TOPSIS with Belief Structure for Group Belief Multiple Criteria Decision Making

The technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution （TOPSIS） is one of the major techniques in dealing with multiple criteria decision making （MCDM） problems, and the belief structure （BS） model has been used successfully for uncertain MCDM with incompleteness, impreciseness or ignorance. In this paper, the TOPSIS method with BS model is proposed to solve group belief MCDM problems. Firstly, the group belief MCDM problem is structured as a belief decision matrix in which the judgments of each decision maker are described as BS models, and then the evidential reasoning approach is used for aggregating the multiple decision makers＇ judgments. Subsequently, the positive and negative ideal belief solutions are defined with the principle of TOPSIS. To measure the separation from ideal solutions, the concept and algorithm of belief distance measure are defined, which can be used for comparing the difference between BS models. Finally, the relative closeness and ranking index are calculated for ranking the alternatives. A numerical example is given to illustrate the proposed method.

DNA extraction method selection for agricultural soil using TOPSIS multiple criteria decision-making model

There is an increased interest in the extraction of nucleic acids from various environmental samples since culture-independent molecular techniques contribute to deepen and broaden the understanding of a greater portion of uncultivable microorganisms. Due to difficulties to select the optimum DNA extraction method in view of downstream molecular analyses, this article presents a straightforward mathematical framework for comparing some of the most commonly used methods. Four commercial DNA extraction kits and two physical-chemical methods (bead-beating and freeze-thaw) were compared for the extraction of DNA under several quantitative DNA analysis criteria: yield of extraction, purity of extracted DNA (A260/280 and A260/230 ratios), degradation degree of DNA, easiness of PCR amplification, duration of extraction, and cost per extraction. From a practical point of view, it is unlikely that a single DNA extraction strategy can be optimum for all selected criteria. Hence, a systematic Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was employed to compare the methods. The PowerSoil? DNA Isolation Kit was systematically defined as the best performing method for extracting DNA from soil samples. More specifically, for soil:manure and soil:manure:biochar mixtures, the PowerSoil?DNA Isolation Kit method performed best, while for neat soil samples its alternative version gained the first rank.

Dual worth trade-off method and its application for solving multiple criteria decision making problems

To overcome the limitations of the traditional surrogate worth trade-off （SWT） method and solve the multiple criteria decision making problem more efficiently and interactively, a new method labeled dual worth tradeoff （DWT） method is proposed. The DWT method dynamically uses the duality theory related to the multiple criteria decision making problem and analytic hierarchy process technique to obtain the decision maker＇s solution preference information and finally find the satisfactory compromise solution of the decision maker. Through the interactive process between the analyst and the decision maker, trade-off information is solicited and treated properly, the representative subset of efficient solutions and the satisfactory solution to the problem are found. The implementation procedure for the DWT method is presented. The effectiveness and applicability of the DWT method are shown by a practical case study in the field of production scheduling.

Software Selection in Manufacturing Industries Using a Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method, PROMETHEE

This paper presents an effective decision making framework for software selection in manufacturing industries using a multiple criteria decision making method, Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE). The method is improved in the present work by integrating with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the fuzzy logic. Fuzzy logic is introduced to handle the imprecision of the human decision making process. The proposed decision making framework is practical for ranking competing software products in terms of their overall performance with respect to multiple criteria. An example is included to illustrate the approach.

基于MCDM-BPNN的城市内涝风险评价及调蓄池选址

为建立一套较为完善的城市内涝风险评价体系,并据此确定调蓄池位置,首先,从积水风险、超载风险和边侧进流量3个维度构建评价指标,设计一种包括改进层次分析法(IAHP)、反熵权法(AEW)和优劣解距离法(TOPSIS)的混合多准则决策框架(MCDM);然后,将IAHP-AEW-TOPSIS模型分别与IAHP-TOPSIS、AEW-TOPSIS模型对比,通过斯皮尔曼排序相关系数验证排序一致性,通过计算变异系数、相对极差和灵敏度证实IAHP-AEW-TOPSIS模型的性能;最后,结合反向传播神经网络(BPNN),建立MCDM-BPNN模型,并以山西省某一内涝易发区域为例进行验证。结果表明:积水风险对城市内涝风险评价体系的影响最为显著,所占权重为0.46,其次为超载风险,所占权重为0.36;节点位置与连接管道数量很大程度上对该节点的内涝风险产生影响,在管道汇接处或汇流面积较大处内涝出现更为频繁;IAHP-AEW-TOPSIS模型在样本判别方面具有更好的性能;在5年与10年重现期下,MCDM-BPNN模型验证集准确率分别为93.3%和100%,能够准确快速模拟和预测城市洪水;应用案例设置调蓄池后,高、中、低风险节点数量分别为7、9、30和6、19、21,内涝溢流削减效果显著。

Extension of Paraconsistent Many-Valued Similarity Method to Group Decision

The Paraconsistent Many-Valued Similarity (PMVS) method for multi-attribute decision making will be incomplete as a decision model if it is not extended to the realm of group decision-making. Therefore, in this article, our primary objective is to show how the paraconsistent many-valued similarity method can be used to solve group decision-making problems involving choice making or ranking of a finite set of decision alternatives. Moreover, since weights are very important parameters in multi-attribute decision-making, we have introduced the Borda rule to calculate the weights of experts and that of every criterion under consideration. To demonstrate how the proposed method works, a numerical example on energy sources of an economy from the points of view of a group of experts is investigated. Further, we compare the results of this new approach with that of fuzzy TOPSIS group decision-making method to illustrate the robustness and effectiveness of the former.

Decision Making in Sustainable Development: Some Methods to Evaluate Energy and Nonrenewable Resources Waste When Using Some Plastics

This paper explores a decision making model for a multidisciplinary problem in nature. This problem considers the role of energy use in sustainable development and the potential sources to increase energy efficiency during its whole life cycle;it also deals with multicriteria decision making of plastic materials used in a day to day basis. Exergy analysis of plastic materials used to the manufacture of disposable polyethylene bags comparing them with other materials that can be used for substitution will be important to take decisions. We are also interested in plastic poly (ethylene Terephthalate or PET) bottles. The calculation of the incoming and outgoing Exergy flows during the production processes are carried out. The Exergy loss considering the sustainability concept, Green House Gases emissions, real energy flows needed to the chain of processes, material balances in the productions chains and value added, are presented as a set of criteria to make decisions of alternative materials including the actual ones. A case study for Mexico’s market will be developed in order to prove the methodology. It offers some interesting data about consumption and production of bags and bottles.

A Quantity Model for Controlling and Measuring Software Quality Based on the Expert Decision-Making Algorithm

Researchers have been active in the field of software engineering measurement over more than 30 years. The software quality product is becoming increasingly important in the computerized society. Target setting in software quality function and usability deployment are essential since they are directly related to development of high quality products with high customer satisfaction. Software quality can be measured as the degree to which a particular software program complies with consumer demand regarding function and characteristics. Target setting is usually subjective in practice, which is unscientific. Therefore, this study proposes a quantity model for controlling and measuring software quality via the expert decision-making algorithm-based method for constructing an evaluation method can provide software in relation to users and purchasers, thus enabling administrators or decision makers to identify the most appropriate software quality. Importantly, the proposed model can provide s users and purchasers a reference material, making it highly applicable for academic and government purposes.

基于多准则决策方法的避难场所选址模型研究

针对避难场所规划选址中的现实问题与需求,从方法易操作和可实施角度出发,构建了面向城市规划业务流程与工作实践的防灾避难场所选址模型。该模型基于多准则决策方法(MCDM),以避难场所选址的安全性和均好性为主要目标。模型综合考虑了人口密度、建筑质量、交通系统和避难场所设施配置四项选址影响因素,并采用AHP-熵权法确定影响要素权重。以江阴市为实证案例,套用模型经过两轮评估及编码者测试,最终明确了备选避难场所资源的优先建设排序,验证了模型的可行性与实用性。研究提出的影响要素和量化指标易于取得,打分方法便于操作,适用于城市规划阶段的避难场所规划选址与建设时序决策。

水利工程施工的IT2FS-MARCOS风险评价

为解决专家决策的主观性造成的风险评价不确定性和不同风险参数权重下考虑多种风险因子评价问题,这里提出一种基于IT2FS-MARCOS法的水利工程施工风险评价方法。首先确定水利工程施工风险指标评估体系,运用最优最劣法(BWM)融合基于层间相关性的客观赋权法(CRITIC)的组合赋权法对各风险参数的权重进行分析;然后引入区间2型模糊集(IT2FS)改进多准则决策中的基于折衷方案的备选方案排序法(MARCOS)计算各风险因素的效用函数值,基于效用函数值进行风险因素分析和评价。结合工程实例应用,表明:地质、天气条件和作业计划安排等风险因素危险程度较高,其中地质条件对该施工项目安全威胁最大,为水利工程施工需重点管理的风险因子。该模型的特点是不仅考虑了专家评价的模糊性,而且采用多准则决策方法避免对风险参数简单加权,与优劣解距离法(TOPSIS)相比,本方法与工程实际符合得更好,有望为处理水利工程不确定信息下的风险评价提供一种新的思路。

考虑性能稳定性的机械系统可靠性分配方法研究

针对机械系统可靠性分配,提出了一种考虑性能稳定性的可靠性分配方法。引入元动作理论对机械系统进行结构分解,以元动作单元为分配对象,建立元动作可靠性二层综合评价指标模型,结合多准则决策(MCDM)方法,得到元动作可靠性分配系数;然后建立机械传动系统稳定性模型,并计算各个元动作对系统性能稳定性的影响系数;最后,利用性能稳定性的影响系数对可靠性分配系数进行修正,实现机械系统可靠性的合理分配。通过与传统方法进行对比,验证了所提方法的有效性。

采用改进的AHP方法进行船型方案MCDM论证

基于船舶工程领域系统设计的非线性和复杂性 ,采用改进的 AHP方法进行船型方案的多目标优选决策 .对传统的 AHP方法进行改进时 ,采用构建三标度矩阵的方法 ,避免了采用九标度方法构建判断矩阵时权重选择的模糊性 ,从而减少了决策过程中设计者的主观臆断性 .实例证明 ,与采用传统的九标度方法相比 ,三标度方法具有简单明了、使用方便等优点 。

煤矿生产物流系统安全资源DMIP-MCDM评价法

为提升煤矿生产物流系统安全水平,运用多准则决策(MCDM)方法,建立基于动态多维交互投影(DMIP)的煤矿生产物流系统安全资源DMIP-MCDM评价法。首先,集成多个直觉正态模糊数(INFNs)动态聚合决策矩阵,并由此计算初始评价权重及均衡度评价权重;其次,依托直觉正态模糊广义混合变权Bonferroni(INFNGHVWB)算子计算精确度评价权重;再次,计算各级指标因素层的DMIP聚合评价权重及安全资源配置的最终总体评价权重;最后将DMIP-MCDM评价法应用于某矿生产物流系统中,进行实证分析。结果表明,安全资源配置的类别各异,同时交互影响;用DMIPMCDM能够实现安全资源配置状况的多维动态系统评价,有助于优化安全资源配置结构。

基于FAHP和FMCDM构建软件可信性评估模型

结合软件可信性评估的特点及模糊理论的最新进展,提出一种基于模糊层次分析法和模糊多指标决策理论的评估模型。首先针对软件可信性没有一致定义的现状,提出了相对可信性的概念;接着基于模糊数理论,用三角模糊数表示专家评估中语言变量的主观性和模糊性,结合专家给出的模糊指标权重及待评软件可信等级的模糊评价,得到软件可信性的集成模糊评价;最后,将该模型应用到国内某汽车制造企业整车产品开发项目管理软件评估中,实例说明软件可信性评估的具体过程,结果验证了该模型的实效性。

Applying an Ordinal Priority Approach Based Neutrosophic Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Approach to Develop Sustainable Geothermal Energy Source

Geothermal energy is considered a renewable,environmentally friendly,especially carbon-free,sustainable energy source that can solve the problem of climate change.In general,countries with geothermal energy resources are the ones going through the ring of fire.Therefore,not every country is lucky enough to own this resource.As a country with 117 active volcanoes and within the world’s ring of fire,it is a country whose geothermal resources are estimated to be about 40%of the world’s geothermal energy potential.However,the percentage used compared to the geothermal potential is too small.Therefore,this is the main energy source that Indonesia is aiming to exploit and use.However,the deployment and development of this energy source are still facing many obstacles due to many aspects from budget sources due to high capital costs,factory construction location,quality of resources,and conflicts of the local community.In this context,determining the optimal locations for geothermal energy sites(GES)is one of the most important and necessary issues.To strengthen the selection methods,this study applies a two-layer fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method.Through the layers,the Ordinal Priority Approach(OPA)is proposed to weight the sub-criteria,the main criterion,and the sustainability factors.In layer 2,the Neutrosophic Fuzzy Axiomatic Design(NFAD)is applied to rank and evaluate potential locations for geothermal plant construction.Choosing the right geothermal energy site can bring low-cost efficiency,no greenhouse gas emissions,and quickly become the main energy source providing electricity for Indonesia.The final ranking shows Papua,Kawah Cibuni,and Moluccas as the three most suitable cities to build geothermal energy systems.Kawah Cibuni was identified as the most potential GES in Indonesia,with a score of 0.46.Papua is the second most promising GES with a score of 0.45.Next is the Moluccas,with a score of 0.39.However,the three least potential sites among the 15 studied sites are Lumut Balai,Moluccas and Patuha,with scores of 0.08,0.11 and 0.17,respectively.The conclusion of this study also classifies positions into groups to aid in decision-making.

毕达哥拉斯犹豫模糊集多属性决策研究

针对属性间相互关联,评价信息为毕达哥拉斯犹豫模糊信息的多属性决策问题,首先通过研究犹豫度对决策结果的影响,提出一种新的毕达哥拉斯犹豫模糊集得分函数,解决了现有得分函数中存在的不足。其次,提出一种最小公倍数规范化原则,解决了现有方法容易引入误差的缺陷。最后,针对属性关联的多属性决策问题,基于λ-模糊测度与Choquet积分,提出了一种拓展交互式多准则决策(interative multi-criteria decision-making,TODIM)方法,既解决了属性关联的问题,又通过前景理论反映了决策者的心理行为特征。实例分析与敏感性分析验证了所提算法的正确性与有效性。

基于社交媒体的学者影响力评价模型构建与实证研究

文章以中美两国图情领域学者为研究对象,构建指标体系并运用熵权法和TOPSIS法搭建基于社交媒体的学者影响力评价模型,量化学者在非正式科学交流的影响力,进而有针对性地补充现有人才评价的不足之处,提高科学交流效率。模型结果与学者h指数相关性分析结果显示:两国学者都为正相关,中国学者为中度相关,美国学者为弱相关;学者影响力评价结果比学者h指数更有区分度。基于社交媒体的学者影响力评价模型具有一定的科学性与可操作性,拓展了评价指标数据的来源,能够体现学者在非正式交流途径中的影响力。

An Evaluation of the Critical Success Factors in Sustainable Food Supply Chains in Developing Countries

Food is one of the biggest industries in developed and underdeveloped countries. Supply chain sustainability is essential in established and emerging economies because of the rising acceptance of cost-based outsourcing and the growing technological, social, and environmental concerns. The food business faces serious sustainability and growth challenges in developing countries. A comprehensive analysis of the critical success factors (CSFs) influencing the performance outcome and the sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) process. A theoretical framework is established to explain how they are used to examine the organizational aspect of the food supply chain life cycle analysis. This study examined the CSFs and revealed the relationships between them using a methodology that included a review of literature, interpretative structural modeling (ISM), and cross-impact matrix multiplication applied in classification (MICMAC) tool analysis of soil liquefaction factors. The findings of this research demonstrate that the quality and safety of food are important factors and have a direct effect on other factors. To make sustainable food supply chain management more adequate, legislators, managers, and experts need to pay attention to this factor. In this work. It also shows that companies aiming to create a sustainable business model must make sustainability a fundamental tenet of their organization. Practitioners and managers may devise effective long-term plans for establishing a sustainable food supply chain utilizing the recommended methodology.

Robust data envelopment analysis based MCDM with the consideration of uncertain data

The application of data envelopment analysis （DEA） as a multiple criteria decision making （MCDM） technique has been gaining more and more attention in recent research. In the practice of applying DEA approach, the appearance of uncertainties on input and output data of decision making unit （DMU） might make the nominal solution infeasible and lead to the efficiency scores meaningless from practical view. This paper analyzes the impact of data uncertainty on the evaluation results of DEA, and proposes several robust DEA models based on the adaptation of recently developed robust optimization approaches, which would be immune against input and output data uncertainties. The robust DEA models developed are based on input-oriented and outputoriented CCR model, respectively, when the uncertainties appear in output data and input data separately. Furthermore, the robust DEA models could deal with random symmetric uncertainty and unknown-but-bounded uncertainty, in both of which the distributions of the random data entries are permitted to be unknown. The robust DEA models are implemented in a numerical example and the efficiency scores and rankings of these models are compared. The results indicate that the robust DEA approach could be a more reliable method for efficiency evaluation and ranking in MCDM problems.

A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on ANP and TOPSIS for Facility Layout Selection

Facility layout selection is a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem,since it has a strategic impact on the efficiency of manufacturing system.In view of the interdependency among selection criteria,analytic network process (ANP) is proposed to analyze the structure of the facility layout selection problem and determine the weights for each criterion.A network structure is constructed that shows all elements and clusters and their interactions.Limit priorities are also calculated which help decision maker evaluate the relative importance among criterion in the alternative selection process.Moreover,a hybrid MCDM approach that employs ANP and technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS)method to rank the optimal facility layout alternatives.Finally,an application of a new aeronautic component assembly workshop facility layout selection is conducted.To further illustrate the advantage of the proposed approach,the difference between ANP-TOPSIS and AHP-TOPSIS methods are compared and discussed.Results have demonstrated the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method.