术后恢复指标;术前、术后12 h、24 h、36 h,采用视觉疼痛模拟量表(Visual analogue scale,VAS)评估疼痛程度;术前、术后3 d,采用酶联免疫吸附法检测血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(Tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α)、白细胞介素-17(Interleukin-17,IL-17)、高敏C反应蛋白(Highly sensitive C-reactive protein,hs-CRP);术后3 d,比较两组排便功能恢复及并发症情况。结果:PPH术组术中总失血量低于STARR术组,手术用时、住院天数、创面愈合时间短于STARR术组(P<0.05);术后12 h、24 h、36 h,PPH术组VAS评分均低于STARR术组(P<0.05);术后3 d,PPH术组血清TNF-α、IL-17、hs-CRP水平低于STARR术组(P<0.05);术后3 d,PPH术组术后排便功能恢复优于STARR术组(P<0.05);PPH术组术后并发症总发生率低于STARR术组(P<0.05)。结论:PPH术治疗Ⅳ度混合痔能缩短手术用时,减少术中出血,减轻炎症反应,降低术后疼痛,改善术后排便功能,加快康复进程。

吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术联合外剥内扎术治疗重度痔疮的效果

目的:探究吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术(PPH)联合外剥内扎术(M-M)治疗重度痔疮患者的效果。方法:回顾性收集2022年9月—2023年9月华侨大学附属厦门长庚医院收治的106例重度痔疮患者的病历资料,按手术方案不同分为试验组(接受PPH联合M-M治疗,n=53)与对照组(接受M-M治疗,n=53)。比较两组手术指标、肛肠动力学指标、疼痛评分、疼痛应激因子及并发症。结果:试验组术中失血量较对照组更少,创面愈合时间、手术用时、住院用时较对照组短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1个月,两组肛管最大收缩压(MASP)、肛管静息压(ARP)较术前降低,且试验组较对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1 d,两组血清前列腺素E_(2)(PGE_(2))、5-羟色胺(5-HT)、P物质(SP)水平较术前升高,但试验组较对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组并发症发生率为1.89%(1/53),低于对照组的15.09%(8/53),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相较于单纯M-M,PPH联合M-M治疗重度痔疮患者可进一步优化手术指标,减轻疼痛感,改善肛肠动力学,降低并发症发生风险,且对机体疼痛应激因子水平影响更小。

吻合器痔上黏膜环切术在混合痔患者中的临床疗效分析

目的 探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗混合痔患者的临床疗效。方法 205例混合痔患者为研究对象,根据手术方法不同分为对照组(70例)和观察组(135例)。对照组实施痔外切内扎术治疗,观察组实施吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗。比较两组患者的临床疗效、手术时间、住院时间、切口愈合时间、术后肛门疼痛评分及术后并发症发生情况。结果 与对照组(88.6%)比较,观察组患者的临床总有效率(97.8%)明显更高(P<0.05)。观察组患者手术时间、住院时间和切口愈合时间分别为(22.56±5.04)min、(5.48±0.67)d、(20.39±4.86)d,对照组患者分别为(31.37±5.70)min、(7.69±1.02)d、(27.58±5.57)d,与对照组比较,观察组患者的手术时间、住院时间和切口愈合时间明显更短(P<0.05)。观察组患者术后1、5、10 d的肛门视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分分别为(2.98±1.32)、(1.34±1.16)、(1.10±1.02)分,对照组患者分别为(5.16±2.25)、(3.88±1.47)、(2.63±1.23)分,与对照组比较,观察组患者术后1、5、10 d的肛门VAS评分均明显降低(P<0.05)。与对照组(11.4%)比较,观察组患者术后并发症发生率(3.7%)明显降低(P<0.05)。结论 吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗混合痔患者的临床疗效显著,能够有效改善患者的临床症状,缩短手术时间、住院时间和切口愈合时间,缓解术后肛门疼痛,降低术后并发症发生率,预后良好,值得临床推广应用。

自动弹力线痔疮套扎术联合适形缝合术治疗重度脱垂性痔的疗效观察

目的观察自动弹力线痔疮套扎术(ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids,RPH)联合适形缝合术治疗重度脱垂性痔的疗效。方法选取2021年6月至2022年8月徐州市第一人民医院收治的重度脱垂性痔患者78例,根据随机数字表法将其分为观察组和对照组,每组各39例。观察组患者予RPH联合适形缝合术治疗,对照组患者予外剥内扎术治疗。比较两组患者的手术时长、术中出血量、术后并发症、创面愈合时间、肛门功能及总体满意度。结果观察组患者的术中出血量显著少于对照组,住院时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者的术后疼痛、出血、肛门水肿、肛缘皮赘形成均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。术后12周,两组患者的Wexner肛门失禁评分均显著低于本组术前(P<0.05),且观察组患者的Wexner肛门失禁评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者的治愈率显著高于对照组(92.31%vs.74.36%,χ2=55.46,P=0.03),对治疗的整体满意度明显高于对照组(χ2=58.57,P=0.02)。结论RPH联合适形缝合术治疗重度脱垂性痔疗效确切,可减轻患者痛苦,缩短住院时间,减少并发症,提高患者的舒适度及满意度。

吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合闭合性痔切除术治疗环状混合痔的效果及对疼痛程度的影响

目的探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合闭合性痔切除术治疗环状混合痔的效果及对疼痛程度的影响。方法选取2022年2月至2023年2月我科收治的98例环状混合痔患者作为研究对象,随机将其分为对照组(开放性痔切除术)和观察组(吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合闭合性痔切除术),各49例。比较两组的手术疗效。结果观察组的手术时间、住院时间、切口愈合时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后1 d,观察组的P物质(SP)、前列腺素E_(2)(PGE_(2))及缓激肽(BK)水平低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后1 d,观察组的血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、血小板源性生长因子(PDGF)及碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)水平高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的并发症总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合闭合性痔切除术治疗环状混合痔可缩短手术时间,减少术中出血,加快术后恢复,减轻术后疼痛,促进创面恢复,也能降低并发症发生率,值得推广。

促愈熏洗方联合大黄外敷对混合痔环切术后的康复作用

目的探讨促愈熏洗方联合大黄外敷对混合痔吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)后的康复作用。方法选取2023年1月至2023年12月收治的拟行PPH术治疗的混合痔患者104例,采用随机原则分为大黄外敷组和联合组(促愈熏洗方联合大黄外敷),每组52例。两组PPH术后均行常规护理,大黄外敷组在此基础上进行大黄外敷治疗,联合组在大黄外敷组基础上加用促愈熏洗方熏洗治疗。比较两组康复进程、术后并发症、肛门功能、疼痛程度、生活质量。结果联合组康复时间短于大黄外敷组,并发症总发生率1.92%,低于大黄外敷组13.46%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,联合组疼痛视觉模拟评分法评分(VAS)、Wexner便秘评分(WCS)低于大黄外敷组,世界卫生组织生存质量测定表(WHOQOL)评分高于大黄外敷组(P<0.05)。结论促愈熏洗方联合大黄外敷能降低混合痔患者PPH术后并发症,促进康复,提高患者生活质量。

吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合括约肌折叠术治疗轻度直肠脱垂的效果

目的 探讨吻合器痔上环切加内窥镜治疗轻微脱垂患者的效果。方法 选择本院2021年1月—2021年12月收治的轻微性直肠脱垂患者50例,随机将其分成两组,每组25例。对照组单纯行基本疗法,观察组行肛管环切术后肛门内翻术。对两组直肠脱垂患者总有效率、排气时间、创面愈合时间、排便恢复时间、手术时间、住院时间、出血量、并发症发生率进行对比分析。结果 观察组直肠脱垂患者总有效率高达96.0%,大幅优于对照组直肠脱垂患者的76.0%(P<0.05)。观察组术后排气时间、伤口愈合时间及排便时间均优于对照组;手术时间和住院时间均较对照组缩短(P<0.05),观察组出血量较小(P<0.05);观察组直肠脱垂患者的临床不良反应发生率为4.0%,对照组直肠脱垂患者的临床不良反应发生率为24.0%,观察组直肠脱垂患者的临床不良反应发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 对轻微性肛管脱垂患者行肛门内窥镜切除术,效果令人满意,除了能够让患者在术后更加快速地得到康复,促使直肠脱垂病情得以更好地康复,同时也更能减少手术引起的肛门出血、肛门狭窄、肛门周边肿胀、尿道损伤等并发症,是一种安全性和有效性均比较高的手术类型,值得在直肠脱垂患者治疗中大力推广。

直肠扩张与出口梗阻型便秘PPH术后Wexner评分相关性

目的基于排粪造影研究直肠扩张与出口梗阻型便秘吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)术后Wexner评分相关性。方法分析90例出口梗阻型便秘患者资料,研究组60例伴直肠扩张,对照组30例不伴直肠扩张,两组均行PPH治疗。评价参数:直肠最大前后径、左右径、上下径、直肠体积。Wexner评分评估排便功能,比较直肠扩张对出口梗阻型便秘PPH术后Wexner评分的影响。结果研究组治疗前后Wexner评分分别为(26.2±0.7)分、(24.3±0.4)分,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组治疗后Wexner评分与直肠最大前后径(7.23±1.04)cm、左右径(8.58±2.48)cm、上下径(19.42±0.27)cm及直肠体积(78.41±3.22)cm^(3)呈正相关(P<0.05),直肠体积与直肠最大前后径、左右径、上下径呈正相关(P<0.05)。对照组治疗前后Wexner评分分别为(20.1±0.1)分、(6.8±0.2)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论出口梗阻型便秘直肠扩张影响PPH术后Wexner评分,术前了解直肠扩张程度,可能更利于治疗及预后判断。

PPH联合缝扎术治疗对重度环状混合痔患者手术相关指标及肛门功能的影响

目的探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)联合缝扎术治疗对重度环状混合痔患者手术相关指标及肛门功能的影响。方法选取2022年1月—2023年9月浙江省人民医院毕节医院收治的80例重度环状混合痔患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组,每组40例。对照组采用PPH治疗,观察组采用PPH联合缝扎术治疗。比较两组患者的临床疗效、手术相关指标、肛门功能及并发症发生情况。结果观察组治疗总有效率为97.50%,高于对照组的80.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组手术时间为(25.13±1.52)min,长于对照组,疼痛消失时间为(3.62±1.24)d,创面愈合时间为(6.13±1.02)d,住院时间为(7.24±1.83)d,均短于对照组,肛管静息压为(10.18±2.12)kPa,便秘评分量表评分为(7.12±1.43)分,均低于对照组,肛管舒张压为(6.13±1.04)kPa,高于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为5.00%,低于对照组的20.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论PPH与缝扎术联合治疗重度环状混合痔患者效果显著,可有效改善手术相关指标,提升患者肛门功能,降低术后并发症发生率。

PPH联合部分肛门括约肌切断术对重度混合痔患者创缘水肿及疼痛程度的影响

目的探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)联合部分肛门括约肌切断术对重度混合痔患者创缘水肿及疼痛程度的影响。方法选择该院2022年1月—2023年6月收治的72例重度混合痔患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组与观察组,各36例。对照组采用PPH治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加用部分肛门括约肌切断术治疗。比较两组创缘水肿、疼痛程度、肛门功能及并发症发生情况。结果术后2周,两组创缘水肿、视觉模拟评分均降低,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后2周,两组肛管静息压均降低,且观察组低于对照组,舒张压均升高,且观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症总发生率为2.78%,低于对照组的22.22%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论重度混合痔患者采用PPH联合部分肛门括约肌切断术治疗的效果确切,利于改善创缘水肿及疼痛程度,促进患者肛门功能恢复,减少相关并发症的发生,值得推广应用。