Nation-states are inherently part of cultural formations,sustaining,legitimating,and inspiring them.The nations sustaining contemporary states are very different,and major routes of historical nation-state formation c...Nation-states are inherently part of cultural formations,sustaining,legitimating,and inspiring them.The nations sustaining contemporary states are very different,and major routes of historical nation-state formation can be distinguished,which means that global discussions of nation-states cannot be confined to such states<lin a European sense^only.Civilization(s)is a concept with different meanings in singular and in plural,belonging to different semantic fields,at least in European languages.As a singular concept it arose in mid-eighteenth century,distinguishing a high degree of social and cultural development from“barbarism”and“savagery”.It spread rapidly across European languages in the nineteenth century with European world supremacy and evolutionism,as a European self-designation.Civilizations in plural first appeared on a large intellectual scale after World War I,the horrendous slaughters of which shattered the Western ideas of continuous evolution and progress,and of the West as the unique pinnacle of human development.In the plural,civilizations have been used in philosophies of comparative history and evolution,but it may also be used as a tool of cultural analysis.In this sense,civilizations refer to large,ancient enduring cultural configurations,to the deepest layer of contemporary cultural geology.In terms of current demographic size five major such civilizations can be identified.They impinge upon the political culture of states,upon the visions and the language of the state rulers.They do not clash,and they do not determine state behaviour.Nations and civilizations are compared as cultural entities or referents,with a view to laying a basis for analytical comparisons of nation states and civilization-states,in particular their implications of agency,time and history,including their different historical contexts of emergence.The nation and civilization designations of states also related to a wider range of contemporary state categorizations.Contemporary politics and political theorizing of civilizations are looked at in brief empirical overviews of the impact of civilizations upon international relations in the wake of Samuel Huntington’s thesis of“clashes of civilizations”,and of the promise of civilization states as a political project,and as an illuminating tool of cognition.展开更多
In the midst of a stock frenzy in China and tight monetary policy carried out by the Chinese government, what knowledge can we glean from a respected state leader, an economist and a people representative?
文摘Nation-states are inherently part of cultural formations,sustaining,legitimating,and inspiring them.The nations sustaining contemporary states are very different,and major routes of historical nation-state formation can be distinguished,which means that global discussions of nation-states cannot be confined to such states<lin a European sense^only.Civilization(s)is a concept with different meanings in singular and in plural,belonging to different semantic fields,at least in European languages.As a singular concept it arose in mid-eighteenth century,distinguishing a high degree of social and cultural development from“barbarism”and“savagery”.It spread rapidly across European languages in the nineteenth century with European world supremacy and evolutionism,as a European self-designation.Civilizations in plural first appeared on a large intellectual scale after World War I,the horrendous slaughters of which shattered the Western ideas of continuous evolution and progress,and of the West as the unique pinnacle of human development.In the plural,civilizations have been used in philosophies of comparative history and evolution,but it may also be used as a tool of cultural analysis.In this sense,civilizations refer to large,ancient enduring cultural configurations,to the deepest layer of contemporary cultural geology.In terms of current demographic size five major such civilizations can be identified.They impinge upon the political culture of states,upon the visions and the language of the state rulers.They do not clash,and they do not determine state behaviour.Nations and civilizations are compared as cultural entities or referents,with a view to laying a basis for analytical comparisons of nation states and civilization-states,in particular their implications of agency,time and history,including their different historical contexts of emergence.The nation and civilization designations of states also related to a wider range of contemporary state categorizations.Contemporary politics and political theorizing of civilizations are looked at in brief empirical overviews of the impact of civilizations upon international relations in the wake of Samuel Huntington’s thesis of“clashes of civilizations”,and of the promise of civilization states as a political project,and as an illuminating tool of cognition.
文摘In the midst of a stock frenzy in China and tight monetary policy carried out by the Chinese government, what knowledge can we glean from a respected state leader, an economist and a people representative?
