Nursing Experience of Early Application of Nasoenteric Tube for Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill ICU Patients

Objective:To investigate the effective nursing measures of early application of nasoenteric tube for enteral nutrition in critically ill patients in ICU,and to summarize the nursing experience.Methods:The study was carried out in June 2023–November 2023.62 samples of ICU critically ill patients were selected,all of whom used enteral nutrition by mesenteric tube and were grouped into an observation group(n=31)and a control group(n=31)by using the numerical table randomization method.The patients in the control group were basic nursing interventions,and the patients in the observation group were comprehensive quality care,comparing the nutritional indexes,complication rates,and nursing satisfaction between the two groups.Results:All nutritional indicators of the observation group were higher than those of the control group after nursing intervention(P<0.05);the complication rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05);the nursing satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Comprehensive quality nursing care during the early application of a gastroenteric tube for enteral nutrition in critically ill patients in the ICU can improve nutritional indexes,reduce the incidence of complications and improve nursing satisfaction.

The Effect and Nursing of Indwelling Nasal Jejunal Feeding Tube for Enteral Nutrition in Acute Severe Pancreatitis

Objective:To analyze the effect of enteral nutrition and nursing intervention in patients with indwelling nasojejunal tube in acute severe pancreatitis.Methods:Sixty cases of patients with indwelt nasojejunal tubes treated in our hospital from August 2019 to August 2020 were divided into routine group and observation group as research subjects.Patients in both groups received enteral nutrition,patients in the routine group received routine care,and patients in the observation group received quality care.The recovery time of gastrointestinal function,length of hospital stay,hospitalization cost,nutritional indicators and incidence of complications in the two groups were compared.Results:The recovery time of gastrointestinal function in observation group was lower than that in routine group,P<0.05;The length and cost of hospitalization in observation group were lower than those in routine group,P<0.05;The nutritional indexes in observation group were higher than those in routine group,P<0.05;The incidence of complications in observation group was lower than that in routine group,P<0.05.Conclusion:Quality nursing service improve the effect of enteral nutrition,so as to ensure that patients get sufficient nutritional support.Its effect is remarkable and it is worthy of widespread clinical application.

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Early Enteral Nutrition Versus Convenience Diet by Tube Feeding Following Laryngectomy in Chinese Patients

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of early enteral nutritional support in patients undergoing laryngectomy. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 329 laryngeal cancer patients who underwent total or partial laryngectomy from November 2003 to July 2013 in our hospital. Of those patients, 278 were given enteral nutrition (EN group) with elemental formulations through a nasogastric tube beginning within 24 hours after the surgery, while 51 chose not to receive the elemental formulations and were on a homogenate diet (convenience diet group, CD group), which was also given through a nasogastric tube. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Thirteen patients in the EN group (13/278, 4.68%) and six patients in the CD group (6/51, 11.76%) developed fistulas. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.046). The differences in the post-surgical infection rate, average length of hospitalization and other clinical indicators between the two groups were not statistically significant. In conclusion, early enteral nutrition should be recommended in patients undergoing laryngectomy, and convenience diet is not as effective as the commercial formulation in reducing the risk of fistula formation.

Optimal timing and route of nutritional support after esophagectomy: A review of the literature

Some controversy surrounds the postoperative feeding regimen utilized in patients who undergo esophagectomy.Variation in practices during the perioperative period exists including the type of nutrition started,the delivery route,and its timing.Adequate nutrition is essential for this patient population as these patients often present with weight loss and have altered eating patterns after surgery,which can affect their ability to regain or maintain weight.Methods of feeding after an esophagectomy include total parenteral nutrition,nasoduodenal/nasojejunal tube feeding,jejunostomy tube feeding,and oral feeding.Recent evidence suggests that early oral feeding is associated with shorter LOS,faster return of bowel function,and improved quality of life.Enhanced recovery pathways after surgery pathways after esophagectomy with a component of early oral feeding also seem to be safe,feasible,and cost-effective,albeit with limited data.However,data on anastomotic leaks is mixed,and some studies suggest that the incidence of leaks may be higher with early oral feeding.This risk of anastomotic leak with early feeding may be heavily modulated by surgical approach.No definitive data is currently available to definitively answer this question,and further studies should look at how these early feeding regimens vary by surgical technique.This review aims to discuss the existing literature on the optimal route and timing of feeding after esophagectomy.

Early nasogastric enteral nutrition for severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early nasogastric enteral nutrition (NGEN) for patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). METHODS: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2006), Pub-Medline (1966-2006), and references from relevant articles. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, which reported the mortality of SAP patients at least. Two reviewers assessed the quality of each trial and collected data independently. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.9 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Three RCTs were included, involving 131 patients. The baselines of each trial were comparable. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in mortality rate of SAP patients between nasogastric and conventional routes (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.37 and 1.55, P = 0.45), and in other outcomes, including time of hospital stay (weighted mean difference = -5.87, 95% CI = -20.58 and 8.84, P = 0.43), complication rate of infection (RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.62 and 3.23, P = 0.41) or multiple organ defi ciency syndrome (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.27 and 3.47, P = 0.97), rate of admission to ICU (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.48 and 2.09, P = 0.99) or conversion to surgery (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.12 and 3.69, P = 0.64), as well as recurrence of re-feeding pain and adverse events associated with nutrition. CONCLUSION: Early NGEN is a breakthrough in the management of SAP. Based on current studies, early NGEN appears effective and safe. Since the available evidence is poor in quantity, it is hard to make an accurate evaluation of the role of early NGEN in SAP.Before recommendation to clinical practice, further high qualified, large scale, randomized controlled trials are needed.

Endoscopist's approach to nutrition in the patient with pancreatitis

Nutritional therapy has an important role in the management of patient with severe acute pancreatitis.This article reviews the endoscopist's approach to manage nutrition in such cases.Enteral feeding has been clearly validated as the preferred route of feeding,and should be started early on admission.Parenteral nutrition should be reserved for patients with contraindications to enteral feeding such as small bowel obstruction.Moreover,nasogastric feeding is safe and as effective as nasojejunal feeding.If a prolonged course of enteral feeding(>30d) is required,endoscopic placement of feeding gastrostomy or jejunostomy tubes should be considered.

Summary of the Best Evidence for Tube Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Children

Objective:To summarize the evidence of tube feeding intolerance in critically ill children,aiming to provide evidence-based information for clinical nursing staff.Methods:Evidence search was done in Chinese and English databases to guide network and professional associations at home and abroad.The search time limit was from January 2014 to January 2024,nearly 10 years of relevant literature,mainly including guidelines,consensus,expert advice,best practice,evidence summary,system evaluation,and meta-analysis.Literature quality evaluation and evidence extraction were independently performed by two researchers.Results:This paper included 13 articles,including three guidelines,three systematic evaluations,three expert opinions,and four expert consensus.Twenty-six pieces of evidence were summarized from 10 aspects of feeding intolerance definition,team building,nutritional assessment,nutritional preparation,feeding protocol,feeding route,feeding management,pipeline management,gastric residual volume,and drug application.Conclusion:This paper summarized the evidence of tube feeding intolerance in critically ill children,which can provide evidence-based information for clinical practice.The abdominal signs should be closely observed when evaluating feeding intolerance,focusing on the prevention and reduction of feeding interruption.

Gastroenteric tube feeding: Techniques, problems and solutions

Gastroenteric tube feeding plays a major role in the management of patients with poor voluntary intake,chronic neurological or mechanical dysphagia or gut dysfunction,and patients who are critically ill.However,despite the benefits and widespread use of enteral tube feeding,some patients experience complications.This review aims to discuss and compare current knowledge regarding the clinical application of enteral tube feeding,together with associated complications and special aspects.We conducted an extensive literature search on PubMed,Embase and Medline using index terms relating to enteral access,enteral feeding/nutrition,tube feeding,percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy,endoscopic nasoenteric tube,nasogastric tube,and refeeding syndrome.The literature showed common routes of enteral access to include nasoenteral tube,gastrostomy and jejunostomy,while complications fall into four major categories:mechanical,e.g.,tube blockage or removal;gastrointestinal,e.g.,diarrhea;infectious e.g.,aspiration pneumonia,tube site infection;and metabolic,e.g.,refeeding syndrome,hyperglycemia.Although the type and frequency of complications arising from tube feeding vary considerably according to the chosen access route,gastrointestinal complications are without doubt the most common.Complications associated with enteral tube feeding can be reduced by careful observance of guidelines,including those related to food composition,administration rate,portion size,food temperature and patient supervision.

Evaluation of a new method for placing nasojejunal feeding tubes

AIM:To compare fluoroscopic, endoscopic and guide wire assistance with ultraslim gastroscopy for placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes. METHODS:The information regarding nasojejunal tube placement procedures was retrieved using the gastrointestinal tract database at Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College. Records from 81 patients who underwent nasojejunal tubes placement by different techniques between 2004 and 2011 were reviewed for procedure success and tube-related outcomes. RESULTS:Nasojejunal feeding tubes were successfully placed in 78 (96.3%) of 81 patients. The success rate by fluoroscopy was 92% (23 of 25), by endoscopic technique 96.3% (26 of 27), and by guide wire assistance (whether via transnasal or transoral insertion)100% (23/23, 6/6). The average time for successful placement was 14.9 ± 2.9 min for fluoroscopic placement, 14.8 ± 4.9 min for endoscopic placement, 11.1 ± 2.2 min for guide wire assistance with transnasal gastroscopic placement, and 14.7 ± 1.2 min for transoral gastroscopic placement. Statistically, the duration for the third method was significantly different (P < 0.05) compared with the other three methods. Transnasal placement over a guidewire was significantly faster (P < 0.05) than any of the other approaches. CONCLUSION:Guide wire assistance with transnasal insertion of nasojejunal feeding tubes represents a safe, quick and effective method for providing enteral nutrition.

Endoscopic nasojejunal feeding tube placement in patients with severe hepatopancreatobiliary diseases:a retrospective study of 184 patients

BACKGROUND: Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has been recognized as the mainstay of nutritional support in patients with severe hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) diseases for decades. However, recent studies advocate the utilization of endoscopic nasojejunal feeding tube placement (ENFTP), rather than the conventional approach. This study was designed to compare the clinical value of ENFTP and TPN in patients with severe HPB diseases. METHODS: Two groups of patients with severe HPB diseases were analyzed retrospectively. One group of 88 patients received ENFTP, and the other 96 received TPN. Routine blood levels, serum glucose and prealbumin, hepatic and renal function, serum lipid, and calcium were measured at baseline and after 1, 2, and 4 weeks of nutritional support. Also, complication rate, mortality, nutritional support time, mechanical ventilation time, mean length of time in intensive care unit, and duration of hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of nutritional support, the degree of recovery of red blood cells, prealbumin, and blood glucose was greater in the ENFTP than in the TPN group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the ENFTP group showed a lower incidence of septicemia, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, peripancreatic infection, biliary infection, and nosocomial infection, in addition to shorter nutritional support time and hospital stay (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ENFTP is much more effective than TPN in assisting patients with severe HPB diseases to recover from anemia, low prealbumin level, and high serum glucose, as well as in decreasing the rates of various infections (pulmonary infection excluded), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome rate, nutrition support time, and length of hospital stay. Therefore, ENFTP is safer and more economical for clinical application.

Naso-jejunal tube insertion-interface between radiology and endoscopy

A survey was performed to identify the practice associated with endoscopic placement of naso-jejunal(NJ) tubes. We had a total of 236 responses, of which 228 responded to the frequency of requesting X-rayafter placing NJ tubes. The responses suggested that there was a strong variation in the practice. The practice was independent on clinicians' area of interest, hospital setting or experience in endoscopy. Currently there are no accepted guidelines on this. Hence, we advise hospitals to have robust local guidelines until there is internationally agreed consensus.

Bedside ultrasonic localization of the nasogastric tube in a patient with severe COVID-19:A case report

BACKGROUND The indwelling nasogastric tube is commonly used for supplying enteral nutrition to patients who are unable to feed themselves,and accurate positioning is essential in the indwelling nasogastric tube in the body of the aforementioned patients.In clinical practice,abdominal radiography,auscultation,and clinical determination of the pH of the gastric juice are routinely used by medical personnel to determine the position of the tube;however,those treatments have proved limitations in specific cases.There are few case reports on the precise positioning of the nasogastric tube in patients with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19),for whom a supply of necessary nutrition support is significant throughout the process of treatment.CASE SUMMARY A 79-year-old patient,diagnosed with COVID-19 at the stage of combined syndromes with severe bacterial lung infection,respiratory failure,multiple comorbidities,and a poor nutritional status,was presented to us and required an indwelling nasogastric tube for enteral nutrition support.After pre-treatment assessments including observation of the patient’s nasal feeding status and examination of the nasal septal deviation,inflammation,obstruction,nasal leakage of cerebrospinal fluid,and other disorders that might render intubation inappropriate,we measured and marked the length of the nasogastric tube to be placed and delivered the tube to the intended length in the standard manner.Then further scrutiny was conducted to ensure that the tube was not coiled in the mouth,and gentle movements were made to avoid damage to the esophageal mucosa.However,back draw of the gastric juice using an empty needle failed,and the stethoscope could not be used for auscultation due to the specific condition presented by the internal organs of the patient,and the end of the tube was placed in saline with no bubbles spilling out.Therefore,it was not possible to determine whether the nasogastric tube was placed exactly in the stomach and no nutrient infusion was performed for the time being.Subsequently,the ultrasound probe was utilized to view the condition of the patient’s stomach,where the nasogastric tube was found to be translucent and running parallel to the esophagus shaped as“=”.The pre-conditions were achieved and 100 mL nutritional fluid was fed to the patient,who did not experience any discomfort throughout the procedure.His vital signs were stable with no adverse effects.CONCLUSION We achieved successfully used ultrasound to position the nasogastric tube in a 79-year-old patient with COVID-19.The repeatable ultrasound application does not involve radiation and causes less disturbance in the neck,making it advantageous for rapid positioning of the nasogastric tube and worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Single endoscopist-performed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement

AIM: To investigate whether single endoscopist-performed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is safe and to compare the complications of PEG with those reported in the literature. METHODS: Patients who underwent PEG placement between June 2001 and August 2011 at the Baskent University Alanya Teaching and Research Center were evaluated retrospectively. Patients whose PEG was placed for the first time by a single endoscopist were enrolled in the study. PEG was performed using the pull method. All of the patients were evaluated for their indications for PEG, major and minor complications resulting from PEG, nutritional status, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and the use of antibiotic treatment or antibiotic prophylaxis prior to PEG. Comorbidities, rates, time and reasons for mortality were also evaluated. The reasons for PEG removal and PEG duration were also investigated. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent the PEG procedure for the first time during this study. Eight patients who underwent PEG placement by 2 endoscopists were not enrolled in the study. A total of 54 patients were investigated. The patients' mean age was 69.9 years. The most common indication for PEG was cerebral infarct, which occurred in approximately two-thirds of the patients. The mean albumin level was 3.04 ± 0.7 g/dL, and 76.2% of the patients' albumin levels were below the normal values. The mean CRP level was high in 90.6% of patients prior to the procedure. Approximately two-thirds of the patients received antibiotics for either prophylaxis or treatment for infections prior to the PEG procedure. Mortality was not related to the procedure in any of the patients. Buried bumper syndrome was the only major complication, and it occurred in the third year. In such case, the PEG was removed and a new PEG tube was placed via surgery. Eight patients (15.1%) experienced minor complications, 6 (11.1%) of which were wound infections. All wound infections except one recovered with antibiotic treatment. Two patients had bleeding from the PEG site, one was resolved with primary suturing and the other with fresh frozen plasma transfusion. CONCLUSION: The incidence of major and minor complications is in keeping with literature. This finding may be noteworthy, especially in developing countries.

Jejunostomy Feeding Tube Placement in Gastrectomy Procedures: A Systematic Review

Many nutritional interventions have been developed to improve nutritional outcomes following upper gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate whether or not the routine use of intraoperative jejunostomy feeding tubes in partial and total gastrectomy procedures is warranted when assessing complications and nutritional benefits such as improved chemotherapy tolerance. An electronic search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase and CINAHL databases was performed to identify studies which reported complications and/or post-operative outcomes of patients who received an intraoperative jejunostomy feeding tube in gastrectomy procedures. Five articles met the inclusion criteria (n = 636) with four retrospective cohort studies and one RCT. Studies varied in regards to the complications and nutritional outcomes reported. Jejunostomy feeding tube insertion may carry a risk of increased infectious complications but appears to reduce patient post-operative weight-loss and may improve chemotherapy tolerance. Due to the lack of high-quality studies, it is unclear if the routine use of an intraoperative jejunostomy feeding tube is indicated for all patients undergoing gastrectomy procedures or only those at a high-risk of post-operative malnutrition. More comprehensive research is recommended, particularly on the usefulness of home enteral nutrition post-gastrectomy.

Uncommon complication of nasoenteral feeding tube:A case report

BACKGROUND The jejunal nutrition tube has increasingly been used in clinical practice,and the results in frequent complications.CASE SUMMARY We present the case of a 74-year-old male patient who had been admitted to the intensive care unit for aspiration pneumonia and respiratory failure.When confirming the position of the jejunal tube by X-ray,we found that the feeding tube had been placed into the chest.The complications was a disaster,though the misplacement of jejunal feeding tube are uncommon.CONCLUSION We introduced a way of ultrasound-guided jejunum feeding tube placement to avert the disaster,which was convenient and economical.

“Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality,complications,or outcomes”:Commentary

In this commentary,we summarize some of the key points of the original paper“Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality,complications,or outcomes”and offer support for the proposed results.Specifically,we address how early percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG)tube placement may reduce hospital length of stay and costs.We also discuss topics related to the article including PEG weaning and post-stroke nutritional formulation.However,we note that concerns purported by previous studies that early PEG placement may worsen outcomes are not fully addressed,and further research is needed.

Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes

BACKGROUND Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy(PEG)tubes are often placed for dysphagia following a stroke in order to maintain sufficient caloric intake.The 2011 ASGE guidelines recommend delaying PEG tube placement for two weeks,as half of patients with dysphagia improve within 2 wk.There are few studies comparing outcomes based on timing of PEG tube placement,and there is increasing demand for early PEG tube placement to meet requirements for timely discharge to rehab and skilled nursing facilities.AIM To assess the safety of early(≤7 d post stroke)vs late(>7 d post stroke)PEG tube placement and evaluate whether pre-procedural risk factors could predict mortality or complications.METHODS We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing PEG tube placement for dysphagia following a stroke at two hospitals in Saint Louis,MO between January 2011 and December 2017.Patients were identified by keyword search of endoscopy reports.Mortality,peri-procedural complication rates,and post-procedural complication rates were compared in both groups.Predictors of morbidity and mortality such as protein-calorie malnutrition,presence of an independent cardiovascular risk equivalent,and presence of Systemic inflammatory response syndrome(SIRS)criteria or documented infection were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression.RESULTS 154 patients had a PEG tube placed for dysphagia following a stroke,92 in the late group and 62 in the early group.There were 32 observed deaths,with 8 occurring within 30 d of the procedure.There was an increase in peri-procedural and post-procedural complications with delayed PEG placement which was not statistically significant.Hospital length of stay was significantly less in patients with early PEG tube placement(12.9 vs 22.34 d,P<0.001).Protein calorie malnutrition,presence of SIRS criteria and/or documented infection prior to procedure or having a cardiovascular disease risk equivalent did not significantly predict mortality or complications.CONCLUSION Early PEG tube placement following a stroke did not result in a higher rate of mortality or complications and significantly decreased hospital length of stay.Given similar safety outcomes in both groups,early PEG tube placement should be considered in the appropriate patient to potentially reduce length of hospital stay and incurred costs.

Exfoliative esophageal bleeding caused by blind placement of a nasogastric tube:Two cases and a literature review

Transnasal intubation is a clinical operation usually performed blindly at the bedside.Mild adverse events,such as epistaxis and tube misplacement,are relatively common.Esophageal bleeding or perforation and other serious adverse events are rare.In the present study,two cases of severe diffuse esophageal bleeding caused by the blind placement of a nasogastric tube are described.These cases were successfully treated using a covered metal stent or Sengstaken-Blakemore tube.A review of the literature regarding the possible causes of such adverse events and the potential endoscopic treatments for severe hemorrhage are discussed.

Decompression of Malignant Large-bowel Obstruction with a Self-expanding Metallic Stent or Transanal Drainage Tube

Objective To compare the outcomes after self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) or transanal drainage tube (TDT) placement in patients with malignant large-bowel obstruction (MLBO). Methods Seventy-three patients with MLBO from the clinical unit underwent SEMS (n = 51) or TDT (n = 22) placement from 2012 to 2017. The success rates of placement, clinical outcomes after decompression, complications, the time to resuming enteral nutrition (EN), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scoring and the following-up therapeutic options were investigated. Results Technical success were achieved in 100% of patients in both groups. The clinical success rates were 98.0%(50/51) for SEMS and 95.5%(21/22) for TDT. No perforation was found in any group, while 3.9%(2/51) in the SEMS and 18.2%(4/22) in TDT group experienced displacement (P = 0.26). It took 2.1 IQR (0~2) days and 3 IQR (2~5) days to resume EN in the SEMS and TDT groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The KPS scores were significantly higher in patients implanted with SEMS (70, IQR 50~80) than in those with TDT (35, IQR 30~50)(P < 0.001). In the SEMS group, 37.3%(19/51) of patients underwent stenting as a bridge to surgery, 9.8%(5/51) for chemotherapy only and 52.9%(27/51) for palliation, while 40.9%(9/22), 0 and 59.1%(13/22) underwent placement for these reasons in the TDT group, respectively. The majority (6/9) of the patients who underwent TDT placement as a bridge to surgery required stoma creation, while only 31.6%(6/19) of those in the SEMS group needed a stoma (P = 0.080). In addition, anastomotic leakage was only found in the TDT group (2/9)(P = 0.10). Conclusion Both SEMS and TDT placement could provide clinical relief for MLBO. However, SEMS placement is associated with earlier EN, fewer complications, and benefits for the postoperative quality-of-life.

神经重症患者留置双腔胃肠营养管护理专家共识

目的形成神经重症患者留置双腔胃肠营养管护理专家共识,推动护士规范、安全、有效地实施双腔胃肠营养管喂养,满足患者营养需求。方法检索、评价和汇总神经重症患者胃肠营养管护理的相关证据,提取相关的推荐意见,形成专家共识初稿,通过1轮专家函询和2轮专家论证会,结合专家意见修改、完善各条目内容,形成专家共识终稿。结果最终形成的专家共识包括神经重症患者双腔胃肠营养管喂养的操作性定义、置管适应证、置管禁忌证、置管及维护、拔管指征5个方面。结论形成的专家共识实用性较强,可为神经重症患者双腔胃肠营养管的临床护理实践和质量控制提供指导依据。