Objective： To evaluate the effect of moxa-stick suffumigation in the hematology and hematopoieticstem cell transplantation （HSCT） wards with luminar flow. Methods： The plate exposure method was usedto measure the ...Objective： To evaluate the effect of moxa-stick suffumigation in the hematology and hematopoieticstem cell transplantation （HSCT） wards with luminar flow. Methods： The plate exposure method was usedto measure the effect of air-disinfection of moxa-stick suffumigation in hematology and HSCT wards. Theyearly average qualified rates of air sampling in HSCT wards were evaluated from 2007 to 2010. To furtherinvestigate the disinfecting effect of moxa-stick suffumigation, the colony counts of common pathogens（including Staphylcoccus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa） before and after moxa-stick suffumigation werecompared. Results： The mean air quality rates of the HSCT wards with class 100 laminar flow were all above90.0% （91.2%-96.2%） from 2007 to 2010. Moxa-stick suffumigation effectively decreased the presence ofbacteria in the hematology ward＇s air （P〈0.01）. The most notable effect was the drastic reduction in the colonycounts of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the blood plates exposed to air treatedwith moxa-stick suffumigation （77.1 ± 52.9 cfu/m2 vs 196.1 ± 87.5 cfu/m2, P〈0.01; and 100.2±35.3 cfu/m2 vs371.5± 35.3 cfu/m2, P〈0.01）. Conclusion： Moxa-stick suffumigation proved to be a reliable and effective air-disinfection method for hematology and HSCT wards, and hence, it should be employed extensively.展开更多
目的观察隔药回旋灸联合针刺治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效。方法纳入64例带状疱疹后神经痛患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组32例。观察组予隔药回旋灸联合针刺治疗,对照组仅采用单纯针刺治疗。比较两组治疗前后疼痛视觉模拟量表(vis...目的观察隔药回旋灸联合针刺治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效。方法纳入64例带状疱疹后神经痛患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组32例。观察组予隔药回旋灸联合针刺治疗,对照组仅采用单纯针刺治疗。比较两组治疗前后疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analog scale,VAS)评分、皮肤病生活质量指数(dermatology life quality index,DLQI)和汉密顿焦虑量表(Hamilton anxiety scale,HAMA)评分的变化,并比较两组临床疗效及安全性。结果观察组和对照组总有效率分别为93.8%和71.0%,观察组优于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组VAS、DLQI和HAMA评分均明显降低(P<0.05),且观察组明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组均未出现不良反应事件。结论隔药回旋灸联合针刺治疗带状疱疹后神经痛可减轻患者疼痛,提高生活质量,改善患者焦虑状态,疗效优于单纯针刺治疗。展开更多
基金Supported by the Fund from Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Zhejiang Province,China(No.2009CA063)
文摘Objective： To evaluate the effect of moxa-stick suffumigation in the hematology and hematopoieticstem cell transplantation （HSCT） wards with luminar flow. Methods： The plate exposure method was usedto measure the effect of air-disinfection of moxa-stick suffumigation in hematology and HSCT wards. Theyearly average qualified rates of air sampling in HSCT wards were evaluated from 2007 to 2010. To furtherinvestigate the disinfecting effect of moxa-stick suffumigation, the colony counts of common pathogens（including Staphylcoccus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa） before and after moxa-stick suffumigation werecompared. Results： The mean air quality rates of the HSCT wards with class 100 laminar flow were all above90.0% （91.2%-96.2%） from 2007 to 2010. Moxa-stick suffumigation effectively decreased the presence ofbacteria in the hematology ward＇s air （P〈0.01）. The most notable effect was the drastic reduction in the colonycounts of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the blood plates exposed to air treatedwith moxa-stick suffumigation （77.1 ± 52.9 cfu/m2 vs 196.1 ± 87.5 cfu/m2, P〈0.01; and 100.2±35.3 cfu/m2 vs371.5± 35.3 cfu/m2, P〈0.01）. Conclusion： Moxa-stick suffumigation proved to be a reliable and effective air-disinfection method for hematology and HSCT wards, and hence, it should be employed extensively.
文摘目的观察隔药回旋灸联合针刺治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效。方法纳入64例带状疱疹后神经痛患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组32例。观察组予隔药回旋灸联合针刺治疗,对照组仅采用单纯针刺治疗。比较两组治疗前后疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analog scale,VAS)评分、皮肤病生活质量指数(dermatology life quality index,DLQI)和汉密顿焦虑量表(Hamilton anxiety scale,HAMA)评分的变化,并比较两组临床疗效及安全性。结果观察组和对照组总有效率分别为93.8%和71.0%,观察组优于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组VAS、DLQI和HAMA评分均明显降低(P<0.05),且观察组明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组均未出现不良反应事件。结论隔药回旋灸联合针刺治疗带状疱疹后神经痛可减轻患者疼痛,提高生活质量,改善患者焦虑状态,疗效优于单纯针刺治疗。
